Is $15 an hour enough? Only for DINKs in these states, data shows
(NEXSTAR) — Since 2009, the federal minimum wage in the U.S. has been $7.25 an hour. A new bill introduced in the Senate hopes to raise it to $15 an hour next year, followed by incremental increases to reflect inflation.
In some states — including those that already have a minimum wage of $15 an hour or more — that rate isn't enough to cover the average costs a resident may have, according to MIT's Living Wage Calculator.
The calculator takes into account the basic needs a family of varying sizes may have, like food, housing, child care, and transportation, to determine how much a worker must earn hourly to be 'self-sufficient.' Estimated living wages are available for all 50 states, their counties, and major metro areas.
A Nexstar analysis found that, based on MIT's calculations, a $15 an hour rate isn't enough for a single adult, working 40 hours a week every week, to cover their basic needs in any state. The closest is West Virginia, where an hourly wage of $19.43 would suffice.
It also wouldn't be enough for a family of four, with both adults working, to be self-sufficient in any state. Mississippi has the lowest hourly rate necessary for both adults at $22.43 an hour.
In 15 states and Washington, meanwhile, the Living Wage Calculator found that for the same family, both adults would have to be earning $30 an hour or more to cover the same basic needs. In Massachusetts, an hourly living wage for two adults with two children is $37.71, according to MIT's calculator.
Other states where the living wage is double the proposed federal minimum wage are: Alaska, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. (A recent study found that a family of four would need an annual household income of more than $200,000 to live comfortably in 43 states — that equates to both adults earning more than $40 an hour, before taxes and other withholdings.)
The situation is vastly better for adults considered to be a 'DINK': dual-income, no kids.
In 18 states, a household comprised of two adults who are both working, the pair could cover their needs while both earning under $15 an hour. According to MIT's Living Wage Calculator, Arkansas has the lowest necessary rate at $13.59 an hour. Close behind is West Virginia at $13.60.
Other states where the estimated living wage for two working adults falls below $15 an hour include: Alabama, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, and Wisconsin.
An hourly wage of $15 is nearly enough in Texas, where DINKs require $15.04 an hour to cover their basic needs.
These calculations are estimates, and every family's situation is different.
A working couple with no kids in the Little Rock, Ark., area, for example, has a living wage rate of $13.90 an hour, which is higher than the state average. The same couple in Hot Springs, Ark., would each need to earn at least $13.36 an hour, more than 20 cents below the state average.
According to the data produced by MIT's Living Wage Calculator, no state's minimum wage is enough to be considered a living wage for a single working adult, DINKs, or a family of four where both adults are working.
In the District of Columbia, however, the current minimum wage is higher than the living wage outlined for a dual-income, no-kids household. MIT's Living Wage Calculator estimates DINKs in the nation's capital may need an hourly wage of only $17.01. The minimum wage in D.C. is $17.50 an hour, and will increase to $17.95 an hour on July 1.
Several of the nation's largest metros have higher minimum wages than their respective states. In Denver, the minimum hourly wage is $18.81, $4 higher than the state's $14.81 rate and nearly 50 cents higher than the estimated living wage for DINKs living in the city.
You can find the estimated living wage for your region at MIT's Living Wage Calculator.
The bill has bipartisan support, with Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Sen. Peter Welch (D-Vt.) cosponsoring the legislation.
The GOP-controlled House and Senate, though, have also been focused on Trump's priority legislation.
President Donald Trump previously referred to the current rate of $7.25 an hour as a 'low number' in December, but the White House declined to comment on Hawley's proposed legislation to The Hill earlier this month.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
$15 wage above living cost for Arkansas DINKs, but single workers need more
FAYETTEVILLE, Ark. (KNWA/KFTA) — A Senate bill proposes raising the federal minimum wage from $7.25 to $15, but MIT data shows that amount still falls short for many Arkansas workers. MIT's Living Wage Calculator estimates the income individuals and families need to be self-sufficient, factoring in housing, food, transportation, childcare and taxes, with data available by state, county and metro area. For a single adult working full-time in Arkansas, the estimated living wage is $17.23 per hour—higher than both the current federal minimum wage and the proposed $15 rate. Among two-adult households without children, Arkansas has the lowest living wage estimate in the nation: $13.59 per hour per adult. That makes it one of the only common scenarios where a $15 wage would slightly exceed basic needs. Here are the regional living wage estimates for two working adults with no children (commonly referred to as DINKs): Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers: $14.32/hour Little Rock: $13.90/hour Jonesboro: $13.40/hour Hot Springs: $13.36/hour Fort Smith: $13.11/hour Pine Bluff: $13.03/hour Family households face a much steeper climb. In Arkansas, a two-parent, two-child household must earn about $23.91 per hour per adult to cover basic living expenses. Even in Mississippi, the state with the nation's lowest estimate for families of four, each working parent still needs to earn at least $22.43 per hour. By household type, here's how the living wage breaks down in Arkansas: Single adult: $19.49/hour Two adults, both working, no children: $13.59/hour each Two adults, both working, 1 child: $18.84/hour each Two adults, both working, 2 or more children: $23.29–$27.57/hour each To view data for Arkansas as a whole, click here. Data can also be filtered by metro area or county. Federal lawsuit looks to halt Arkansas' Educational Freedom Account program; claims it violates US Constitution Arkansas is one of 18 states where two working adults without children can each earn under $15 per hour and still cover essential expenses. Other states in this category include Alabama, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky and Missouri. The bill to raise the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour has bipartisan sponsorship from Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Sen. Peter Welch (D-Vt.). President Donald Trump previously referred to the current rate of $7.25 an hour as a 'low number' in December, but the White House declined to comment on Hawley's proposed legislation to The Hill earlier this month, Nexstar reports. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
New Texas law requires 10 Commandments to be posted in every public school classroom
AUSTIN, Texas — Texas will require all public school classrooms to display the Ten Commandments under a new law that will make the state the nation's largest to attempt to impose such a mandate. Gov. Greg Abbott announced Saturday that he signed the bill, which is expected to draw a legal challenge from critics who consider it an unconstitutional violation of the separation of church and state. A similar law in Louisiana was blocked when a federal appeals court ruled Friday that it was unconstitutional. Arkansas also has a similar law that has been challenged in federal court. The Texas measure easily passed in the Republican-controlled state House and Senate in the legislative session that ended June 2. 'The focus of this bill is to look at what is historically important to our nation educationally and judicially,' Republican state representative Candy Noble, a co-sponsor of the bill, said when it passed the House. Abbott also signed a bill that allows school districts to provide students and staff a daily voluntary period of prayer or time to read a religious text during school hours. The Ten Commandments laws are among efforts, mainly in conservative-led states, to insert religion into public schools. Texas' law requires public schools to post in classrooms a 16-by-20-inch poster or framed copy of a specific English version of the commandments, even though translations and interpretations vary across denominations, faiths and languages and may differ in homes and houses of worship. Supporters say the Ten Commandments are part of the foundation of the United States' judicial and educational systems and should be displayed. Opponents, including some Christian and other faith leaders, say the Ten Commandments and prayer measures infringe on others' religious freedom. A letter signed this year by dozens of Christian and Jewish faith leaders opposing the bill noted that Texas has thousands of students of other faiths who might have no connection to the Ten Commandments. Texas has nearly 6 million students in about 9,100 public schools. In 2005, Abbott, who was state attorney general at the time, successfully argued before the Supreme Court that Texas could keep a Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of its Capitol. Louisiana's law has twice been ruled unconstitutional by federal courts, first by U.S. District Judge John deGravelles and then again by a three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which also considers cases from Texas. State Attorney General Liz Murrell said she would appeal and pledged to take it to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
State of Texas: Sen. Kelly Hancock resigns to become acting Comptroller, announces campaign for position
AUSTIN (Nexstar) — Republican State Sen Kelly Hancock resigned from the Texas Senate and was hired to be the Chief Clerk at the Texas Comptroller's office on Thursday. The move puts Hancock in the position to become the acting Comptroller of Public Accounts when Comptroller Glenn Hegar leaves his position to become the next Chancellor of the Texas A&M System on July 1. Hancock announced his campaign for Comptroller later that same day, becoming the third Republican in the race for the state's top tax-collector. Hancock has served in the Senate as a representative from the 9th district — based in Tarrant County — since 2013. He was one of just two Senate Republicans who voted to convict Attorney General Ken Paxton in his 2023 impeachment trial. Speaking about his new job and candidacy, Hancock said he is still the same person he has always been. 'I'm still the guy that shops at Walmart, and I'm small business owner,' Hancock said. 'Sure, I've served as a school board member for 13 years, served in the legislature, but that's not who I am.' Hancock is vying to lead the agency that is tasked with rolling out the state's new education savings account program. That will provide state dollars to families who want to send their child to private school. Hancock said he will draw from his 13 years of experience on his local school board to approach that task. 'My love for kids and making sure that every — you know, every child — gets to achieve their dream. Education is how we do that,' Hancock said. Hancock immediately received an endorsement from Gov. Greg Abbott. Former State Sen. Don Huffines and Railroad Commissioner Christi Craddick announced their campaigns for Comptroller earlier this year. Huffines is among those questioning whether this maneuver is constitutionally legal. Huffines reposted a post from a conservative member of the media on X, pointing out the 'holdover' provision of the Texas Constitution. The provision states that a public official must continue to perform the duties of their office until their successor is named. This would appear to suggest that Hancock could not cease performing his duties as a senator until a special election is held to replace him. That also appears to suggest that Hancock could not become Comptroller right away, because the Texas Constitution bars a public official from holding an office in the legislative and executive branches simultaneously. The move raises questions about his appointment to the position. Asked about the contradiction, Hancock said he was hired to the office just like anyone else. 'There was an opening, I was asked to fill it,' Hancock said. 'Comptroller Hegar and I are good friends. We've known each other for a long time, and so that's the way we wanted to go about it.' Huffines called the move by Hancock a 'gross manipulation.' 'It's a gross manipulation of the process by the establishment Republicans, the political elite, because they're scared of me, and they know that I'm going to win,' Huffines said. Now that Hancock has officially resigned his seat, Abbott has to schedule a special election to replace him. The district is strongly Republican — Hancock won reelection in the 9th district by 20 points in 2022 — but given recent trends in special elections across the country, the seat has the potential to become competitive. The U.S. Supreme Court reversed a ruling by a federal appeals court Thursday, clearing the way for plans to temporarily store nuclear waste at a facility in West Texas. The 6-3 vote came in the case, Nuclear Regulatory Commission v. Texas, where the U.S. Court of Appeals in the Fifth Circuit sided with Texas and Fasken Oil and Ranch in their suit against the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to prevent the temporary waste site from being built. The justices reversed the Fifth Circuit ruling. But the Court did not decide the underlying dispute about whether the NRC has the power to license private storage facilities for nuclear waste. While the Court's decision is not a final ruling in favor of the licenses, it clears a key hurdle for the waste storage plans. Texas argued that federal law requires nuclear waste to be stored on site at reactors in the absence of a permanent storage site. Interim Storage Partners, LLC, the company trying to build the storage site in West Texas, argues that the law cited by the state — the Nuclear Waste Policy Act — does nothing to forbid the creation of a temporary storage site. 'The Fifth Circuit held that the NWPA 'doesn't permit' the ISP license, ISP App. 30a, but cited no statutory provision that says that. Nor do respondents. There is none,' the ISP writes in its response. Currently, high-level nuclear waste generated from nuclear power plants is stored at the reactors themselves to avoid transporting the fuel. High-level nuclear waste is highly radioactive and dangerous fuel, which no longer has a fast enough fission process to be used to generate energy, but still poses a threat. Because no federal waste storage site has been built, the NRC hoped to create a temporary storage site in West Texas. Opponents to the site, including the state, said that it would likely become a permanent site with no existing alternative. According to the NRC's website, high-level waste only becomes harmless after being stored for thousands of years. The concern is not only over storage, but transportation. Transporting spent nuclear fuel requires strict oversight and protection. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, the most radioactive material is transported in casks, which are containers that are designed to withstand collisions, being dropped onto a steel spike, burning in gasoline for 30 minutes and withstanding being submerged in water for eight hours. The state also expressed worries about the site's location near oil fields in West Texas. Gov. Greg Abbott submitted comments in the suit that said the nuclear waste site could inflict significant damage to the oil fields if an act of terrorism or an accident affected the site. Texas has strived to lead the nation in nuclear energy production, with plans for the construction of several new uranium mines in South Texas and power plants purchased by large tech companies, like Google and Amazon. Because nuclear power can produce energy without carbon emissions, it is a popular alternative to fossil fuel-heavy sources like coal. But after nuclear disasters abroad and in the U.S. at power plants, including the Three Mile Island plant in Pennsylvania, creation of new nuclear power plants has slowed significantly in the U.S. Meanwhile, foreign powers, like China and India, are ramping up production. Both the Biden and Trump administrations made efforts to bolster nuclear energy in the U.S. by building new reactors and restarting old ones. Recent executive orders by President Donald Trump take measures, including speeding up the licensing process through the Department of Energy, beginning construction on 10 new reactors by 2030 and creating reactors for artificial intelligence data centers and domestic military bases. This week Gov. Abbott traveled across the state to sign a $10 billion property tax relief package and a historic $20 billion water infrastructure bill. Both were priorities of this past legislative session. Abbott started in Denton County on Monday to unveil the latest property tax legislation that will increase the homestead exemption from $100,000 to $140,000, and increase the exemption for disabled Texans and those 65 and older to $200,000. Senate Bill 4 and 23, both authored by State Sen. Paul Bettencourt, R – Houston, will save 5.7 million Texas homeowners about $484 per year on their tax bill, and $907 per year for 2.08 million seniors, according to Bettencourt's office. Even though both SB 4 and SB 23 passed unanimously in the Texas House of Representatives, the proposals did not pass without some criticism. State Rep. Brian Harrison, R-Midlothian, spoke out against SB 4 on the House floor before voting yes on the measure. He argues the property tax cuts do not go far enough. 'It is entirely conceivable that many or most homeowners and property owners will not see any real savings at all because the appraisals are likely to increase and eat up this new exemption,' Harrison said. Gov. Abbott praised the work by the legislature to pass additional tax breaks for Texas homeowners. Both bills will need to be approved by a majority of Texans in the November election. When asked if the state will be able to keep providing these exemptions in the future, the Governor assured the state is in a good financial spot. 'We have some other reserve money to make sure that we will be able to continue to maintain the property tax relief in the future that we provide today,' Abbott said. Later in the week the governor was in Lubbock to sign Senate Bill 7, aimed at investing $20 billion into the state's water fund. The governor called it 'the largest water law in the history of the great state of Texas.' 'Every day, on average in Texas, there's more than 1,000 more people who go to a faucet and turn that on because of the magnitude of the growth,' Abbott said during the ceremony. 'When they go to the faucet to turn it on, they expect the water to flow.' Under the plan, half of the $20 billion would fund new water supply sources, while the other half would support water infrastructure development and repair existing systems. The funding operates as a revolving loan program, providing $1 billion annually for 20 years with repaid loans reinvested in additional projects. House Speaker Dustin Burrows, R-Lubbock, emphasized the economic implications of the water crisis. 'People want to come here because of our economy, because of our culture, and they are coming here with U-hauls,' Burrows said. 'If they show up and they turn on that spigot, and water doesn't come out, those U-hauls are going to go the absolute opposite direction.' SB 7 tasks the Texas Water Development Board with coordinating large-scale water infrastructure projects across regions, promoting standardized specifications for interoperable systems and minimizing eminent domain use by maximizing existing transportation and utility easements. Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, accused the Biden Administration and members of the national press of covering-up the former president's declining health. It is the latest attempt from Congressional Republicans to paint President Joe Biden as unfit to lead. Sen. Cornyn helped lay out the allegations in a U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. Following the hearing, he called out the Democratic party for the alleged cover-up. 'There's no question they had the ability to raise this issue earlier, when his incapacity became obvious to everybody who was paying attention. So Congress needs to look at whatever what possible remedies that we might be able to legislate,' Cornyn said. Only two Democratic senators on the committee, Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Illinois, and Sen. Peter Welch, D-Vermont, attended the meeting. They called the hearing political theater. Other Democrats on the committee who did not attend the hearing called it a distraction from more pressing issues. The office of former President Biden denies any cover-up. A day after the hearing President Biden was in Galveston, TX to celebrate Juneteenth. Biden was presented a plaque for his role in designating Juneteenth as a national holiday. He spoke to the congregation at the Reedy Chapel-AME church. 'You know on this sacred day it reminds me of another sacred day, that wonderful day four years ago in the East Room of the White House when I had a great honor, of course objections from some, of making Juneteenth a federal holiday,' Biden said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
