SC sheriff, former county supervisor face public corruption-related charges
Outside the Richland County Courthouse on Friday, March 14, 2025. (Photo by Jessica Holdman/SC Daily Gazette)
COLUMBIA — A South Carolina sheriff and a former county supervisor stand accused of laundering $27,000 in federal COVID relief funds to illegally inflate the sheriff's paycheck.
A grand jury indicted newly suspended Williamsburg County Sheriff Stephen Gardner and the county's former supervisor, Tiffany Cooks, on five counts each, which included charges of money laundering, embezzlement, misconduct, ethics violations and conspiracy. Each crime carries maximum sentences of five to 10 years in prison, according to prosecutors.
Judge Heath Taylor released both Gardner and Cooks following a hearing held Friday in Columbia on the promise they would make all court appearances. If either were to miss a hearing they would be jailed and held on a bond of $100,000.
Neither Gardner nor Cooks made any kind of statement in court.
Gov. Henry McMaster suspended Gardner, a Kingstree native with 25 years of law enforcement experience, after the indictment Wednesday. The governor appointed Clemson Wright Jr., a special agent with the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, as the county's acting sheriff.
Cooks, elected in 2018, served one term in office as supervisor but was defeated in the 2022 Democratic primary election by former county Sheriff Kelvin Washington. She is currently working as administrator for the town of Estill, 130 miles away in Hampton County.
In court, state prosecutor Creighton Waters alleged Gardner and Cooks schemed to re-route tens of thousands of dollars in coronavirus relief funds to pay the sheriff overtime wages, despite the fact the sheriff was a salaried county employee already earning six figures and therefore not eligible for overtime pay.
Waters claimed they did this by overpaying a friend of the sheriff contracted to do landscaping work for the county. Cooks would cut checks to the landscaper, who would then cash them and give the money over to the sheriff.
The two would meet off site in a parking lot and the landscaper would 'hand over a big old pile of cash,' said Waters, assistant deputy attorney general.
The sheriff then paid the landscaper his hourly wages out of the cash and pocketed the rest himself.
Both Gardner and Cooks allegedly approached the landscaper telling him that all of this was above board, and he would not get in any legal trouble.
'Ultimately, your honor, this was a farce,' Waters told the judge.
The State Law Enforcement Division opened an investigation into the Williamsburg County officials in February 2023, after Cooks' successor discovered a combined $210,000 in overtime pay to salaried elected officials in the county, The Post and Courier and The Kingstree News previously reported.
In addition to the sheriff, Cooks allegedly funneled money to herself, the treasurer, the clerk of court, the auditor and a probate judge. Those other alleged payments were not part of the indictment from the attorney general's office.
Federal prosecutors traditionally have taken the lead on these types of cases involving misappropriation of the federal funds doled out to businesses, non-profits and individuals, as well as state and local governments strapped for cash in the midst of a global pandemic.
Waters told the SC Daily Gazette federal prosecutors ultimately did not pursue federal charges and handed the case over to the state attorney general about three months ago. He declined to say why.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
39 minutes ago
- Politico
US attack on Iran creates dividing line in final days of New York mayoral race
NEW YORK — New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani condemned the United States' bombing campaign in Iran Saturday, while rival Andrew Cuomo raised red flags about the Middle-Eastern country. The split-screen reactions were the latest indication of the diametrically opposed worldviews of the top contenders heading into Tuesday's Democratic primary, in a race that's featured Israeli politics. 'These actions are the result of a political establishment that would rather spend trillions of dollars on weapons than lift millions out of poverty, launch endless wars while silencing calls for peace, and fearmonger about outsiders while billionaires hollow out our democracy from within,' Mamdani — a staunch critic of Israel — posted on X Saturday, shortly after President Donald Trump gave a national address explaining his decision to join in Israel's attack on Iran. After initially declining to answer a question about Iran outside a Brooklyn church Sunday morning, Cuomo later addressed the subject with reporters in Midtown. 'Iran cannot have nuclear capability. That's number one,' he said. 'It's dangerous, not only for the region, it's dangerous internationally. It's dangerous for the United States.' Despite the animus, they two agreed Trump abused his authority by not seeking the authorization of Congress before approving the bombing of three Iranian nuclear sites. 'Donald Trump ran for President promising to end wars, not start new ones,' Mamdani said in his statement. 'Today's unconstitutional military action represents a new, dark chapter in his endless series of betrayals that now threaten to plunge the world deeper into chaos.' Cuomo told reporters Sunday he supported taking out Iran's nuclear facilities, but not Trump's decision to do so unilaterally. 'I don't support the way he did it. I do believe he should have consulted Congress,' Cuomo said. 'I believe this is more of the same: This is Trump saying I don't have to follow the rules.' The former governor also said New Yorkers should get ready for a retaliation from Iran and said he would be on high alert for an attack at an airport, for example. 'Who do you want in charge in that situation?' he asked, suggesting he would be the best candidate to respond. 'Who's handled situations like hurricane Sandy and COVID and terrorist threats? This is not a job for on-the-job training.' Meanwhile, Mayor Eric Adams said he and his team met with NYPD liaisons posted in Middle Eastern countries, including Israel, to discuss the potential fallout of the bombing. The mayor likened the situation to the Russian invasion of Ukraine and said the city was on watch to make sure the conflict did not manifest among the various communities living in the five boroughs with a stake in the fate of the Middle East. 'We will keep New Yorkers updated as we move forward, but at this time there is no one, clear, credible threat,' he said. While voters rank affordability and public safety among their top concerns, the Israel-Hamas war has nevertheless become a flashpoint in the New York City mayoral race. Cuomo readily campaigns against antisemitism, criticizes his opponents who haven't visited Israel and is backed by major Orthodox Jewish leaders. On Sunday, he campaigned in the religious Borough Park section of Brooklyn as GOTV weekend came to a close. A super PAC supporting him has spent millions of dollars going after Mamdani — who would become the city's first Muslim mayor — in ads and mailers, many of which call him antisemitic. Mamdani rejects those claims and says the PAC has engaged in bigotry. Jeff Coltin contributed to this report.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
The MeidasTouch Podcast Now Has 5 Million Subscribers
The MeidasTouch podcast just hit 5 million subscribers, cementing its status as a breakout force in ... More progressive media. Launched during the isolation of the pandemic lockdown era, a group chat between three brothers has transformed into one of the most influential voices in progressive media. The MeidasTouch Podcast — the flagship show of the MeidasTouch Network — has just crossed 5 million subscribers, a milestone that cements its place as not only a media juggernaut but a dominant force in independent political commentary. Founded in 2020 by Ben, Brett, and Jordy Meiselas, MeidasTouch first made waves as an anti-Trump political action committee during the height of the COVID pandemic. At the time, all three brothers were generally frustrated by the state of the world and looking for a productive outlet for their time and talents. 'It felt like screaming into the void,' Brett recently told Vanity Fair. 'So we committed to doing what we could — writing articles, making videos, just getting our thoughts out.' The rise of the MeidasTouch podcast They've been doing that same work, just more of it, ever since. What began with viral videos evolved into a full-fledged media network, now home to a multiple shows including Leigh McGowan's PoliticsGirl, and the legal commentary series Legal AF. But it's the core MeidasTouch Podcast, hosted by the three brothers, that's leading the way and drawing major guests like President Biden and Senators Elizabeth Warren – and racking up viewership numbers that rival cable news. A celebratory tweet posted by the network's senior digital editor Acyn Torabi (@Acyn on X) marked the subscriber milestone, reading in part: 'As we hit 5 million subscribers, I want to say this: this is one small step for the MeidasTouch Network, but I think one giant leap for independent journalism and democracy generally.' As far as who the brothers are: Ben is a lawyer and Colin Kaepernick's business partner, Brett is a two-time Emmy-winning video editor, and Jordy is a top advertising executive in New York. Their network has seen explosive growth so far this year, with Podscribe data showing that the podcast jumped from 57.7 million downloads and views per month in mid-February to 115 million the following month. And even after that surge, the numbers remained strong, with April 2025 data showing 107.3 million downloads. The brothers' YouTube channel alone averages 33 million views every 48 hours, according to Acyn, while the podcast's momentum has been enough to briefly dethrone even The Joe Rogan Experience. In February 2025, MeidasTouch pulled in 57.5 million downloads, outpacing Rogan's 51.5 million for the month. While comparisons to right-wing media stars are inevitable, however, the Meiselas brothers push back on the idea that the left needs its own Rogan. 'Right-wing podcasters weren't cooked up in a lab,' Ben continued in the Vanity Fair interview. 'They developed audiences organically over time.' Brett added that the key isn't finding someone who mimics Rogan's tone or beliefs — it's the authenticity that matters. That's a major part of MeidasTouch's appeal. Brett Meiselas has said in the past that the goal is to make listeners feel like they're part of the same experience the brothers share in private. The vibe, in other words, is supposed to feel like a conversation among friends. As for what's next, Acyn made it clear in his message on X, adding: 'We use our platform for good: to always shine a light on the truth, to expose the injustices taking place, and to confront the authoritarian Trump regime head-on, where corporate news has utterly failed and betrayed us all.' Five million subscribers in, the MeidasTouch Network clearly isn't slowing down. Based on the trends this year alone, there's every reason to believe that this is just the beginning.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Trump hits Iran: 5 questions on what comes next
President Trump's decision to authorize a military strike on Iran is a seismic moment that could reshape the future of the Middle East and his presidency. The administration on Sunday signaled it wants to contain the conflict, underscoring that it does not want an all-out war with Iran but will not accept a world where Tehran has a nuclear weapon. Whether it can contain the fallout is a different proposition and one that may depend largely on Iran. Politically, the vast majority of Republicans are sticking with Trump, while many Democrats are expressing outrage over what they see as a lack of strategy, as well as a lack of notification to Congress ahead of the strikes. The move by Trump is, in some ways, a surprise, as he came to office promising to keep the U.S. out of foreign conflicts. Now, less than six months into his second term, he is on the brink of a larger battle. Here are five big questions. This is the most important question. Administration officials on Sunday signaled that they are hopeful Iran will return to the negotiating table, but signs quickly emerged of a more aggressive response from Tehran. Iranian television reported that Iran's parliament had approved a measure to close the Strait of Hormuz, a key shipping route between Iran and Oman. State-run Press-TV said a final decision on doing so rested with Iran's Supreme National Security Council. Shutting off the waterway could have major implications for global trade, leading to increased oil and gas prices in the U.S. That would bite at Trump, who vowed to bring down prices after years of high inflation under former President Biden in the post-COVID era. It also risks turning the conflict into a broader war. Iran could also launch strikes against U.S. military targets, though its abilities to do so have been hampered by more than a week of strikes by Israel, which has allowed U.S. and Israeli planes more security to fly over Iranian skies. Another widely-discussed possibility is that Iran could back terror attacks around the world on U.S. targets. Of course, there would be serious risks to such actions by Iran. Just taking steps to move forward with its nuclear program, let alone striking out at the U.S., would lead to negative consequences, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned on Sunday. 'Look, at the end of the day, if Iran is committed to becoming a nuclear weapons power, I do think it puts the regime at risk,' he said during an appearance on Fox Sunday Futures. 'I really do. I think it would be the end of the regime if they tried to do that.' Before this week, Trump's Make America Great Again movement looked divided on a strike on Iran. Trump has long criticized past U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and a big part of his draw to many voters was his promise to keep the U.S. out of foreign conflicts. MAGA voices from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) to political pundit Tucker Carlson to former Trump strategic adviser Steve Bannon have all cast doubt on getting the U.S. more directly involved in the Iran-Israeli conflict. In the immediate aftermath of the strikes, Republicans were notably united, with Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) being a notable exception. And administration officials with non-interventionist records were taking rhetorical steps to keep the doubters in line. A chief example was Vice President Vance, who said the U.S. was at war with Iran's nuclear program, not Iran as a country. Iran may not see things that way, and if Tehran takes steps to hurt the U.S., GOP voices who doubted the wisdom of a strike may get louder. That will be something the administration watches closely going forward. Trump, in a Sunday Truth Social post, also touted 'great unity' among Republicans following the U.S. strikes and called on the party to focus on getting his tax and spending legislation to his desk. On the left, Democrats have hit Trump hard over the strike on Iran. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), speaking at a rally on Saturday night, reacted to unfolding events live, arguing Trump's action was unconstitutional as a crowd changed 'no more wars.' Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) said Trump's action was an impeachable offense. That was a bold statement in that Democrats largely have avoided impeachment talk with Trump after twice voting to impeach him during his first term. Both of those efforts ultimately ended with Senate acquittals and, finally, with Trump's reelection last year. Presidents in both parties have taken limited military strikes without first seeking permission from Congress, but Democrats have also brought up the War Powers Act, saying Trump went too far with the strikes. At the same time, many Democrats are concerned about Iran's potential to go nuclear, and the party does not want to be cast as soft on Tehran. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), a vociferous opponent of Iran, called for his GOP counterpart, Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), to put the War Powers Act on the floor so senators could vote to authorize Trump's actions. Going a step further, Schumer said he would vote for it. 'No president should be allowed to unilaterally march this nation into something as consequential as war with erratic threats and no strategy,' Schumer said in the statement. 'Confronting Iran's ruthless campaign of terror, nuclear ambitions, and regional aggression demands strength, resolve, and strategic clarity. The danger of wider, longer, and more devastating war has now dramatically increased.' 'We must enforce the War Powers Act, and I'm urging Leader Thune to put it on the Senate floor immediately. I am voting for it and implore all Senators on both sides of the aisle to vote for it,' he said. Another Democrat further to the center, Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, retweeted Trump's Truth Social post on the attack and said he fully agreed with it. In general, the strikes on Iran may further divide Democrats on liberal-centrist and generational lines. Yet much, again, depends on events. A successful Gulf War by former President George H.W. Bush did not save his presidency in 1992. And the second Gulf War ended disastrously for the Republican Party led by Bush's son, former President George W. Bush. Trump justly had a reputation as a president who is averse to foreign conflicts, given his criticism of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and his repeated calls that he would keep the U.S. out of such wars. So how did this Trump end up bombing Iran, becoming the first president to authorize the dropping of some of America's most lethal non-nuclear bombs? It's more likely Trump's shift is a bit of a one-off based on current world events than a complete change in philosophy. After Israel's initial strike on Iran on June 13, the administration distanced itself from the decision. Trump previously has been seeking to get Iran to agree to a nuclear deal, and many reports suggested he was not keen on an aggressive Israel attack. But that attack happened, and it went well. Israel had control of Iranian airspace, potentially clearing the way for U.S. B-2 bombers. Action by Russia was unlikely given its own war with Ukraine — something that was not part of the political fabric in Trump's first term. Iran's backers in Hamas and Hezbollah also have been devastated by Israel since Hamas launched its attack on Oct. 7, 2023, an event that has had a number of serious repercussions. Some U.S. officials on Sunday called for peace, a sign that Trump is not seeking a prolonged conflict. That could also be a message to his supporters who did not think they were voting for a leader who risked getting the country into a Middle East War. At least some of those voters may be asking questions in the days and weeks to come, and what comes next will make a big difference in shaping their views. Trump's decision to attack Iran and enter the Israeli-Iran war is a big win for hawkish supporters and allies of the president, most notably Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.). It is also, oddly, something that will be cheered by certain Republicans who are more often critics of Trump, such as former National Security Adviser John Bolton and former Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.). It seems clear Trump is listening to the voices of Graham, Rubio and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, despite the sometimes-tense relationship between the U.S. and Israeli leaders. Vance is clearly a part of the president's inner circle, and it was notable that he, Rubio and Hegseth were at Trump's side when he announced the strikes on Saturday night. Trump 2.0 has been notable for having few voices that offer pushback to Trump's decisions. It is difficult to see Hegseth pressing Trump to move in a different direction on a national security issue, for example. And Trump twice this week described assessments by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard that Iran was not close to developing a nuclear weapon as wrong. So, who has Trump's ear? Most of these key people surround Trump and others, like White House chief of staff Susie Wiles. But Trump is his own decider-in-chief, and the Iran strikes are a reflection of his own unpredictability.
