Human Teeth Evolved From Body Armor of Extinct Species
A new study, published on May 21 in the journal Nature, has revealed surprising information about the origins of human teeth.
Our teeth evolved from the piercing 'body armor' of extinct fish, which existed about 465 million years ago. The study explained how sensory tissue found within the exoskeletons of the fish can be tied to the same "genetic toolkit" that comprises human teeth. "This shows us that 'teeth' can also be sensory even when they're not in the mouth," Yara Haridy, the study's co-author, said in a statement.The information came as a surprise to Haridy and her fellow researchers, who initially wanted to find the oldest vertebrate fossil ever recorded. Vertebrate fossils can typically be identified because they contain internal tubules which store dentine, the calcified tissue which is found under the enamel of human teeth. Dentine is also found inside the external bumps on the armor of ancient fishes.
While analyzing the 'first fish' species, Anatolepis heintzi, scientists found what appeared to be large pores filled with dentine. They compared the fossil to several ancient and modern animals, but upon further inspection, they found the pores to be more similar to the sensory organs which crabs have on their shells. That means Anatolepis heintzi is an invertebrate arthropod rather than a vertebrate fish.Scientists were astonished to discover that fish and ancient arthropods produce the same type of mineralized tissue. They believe that human teeth began evolving into their modern form around 460 million years ago after animals utilized the same "genetic toolkit" to make their teeth.
"Viewed through this evolutionary lens, the fact that teeth in the mouth are extremely sensitive is less of a mystery, and more a reflection of their evolutionary origins within the sensory armor of early vertebrates," the study noted.Human Teeth Evolved From Body Armor of Extinct Species first appeared on Men's Journal on May 23, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
3 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
Slash your biological age by up to 16 years by doing this one thing during your daily walk — new study says
There's a way to roll back the clock on your biological age — and, according to a new(ish) study, you can do it on your daily walk. No frills, no nonsense, just a small tweak for big results. We already know there are many benefits to walking, including a boost to your cardiovascular health, stronger muscles, bones and joints, ramped up calorie burn, a healthier metabolism and better mood and emotional wellbeing. If that's not enough, research straight out of Britain has shown that one particular aspect of your walks could supercharge your results, including reducing your biological age by up to 16 years. Yep, you read that correctly. And no, it's not 10,000 steps, a weighted vest, or walking backwards. This is the one thing you need to know the next time you lace up a pair of the best hiking boots and head out. Research, published in Nature in 2022, found that your speed could play a role in cutting your biological age. The study assessed over 400,000 Brits and biological age (how quickly you're aging based on chemical markers) and found that speed made a difference. Results showed that those with a steady to average and brisk walking pace 'had significantly longer LTL compared with slow walkers.' LTL, meaning leucocyte telomere length, is a marker of biological age. Using 'accelerometer-assessed measures of physical activity,' the researchers found associations between longer LTL and 'habitual activity intensity,' rather than total amount of activity. In other words, your pace may do more for your health than total steps. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. While it's true that the more you move during the day, the better for your metabolism and overall health, we now know that you don't need 10,000 steps every day to maximize it; as little as 7,000 steps per day could be enough! But if you plan to track your step count, making your walk more brisk could be more beneficial across the same distance than an amble. That said, I love a slow walk, and recently took up intuitive walking to boost mindfulness, so I'm a firm believer in a time and place for everything. Given that brisk walking, like power walking, can have a positive impact on weight management and cardiovascular fitness, it checks out that this could also improve your biological age, too. So what about speed? The study used self-reported walking pace, providing participants with a touchscreen Q&A and response options of 'slow,' 'steady/average,' or 'brisk.'Slow pace was defined as less than 3mph, steady pace was between 3 -4mph and brisk walking was over 4mph. There you have it. A faster walking pace is associated with longer LTL, potentially cutting up to 16 years off your biological age. The study showed that brisk walkers had a biological age of up to 16 years younger, and that brisk walking could lead to a younger biological age rather than the other way around. The study also suggests that time spent habitually in higher-intensity activities like brisk walking had a stronger association with biological age than the total amount of walking or distance. All in all, this supports the idea that more intensive and habitual movement, like increased walking pace, can impact biological markers and overall health. And better still, if you increase your pace, even a short walk could boost longevity.
Los Angeles Times
a day ago
- Los Angeles Times
Early humans adapted to extreme habitats. Researchers say it set the stage for global migration
WASHINGTON — Humans are the only animal that lives in virtually every possible environment, from rainforests to deserts to tundra. This adaptability is a skill that long predates the modern age. According to a new study published this week in Nature, ancient Homo sapiens developed the flexibility to survive by finding food and other resources in a wide variety of difficult habitats before they dispersed from Africa about 50,000 years ago. 'Our superpower is that we are ecosystem generalists,' said Eleanor Scerri, an evolutionary archaeologist at the Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology in Jena, Germany. Our species first evolved in Africa around 300,000 years ago. Though prior fossil finds show some groups made early forays outside the continent, lasting human settlements in other parts of the world didn't happen until a series of migrations around 50,000 years ago. 'What was different about the circumstance of the migrations that succeeded — why were humans ready this time?' said study co-author Emily Hallett, an archaeologist at Loyola University Chicago. Earlier theories held that Stone Age humans might have made a single important technological advance or developed a new way of sharing information, but researchers haven't found evidence to back that up. This study, whose findings were published Wednesday, took a different approach by looking at the trait of flexibility itself. The scientists assembled a database of archaeological sites showing human presence across Africa from 120,000 to 14,000 years ago. For each site, researchers modeled what the local climate would have been like during the time periods that ancient humans lived there. 'There was a really sharp change in the range of habitats that humans were using starting around 70,000 years ago,' Hallet said. 'We saw a really clear signal that humans were living in more challenging and more extreme environments.' Though humans had long survived in savannas and forests, they shifted into diverse environments including dense rainforests and arid deserts in the period leading up to 50,000 years ago, developing what Hallet called an 'ecological flexibility that let them succeed.' Although this leap in abilities is impressive, it's important not to assume that only Homo sapiens did it, said University of Bordeaux archaeologist William Banks, who was not involved in the research. Other groups of early human ancestors also left Africa and established long-term settlements elsewhere, including those that evolved into Europe's Neanderthals, he said. The new research helps explain why humans were ready to expand across the world way back when, he said, but it doesn't answer the lasting question of why only our species remains today. Larson writes for the Associated Press.
The Hill
a day ago
- The Hill
Trump THREATENS US Food Security By Slashing Science Funding, Experts Warn
The Trump administration's cuts to climate research and weather forecasting are 'blinding' the U.S. to oncoming threats to its food supply — and kneecapping efforts to protect it. Heat waves and drought driven by fossil fuel burning could pose an existential threat to key parts of the American food supply, according to a recent study published in the journal Nature. Forecasting and adaptation could cut those crop failures almost in half, the study found. But those measures are under attack from President Trump's mass staff reductions at agencies tracking weather and climate. READ MORE:
