Trump Administration Blasts Biden, Fauci for ‘Outright Censorship' on Revamped Covid-19 Website

The Trump Administration on Friday unveiled a reconstructed covid.gov website that said a Wuhan lab leak was the 'most likely origin of Covid-19.' The revamped site also blasted Dr. Anthony Fauci and President Biden, saying his administration resorted to 'outright censorship' by working with social media companies to suppress dissenting opinions on the virus' origin and how to treat it.
'Public health officials often mislead the American people through conflicting messaging, knee-jerk reactions and a lack of transparency,' the updated website now reads. 'Most egregiously, the federal government demonized alternative treatments and disfavored narratives, such as the lab leak theory, in a shameful effort to coerce and control the American people's health decisions.'
The site adds: 'When those efforts failed, the Biden Administration resorted to 'outright censorship — coercing and colluding with the world's largest social media companies to censor all Covid-19-related dissent.''
The Biden Administration, according to the 'Twitter Files' released soon after Elon Musk bought the platform in late 2022, had pressured Twitter executives to censor content it deemed Covid misinformation, primarily around vaccine skepticism. White House officials routinely held meetings with Twitter executives to discuss how they were policing the platform, it was also revealed.
And earlier this year, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg told Joe Rogan that the Biden Administration 'basically pushed' Facebook and Instagram to censor posts the government considered Covid misinformation.
The updated website also rips Dr. Fauci and the mainstream media for working to 'discredit the lab leak theory.' Under a section titled 'The Origin,' the website now outlines five points backing the 'likely' lab leak, including the coronavirus possessing a 'biological characteristic that is not found in nature.'
You can read the site for yourself by clicking here.
The post Trump Administration Blasts Biden, Fauci for 'Outright Censorship' on Revamped Covid-19 Website appeared first on TheWrap.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

New York Post

31 minutes ago

• New York Post

Miranda Devine: Trump's ‘spectacular' Iran strike could carve his place in history as most courageous leader since Ronald Reagan

What an impressive sight it was Sunday, when the futuristic B-2 stealth bombers sliced through the powder-blue Missouri sky on their triumphant return to home base in the American heartland after dropping their Massive Ordnance Penetrator bombs on Iran's underground nuclear sites. The strikes were 'a spectacular military success,' President Trump told the world Saturday night, after emerging from the Situation Room. 'Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated. Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace,' he said. Advertisement While Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan 'Razing' Caine said Sunday it was 'way too early' to know the full extent of damage at Iran's Fordow uranium-enrichment complex, satellite images show several large holes and a layer of gray-blue ash where all 14 massive 'bunker buster' bombs, each weighing 30,000 pounds, hit their target Saturday night in Operation Midnight Hammer. The strikes were also a spectacular political calculation by the president who ran on no new wars, and managed to keep a poker face all week as he was given advice by all and sundry. 'Unconventional' He made the right decision, and it appears to have been executed flawlessly. A limited strike, in and out. Iran's nuclear capability has been eliminated or at least severely degraded. No regime change. If the nuclear threat from Iran is indeed neutralized, leading to the extension of the Abraham Accords and peace in the Middle East, Trump will have achieved what countless predecessors failed to do. Advertisement If he pulls it off, without embroiling us in a larger war, he will have carved his role in history as the most courageous and consequential leader since Ronald Reagan. The man who rose from the stage in Butler, blood pouring down his face, raised his fist in the air and said, 'Fight, Fight Fight,' is exactly who you want as commander in chief at a time like this, especially as it's not his first rodeo. Photographs released by the White House show a serious-faced Trump inside the Situation Room Saturday night, wearing his trademark suit and red tie, not cosplaying a flyboy as his more casually-attired predecessors liked to do. His only bow to informality was a red MAGA hat with '45-47' on the side, representing his bifurcated presidential terms and the relentless grit it took to come back from the political dead. Advertisement So much for 'TACO Don.' He outfoxed everyone. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, just after emerging from the Situation Room last week where he watched the president deal with the complexities of the Iran-Israel war, likened Trump to Winston Churchill. 'He has a strategy and it's not a conventional strategy, but what conventional person has ever done great things?' said Bessent, in an interview for my new podcast Pod Force One. 'Does anybody think that Winston Churchill was conventional? '[Trump is] also so flexible in terms of the way he looks at things,' Bessent said. 'We've just spent basically the past 24 hours in the Situation Room over the Iran-Israel conflict, and I can tell you that the American people should know, and the American troops should know, that Donald Trump is doing an incredible job looking after their interests in what could turn, without someone like him, could turn into a widespread conflict that US soldiers and interests could get sucked into.' New team Advertisement In one fell swoop, Trump also restored the prestige of the US military, which had plummeted under Joe Biden. Most welcome was the upgrade from Gen. Mark 'Thoroughly Modern' Milley of 'white rage' fame, whom Biden had to give a preemptive pardon on his way out the door, presumably for his Trump-deranged outbursts to the Chinese. In Milley's place we now have 'Razing Caine,' once a daring F-16 pilot, and as cool and contained a general as you could find. 'This mission demonstrates the unmatched reach, coordination, and capability of the United States military,' he told reporters in a Sunday news conference alongside Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, another veteran whose rapport with 'war fighters' has helped revive recruitment to record levels. 'In just a matter of weeks, this went from strategic planning to global execution,' said Caine. 'As the president clearly said last night, no other military in the world could have done this.' Every week, Post columnist Miranda Devine sits down for exclusive and candid conversations with the most influential disruptors in Washington. Subscribe here! What a contrast to the previous administration. Under Biden, our military was humiliated. Preposterous wokery and weak leadership led to a breakdown in discipline embodied in online displays of perverts in uniform dolled up in kinky dog masks and bondage gear. Advertisement Under Biden, incompetence was the order of the day, from the disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan, leaving behind $7 billion of equipment, to the failure to bring our astronauts home from the International Space Station, to the $230 million Gaza pier debacle which resulted in the death of one young soldier and dozens of troops injured while delivering minimal aid. The morale and reputation of our armed forces was severely depleted, making a mockery of Biden's frequent refrain' God bless our troops.' Under Biden, Obama's benighted Iran deal that Trump axed in his first term was reanimated. Trump 1.0 left Iran on its knees, unable to fund its proxies to attack Israel. Biden, in his wisdom, empowered and enriched Iran, reappointing Robert Malley, Antony Blinken's childhood friend from their prestigious Parisienne école, as Iran envoy. Malley was then suspended without pay pending an FBI investigation into an Iranian influence ring and his 'mishandling' of classified information. Naturally, the Ivy League came to his rescue, giving him gigs at Yale and Princeton. That is Biden's legacy. Advertisement But instead of thanking Trump for saving the world from a nuclear Iran, Democrats are pretending that he did something unconstitutional, and are whining because he didn't inform Democrat leaders in Congress before the top-secret operation. They only have themselves to blame for proving to be so unreliable with secrets in the past. Hello, Schifty Schiff. Dems were fine with Obama bombing Libya, Syria and Pakistan an estimated 13,000 times, killing thousands of people, without asking Congress for permission. Remember then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton cackling over Libyan leader Moammar Khadafy's gruesome end when he was sodomized and brutalized to death on camera as she watched lasciviously from afar: 'We came, we saw, he died,' she said. Strong stance Advertisement Democrats should sit this one out. Despite their threats to impeach him, Trump has seized the moral authority and no doubt his already buoyant approval ratings will soar. That's the political dividend of strong leadership. What GOP senator could refuse to pass Trump's beloved Big Beautiful Bill now? And as with everything Trump does, the visuals were impeccable. The icing on the cake was his brand new 100-foot flagpole out the front of the White House, with Old Glory waving languidly in the night breeze as the B-2s worked their magic half a world away. Advertisement You're paying for radical Zoh New York, we have a problem. How could a candidate as toxic and radical as Zohran Mamdani be so close to victory in Tuesday's Democratic mayoral primary? An antisemitic socialist who is running to defund the police and raise more taxes for illegal migrants should be a political impossibility, yet he has surged to second place behind Andrew Cuomo in the polls. Attorney Denise Cohen, who writes a substack as 'Rational New Yorker,' has figured out this dangerous man 'could attain the highest office in NYC using public money that most of us didn't approve through a slush fund that we unwittingly paid for.' Mamdani has the highest social media engagement of all mayoral candidates with almost 6 million likes on TikTok, and has created the false appearance of a vibrant grassroots campaign with tens of thousands of small dollar donors, she writes. But he didn't amass a $8.4 million war chest from grassroots donations. Eighty percent of it came from taxpayers thanks to a New York campaign finance law in which the New York City Campaign Finance Board matches small donations by $8 for every $1 raised. If Mamdani wins, you and I probably paid for his campaign.

Yahoo

37 minutes ago

• Yahoo

U.S. Sits on Billions of Untapped Oil Barrels

The United States is the largest oil and gas producer in the world. It is also experiencing a slowdown in its oil production for a number of reasons, including natural depletion. The U.S. Geological Survey, however, has just published a study stating that there are almost 30 billion new barrels of untapped oil—under federal lands, no less. Oil and gas drilling was a contentious topic during the Biden administration. The administration decidedly did not like it and put a serious effort into curbing this drilling as much as the law allowed. As soon as Donald Trump became president, the tables turned and drilling on federal lands became very much a desirable direction for federal energy policy to move in, with the President prioritizing affordable energy and higher exports. Now, the U.S. Geological Survey has thrown its weight behind the American energy dominance idea, reporting estimated undiscovered oil reserves of 29.4 billion barrels across the country, with the leader being Alaska with 14.46 billion barrels of untapped oil under federal lands. New Mexico is next, with 8.925 billion barrels of undiscovered oil, followed by Nevada, with 1.4 billion barrels. Untapped gas reserves on federal land were estimated at over 391.55 trillion cu ft. Now, the only question is when these hitherto untapped resources will be number of drilling rigs in the U.S. oil patch has been on a steady decline recently, reflecting an extended weakness in international prices. This has now changed, of course, after Israel attacked Iran on June 13, but the industry is in no rush to reverse course for the time being. The industry is playing it safe, not least because cheap drilling sites are running out—or maybe not, if the USGS assessment of untapped resources is correct. For years now, the biggest production growth driver of U.S. oil has been the Permian Basin, spanning Texas and New Mexico. The Permian has single-handedly offset declines in a number of other shale plays and largely uneventful day-to-day business in conventional fields. But the Permian is not inexhaustible, and more importantly, it's not cheap to drill everywhere there. So, costs are rising in the Permian as some parts of the play hit their geological limits while others, yet to be drilled, are not expected to be as prolific as that top-tier acreage that the industry is running out of currently. This has sparked some concern among commentators, although some have argued that there may yet be another boom left in the most prolific shale play in the country. Yet with the USGS's new assessment of undiscovered reserves, such a boom becomes less important for the current administration's dominance plans. If there are 14.46 billion untapped barrels of crude under Alaska alone, shortage of new oil will not become a problem for the world's top producer anytime soon. 'American Energy Dominance is more important than ever, and this report underscores the critical role science plays in informing our energy future,' Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum said in comments on the USGS study. 'Thanks to the USGS's rigorous and independent assessment, we're better equipped to manage America's vast public lands responsibly while supporting energy security and economic opportunity.' Crude oil is currently trading at over $75 per barrel. In fact, WTI is climbing closer to $76 per barrel amid the spike in violence in the Middle East. How long this will hold is anyone's guess, but the fact is that prices are set for their third consecutive weekly rise. This is a short-term development, of course, while oil companies are more interested in the long-term outlook for their business. This is also uncertain, alas, because federal policy could flip in three years just like it flipped when Trump took the helm. Indeed, environmentalists are massively unhappy about any oil and gas drilling on any federal lands. 'America's public lands are intended to be held in trust for all people in this country, and their resources managed carefully and in perpetuity,' a Natural Resources Defense Council blog post from February said, as quoted by Bloomberg. 'As the Trump administration shifts to a pro-industry footing to help rich dirty energy companies get even richer, we're seeing this trust responsibility shirked in shocking and truly damaging ways,' the author, senior program advocate Josh Axelrod, wrote. The Center for American Progress claimed earlier this year that more drilling on federal lands would not bring down energy costs for Americans, in part because companies were uninterested in the acreage that the federal government had to offer, and also, they worked like a cartel to set prices. Such attacks on oil and gas will no doubt intensify—even as banks, the actual people with the money, walk back their climate commitments and boost investment in oil and gas. With or without these attacks, however, tapping those billions of barrels would depend on one thing only: whether it makes economic sense. With new discoveries few and far between globally, they might start making such sense before very long. By Irina Slav for More Top Reads From this article on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Yahoo

an hour ago

• Yahoo

Iran almost certainly will retaliate against the U.S. But when, where and how?

What comes next? Iran − and its hard-line supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei – are almost certainly going to strike back in response to historic U.S. military strikes on three of its suspected nuclear facilities. But if history is any guide, that response could happen at any time − and anywhere, and in any form, former U.S. intelligence officials and diplomatic experts say. 'Missiles, militias and acts of hostage-taking – that's their go-to' range of options, the Biden administration coordinator for the Middle East, Brett McGurk, said in an interview June 21 with CNN. 'I suspect Iran will have to do something.' More: Who is Iran's Supreme Leader? Like Trump, he controls a real-estate empire But like others wondering about Iran's intentions, McGurk said he has no idea what the Islamic regime's next step will be. That's especially the case given President Donald Trump's warning that any retaliatory act will be met with even greater force than what he says obliterated the uranium enrichment sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. 'If peace does not come quickly, we will go after those other targets with precision, speed and skill,' Trump said in an address to the nation late June 21. 'Most of them can be taken out in a matter of minutes.' In an early morning briefing June 22, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said he hoped the scope of the surprise attack would persuade Tehran's mullahs not to retaliate. "We believe that will have a clear psychological impact on how they view the future," Hegseth said, "and we certainly hope they take the path of negotiated peace." Former Trump National Security Adviser John Bolton told USA TODAY that Iran 'may well retaliate, but this is the kind of decision that can fragment the regime at the top, and ultimately bring it down.' "Right now, Iran has one military adversary which is pounding it and its terrorist proxies with great success,' Bolton said in reference to Israel, which also had attacked Tehran's suspected nuclear sites. 'Is Iran really eager to add the United States as a second military adversary? Some Iranian ayatollahs and military flag officers may not be suicidal.' More: Trump vowed to keep US out of wars. What changed when he decided to bomb Iran? Former top U.S. counterterrorism official Javed Ali agreed that a strong Iranian counterpunch is 'possible but very risky, and the situation is very different than in January 2020 when the U.S. and Iran last attacked each other" after the first Trump administration assassinated Iranian military leader Qasem Soleimani. On Jan. 8, 2020, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) launched ballistic missiles at Iraqi bases housing U.S. troops, wounding more than 100 service members. Karim Sadjadpour, a Carnegie Endowment for International Peace senior fellow and longtime Iran watcher, said it's 'unlikely the Iranians will see it the same way' as Trump and Hegseth 'This is more likely to open a new chapter of the 46-year-old US-Iran war than conclude it,' Sadjadpour, who regularly advises senior U.S., European and Asian officials on Iran, said in a series of posts on X. More: Iran warns it 'reserves all options' after US airstrikes on nuclear sites: Recap But he, too, said many of Iran's retaliatory options are 'the strategic equivalent of a suicide bombing' given the potential response by the United States and Israel. The Tehran regime, with its powerful military and numerous proxy fighting forces in the Middle East, could strike U.S. troops in the region, experts and former officials said. It also could attack U.S. embassies and civilian targets frequented by Americans, they said, and launch cyberattacks against crucial infrastructure in the United States. Another option: attacking oil facilities in the Persian Gulf or mining the Strait of Hormuz to shut down international shipping lanes, with the help of the Houthi militias that Tehran trains and funds in Yemen. Iran also could launch terrorist attacks using Hezbollah fighters that have been blowing up U.S. military and civilian targets in the region since the 1983 bombings of the U.S. Embassy and a Marine Corps barracks in Lebanon that killed 300 people. And Iran could launch some of its vast arsenal of missiles against Israel, though that would risk having many of them shot down by Israel's Iron Dome defense apparatus. Tehran also has some of the world's most accomplished cyberwarriors, and it could cause chaos and disruption by attacking U.S. critical infrastructure. That risk is both credible and growing, said Rear Adm. Mark Montgomery, a former executive director of the Cyberspace Solarium Commission, after a 700% increase in similar attacks on Israeli infrastructure. 'If you ask me, 'Is it possible?' Yes,' said Montgomery, a senior fellow at the McCrary Institute at Auburn University. 'Is it likely? Yes.' Much, if not all, of Iran's response will be dictated not by its civilian government but by Khamenei, the Iranian cleric who has served as the second supreme leader of Iran since 1989. Khameini is considered one of the longest-serving dictators in the world, who rules the oil-rich Islamic republic with an iron fist. But he's also a savvy politician who knows his regime 'may not survive the blowback' that a response would trigger, Sadjadpour said The U.S. intelligence community has, for years, made similar assessments. In its most recent annual assessment, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence concluded Tehran would continue to use its loose consortium of like-minded terrorist and militant actors, known as the 'Axis of Resistance,' against the U.S. and Israel. Although Iran has seen some of its proxies destroyed or degraded, 'these actors still represent a wide range of threats' that could be mobilized in a counterattack, the ODNI said. But the ODNI also concluded that Khamenei 'continues to desire to avoid embroiling Iran in an expanded, direct conflict with the United States and its allies.' Though Khamenei is not considered reckless, he has also painted himself into a corner by saying publicly that Tehran would never cave in to U.S. pressure. On June 18, he warned the United States that it would suffer 'irreparable damage' if it took military action against Iran amid its conflict with Israel. As a result, Sadjadpour said, 'his survival instincts and defiant instincts are in great tension now.' Iran's response undoubtedly will be hampered by lethal attacks on its military and proxy forces by Washington and Israel in recent years, beginning with the first Trump administration's targeted killing of Soleimani. Soleimani's death prompted 'real and specific threats' and assassination plots against Trump and former Trump administration officials on U.S. soil, including Bolton. More: Trump says US intel briefed him about how Iran wants to assassinate him to sow discord in US Tehran's regional power also has been eroded by the death of its strongest regional ally, Syrian strongman Bashar al-Assad. Israel has decimated its most powerful proxy, Hezbollah, by a series of military strikes and assassinations. And Trump, since returning to office, has launched numerous military strikes on Yemen's Houthis. For now, the United States will be watching and waiting to see if Khameini and Iran decide to launch some kind of 'one-off' unilateral response, or a coordinated effort with – or through – one of those proxy groups – or a third, Hamas. 'We have to be ready for that,' McGurk said. Like others, McGurk said it's also possible that Iran will stand down and heed Trump's warning not to retaliate or face a potential regime-ending response. 'I hope that's where this goes,' McGurk said. 'We've got to be prepared for the worst while hoping and working for the best. … These next few days will be quite something. These are unprecedented times.' By 1 a.m. Washington time on June 22, Iran had already fired its first retaliatory missile, according to media reports citing the Israel Defense Forces. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Iran is likely to retaliate for U.S. strikes. But when, where and how?