It's hurricane season. Florida's property insurance isn't ready.
Prior to the start of this legislative session, Florida lawmakers were widely expected to make progress toward improving resilience of properties, including increased funding for the My Safe Florida Home grant, while also letting the recent legal reforms credited with stabilizing the state's insurance market continue to work before making additional reforms.
However, what played out in session was shocking to say the least.
While the Florida Legislature passed legislation that expanded the My Safe Florida Condominium Pilot Program to help condo owners harden their properties from storms, the Florida House also pursued a reversal of the aforementioned reforms. The House filed legislation to reverse the hard-fought legal reforms and return back to the status quo of a few years ago when Florida had some of the largest property insurance rate increases in the country.
This was the wrong call and many lawmakers and the governor balked at this attempt to go back on these reform efforts only a few years into them.
Thankfully, the Florida Senate agreed that reversing reforms now would do nothing to improve insurance rates for policyholders and putting a stop to the bill in its chamber to give more time to allow for the reforms to take hold. The bill ultimately was withdrawn from consideration.
Opinion: Gov. Ron DeSantis, where's the real homeowners insurance fix for Florida?
However, this does not mean that all is perfect in Florida's property insurance market. Floridians still pay among the highest property insurance bills in the country and while the percentage rate of increases have gone down, people are still seeing increases in their bills each year.
'Grotesque': Husband-wife insurance execs earn more than $50 million in 2 years
Florida has long flirted with the seductive idea that we can legislate away the price of hurricane exposure by artificially lowering rates. From rate freezes to mandatory rollbacks, we've repeatedly treated high premiums as a political failure rather than a financial signal.
But risk doesn't disappear because we vote it down. It simply moves underground, only to reemerge when disaster strikes.
For example, when Citizens Property Insurance Corp. underprices risk, or when state regulators restrict private insurers from charging actuarially sound rates, we may enjoy temporary relief. But the market doesn't forget.
Insurers leave. Capital dries up. And when the losses come, as they always do, the money has to come from somewhere. It's a classic bait-and-switch: legislate artificially low premiums, then shift the true cost onto the public after the next storm passes and headlines fade.
This 'hurricane tax' is a hidden levy we all pay for the comfort of denial. Actually addressing the property insurance affordability crisis requires reduction of risk among new and existing properties and not hiding costs.
Opinion: Florida must strengthen its electrical grid before it's too late
The National Institute of Building Sciences estimates that every $1 spent on mitigation saves $6 to $7 in future disaster recovery costs. Programs like the previously mentioned My Safe Florida Home grant have already demonstrated their value and continue to see funding increases, providing grants and inspections that help homeowners strengthen their properties.
The results for those taking advantage of the program: fewer claims, less damage and quicker recoveries.
Florida policymakers have made good-faith efforts into stabilizing the market but there is more we can do to improve the market. Now, we need to allow insurance pricing to reflect exposure to risk and to continue offering mitigation grants to strengthen homes.
Mitigation may not offer the same short-term political wins as artificially cutting rates but it does offer a long-term solution that will benefit all Floridians.
Doug Izzo is the executive director of the Englewood Chamber of Commerce. This opinion piece was distributed by The Invading Sea, which publishes news and commentary on climate change and other environmental issues affecting Florida.
This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: Florida hurricane season is here. Insurance isn't ready | Opinion
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Massie on Iran strikes: ‘No imminent threat' to US authorizing that
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) on Sunday slammed the United States's recent strikes against Iran, saying there was 'no imminent threat' to the U.S. to authorize them. In an interview on CBS's 'Face the Nation,' host Margaret Brennan stated that House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said that ''the Article One power of Congress really allows for the president to do this. It was a limited, necessary, targeted strike,'' of the Iran attacks. 'Well, he's probably referring to the War Powers Act of 1973, but that's been misinterpreted. There were no imminent threats to the United States, which was what would authorize that. And I think that's peculiar to hear that from the speaker of the House,' Massie responded. On Saturday, Trump announced that the U.S. had bombed three Iranian nuclear sites, stepping into an ongoing conflict between Iran and Israel that kicked off the prior week. Massie quickly posted on the social platform X that Trump's bombing of Iranian nuclear sites was unconstitutional. Massie did his interview alongside Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who is a co-sponsor of a war powers resolution with the Kentucky Republican to prohibit U.S. involvement in Iran. 'The tragedy in this country is that we keep entering these overseas wars. We triumphantly declare the mission is accomplished the day after. And then we're left with Americans burdening the consequences for decades,' Khanna said in the 'Face the Nation' interview.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
New Texas law will require Ten Commandments to be posted in every public school classroom
Texas will require all public school classrooms to display the Ten Commandments under a new law that will make the state the nation's largest to attempt to impose such a mandate. Gov. Greg Abbott announced Saturday that he signed the bill, which is expected to draw a legal challenge from critics who consider it an unconstitutional violation of the separation of church and state. A similar law in Louisiana was blocked when a federal appeals court ruled Friday that it was unconstitutional. Arkansas also has a similar law that has been challenged in federal court. Advertisement 4 Gov. Greg Abbott announced Saturday that he signed the bill, which is expected to draw a legal challenge from critics. James Breeden for the NY Post The Texas measure easily passed in the Republican-controlled state House and Senate in the legislative session that ended June 2. 'The focus of this bill is to look at what is historically important to our nation educationally and judicially,' Republican state representative Candy Noble, a co-sponsor of the bill, said when it passed the House. Advertisement Abbott also signed a bill that allows school districts to provide students and staff a daily voluntary period of prayer or time to read a religious text during school hours. 4 The Texas measure easily passed in the Republican-controlled state House and Senate in the legislative session that ended June 2. AP The Ten Commandments laws are among efforts, mainly in conservative-led states, to insert religion into public schools. Texas' law requires public schools to post in classrooms a 16-by-20-inch (41-by-51-centimeter) poster or framed copy of a specific English version of the commandments, even though translations and interpretations vary across denominations, faiths and languages and may differ in homes and houses of worship. Advertisement 4 The Ten Commandments laws are among efforts, mainly in conservative-led states, to insert religion into public schools. Jay Janner/American-Statesman / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images Supporters say the Ten Commandments are part of the foundation of the United States' judicial and educational systems and should be displayed. Opponents, including some Christian and other faith leaders, say the Ten Commandments and prayer measures infringe on others' religious freedom. A letter signed this year by dozens of Christian and Jewish faith leaders opposing the bill noted that Texas has thousands of students of other faiths who might have no connection to the Ten Commandments. Texas has nearly 6 million students in about 9,100 public schools. Advertisement 4 Opponents, including some Christians, say the Ten Commandments and prayer measures infringe on others' religious freedom. AP In 2005, Abbott, who was state attorney general at the time, successfully argued before the Supreme Court that Texas could keep a Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of its Capitol. Louisiana's law has twice been ruled unconstitutional by federal courts, first by U.S. District Judge John deGravelles and then again by a three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which also considers cases from Texas. State Attorney General Liz Murrell said she would appeal and pledged to take it to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary.
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Senate parliamentarian rejects GOP's attempt to limit courts' contempt powers
The Senate parliamentarian has ruled against a controversial provision in the Senate Republicans' megabill that would have made it significantly more difficult for courts to enforce contempt findings against the Trump administration. The parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, ruled that limiting courts' ability to hold Trump officials in contempt violated the Senate's rules governing what can be passed with a simple-majority vote on the budget reconciliation fast track. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) hailed the parliamentarian's decision as a major victory. 'Senate Republicans tried to write Donald Trump's contempt for the courts into law — gutting judicial enforcement, defying the Constitution and bulldozing the very rule of law that forms our democracy,' Schumer said in a statement responding to the development. 'But Senate Democrats stopped them cold. We successfully fought for rule of law and struck out this reckless and downright un-American provision,' he said. The provision, tucked into the thousand-page bill House Republicans passed in May, would have required anyone suing the federal government to pay a bond before a court would be allowed to use its contempt power to enforce injunctions and other rulings. Courts have already ruled more than 190 times against the Trump administration since January. The controversial language received little notice when it came to the floor, and Rep. Mike Flood (R-Neb.) later caused an uproar at a town hall meeting when he admitted he didn't know the provision was in the legislation when he voted for it. 'If enacted, this would have been one of the most brazen power grabs we've seen in American history — an attempt to let a future President Trump ignore court orders with impunity, putting him above the law,' Schumer said Sunday afternoon. 'Donald Trump is not above the law. And thanks to Senate Democrats – including the tireless work of Senator Durbin and the Judiciary Democrats – the courts can still hold him and any president accountable,' Schumer said.
