
DRG payment plan to cover both public, private healthcare providers, Health Minister clarifies
KUALA LUMPUR: The government's plan to implement the diagnosis-related group (DRG) payment model will include both public and private healthcare providers, with particular focus on the private sector, said Health Minister Datuk Seri Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad.
The health minister dismissed a report last month which claimed that private healthcare providers would be left out of the DRG framework.
"Completely wrong. The DRG payment system is intended for both public and private healthcare providers, especially the private sector.
"While we do want the public system to adopt it as well, the main focus is on the private sector," he told reporters after a panel discussion at Bank Negara Malaysia's Sasana Symposium 2025.
The panel discussion on "Rising Cost, Rising Stakes: Expediting Reforms to Address Medical Inflation" featured Bank Negara governor Datuk Seri Abdul Rasheed Ghaffour, Finance Ministry secretary general of treasury Datuk Johan Mahmood Merican, and World Bank senior economist Aakash Mohpal.
Dzulkefly said the DRG is designed to provide a standardised, fair and equitable framework for healthcare remuneration.
"It ensures there is no overcharging by basing payments on clearly defined groupings, such as diagnosis, procedures and complications," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Malaysia late to the party? Here's how DRG hospital funding reforms unfolded around the world starting in 1983
KUALA LUMPUR, June 21 — Malaysia is set to adopt the Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG)-based hospital payment system in a bid to make healthcare more efficient, transparent and sustainable. It joins a growing list of nations that have overhauled hospital funding models to control escalating costs and incentivise better patient care. Originally developed in the United States in the early 1980s, DRG systems assign hospitals a fixed reimbursement rate based on a patient's diagnosis, rather than the number or type of services provided. This helps discourage unnecessary procedures and encourages shorter hospital stays. Here's how countries across the globe have implemented and adapted a DRG approach to suit local needs: Malaysia — End 2025 Malaysia's dual healthcare system consists of a heavily subsidised public sector and a fee-based private sector. The DRG system will introduce fixed, standardised pricing for treatments regardless of actual costs. The government plans to roll out its DRG system in phases starting at the end of this year, beginning with minor ailments in public hospitals. Health Minister Datuk Seri Dzulkefly Ahmad said the move is expected to drive innovation and transparency, while reducing overall costs. 'DRG implementation is a long-term process, but we're beginning with minor cases before moving on to more complex treatments. Our goal is to establish a well-designed system that works specifically for Malaysia,' he said on Wednesday. United States — DRG pioneer (1983) The United States was the first to introduce DRGs, launching them in its Medicare system in 1983. Hospitals were reimbursed a fixed amount rather than issuing itemised bills, pushing them to become more cost-efficient. Australia — 1992 Australia implemented its own version, the Australian National DRG (AN-DRG), in 1992 based on a modified US model. In 1998, this was replaced by the Australian Refined DRG (AR-DRG), tailored to local clinical and administrative needs. Following the 2011 National Health Reform Agreement, Australia adopted activity-based funding nationwide, aiming to increase transparency and improve resource allocation in public hospitals funded jointly by the Commonwealth and state governments. Sweden, Finland, Norway — Mid-1990s These three Nordic countries adopted modified DRG systems in the mid-1990s to align with their respective healthcare structures. Germany — 2000 Germany formally adopted DRG systems under the Social Health Insurance Reform Act of 2000. Based on Australia's AR-DRG model, the German system is overseen by its Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK). By 2003, DRG systems were mandatory in all hospitals. InEK continues to manage coding, pricing and classification updates to ensure the system keeps pace with clinical and economic developments. Estonia — 2001 After the Russian financial crisis of 1999, Estonia faced long wait times and tight hospital budgets. In 2001, it replaced its fee-for-service (FFS) model with DRG-based payments, improving cost predictability and reducing delays in care. Croatia — 2002 Croatia's Health Insurance Fund began adopting DRGs in 2002 via a system known as Plaćanje po terapijskom postupku (PPTP). The aim was to shorten hospital stays, improve patient turnover, and optimise resource use. Over time, DRGs helped rationalise services and improve access to key procedures. Thailand — 2003 Thailand incorporated DRGs into its Universal Coverage Scheme (UCS) in 2003, initially covering inpatient care for 49 million people. Previously based on FFS, the scheme saw fewer unnecessary treatments and better budget control post-DRG. Over time, DRGs expanded to include subacute and psychiatric services. Thailand's other two public healthcare schemes — the Social Security Scheme and the Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme — also adopted DRGs by the late 2000s. China — 2009 China's healthcare system uses DRGs in various forms across provinces. In 2011, Beijing introduced DRGs under its Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance (BJ-UEBMI). Today, three DRG systems are in use: C-DRG for pricing and payments CHS-DRG for insurance reimbursements (launched nationally in 2020) CN-DRG for hospital performance evaluation By 2021, DRG reforms were piloted in 30 cities, with a nationwide rollout planned under the National Healthcare Security Administration. South Korea — 1997 to 2013 South Korea began DRG pilots in 1997, targeting specific diseases. A voluntary phase followed, gaining broad uptake. By 2012, DRGs were mandatory for small clinics, and by 2013, tertiary hospitals joined. This helped reduce overtreatment under the FFS model and introduced more consistent pricing. Philippines — 2013 The Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PhilHealth) began shifting from FFS to case-based payments in 2014 with the All Case Rates (ACR) system. The 2019 Universal Health Care Law reinforced this approach, mandating PhilHealth to strengthen financial risk protection and further refine DRG-based mechanisms. Indonesia — 2014 Indonesia launched its national health insurance programme, Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN), in 2014 alongside its DRG system, INA-CBGs. Both inpatient and outpatient services are reimbursed using standard tariffs set by the Ministry of Health. This model has helped keep JKN financially sustainable and scalable.

Barnama
13 hours ago
- Barnama
NCCM 2025: MOH To Focus On Lung Health Prevention And AI
KUALA LUMPUR, June 20 (Bernama) -- The Ministry of Health (MOH) is entering the final phase of its National Strategic Plan for Cancer Control Programme 2021–2025, with a renewed focus on strengthening cancer prevention, early detection and sustainable financing. In this regard Health Minister Datuk Seri Dr. Dzulkefly Ahmad said the three-day National Cancer Congress Malaysia (NCCM) 2025, jointly organised by the National Cancer Society of Malaysia (NCSM) and Sunway University starting today, is aligned with the ministry's plan in charting the next chapter of the strategic plan for cancer which is more data-driven, inclusive and forward-looking approach. 'Cancer remains one of the most pressing and devastating challenges in our fight against the pandemic of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs). 'According to the National Cancer Registry Report 2017–2021, we now record over 169,000 reported cancer cases, an increase of 47 per cent from the previous cycle. The lifetime risk of cancer has also increased to one in eight Malaysians,' he said during his keynote address at the opening ceremony of NCCM 2025 themed 'Bridging Gaps, Building Hope, Empowering Lives', at Sunway University, Petaling Jaya, here today. Dzulkefly said in response to the rising threat of lung cancer, the ministry introduced the Lung Health Initiative during last year's NCCM which is currently among the top three most common cancers in Malaysia and a leading cause of death. He said Malaysia led the way on the global stage in cancer prevention and early detection with the adoption of the global resolution entitled Promoting and Prioritising an Integrated Lung Health Approach at the 78th World Health Assembly (WHA78), co-sponsored by 15 other WHO member states. 'This is a historic milestone not just for Malaysia, but for global public health. It reflects our belief in a whole-of-planet approach for lung health that integrates prevention, digital innovation, and people-centred care. 'Implementation is already underway, across six states namely Selangor, Penang, Kedah, Pahang, Kelantan and Sabah. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is now being utilised for chest X-rays in selected health clinics and government hospitals for interpretation, improving accuracy and accelerating early detection for lung cancer and other respiratory illnesses,' he said. Dzulkefly also commended National Cancer Society Malaysia (NCSM) for extending the effort through mobile AI X-ray units, which help screen underserved communities and workers in industrial settings.


Daily Express
16 hours ago
- Daily Express
Fresh approaches needed to reignite interest in medicine, says expert
Published on: Friday, June 20, 2025 Published on: Fri, Jun 20, 2025 By: Bernama Text Size: Once regarded the pinnacle of academic achievement, pursuing a career in medicine is now seen as a long, demanding and rigid path. Kuala Lumpur: There was a time when becoming a doctor was seen as one of the most prestigious career paths; when local universities could no longer cope with the surge in applications for medical studies. Many parents were once willing to spend large sums to send their children abroad to study medicine after failing to secure places in local universities. Times, however, have changed, and the field is now increasingly being overlooked. Advertisement Health minister Dzulkefly Ahmad recently urged straight-A SPM students to consider pursuing medicine at the university level. He also expressed concern over students' declining interest in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) fields, warning that it could have long-term implications for the country's medical sector. This decline in interest is acknowledged by Dr Norsham Juliana Nordin from Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, who notes that today's youths are more informed and career-conscious, having grown up in a vastly different environment from that of previous generations. 'They are more critical when evaluating career choices, often prioritising work-life balance. While medicine was once regarded as the pinnacle of academic achievement, it is now seen as a long, demanding and rigid path,' she told Bernama. 'This especially when compared to emerging fields like technology, entrepreneurship, data science, or artificial intelligence.' Advertisement Further discouraging high-achieving students from a career in medicine are the social media narratives that highlight hardships, long working hours, and perceived lack of fair compensation. 'This trend reflects society's growing tendency to prioritise income over impact. Today, students who aspire to become doctors are often discouraged by the perceived academic burden and the significant personal sacrifices involved,' Norsham added. She pointed out that ongoing issues within the national healthcare system – such as unstable contract positions, excessive workloads, and toxic work cultures, including bullying or high-pressure environments with minimal support – have become red flags for young people. At the same time, social media glamourises other careers as being more flexible, expressive, and less stressful. Norsham also believes the declining appeal of medicine is partly due to how the profession is treated as 'guilty until proven innocent' when it comes to patient care. Every medical decision carries inherent risk, and as such, 'every action taken to save a patient, no matter how small, invites scrutiny and accountability', she said. Restoring true purpose To reignite interest in the profession, Norsham suggests regularly reminding both practitioners and medical students of its true value: the nobility of saving lives. She believes a more holistic approach is needed, starting with restoring joy to the learning process. 'The younger generation is not afraid of sacrifice – they just want that sacrifice to be valued and supported by a fair system. Now is the time for all stakeholders, especially experts and influential medical figures, to step forward and lead the change.' Norsham also stressed the importance of nurturing interest in medicine from secondary school, giving students early exposure to the profession. 'If they see that being a doctor isn't a burden but a meaningful life path, they'll choose it willingly. But this requires collective readiness to shape a more appealing and competitive career path in medicine, so we can present a more convincing narrative to students.' Relatedly, she believes medical curriculums today can be both fun and innovative without compromising the integrity of the field. 'Creative learning methods like simulations, virtual reality, gamification, and story- or visual-based teaching not only strengthen comprehension but also foster positive emotion, which is vital for sustaining student interest,' she said. 'Let's restore the core strength of this profession: the healing spirit. Today, we must first 'heal the young healers' by restoring their mental health, motivation, and work environment.'