
Pak Politician Backs Pahalgam Mastermind, Shares Stage With LeT Chief's Son
Islamabad:
In what could be seen as yet another evidence of Islamabad fostering terrorism on its land, a prominent Pakistani politician was seen sharing the stage with the leadership of UN-proscribed terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). The incident happened in Pakistan's Punjab province, where the state's assembly speaker, Malik Muhammad Ahmed Khan, was spotted attending a rally with LeT deputy chief Saifullah Ahmad and Talha Saeed, son of LeT chief and 26/11 Mumbai attacks mastermind Hafiz Saeed.
Saifullah Khalid, also known as "Kasuri," is one of the masterminds of the recent terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam and a US-designated terrorist. Meanwhile, Talha Saeed is the de facto head of the terrorist group Lashkar-e-Taiba.
When asked about his presence at the rally, the Speaker of the Punjab Assembly told reporters that LeT deputy chief Kasuri "should not be seen as an accused in the Pahalgam terror attack case without an investigation."
📍 #Exclusive 🇵🇰👹
Pakistan Punjab Assembly Speaker Malik Ahmed Khan defends Pahalgam mastermind Saifullah Kasuri and accuses India of being responsible for the Pahalgam terrorist attack
Note : On May -28, Pak politician Malik Ahmed Khan shared the stage with Talha Saeed,… pic.twitter.com/A87K6S1rlD
— OsintTV 📺 (@OsintTV) June 1, 2025
"It was a political rally, and politicians from all walks of life were present there. Because I have a personal connection with the place (Kasur--the town where the May 28 rally took place), organisers also called me and I went," he said.
Khan, a high-profile political figure in Pakistan, came under scrutiny after several video clips from the rally held on Wednesday (May 28) emerged on social media. In one of the footage, Talha Saeed was seen welcoming Malik Ahmad Khan on stage with other politicians.
Another clip showed Kasuri calling India an enemy state ("dushman") and claimed he was "wrongfully" accused as the mastermind of the Pahalgam terror attack. He boasted of becoming more famous after India's charges.
The event triggered security concerns among diplomatic circles, especially in India, where authorities are closely watching the development. LeT is a banned terror organisation, but the group and its affiliates continue to operate openly in Pakistan, often holding public gatherings under the guise of charity or nationalist causes. The presence of high-profile politicians at such gatherings continues to raise questions about Pakistan's commitment to fighting terrorism.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
How a tiny South Caucasus country is becoming India's strategic answer to Turkey-Pakistan ties
India has evacuated 110 students studying at Iran's Urmia Medical University through Armenia , as regional tensions in West Asia rise. The operation highlights New Delhi's growing logistical presence in the South Caucasus and its evolving partnership with Armenia, a country increasingly aligned with India on regional security concerns. The development comes amid geopolitical shifts in the region. India's closer ties with Armenia are shaped by mutual interests in countering the influence of Turkey and Pakistan, both of which have backed Azerbaijan in recent regional conflicts. India, Armenia and the Pakistan-Turkey equation Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan had, in 2020, accused Pakistani special forces of aiding Azerbaijani troops. Indian officials have also stated that Pakistan used Turkish drones to target India during Operation Sindoor. Turkey's opposition to India stems from its continued support for Pakistan's position on Kashmir. President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has regularly raised Kashmir at international forums, including the United Nations. Ankara's increasing defence and diplomatic cooperation with Islamabad has added to the friction. Live Events India has viewed these developments as interference in its internal affairs. In response, India has chosen to deepen engagement with Armenia, not merely as a reaction to the trilateral bloc of Azerbaijan, Turkey, and Pakistan, but as part of a broader regional strategy. India-Armenia cooperation based on long-term interests Indian officials and analysts say that the ties with Armenia are driven by strategic, defence, and diplomatic considerations. While Azerbaijan and Turkey have echoed Pakistan's views on Kashmir, India's ties with Yerevan extend beyond short-term alignment. India and Armenia have maintained stable diplomatic relations since 1991. Armenia has emerged as a growing customer of Indian defence systems, with ties being bolstered by shared historical links and positive diplomatic engagement. India emerges as top defence supplier to Armenia India has recently overtaken Russia as Armenia's largest defence supplier. This follows a shift caused by Russia's military engagement in Ukraine, which disrupted its arms export capacity. Armenia's dependence on Indian systems marks a key shift in the military balance in the region. Major defence supplies from India to Armenia India's defence exports to Armenia now include a wide range of advanced systems: Pinaka Multi-Barrel Rocket Launcher Systems : Four batteries delivered for long-range rapid fire operations. ATAGS Howitzers : 90 units of the long-range, precision artillery systems supplied. Swathi Weapon Locating Radars (4 units): For detecting and tracking incoming enemy fire. Akash Surface-to-Air Missile Systems (4 units): Medium-range air defence system used during Operation Sindoor. Ashwin Advanced Air Defence Interceptors (15 units): Acquired in 2023 for aerial threat interception. TC-20 (MaRG 155mm) Self-Propelled Howitzers (72 units): Delivered by Kalyani Strategic Systems. Spartan-S thermal sights: From Tonbo Imaging , these aid night-time military operations. Anti-drone systems developed by India's Zen Technologies have also reportedly been delivered, though the company has not confirmed the deal. India fills vacuum left by Russia India's entry as Armenia's principal arms supplier coincides with Russia's reduced ability to meet defence demands due to its focus on the war in Ukraine. This change has allowed India to step in and expand its footprint in the strategically located Caucasus region. Experts view this shift as significant for India's ambitions to grow as a defence exporter while also asserting influence in regions bridging Europe and Asia. A partnership with long-term impact India's growing defence partnership with Armenia suggests a strategic realignment in the region. For India, it is an opportunity to emerge as a dependable defence supplier. For Armenia, it diversifies its defence sources and strengthens its military readiness. The full details of recent defence deals have not been publicly disclosed. However, the regular exchanges and volume of recent arms transfers indicate a growing strategic partnership with wider implications for regional geopolitics.


News18
an hour ago
- News18
Iran's Nuclear Programme, Regime Change, Or Both? Decoding What Israel Is Really After
Last Updated: The Israel-Iran-US developments over seven days, which have left the world wary and confused, have given rise to one question – What is Israel's endgame? On June 13, Israel launched its Operation Rising Lion, claiming it wanted to destroy Iran's nuclear programme. Amid Israel's attempts to get the US involved came US President Donald Trump's barrage of boastings — how Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is a small target, how he stopped Israel from killing Khamenei and how Iran did not take the deal offered to it and 'big things" were happening. Meanwhile, Israel PM Benjamin Netanyahu on June 17 insisted that a regime change could be a byproduct of the conflict. In all this, Iran remains defiant. By June 20, Trump said he would decide if he should participate in the strikes in two weeks; while Russian President Vladimir Putin's spokesperson Dmitri Peskov said the talk of a regime change in Iran is 'unimaginable" and even the 'talk should be unacceptable". Israel officially started with the goal to dismantle key components of Iran's nuclear and ballistic-missile capabilities. On June 13, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in a televised address, called it a 'decisive moment in Israel's history" and vowed the strikes would continue 'as long as needed" to dismantle Iran's nuclear threat. He emphasised the war is against Iran's regime, not its people, and thanked Trump for support. Billions & Counting: How Much Are Gaza, Iran Wars Costing Israel? Explained However, Defense Minister Israel Katz later publicly said that Iran's Supreme Leader 'cannot continue to exist", which went beyond nuclear deterrence. Soon, Netanyahu went a step further to suggest that a regime change in Iran could be an unintended 'byproduct" of military action. He also said that Israel can strike Iran's fortified Fordow nuclear site without U.S. assistance. On June 19, Netanyahu warned that Israel was 'close to the final result", asserting 'nobody in Iran has immunity" and commending U.S. support while criticizing the Biden administration's hesitation. Analysts say Israel's political and military messaging signal a possible strategic escalation, from sabotage to systemic regime weakening. Moreover, if the US, which has sought a two-week diplomatic window, opts in, Israel's limited air campaign could expand dramatically. IRAN'S POSTURE OF DEFIANCE Despite the pressure, Khamenei has emphatically refused to back down or negotiate surrender. Following Israeli airstrikes, Khamenei condemned them as criminal, warning the 'Zionist regime" faces a 'bitter and painful fate". In a televised address on June 18, Khamenei rejected Trump's call for 'unconditional surrender," declaring Iran will not yield and warned U.S. action would have 'irreparable consequences". President Masoud Pezeshkian publicly urged restraint saying Iran doesn't seek war but will respond 'appropriately." Privately, he cautioned that going to war could collapse the economy and destabilise the country. Although backchannel talks have reportedly occurred between U.S. and Iranian officials, no concessions have been made. Iran's foreign minister has now reiterated that the US asked them to negotiate, but they refused. WHAT ARE ISRAEL's OPTIONS? Weaken the regime enough for internal fracturing or power realignment within the IRGC. Khamenei's potential elimination, which could shock political structures – but Iran has institutional succession plans in place, making the collapse unlikely to be immediate. Moments ago, Israel launched Operation 'Rising Lion", a targeted military operation to roll back the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival. This operation will continue for as many days as it takes to remove this threat. —— Statement by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu: — Benjamin Netanyahu – בנימין נתניהו (@netanyahu) June 13, 2025 CAN NETANYAHU CAUSE AN UPRISING IN IRAN? Netanyahu did make an appeal to the Iranian people to provoke public backlash, but experts feel it could backfire, instead unifying Iranians against foreign aggression. BREAKING: Iran's foreign minister says that the country's ballistic missile program is not negotiable— The Spectator Index (@spectatorindex) June 20, 2025 ISRAEL'S OCTOPUS LOGIC Former Defense Minister Naftali Bennett introduced the idea: Israel had been fighting only the tentacles, but now aims to suffocate the head— Iran —by weakening its central power and disrupting its regional network. Netanyahu echoed this metaphor, stating: 'Iran is the head of the octopus, and you see its tentacles all around—from the Houthis to Hezbollah to Hamas." What the tentacles represent, according to Israel: Hezbollah in Lebanon Hamas in Gaza Houthis in Yemen Shiite militias in Iraq and Syria These groups are viewed as extensions of Iranian influence—armed, financed, and strategically coordinated from Tehran. Israel has engaged in direct operations targeting Iranian proxies (tentacles) and covert internal strikes inside Iran. The overarching goal: Force Tehran to refocus inward, drain its resources and weaken its ability to project power regionally. CAN ISRAEL OUST THE REGIME? In several media reports, military and intelligence circles in Israel have privately acknowledged that removing Iran's regime would be 'very hard", entailing ground invasion or U.S. boots on the ground, which Israel lacks. Eliminating senior IRGC figures has shaken Iran's establishment, but it remains institutionally strong. The IRGC is enshrined as the cornerstone of the regime, and losing top leaders doesn't equate to regime collapse. Increasingly unpopular opinion: Israel does not want regime change. Those who think so should explain why Israel didn't even *try* to go after the supreme leader. They want a hardliner state who tries to retaliate and make Israel the victim, but fails to inflict much damage.— Maryam Alemzadeh (@MaryamAlemzadeh) June 14, 2025 WHAT IF KHAMENEI IS ELIMINATED? Reuters had reported that Israel had a plan to kill Khamenei, which vetoed by the White House, but power in Iran is institutionalized and not concentrated in one man. His death would be a blow, but succession mechanisms are in place. Iran has been preparing for life post-Khamenei amid ongoing talks. A POST-CONFLICT IRAN: EXPERTS' VERSION In various media reports, experts have suggested what a post-conflict Iran may look like: A democratic transition may be unlikely with the possibility of sectarian civil war, IRGC coup, or inertia. It may not be a pluralistic democracy. A power vacuum may emerge, but it's more likely that the IRGC or other ruling elites would fill it—not civilian or democratic groups. Playing out 4 cautionary paths for advocates of regime change in Iran: 1. Iran breaks out North Korea style out and becomes globally sanctioned, nuclear-armed pariah-militarily untouchable but economically and diplomatically ostracized leaving an entrenched hardline regime 1/— Sanam Vakil صنم وكىل (@SanamVakil) June 14, 2025 STRATEGIC LOGIC Netanyahu has viewed Iran as Israel's primary threat for two decades, but historically preferred containment over direct confrontation—thanks in part to previous U.S. administrations. Since October 7, internal calculation has shifted: Israel's ultimate practical goal is to weaken the regime and hope for domino effects, not full regime overthrow. How Long Does It Take For Iran's Ballistic Missiles To Reach Israel? The Weapon Explained Analysts say while Israel is publicly calling for regime destabilisation now, it might not be the preferred endgame. Some like Maryam Alemzadeh argue that Israel actually wants a hardliner government that tries to retaliate yet fails, preserving the 'straw-man enemy" essential to its security narrative . top videos View all Israel is clear on one thing — a weakened Iran would mean weakened proxies, less Hamas, less Hezbollah, fewer threats on Israel's borders. With inputs from agencies About the Author Manjiri Joshi At the news desk for 17 years, the story of her life has revolved around finding pun, facts while reporting, on radio, heading a daily newspaper desk, teaching mass media students to now editing special copies ...Read More Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : israel iran Israel Iran tension news18 specials Location : Mumbai, India, India First Published: June 20, 2025, 14:47 IST News explainers Iran's Nuclear Programme, Regime Change, Or Both? Decoding What Israel Is Really After


Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Munir's two-card trick: How Pakistan's crypto pitch and Nobel flattery won Trump's favour
General Asim Munir strategically engaged with Donald Trump, securing a White House lunch and praise for Pakistan's restraint with India. Munir's charm offensive included a crypto initiative involving Trump's sons, aiming to position Pakistan as a crypto hub. This move subtly sidelined Pakistan's civilian leadership and publicly snubbed India's rejection of US mediation. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads In a deft diplomatic manoeuvre that cost Pakistan little but delivered big returns, Army Chief General Asim Munir has successfully reinserted Islamabad into Washington's strategic radar, by flattering US President Donald Trump and feeding his long-standing craving for the Nobel Peace result: a private lunch at the White House between Munir and Trump, public praise for Pakistan's restraint following a recent military flare-up with India, and a notable snub to both Pakistan's civilian leadership and New Delhi.'The reason I had him here was I wanted to thank him for not going into the war (with India) and ending it,' Trump said after hosting Munir. 'I was honored to meet him today.' Trump also gave credit to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, saying, 'Two very smart people decided not to keep going with the war. Those are two big nuclear powers.'But with India having publicly rejected a US role in de-escalating tensions, it was Munir who ended up with the spotlight. The White House itself disclosed that the real reason for the lunch invitation was Munir's push for Trump to receive the Nobel Peace Prize for helping dial down tensions between India and flattery struck a chord with Trump, who has repeatedly complained that he has been unfairly denied the honour. 'They gave one to Obama immediately upon his ascent to the presidency, and he had no idea why he got it. You know what? I got us out of wars. I made deals that nobody thought were possible,' Trump has often Munir's charm offensive didn't stop with the Nobel. In April, he laid the groundwork with a crypto initiative that tapped into Trump-world business interests. A US-based cryptocurrency firm, World Liberty Financial (WLF), signed a Letter of Intent with the Pakistan Crypto Council (PCC), giving WLF the right to spearhead blockchain integration across Pakistani financial institutions. The partnership also aimed to explore asset tokenization, stablecoins, and DeFi pilot projects, part of a broader plan to position Pakistan as 'the crypto capital of South Asia.'What made the deal particularly intriguing in Washington circles was WLF's ownership: Trump's sons Eric and Donald Jr., along with son-in-law Jared Kushner, collectively hold a 60% stake in the company. The delegation to Islamabad was led by Zachary Witkoff, whose father Steve Witkoff, a long-time Trump associate, currently serves as the US Special Envoy to the Middle Munir personally welcomed the group and later held a closed-door meeting with Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, which helped seal the high-level access in Washington. The White House lunch, though private, was kept secret for weeks to avoid backlash from Pakistani expats loyal to former PM Imran Khan, who remains in custody under the military's watch.