
Knapsack: Licking County Children Services serve us all
It is very hard to believe it has been 10 years since Licking County had to approve our primary levy for Children Services, and it's up again for a vote May 6.
The Ohio Revised Code calls on counties to put these sorts of limited levies before the voters on a recurrent basis; 10 years is about the longest these go. School districts, boards of developmental disabilities and libraries are all the kinds of public entities which are subject to this kind of electoral review.
Yes, I was involved in this the last time, as campaign treasurer and working with the Citizens for Children Services, a kind of political action committee specifically for asking support of our levy.
Children Services is one part of the larger Licking County Job & Family Services office, which has a variety of funding streams, state and federal, for the work they do, but Children Services is largely funded directly by county property owners.
Knapsack: 'Unalienable' is a peculiar word with some specific import
It's been long discussed in Ohio that when it comes to the amount of state support for local Children Services, on foster care and kinship care, adoption and assisting with abused and neglected children, we are at or near the very bottom. By most nationwide measures, Ohio is 50th out of 50 states, and if the state were to double the amount it contributes to Children Services, we would still be in 50th place.
It should really sting that in 49th place is Michigan. Yeah, they're at the bottom, too, but above us.
There's a long history as to why this is so. I can't fix longstanding systemic problems (though I've tried to be engaged and proactive these last 10 years since I first learned these data points), so the reality in Ohio is that the state expects county property owners to cover what it won't. And we have to do it again because the law says these levies are limited.
This time, we're asking for a replacement of the existing levy. The millage stays the same, but we get the smallest possible increase by using the latest assessed value of the homes, buildings, and property. But because of the mysteries of rollback provisions in state law, as housing values are assessed, the levy recipients continue collecting on where we were.
Knapsack: Preparing for the 2026 celebration of our nation's founding warrants reflection
We need a replacement levy passed simply because while we are successfully helping to see that fewer kids are entering the care of the county, the costs have increased beyond the reduction of total cases. Specialized foster care and residential care cost more, and the county staff has their hands full finding placement as it is. We decided well before the last renewal of this levy in 2015 that we were committed to keeping Ohio kids in Ohio and not using out-of-state placements, even when those might have cost us less. That's still our program. To implement it, we need the dollars to cover in-state placement.
So on May 6, or as you vote early, in Licking County we are asking you to vote 'yes' to replace the Children Services levy. I am here to tell you the money is carefully managed, spent wisely, and with an eye to reducing the need to have state care intervene in a child's life in the first place. But when it has to happen, we want to keep kids safe, close to home and where they can thrive.
I hope you will join me in voting 'yes' for Children Services this May 6.
Jeff Gill is a writer, storyteller and preacher in central Ohio; he's worked on a few Children Services levies and programs before. Tell him how you want to see children grow and thrive at knapsack77@gmail.com, or follow @Knapsack77 on Threads or Bluesky.
This article originally appeared on Newark Advocate: Knapsack: Licking County children need your support May 6
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Some local police departments opt to charge for body camera video in light of new law
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) – The Whitehall and Grove City police departments have opted to charge for body camera video in light of a recently implemented law, as multiple other central Ohio agencies consider doing the same. In January, Gov. Mike DeWine signed House Bill 315 into law, which permits government agencies to charge the public and news media the 'estimated cost' of processing videos for public records requests before releasing them. This could include video from body cameras, dash cameras and surveillance footage from jails. Abstinence, patriotism and monogamy all required curriculum under new Ohio bill The statute officially took effect in April, allowing departments to charge up to $75 per hour of video, with fees capped at $750 per request. Before the law went into effect, the Ohio Revised Code allowed agencies to charge for public records, but only nominal fees associated with copying the content onto items such as paper or a flash drive, not labor costs. NBC4 reached out to central Ohio law enforcement agencies, asking if they have changed their public records request policies given the law's implementation. Whitehall has opted to charge the full amount as allowed by the law for body camera video – $75 per hour, or $1.25 per minute, with a cap of $750. The policy states that certain requests by victims or their representatives may be exempt from fees. 'Fees are necessary to cover the costs associated with reviewing, redacting, processing, storing, and distributing public record requests,' the policy states. Site of chemical leak offering compensation, set to reopen The Grove City Police Department has also chosen to charge for police video, with its policy asserting the amount charged will be based on the hourly rates of employees involved in producing the record, but costs will not exceed $75 per hour of footage or $750 overall. For records of certain 'critical incidents,' the police chief may choose to produce the video at no cost to the requester to ensure public transparency, the policy states. The chief of the Blendon Township Police Department, John Belford, said his agency has submitted a draft of a policy to its township attorney for review. Belford said he is recommending the department charge for body camera video, as the footage often requires 'extensive review and redaction.' 'The time that is spent by our administrative staff redacting and producing copies of releasable video has a substantial impact on our staff workload and time management,' he said. The Columbus Division of Police said it has not completed its policy and declined to share if the department plans to charge for video or not. The Hilliard Division of Police stated it is continuing to review the new law. The Pickerington Police Department said it had not yet changed its policy but will consider charging for body camera video under the new law during its budgeting process for 2026, which will likely begin in September. Both the Gahanna and Dublin police departments said they have not made any changes to their policies at this time. Progress made one year since SAFER program launched in Worthington The Delaware County Sheriff's Office stated it is still working on determining its policy. A spokesperson said the department is currently working on a 'significant backlog' of requests, and that it will not charge for those since they were received prior to the new law taking effect. Since the statute says law enforcement agencies may adopt a change to their policy, there is no deadline for them to make a decision, Capital University law professor Susan Gilles previously told NBC4. Multiple departments said they have become overwhelmed with video requests, specifically from people who request body camera content to post online, and that charging will help them manage their records department. DeWine previously stated the intention of the law is to help law enforcement officials cover the administrative costs associated with editing video. Police departments often have to redact the voices or faces of uncharged suspects or victims whose identities are protected under the law. Five-story apartment building nears construction in Franklinton However, the new statute has drawn criticism and concerns about police transparency. Families with loved ones who were killed by police held a news conference shortly after the bill was signed into law. Shawna Barnett, the sister of Andre Hill, who was fatally shot by a former Columbus police officer in 2020, said that the law damages public trust. Gilles also told NBC4 earlier this year that the legislation was not 'well thought through' and would make public records less accessible. DeWine said in a January news release that if the policy has 'unforeseen consequences,' he will work with the legislature to amend the language. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Yahoo
11-06-2025
- Yahoo
Withrow chosen for council seat
Jun. 11—SOUTH POINT — The filling of a vacant seat led off business at the meeting of the village council in South Point last week, but, due to issues of residency requirements with the person chosen, the seat will remain vacant until the August meeting of council. Marlene Arthur, who served on council for three decades, died April 29 at age 87. According to Ohio Revised Code, the council has 30 days to name someone to fill the seat or the duty falls to the mayor to appoint someone to the seat. As the May meeting of council took place only a few days after Arthur's death, the mayor and council agreed to deal with the matter at their June meeting, which took place on June 3. Three applicants expressed interest in the seat: Eric Rawlins, Charlie Withrow and Sandy Daniel. However, prior to the meeting, Rawlins withdrew his name from consideration. In the days preceding the meeting, Mayor Jeff Gaskin said discussions with council had resulted in a 2-2 tie between Withrow and Daniel and no consensus had been achieved. He said he was prepared to appoint Daniel to the position. However, at the start of the meeting, it was announced by members that council member Chuck Austin would be voting, along with Mary Cogan and Brad Adkins, for Withrow. Cogan said council members had been contacted by Lawrence County Commissioner Colton Copley, who is Arthur's grandson, and he had expressed strong opposition to Daniel filling Arthur's seat. Gaskin then called for a vote on the matter, stating he would appoint the council's choice. Cogan, Arthur and Austin voted for Withrow, while members David Classing and Rocky McCoy voted for Daniel. Each member simply stated the name of their choice, except Adkins, who, in voting for Withrow, added the remark, "He has business experience. He's not anti-business." This prompted a response from one of Daniel's supporters, who said, "She is not anti-business." "That's not what the yard sign said," Adkins responded, before Gaskin cut him off and called for order, as Daniel and her sister left the meeting. Following this, Gaskin went to his office to get a Bible and proceeded to administer the oath of office to Withrow. However, following the meeting, complications with the seat arose, as it was discovered that Withrow does no meet the residency requirements for the seat. "He will on Aug. 1," Gaskin told The Tribune on Monday, stating that a one-year residency is required. Gaskin said the code says the mayor "shall appoint" in the case of a vacancy, according to ORC. "But it doesn't say when." Gaskin said he intends to wait until the council's meeting in August, which will fall on the fifth of that month, to officially appoint Withrow. The seat will remain vacant for the council's July meeting. "It was the council's choice," he said. Gaskin pointed out that Arthur's seat was on the ballot this November, and her term expires at the end of the year. "So it's only six months left," he said. He said candidates, including Withrow, should he choose to run, have until Aug. 6 to file petitions for the board of election for the November election. In other business at the June 3 meeting, the council: —Heard from several residents, led by Michael Chapman, who sought for the village to vacate an alley behind their homes on Mulberry Street. Chapman stated the alley is grassy and graveled and that he and other residents maintain it. "The property is not being used," he said. "And it hasn't in years." Gaskin asked Chapman what he planned for the property and he said he hoped to extend his garage into his portion. He said the residents would split the alley between them. He said they were able to get signatures from five of the six property owners in favor of the village vacating the alley. The group was advised they would need to come back and present a request with six signatures for the council to consider a vacation. —Heard from Jeremy Clay, of Lawrence County Economic Development Corporation, who gave an update on projects at The Point industrial park. Clay's visit, previously scheduled, came days after it was announced that health food company Azure plans to open a facility in South Point, bringing 150 jobs with it. The facility is expected to open in July 2026. "And they are bringing no one with them," Clay said of the jobs at the new location. "They will be hiring top to bottom. This is a big win for the community." —Heard from Linda Main, of People for the Point, who reminded the room that the nonprofit's Party in the Park will take place July 5 at the village park, with fireworks set for 10 p.m. —Voted to repeal an ordinance, passed earlier this year, in which public employees would pay 10 percent of their benefits. This reverted to the previous setup, in which the village paid 100 percent of benefits. —Heard from Gaskin, who said the village is receiving $200,000 from the Ohio General Assembly in its capital projects legislation, to build an outdoor amphitheater. Gaskin said the structure, which be approximately 50 feet long, would be used for concerts and showing movies. —Authorized Gaskin to request a grant from the Ohio Department of Natural Resources for improvements on the village's riverfront. The village received $1.2 million last year from the General Assembly in funds Gov. Mike DeWine set aside for the state's Appalachian counties. The funds Gaskin is seeking would be used for that project. —Heard from fire chief Mark Goodall, who said the village's new fire truck, a 2025 model, was brought to Lawrence County and made an appearance in the Ironton-Lawrence County Memorial Day Parade, before being returned to the manufacturer for additional work and completion. You Might Like News Area students named to OU's Spring 2025 President's List News DeWine, mental health leaders unveil 988 license plate News Concert series returns Tuesday night News DeWine announces Ohio Missing Persons Working Group recommendations

Yahoo
11-06-2025
- Yahoo
DeWine announces Ohio Missing Persons Working Group recommendations
Jun. 11—COLUMBUS — Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine and Ohio Department of Public Safety Director Andy Wilson recently announced more than a dozen recommendations from the Ohio Missing Persons Working Group to improve the efficiency of missing persons investigations in Ohio. DeWine created the working group in January to examine the complexities of missing persons cases, the roadblocks encountered by law enforcement, and the struggles faced by families with missing loved ones. "Thousands of children and adults are reported missing each year, and although most are located quickly, some simply vanish, leaving anguished families behind and adding to law enforcement's growing caseload," said DeWine. "The goal of this working group was to identify what more we could do as a state to help law enforcement bring more missing people home and support family members during a time of great despair." Members of the working group, including law enforcement, advocates, family members, and educators, recommended 18 areas of improvement around the issues of information sharing between law enforcement agencies, communication between family members and investigators, continued professional training, public education, and advocacy. Working group members suggested several changes to Ohio law, including the strengthening of penalties for those who interfere with custody, the addition of Endangered Missing Child Alerts to the Ohio Revised Code, and the ability for law enforcement to more easily access information such as phone and social media records in circumstances where a missing person is believed to be at risk. Other recommendations aim to ease the burden on family members by breaking down communication barriers with law enforcement, providing easier access to resources, and engaging advocates to support families of children who repeatedly disappear. "The testimony from family members of missing persons was particularly impactful, and the working group acknowledges the grief, loss, and trauma they've experienced," said Ohio Department of Public Safety Director Andy Wilson, who chaired the working group. "The pain and frustration expressed to the working group were real and readily apparent. The efforts of this working group aim to bring some level of relief, justice, or closure to those across the state who have experienced the loss associated with a missing family member. " DeWine has ordered several cabinet agencies to carry out multiple recommendations, including: —The Ohio State Highway Patrol within the Ohio Department of Public Safety will automate the process of notifying specific law enforcement agencies of Endangered Missing Child Alerts. —The Ohio Collaborative Community-Police Advisory Board within the Department of Public Safety's Office of Criminal Justice Services will create a law enforcement best practices guide on interacting with family members of missing persons. —The Office of Criminal Justice Services will expand the Ohio Prisoner Extradition Reimbursement Program to include interference with custody cases. —The Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services and the Ohio Department of Health will develop continued professional training to further educate the healthcare industry on law enforcement exemptions to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. —The Ohio Department of Children and Youth, Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, Ohio Department of Job and Family Services, and others will work with local law enforcement to develop a pilot program that utilizes advocates to support at-risk youth who regularly leave their homes or group home settings. DeWine also announced that, in response to a recommendation from the working group, he is contacting the U.S. Attorney General's Office to alert them to deficiencies in data sharing between local, state, and federal databases. Further recommendations were made to the Ohio Attorney General's Bureau of Criminal Investigation (BCI). BCI's Missing Persons Unit is the state authority on missing persons investigations and can assist local law enforcement agencies on request. Suggestions for BCI include the creation of a central repository of resources for families and investigators, the launch of an annual missing persons conference, and the establishment of a confidential forum for law enforcement to discuss investigative techniques and perform case reviews. You Might Like News Area students named to OU's Spring 2025 President's List News DeWine, mental health leaders unveil 988 license plate News Concert series returns Tuesday night News Proctorville woman killed in WV crash