State Dept. sued over Trump deal to house migrants in El Salvador prison
A coalition of democracy groups sued the State Department Thursday, challenging the Trump administration's agreement with the government of El Salvador to house more than 200 migrants deported to a notorious prison.
The groups, represented by the left-leaning legal organization Democracy Forward, said the government took 'unprecedented action' to transport migrants living in the United States 'beyond the reach of U.S. law.'
El Salvador is reportedly being paid some $15 million by the Trump administration to house migrants in the country. The lawsuit marks the first legal challenge to the deal between Trump and Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele.
'That action shocks the conscience,' Democracy Forward lawyer Jessica Anne Morton said in the complaint. 'It also violates the law.'
The suit cites the extreme conditions within the CECOT mega prison, known by its acronym in Spanish, where prisoners sleep in crowded cells with bunks three levels high, and are not allowed to go outside or have visitors of any kind.
'Executive branch leaders have stated that the government plans to continue availing itself of the Agreement, sending more people, including potentially U.S. citizens, to indefinite detention in what is an effective black site,' Morton wrote.
The challengers alleged that the State Department's actions bypass federal immigration law and international treaties while violating constitutional rights to due process, legal counsel and protection against cruel and unusual punishment.
They say the Administrative Procedure Act requires agency actions, like the agreement, to be 'both reasonable and reasonably explained.'
'The Agreement is neither,' the complaint reads.
During a trip to El Salvador to visit the mistakenly deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia, Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) was told financial considerations were at play as they kept the man locked away.
Van Hollen had pressed Salvadoran Vice President Félix Ulloa about why Abrego Garcia was being imprisoned when he had no criminal history in either country.
'His answer was that the Trump administration is paying the government of El Salvador to keep him at CECOT,' Van Hollen said during an April trip to the Central American country.
Numerous migrants have challenged Trump's plans to deport them to El Salvador, including under the Alien Enemies Act, but the suit is the first to challenge the agreement between the two countries.
Five groups brought the lawsuit: Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL), Immigrant Defenders Law Center, Immigration Equality and California Collaborative for Immigrant Justice.
Skye Perryman, Democracy Forward's president and CEO, called the practice 'unAmerican' in a statement.
'Our lawsuit makes clear: No president—past or present—can buy their way out of the Constitution to disappear people behind a paywall of impunity,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
17 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Netherlands Defence Minister: NATO-wide 5% defence spend would be "historic"
Ruben Brekelmans, Netherlands Minister of Defence said they and their European partners support President Donald Trump's calls to encourage Iran to the negotiation table in order to "come to a sustainable solution". Speaking about the upcoming NATO meeting, he told Bloomberg's Oliver Crook "if we agree to 5% spending on core defence and defence-related matters, that would be a historic step" and said it would be of particular significance "if 32 allies in unity agree on this". (Source: Bloomberg)
Fox News
19 minutes ago
- Fox News
Ted Cruz: Biden's foreign policy 'accelerated' Iran's nuclear program
All times eastern FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: Trump to huddle with top brass after hammering Iran's nuclear sites
The Hill
19 minutes ago
- The Hill
Leavitt: ‘High degree of confidence' strikes hit Iran's stored enriched uranium
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Monday the Trump administration has a 'high degree of confidence' that its strikes against Iran hit locations where enriched uranium was being stored amid questions about whether officials in Tehran had relocated the nation's stockpile. 'We are confident, yes, that Iran's nuclear sites were completely and totally obliterated, as the president said in his address to the nation on Saturday night,' Leavitt said on ABC. 'And we have a high degree of confidence that where those strikes took place is where Iran's enriched uranium was stored,' she added. 'The president wouldn't have launched the strikes if we weren't confident in that. So this operation was a resounding success.' The U.S. on Saturday struck three Iranian nuclear facilities: Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. President Trump described them in an address to the nation as 'completely and totally obliterated,' something he reiterated in a social media post late Sunday. But experts have acknowledged it would take time to determine the extent of the damage from U.S. strikes, and some reports raising the possibility that Iran moved some of its enriched uranium away from those sites ahead of the attack. 'Final battle damage will take some time, but initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction,' Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine said Sunday. The New York Times reported that there was evidence Iran had moved equipment and uranium from the Fordow site in recent days, citing two Israeli officials. The Times also cited text messages from the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency indicating Iran had moved its uranium stockpile. Trump administration officials have maintained that the purpose of the strikes was to decimate Iran's nuclear program and severely curtail Tehran's ability to develop a nuclear weapon. 'We're not at war with Iran. We're at war with Iran's nuclear program,' Vice President Vance said Sunday on NBC News's 'Meet the Press.'
