
Iran accuses US of violating nuclear treaty with airstrikes
Iran has accused the US of violating international law and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) following overnight airstrikes on three of its key nuclear facilities. However, Tehran says preliminary inspections have found no signs of radioactive contamination.
In a statement issued early on Sunday, the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI) confirmed that US strikes targeted its nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. The operation, conducted in coordination with Israel, was condemned by the Iranian authorities as an illegal and 'brutal' act.
'This act of aggression was carried out under the shadow of international indifference, and with the apparent support or silence of the International Atomic Energy Agency,' the AEOI said.
Iran's Center for the National Nuclear Safety System reported that emergency inspections had been completed at all three locations. 'No signs of contamination have been recorded,' the agency said, adding that there is 'no danger to residents living near the affected sites.'
Iran vowed that its nuclear program will not be derailed. 'We will not allow this national industry – built through the sacrifices of our nuclear martyrs – to be stopped by evil conspiracies,' the AEOI said, promising legal action over the strikes.
Washington has not formally responded to the accusations of NPT violations. President Donald Trump, who confirmed US involvement in the attacks, warned Iran against retaliating, saying further strikes would follow any response.
The strikes mark a dramatic escalation in the already volatile tensions between Iran and Israel. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) described the joint offensive as targeting Iran's missile and nuclear infrastructure.
Iranian officials maintain that its nuclear program is entirely peaceful and under the oversight of international inspectors. The International Atomic Energy Agency has not reported any current evidence of an Iranian nuclear weapons program.
The incident has sparked fears of further regional instability, with Iran accusing the US of undermining global non-proliferation norms. As of Sunday afternoon, Tehran had not announced any military response.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Russia Today
19 minutes ago
- Russia Today
Ukrainian sovereignty, worsening positions and ‘final mistake': Key takeaways from Putin's Q&A
Moscow is not seeking the unconditional surrender of Ukraine, but wants it to acknowledge the realities on the ground, Russian President Vladimir Putin has said at SPIEF 2025, commenting on various aspects of the Ukraine conflict, Russia's goals, and potential directions for resolving the crisis. Putin took part in the plenary session of the annual St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF 2025) on Friday, delivering a major speech and conducting a Q&A session. Here are the key takeaways regarding the Ukraine conflict:Ukrainian surrender Asked whether Moscow expects an 'unconditional surrender' from Kiev – similar to the demand his US counterpart, Donald Trump, is making of Iran – Putin said this is not the case, reiterating Russia's readiness to resolve the conflict through diplomacy.'We are not seeking the surrender of Ukraine. We insist on recognition of the realities that have developed on the ground.' Worsening negotiation positions Russia has consistently attempted to settle the conflict in the former Ukrainian Donbass, which erupted after the Western-backed 2014 Maidan coup, through diplomatic means, the president said. However, these efforts were repeatedly undermined by Kiev and its backers.'At each stage, we suggested to those with whom we were in contact in Ukraine to stop and said, 'Let's negotiate now. Because this logic of purely military actions can result in your situation getting worse, and then we will have to conduct our negotiations from other positions, from positions that are worse for you.' This happened several times,' Putin said. Foreign-fueled conflict Negotiations held in Istanbul in early 2022, shortly after the conflict escalated, fell apart under pressure from the same 'neocolonial forces,' Putin added.'Those who are guided by old, neocolonial principles, including and above all in Europe, thought that now they would easily profit at the expense of Russia: crush it, destroy it, annihilate it, and receive some dividends from this.' Ukraine's sovereignty Russia has never denied Ukraine's right to exist as an independent nation, Putin said. However, in the years since the Soviet Union's collapse, the country has drifted from the principles on which it originally gained its independence. 'The grounds on which Ukraine became independent and sovereign were set out in the Declaration of Independence of Ukraine of 1991, where it is clearly written in black and white that Ukraine is a non-aligned, non-nuclear, neutral state. It would be a good idea to return to these fundamental values on which Ukraine gained its independence and sovereignty,' he the same time, Putin reiterated his belief that, in a certain sense, all of Ukraine is Russian. 'I have said many times that I consider Russians and Ukrainians to be one people, in fact. In this sense, all of Ukraine is ours.' Going nuclear would be Kiev's 'final mistake' Obtaining and using a nuclear device of any sort, including a dirty bomb, would be the 'final mistake' for Kiev, the Russian president warned. This would trigger a mirror response from Moscow with 'catastrophic' consequences for Ukraine, he said. 'Our response will be very harsh and, most likely, catastrophic for both the neo-Nazi regime and, unfortunately, for Ukraine itself. I hope that they will never come to that,' Putin stated, adding that Moscow currently has no intelligence suggesting that Kiev is attempting to do military thinned out Ukrainian forces are suffering from severe manpower shortages, with units at only 47% strength on average, Putin stated. He said Ukraine's attack on Russia's Kursk Region last August – driven by political rather than military reasoning – worsened the situation and further stretched its forces along an expanded frontline. 'They got into Kursk Region. First of all, they lost 76,000 people there. It was a disaster for them,' Putin said. 'In the end, as we said, we drove them out of there, but they created a threat to us... along the entire line of the border with Ukraine, in two other neighboring regions,' he actions created an additional 1,600km line of contact, he said. 'They pulled apart all their armed forces. It is hard to imagine bigger stupidity from a military point of view.' Russian troops could go deeper into Ukraine Putin did not rule out the possibility of advancing further into Ukrainian territory to establish a buffer zone to protect Russian border areas from further the defeat of Ukrainian forces in Kursk, Russian troops moved into Ukraine's Sumy Region. According to Putin, the buffer zone there is already up to 12km deep.'We don't have the goal of taking Sumy, but in principle, I don't rule it out,' he said.


Russia Today
6 hours ago
- Russia Today
Top Iranian diplomat expects ‘critical' talks with Putin
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi is expecting to hold a 'crucial' meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin during his pre-arranged visit to Moscow, which coincided with US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities over the weekend. Israel launched an attack on Iran last week, claiming Tehran was on the brink of developing a nuclear weapon. Iranian officials rejected the accusation and responded with retaliatory strikes. On Sunday, the United States followed with what it described as 'massive precision strikes' on nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. The attacks were widely condemned as violations of international law. International Atomic Energy Agency Director General Rafael Grossi said the strikes caused 'a sharp degradation in nuclear safety and security.' Speaking to reporters on Monday morning after arriving in Moscow, Araghchi said the situation demanded urgent coordination. 'Given the current exceptional circumstances in the region, it is essential that Iran and Russia engage in closer, more precise, and more serious consultations,' he stated. 'Naturally, our talks this time will be more serious and cover broader dimensions. We will have important and serious discussions with President Putin, and I am confident that the outcomes will benefit both countries.' The Kremlin has yet to confirm a meeting between Putin and Araghchi. Russian President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly stated that Iran has the right to use nuclear technology for peaceful purposes. In media appearances during the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF) last week, he emphasized that resolving the conflict should include mutual security guarantees – protecting both Iran's right to peaceful nuclear development and Israel's right to security. Araghchi described Russia as a strategic ally and said the two countries have maintained regular dialogue on regional issues. He also noted that during recent nuclear negotiations with the US, Tehran 'continuously consulted with our Russian friends, sharing every step of the progress with them.' Russia has strongly condemned the US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, calling them a flagrant breach of international law. In a statement on Saturday, the Russian Foreign Ministry described the attacks as 'a reckless decision' and 'a blatant violation of the UN Charter and relevant Security Council resolutions.' It warned that the strikes – carried out by a permanent member of the Security Council – could have caused a nuclear disaster and had 'drastically increased the likelihood of a larger conflict in the Middle East.'


Russia Today
8 hours ago
- Russia Today
Vance explains how Iran bombing is ‘different' from other US wars
Vice President J.D. Vance has pushed back against comparisons between US airstrikes on Iran and previous American wars in the Middle East, claiming that this time Washington's actions are truly limited and rooted in national security objectives – not a drive for regime change. In an interview with NBC's Meet the Press on Sunday, Vance emphasized that 'we're not at war with Iran – we're at war with Iran's nuclear program,' describing the overnight strike as 'a very precise, very surgical' operation that allegedly dismantled Tehran's nuclear capabilities. Responding to concerns that the United States could be drawn into another prolonged conflict, Vance said the difference lies in leadership. 'I certainly empathize with Americans who are exhausted after 25 years of foreign entanglements in the Middle East,' he said. But the difference is that back then we had dumb presidents, and now we have a president who actually knows how to accomplish America's national security objectives. 'We have no interest in a protracted conflict. We have no interest in boots on the ground,' he added. Vance further insisted that the United States is not seeking to topple the Iranian government. 'Our view has been very clear that we don't want a regime change,' he said. 'We do not want to protract this or build this out any more than it's already been built out.' However, President Trump appeared to leave the door open to regime change in Tehran in a post on Truth Social later in the day. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a regime change??? MIGA!!!' he wrote. Vance also echoed Trump's repeated warnings to Tehran against retaliation in any form, calling it 'the stupidest thing in the world,' and reaffirming that the US would respond with 'overwhelming force' if American personnel were targeted. Trump has faced criticism from lawmakers over the lack of congressional authorization, but Vance defended the legality of the strike, arguing that the president has the authority to prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Moscow has criticized the Iranian WMD claim, drawing comparisons to the justification used by then-US Secretary of State Colin Powell in the lead-up to the 2003 Iraq War. 'Many today feel a strong sense of déjà vu,' Russian Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia told the UN Security Council on Sunday. 'The current situation is essentially no different: we are once again being urged to believe in fairy tales in order to once again bring suffering to millions of people living in the Middle East.'