Your health plan might get costlier in US as Trump's tariff is pushing insurers to hike premiums
US health insurers are increasing premiums for individual and small group plans, citing US President Donald Trump's tariffs as a contributing factor. Independent Health Benefits Corporation in New York anticipates a 3% premium increase due to tariff-affected medication costs, while UnitedHealthcare of Oregon attributes a similar percentage of its premium hike to tariff uncertainties. Trump once again repeated his claim that he will impose tariffs on pharma sector.
The tariffs announced by President Trump are expected to rise the prices of prescription drugs, medical devices and other medical products and services
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Health insurers to hike premium
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Health insurers in the US said President Donald Trump's tariffs are driving them to raise premiums they will charge to individual and small group plans next year. They have started to notify states to that Trump's tariffs will drive up the premium for the enrollees next year, Axios reported. Independent Health Benefits Corporation has notified New York regulators of its intention to raise premiums for individual market enrollees by 38.4% in 2026. According to a spokesperson speaking to Axios, approximately 3% of that increase is due to anticipated cost hikes for medications, including imported drugs affected by tariffs. Similarly, UnitedHealthcare of Oregon reported that nearly 3% of its proposed 19.8% premium hike for small group plans is linked to uncertainties surrounding tariffs imposed by Trump.Trump has signaled that sector-specific tariffs on pharmaceuticals are expected 'very soon,' fueling uncertainty as Congress weighs cutting Medicaid and ending enhanced subsidies under the Affordable Care Act. "There are sort of a perfect storm of factors that are driving prices up," Sabrina Corlette, research professor at Georgetown's Center on Health Insurance Reforms told Axios.On Wednesday, Donald Trump told reporters on board the Air Force One, that tariffs on the Pharma sector are 'coming soon.'"Pharma tariffs are going to come in at levels you haven't really seen before. We are looking at pharmaceuticals as a separate category. We will be announcing that sometime in the near future, and not too distant future. It's under review right now," Trump had said back in April.The expected price of goods and services and projected demands for them are taken into consideration by health insurers for calculating monthly premiums in advance of each year. The tariffs announced by President Trump are expected to rise the prices of prescription drugs, medical devices and other medical products and services. And ultimately, enrollees might have to bear the brunt of it.KFF policy analyst Matt McGough wrote in an analysis that a bunch of health insurers administering individual and small group plans have already explicitly told state regulators that tariffs are forcing plans to raise enrollee premiums more than they otherwise would next year. Insurers "don't have any historical precedent or data to project what this is going to mean for their business and health costs," McGough said to Axios. "I think it really makes sense that they're trying to hedge their bets."Some insurers have noted that although they are closely monitoring the effects of tariffs, they have not yet factored them into their premium pricing."There is uncertainty around inflation and the economy due to possible tariffs however we did [not] put anything for this in this filing," Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Northwest's report to Oregon reads.State regulators can also push back on insurers' premium calculations before they're finalized, McGough noted.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
a day ago
- Economic Times
Trump expands ban on transgender rights: VA denies fertility treatment for veterans under new rules
Transgender veterans barred from fertility treatment Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel When US President Donald Trump returned to the White House, one of his first acts was to sign an executive order to ban transgenders from participating in the military. Now months later, the Department of Veterans Affairs followed suit with a ban on medical insurance coverage for gender-affirming care, reports NewsWeek.A leaked email from a person at the Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) revealed that transgender veterans eligible for health benefits will no longer receive financial coverage for egg- and sperm-freezing fertility treatments. The email shows the department will no longer cover the costs for those transgender veterans preparing for gender dysphoria treatment and seeking cryopreservation. Dsyphoria treatment is a process in which eggs or sperm (gametes) are frozen and stored to be thawed for later since Donald Trump has returned to office, he has taken a slew of actions regarding transgender people, including signing an executive order stating that there are only two unchangeable sexes and another attempting to ban transgender women from competing in women's sports. He also signed an order aimed at restricting access to puberty blockers and other gender care for people under age 19 with some of his actions sparking legal challenges in the March, it was announced in the VA specifically that the department began phasing out treatment for gender dysphoria following Trump's executive order recognizing only two sexes. However, the VA stated that transgender veterans would still have access to VA health care the email now indicates a shift from the previous policy. "On yesterday's (6/16/2025) National Fertility Interdisciplinary Teams Office Hours call, it was announced that VA will no longer pay for cryopreservation of gametes for a medical indication if it involves transgender veterans seeking cryopreservation in preparation for treatment of Gender Dysphoria or Gender Identity Disorder. This will reportedly affect new authorizations and will not disrupt cryopreservation that has already been initiated," the email viewed by NewsWeek added that according to another senior official in the Veterans Health Administration "the change is reportedly already in effect and an official announcement will be forthcoming" and advised the department to "hold on authorizing any new cryopreservation for medical indications related to gender dysphoria/gender identity disorder" while waiting for further guidance."We want to avoid a situation where veterans could be told they are approved for cryo, only to find out after the fact that VA cannot pay for care they received," the email Keith, the founder and executive director of the Michigan-based transgender charity Stand With Trans, said the policy was "discrimination.""Clearly, the rights of the trans community are the target of attack," she told Newsweek. "It doesn't matter whether someone is an adult, a minor, a veteran, a professional, or other, if one is trans identified, they are seeing rights being taken away one by one. It is deplorable. If one class of people can receive treatment paid for with their benefits, then other classes of people should receive the same. This is why we have the equal protection clause in our Constitution."No one should be excluded from a particular treatment because they are transgender. This is the very definition of discrimination."This comes days after the Trump administration denied reporting by The Guardian that said new VA hospitals could refuse care to veterans based on factors like marital status and political affiliation due to an executive order by President Guardian earlier Monday published a report saying VA hospitals are implementing new rules in response to Trump's executive order in January, which would permit workers to deny care to veterans based on characteristics not protected by federal House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly adamantly denied The Guardian's reporting. Writing on social platform X, Kelly addressed the article's writer, Aaron Glantz, saying, 'Aaron, this is a totally FALSE story that The Guardian should retract immediately. Fearmongering with our Veterans to try to score clicks for your failing 'news outlet' is pathetic and shameful.'
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Trump expands ban on transgender rights: VA denies fertility treatment for veterans under new rules
When US President Donald Trump returned to the White House, one of his first acts was to sign an executive order to ban transgenders from participating in the military. Now months later, the Department of Veterans Affairs followed suit with a ban on medical insurance coverage for gender-affirming care, reports NewsWeek. A leaked email from a person at the Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) revealed that transgender veterans eligible for health benefits will no longer receive financial coverage for egg- and sperm-freezing fertility treatments. The email shows the department will no longer cover the costs for those transgender veterans preparing for gender dysphoria treatment and seeking cryopreservation. Dsyphoria treatment is a process in which eggs or sperm (gametes) are frozen and stored to be thawed for later use. ALSO READ: Amazon's one-month deadline to US employees amid mass layoff fear: Resign in 60 days or... by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 2025년 가장 여유 넘치는 농장 게임. 설치 없음 Taonga: 아일랜드 팜 플레이하기 Undo Transgender veterans barred from fertility treatment Ever since Donald Trump has returned to office, he has taken a slew of actions regarding transgender people, including signing an executive order stating that there are only two unchangeable sexes and another attempting to ban transgender women from competing in women's sports. He also signed an order aimed at restricting access to puberty blockers and other gender care for people under age 19 with some of his actions sparking legal challenges in the US. In March, it was announced in the VA specifically that the department began phasing out treatment for gender dysphoria following Trump's executive order recognizing only two sexes. However, the VA stated that transgender veterans would still have access to VA health care services. Live Events But the email now indicates a shift from the previous policy. "On yesterday's (6/16/2025) National Fertility Interdisciplinary Teams Office Hours call, it was announced that VA will no longer pay for cryopreservation of gametes for a medical indication if it involves transgender veterans seeking cryopreservation in preparation for treatment of Gender Dysphoria or Gender Identity Disorder. This will reportedly affect new authorizations and will not disrupt cryopreservation that has already been initiated," the email viewed by NewsWeek read. ALSO READ: Katy Perry-Orlando Bloom have broken up? Shocking report claims couple had explosive fight over 'cringeworthy' space flight It added that according to another senior official in the Veterans Health Administration "the change is reportedly already in effect and an official announcement will be forthcoming" and advised the department to "hold on authorizing any new cryopreservation for medical indications related to gender dysphoria/gender identity disorder" while waiting for further guidance. "We want to avoid a situation where veterans could be told they are approved for cryo, only to find out after the fact that VA cannot pay for care they received," the email read. Roz Keith, the founder and executive director of the Michigan-based transgender charity Stand With Trans, said the policy was "discrimination." "Clearly, the rights of the trans community are the target of attack," she told Newsweek. "It doesn't matter whether someone is an adult, a minor, a veteran, a professional, or other, if one is trans identified, they are seeing rights being taken away one by one. It is deplorable. If one class of people can receive treatment paid for with their benefits, then other classes of people should receive the same. This is why we have the equal protection clause in our Constitution. ALSO READ: Trump to skip Jeff Bezos-Lauren Sanchez's star-studded Venice wedding? What you need to know "No one should be excluded from a particular treatment because they are transgender. This is the very definition of discrimination." This comes days after the Trump administration denied reporting by The Guardian that said new VA hospitals could refuse care to veterans based on factors like marital status and political affiliation due to an executive order by President Trump. The Guardian earlier Monday published a report saying VA hospitals are implementing new rules in response to Trump's executive order in January, which would permit workers to deny care to veterans based on characteristics not protected by federal law. White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly adamantly denied The Guardian's reporting. Writing on social platform X, Kelly addressed the article's writer, Aaron Glantz, saying, 'Aaron, this is a totally FALSE story that The Guardian should retract immediately. Fearmongering with our Veterans to try to score clicks for your failing 'news outlet' is pathetic and shameful.'
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Trump aid cuts deal a blow to HIV prevention in Africa
Emmanuel Cherem, a 25-year-old gay man in Nigeria, tested positive for HIV two months after U.S. President Donald Trump 's administration cut access for at-risk groups like gay men and injecting drug users to medication that prevents infection. Cherem admits he should have been more careful about practicing safe sex but had become accustomed to using the U.S.-supplied pharmaceutical. The drug - known as Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis, or PrEP - is typically taken daily as a tablet and can reduce the risk of contracting HIV through sex by 99%. "I blame myself... Taking care of myself is my first duty as a person," Cherem said at his gym in Awka, the capital of Nigeria's southeastern state of Anambra. "I equally blame the Trump administration because, you know, these things were available, and then, without prior notice, these things were cut off." Trump ordered a 90-day pause on foreign aid after taking office in January and halted grants by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). The agency was responsible for implementing the bulk of the assistance under the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief ( PEPFAR ), the world's leading HIV/AIDS initiative. Sub-Saharan Africa remains the epicenter of the AIDS pandemic. Trump's cuts have restricted the availability of drugs that millions of Africans have taken to prevent infection - particularly vulnerable communities such as gay men and sex workers - as aid groups and public health systems in Africa strove to roll back the disease. The number of initiations, or people who have taken at least one dose of the drug, rose in Africa from fewer than 700 in 2016 to more than 6 million by late 2024, according to PrEPWatch, a global tracker. More than 90% of new initiations last year were financed by PEPFAR, using cheap generic versions of the drug. Sub-Saharan Africa had 390,000 AIDS-related deaths in 2023, or 62% of the global total, according to UNAIDS, the United Nations AIDS agency. However, progress has been made: that death toll was down by 56% from 2010, according to the World Health Organization. Now, some of those who've lost access to the preventative medication because of U.S. cutbacks are already testing positive, according to 10 patients, health officials and activists. Restrictions on PrEP have coincided with dwindling supplies of more widely used HIV prevention tools like condoms and lubricants "because of the US funding cuts", according to a UNAIDS fact sheet from May. The combination is creating what nine activists and three medical experts described as a major threat to prevention across the continent. "I just see this as incredibly short-sighted because we were on a winning path," said Linda-Gail Bekker, an HIV expert at the University of Cape Town. She said that many African governments did not have the resources to spend on PrEP drugs on top of treatment for HIV infections, risking a worsening of the pandemic. "It's as predictable as if you take your eye off a smouldering bushfire and the wind is blowing: a bushfire will come back." Trump has said that the United States pays disproportionately for foreign aid and he wants other countries to shoulder more of the burden, as he seeks to reduce U.S. government spending across the board. The U.S. disbursed $65 billion in foreign assistance last year, nearly half of it via USAID, according to government data. "It's a question of who has primary responsibility for the health needs of citizens of other countries, and it's their own governments," said Max Primorac , a former senior USAID official who is now senior research fellow at The Heritage Foundation's Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom. "We all know, and this is a bipartisan issue, that aid dependency doesn't help these people - that the best solution is for these countries to be able to take over the responsibility of these programs." A RISE IN CASES UNAIDS says the permanent discontinuation of PEPFAR-supported prevention and treatment programs could lead to an additional 2,300 new HIV cases globally per day. There were 3,500 new cases per day in 2023. Reuters spoke to 23 health workers, PrEP users and activists, nearly all of whom said that the increase in HIV infections since the funding cuts was impossible to quantify because many organisations working with vulnerable populations have been defunded. A State Department waiver issued on February 1 allowed some PEPFAR activities to restart, but only covered HIV prevention for mother-to-child transmission. That means PEPFAR-financed PrEP is no longer available for gay and bisexual men, sex workers and injecting drug users who are especially exposed to the virus. Many African governments had specifically targeted these groups in their PrEP programs. A spokesperson for the State Department, which oversees USAID and the PEPFAR program, told Reuters it "continues to support lifesaving HIV testing, care and treatment, and prevention of mother to child transmission services approved by the Secretary of State." "All other PEPFAR-funded services are being reviewed for assessment of programmatic efficiencies and consistency with United States foreign policy," the spokesperson said. The spokesperson did not directly respond to a question about why the waiver had excluded vulnerable groups from PrEP distribution. In East and Southern Africa, the sub-region that accounts for more than half of all people living with HIV, the U.S. had been funding nearly 45% of HIV prevention programming, UNAIDS said in March. Some countries like Malawi, Zimbabwe and Mozambique were almost entirely dependent on PEPFAR for their HIV prevention programs, the agency said. In some wealthier nations, like South Africa and Kenya, PEPFAR represented less than 25% of spending on HIV prevention. Russell Vought , the director of the U.S. Office of Management and Budget, told a Congressional committee on June 4 that, due to high U.S. debt levels, Africa needed to shoulder more of the burden in fighting AIDS. Asked specifically about restrictions on HIV prevention programs, Vought said: "We believe that many of these nonprofits are not geared toward the viewpoints of the administration." His office did not respond to a request for further details. 'I PRAY TRUMP CHANGES HIS POLICY' Reuters spoke to four PrEP users in Nigeria, all gay or bisexual men, who have tested positive for HIV since January when they stopped being able to obtain more pills, after practicing unsafe sex. Hearty Empowerment and Rights (HER) Initiative, a community-based organisation in southeastern Nigeria, worked with other groups that provide HIV/AIDS services to confirm the men's diagnosis and help secure treatment for them, said executive director Festus Alex Chinaza. In Asaba, the capital of Nigeria's Delta state, Echezona, a 30-year-old gay man who took PrEP pills daily for more than three years, is struggling to come to terms with his HIV-positive test result, which he received in early May. He regrets that he had unprotected sex. "I just pray and wish that Trump actually changes his policy and everything comes back to normal so that the spread and transmission of the virus would be reduced," said Echezona, who asked to be identified only by his first name for fear of stigma. Like the other three men, he described being told by staff at community-based clinics that PrEP was only available to pregnant and lactating women, in line with the Trump administration guidelines. Nigeria has an adult HIV prevalence rate of 1.3% and an estimated 2 million people living with HIV, the fourth-highest total globally, according to UNAIDS. But for so-called key populations, the rates are much higher: 25% for men who have sex with men, according to a survey completed in 2021. The Nigerian health ministry did not respond to a request for comment on the effects of the Trump administration's cuts to HIV prevention services. South Africa - which has an estimated 7.7 million people living with HIV, according to UNAIDS, the highest number in the world - pays for its own PrEP pills. But some clinics where so-called key populations obtained them relied on PEPFAR grants and have been forced to close in recent months. PrEP is also available for free at public health centers, but gay men and sex workers often avoid such facilities, fearing discrimination and harassment, nine activists said. Francois Venter, executive director of the Ezintsha medical research center at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, said PrEP distribution from public sector clinics in the city had shown almost no increase since the Trump cuts. Foster Mohale, spokesperson for South Africa's health ministry, said the ministry was "not aware" of reports that key populations were avoiding health facilities due to stigma. "We have sensitized health officials across the country to create (a) conducive environment for all healthcare seekers/clients to access the service without feeling judged or discriminated against," he said. (Reporting and writing by Robbie Corey-BouletAdditional reporting by Seun Sanni in Awka, Nigeria, Nellie Peyton in Johannesburg, Amindeh Blaise Atabong in Yaounde, Ange Adihe Kasongo in Kinshasa, Maxwell Akalaare Adombila in Accra and Jennifer Rigby in London. Editing by Daniel Flynn)
