logo
Cancelling God Save the King anthem for schools violated the law, Manitoba trustee says in court action

Cancelling God Save the King anthem for schools violated the law, Manitoba trustee says in court action

CBC3 days ago

A western Manitoba school trustee is taking court action against his fellow trustees, claiming they violated the Public Schools Act by halting a plan to bring God Save the King back into the classrooms of Mountain View School Division.
Paul Coffey filed an application on June 2 with the Court of King's Bench for a hearing on the matter, now set for June 23 in Dauphin.
His application names trustees Scott Lynxleg, Gabe Mercier, Floyd Martens, Conrad Nabess, John Taylor, and Jarri Thompson as respondents.
Coffey accuses them of acting outside the scope of their legal authority, breaching their duties, undermining the board's legitimacy and exposing it to legal and reputational risk.
Coffey wants authorization to apply to another judge for a declaration the other trustees violated the act, and to have their decision overturned.
CBC News has reached out to the respondents. In an emailed response, Lynxleg said, "We have been advised to make no comment until court proceedings are completed."
In mid-January, Jason Gryba, the chair of the Dauphin-based division's board, issued a directive that the royal anthem must be included in morning announcements at division schools, along with O Canada and land acknowledgements.
The move was based on the Patriotic Observances Regulation, a little-used rule in Manitoba legislation that says O Canada must be played at the start of the school day, while God Save the King should be played at the end of the day or the end of opening exercises.
The practice has not been enforced for decades, and the Manitoba School Boards Association has said it was unaware of any other boards that maintain the tradition.
In a 6-3 vote on Jan. 27, the board voted to stay the plan, and see whether it is legally required and supported by area residents.
Gryba and Coffee voted against, while trustee Kerri Wieler abstained. The six trustees named as respondents voted in favour.
The anthem is considered a musical salute to the British monarch. Indigenous groups have spoken out against colonization at the hands of the monarchy.
Jarri Thompson, a First Nations trustee, put forward a motion to halt the move. It was seconded by Lynxleg, another First Nations trustee.
In his application, Coffey states the Patriotic Observances Regulation is still a requirement and "the law is not optional."
Under the Public Schools Act, trustees are legally bound to uphold all legislation and their oaths. No legal authority permits a school board to stay a provincial regulation — any changes to legislation must follow lawful procedures, not unilateral resolutions, the application states.
The trustees were warned about that "at least 11 times" before the vote, yet breached their duties anyway, the application alleges.
Because of that, the public and courts cannot have confidence that future decisions by the board will comply with the law, it claims.
The board — which oversees 16 schools with a $50-million budget, 3,100 students and 700 staff — must adhere to the law in order to preserve confidence in its legitimacy and accountability, the application states.
Discord on the board
Coffey, in his application, called the vote part of "a broader pattern of governance failures and jurisdictional overreach" by some trustees.
Discord among board members last year ultimately prompted the government of Manitoba to appoint a third-party panel to oversee operations. That, in turn, led Gryba and Wieler to accuse province of intimidation.
In April 2024, Coffey gave a presentation at a board meeting where he said the residential school system began as a good thing.
He also questioned the level of abuse at the schools and said the term "white privilege" is "racist."
In June of last year, Gryba, Taylor, Wieler and Coffey also voted to fire the division's superintendent, which led to three trustees quitting days later.
And in September, the board defied the provincially appointed panel by holding a meeting with just four trustees, fewer than the required quorum.
The tumult on the board has been attributed to new trustees butting heads with the old guard.
Lynxleg, one of the trustees elected in October to fill the vacancies, has said he would like to see the province eradicate the Patriotic Observances Regulation altogether.
The province appears to agree.
In March, the NDP government introduced a bill in the legislature to formally eliminate the requirement, but it has yet to be debated, after the Opposition Progressive Conservatives used their right under House rules to hold the bill back at the end of the legislature's spring sitting.
The bill would also end a requirement that the Lord's Prayer be recited. Mandatory prayer in schools was struck down by the Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench in 1992 but the rule has not been formally removed.
It would also require all school boards to have policies respecting land and treaty acknowledgements — something most already have in place.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Liberals, Conservatives pass major projects legislation in House of Commons
Liberals, Conservatives pass major projects legislation in House of Commons

CTV News

time25 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Liberals, Conservatives pass major projects legislation in House of Commons

Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks at a press conference on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, on Thursday, June 19, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/ Patrick Doyle Conservative members of Parliament voted with the minority Liberal government to pass its marquee major projects legislation Friday evening, setting it up to become law before Canada Day. The legislation, also known as the one Canadian economy act, would allow the government to green-light a list of projects that have been deemed to be in the national interest, fast-tracking their approvals. The Liberals have called it the core of the government's domestic economic response to U.S. tariffs. 'This is what makes us different from the United States, this is what makes us more independent from the United States, this is what's going to move us forward,' Prime Minister Mark Carney said at a press conference after the vote, adding the legislation needed to pass quickly 'because we are in a crisis.' 'And if you don't think we're in a crisis, go to Sault Ste. Marie, go to Hamilton, go to Windsor.' After the second of two votes in the House of Commons on Friday, Carney crossed the floor to shake hands with Opposition House leader Andrew Scheer and Conservative deputy leader Melissa Lantsman. Two votes were held instead of one after the House Speaker ruled that the legislation had two distinct parts without a clear common element. That allowed the Bloc Quebecois and NDP members to vote in favour of the first part of the bill -- which looks to tackle internal trade barriers -- and against the more controversial second part dealing with major projects. The major projects bill grants the government sweeping powers to quickly approve projects that are deemed to be in the national interest. Provincial and territorial premiers have given Carney lists of projects they want to see approved, but no national list of projects has been made public so far. 'We all agree that more fulsome conversations are needed to select the nation-building projects and to determine the conditions that they must fulfil. In other words, the real work begins now,' Carney said. The legislation has drawn criticism from Indigenous leaders and environmental groups who say it gives too much power to the federal cabinet to bypass existing laws. The legislation was introduced on June 6 and was pushed through the House after about eight hours of committee study on Tuesday and Wednesday. The House transport committee did amend the bill to, among other things, remove the Indian Act from a list of laws the government can sidestep when determining whether a project should move forward. First Nations leaders have warned the bill could violate their constitutionally protected rights and may lead to legal challenges. Carney emphasized the need to respect the constitutional rights of Indigenous Peoples in his press conference on Friday. 'The major projects office will have an Indigenous advisory council whose core function will be to honour Section 35 rights in the implementation of this bill,' he said. He promised to hold full-day summits with First Nations, Inuit and Metis rights-holders and leaders in the coming weeks, alongside Crown-Indigenous Relations Minister Rebecca Alty and Indigenous Services Minister Mandy Gull-Masty. 'Consultation, co-operation, engagement and participation are at the heart of this bill,' he said. The bill is now headed to the Senate, which is scheduled to sit until June 27. By Sarah Ritchie. With files from Kyle Duggan and Alessia Passafiume.

House of Commons passes Liberals' major projects bill
House of Commons passes Liberals' major projects bill

Globe and Mail

time39 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

House of Commons passes Liberals' major projects bill

Liberal and Conservative members of Parliament voted to pass the government's major projects legislation this evening. After the second of two votes, Prime Minister Mark Carney crossed the floor to shake hands with Opposition House leader Andrew Scheer and Conservative deputy leader Melissa Lantsman. Two votes were held instead of one after the House Speaker ruled that the legislation had two distinct parts without a clear common element. That allowed the Bloc Québécois and NDP members to vote in favour of the first part of the bill — which looks to tackle internal trade barriers — and against the more controversial second part dealing with major projects. The major projects bill grants the government sweeping powers to quickly approve projects that are deemed to be in the national interest. The bill is now headed to the Senate, which is scheduled to sit until June 27.

Vancouver councillor calls for transparency from mayor over Downtown Eastside crime and drugs task force
Vancouver councillor calls for transparency from mayor over Downtown Eastside crime and drugs task force

CBC

timean hour ago

  • CBC

Vancouver councillor calls for transparency from mayor over Downtown Eastside crime and drugs task force

Social Sharing A Vancouver city councillor is calling for more transparency from the mayor's office after it was revealed the Vancouver Police Board was not aware of a program intended to curb crime and violence in the Downtown Eastside. In February, Mayor Ken Sim introduced Task Force Barrage, a "long-term operation to dismantle organized crime networks and target predatory criminals" in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside. The program cost $5 million — on top of the Vancouver Police Department's budget of $453 million for 2025. As reported by CTV News Thursday, VPD Board Chair Frank Chong said the board wasn't aware of Task Force Barrage until it was revealed in a media announcement. Chong described it as a miscommunication with some missteps, and that they're working to improve processes. Speaking to CBC News on Friday, Coun. Pete Fry said the same was the case for city council — save for Sim and his ABC caucus. "I attended that same media conference to find out about it at first when the mayor and his entire ABC caucus arrived on stage to announce this operation barrage," Fry said. "I'm very curious how this was authorized, what the communication pattern was, what are the objectives, what are the key performance indicators to justify a $5-million expenditure that seems to have come out of the mayor's office." The Green Party councillor said the announcement was a "complete surprise" at the time, adding that the B.C. Police Act specifies that any changes to the board's budget must be agreed to by both the council and board. "A council must include in its budget the costs in the provisional budget prepared by the municipal police board, as adjusted to reflect the following: (a) changes agreed to by the council and the board," reads Section 27. Since the launch of the task force in February, the VPD has deployed additional front-line officers to the Downtown Eastside area. Police said in an update about a month later that the initiative had contributed to a decline in street-level assaults and other violent crimes in the area. WATCH | What impact has the task force had 1 month in? Has a new police task force helped reduce crime in the Downtown Eastside? 3 months ago Duration 2:32 During this Thursday's meeting with the police board, VPD Deputy Chief Const. Howard Chow touted the program's effectiveness. He said they've seized 962 weapons and 96 firearms — 16 of which were real, the rest replicas — and that they've made 610 warrant arrests, with 341 new charges to individuals. "This is what success looks like," Chow said, adding the numbers only show "one side of the story." "It really is the perception of crime and the sense of safety down there that's gonna really mark whether this was a success or not for us." Sim, who attended the board meeting, applauded their work. "I'm just gonna speak from my heart here — this is a no-brainer. It makes absolute sense," Sim told Chow. "Thank you very much for all of your efforts. You guys are making a huge difference." Fry said he acknowledges there are serious issues around crime in the Downtown Eastside and commended the VPD's work, but that he mainly takes issue with the lack of transparency and accountability around the process. "Vancouver police are being very diligent and doing more street work and that's great," he said. "But we still need that clarity in chain of command. We need to know that authorizations from the police office are not coming out from the back room of the mayor's office, but they're coming through the appropriate channels, and there's appropriate accountability." Fry said he's also filed his own freedom of information request to find out who authorized the task force and its budget. Asked why the police board wasn't aware of Task Force Barrage until it was announced, Sim said it was a matter of process. "The VPD, they deal with their operational issues, and as a board, the VPD board, they basically review stuff and sometimes when there's communication challenges or whatever, you reassess and you improve them," Sim said. "We're in a constant process of improving processes."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store