‘She was so fit, so well': the heart patient who died before getting vital surgery

Sue Griffin was an active 68-year-old, retraining to become a nurse and indulging her love of horse riding, when she began to experience breathing difficulties, such as breathlessness. 'She was then diagnosed with asthma, and was going to see an asthma nurse,' her daughter Kirstie Campbell recalls.
But despite treatment, it soon became apparent that Griffin's symptoms were not improving. 'She was getting more and more breathless as time was progressing,' Campbell says. 'She struggled doing things with the horses as well, she'd always done everything herself. She was getting fairly frustrated with herself, thinking that she was just turning into an old lady really quickly.'
Griffin's breathing difficulties seriously progressed in 2021 and, after phoning 111, she was admitted to hospital and seen by the cardiology ward, where she was diagnosed with severe aortic stenosis. Her aortic valve, which controls blood moving from the heart to the body, was restricting blood flow. This causes it to become narrow, resulting in symptoms such as shortness of breath and chest pain.
'She stayed [in hospital] for a few days and it became apparent how serious her condition was,' Campbell says. 'It was made worse by the fact that she was anaemic. She was told she needed the procedure asap, but was still told to go home and wait for the hospital to be in contact within the next two weeks for an appointment.'
The procedure, known as Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (Tavi), is used to replace the valve without open heart surgery. Griffin was still waiting for her procedure to be scheduled when her condition suddenly declined, leading to her death in hospital.
According to research by Valve for Life UK, up to 8.2% of patients on the elective Tavi waiting list die before being able to receive treatment, with some centres reporting a mortality rate as high as 20%. 'Everyone on the waiting list for this procedure needs it and is urgent, and they're all just a ticking timebomb, unfortunately,' Campbell says.
'It comes as no surprise that the figure is as high as it is, and I think it comes down purely to early diagnosis, and once they've got the diagnosis, they're already gravely ill,' Campbell says. 'What I'm finding really sad is that it's all been missed.'
But, for Campbell, one of the hardest things to process is the fact that, if her mother had been able to have the procedure scheduled, the outcome may have been different.
'Knowing and listening to the surgeon who could have performed the surgery on my mum [during the inquest], and hearing him saying that there is a 1% mortality rate to this surgery that could have saved her life is extraordinary,' Campbell says. 'She was so fit, so well and so stoic, and she was my everything in my life. I worked with her for the last 40-odd years and spoke to her every day.'
She added: 'Since then, I've lost myself as well because I don't have the one person that I can trust and belong to. It's hit me in a huge way that I didn't think was possible. Everything is more transient because I've lost the biggest person in my life and that's what I struggle to get over.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Guardian

30 minutes ago

• The Guardian

All babies in England to get DNA test to assess risk of diseases within 10 years

Every baby in England is to have a DNA screening to avoid fatal diseases and receive personalised healthcare as part of the government's £650m investment in DNA technology, it has been reported. Within a decade, every newborn will undergo whole genome sequencing, which assesses the risk of hundreds of diseases and is expected to form part of the government's 10-year plan for the health service. Wes Streeting, the health secretary, told the Telegraph the advances in genomics would allow people to 'leapfrog' killer illnesses and receive 'personalised' health care. He said: 'The revolution in medical science means that we can transform the NHS over the coming decade, from a service which diagnoses and treats ill health to one that predicts and prevents it. 'Genomics presents us with the opportunity to leapfrog disease, so we're in front of it rather than reacting to it.' Streeting added: 'With the power of this new technology, patients will be able to receive personalised healthcare to prevent ill health before symptoms begin, reducing the pressure on NHS services and helping people live longer, healthier lives.' All new parents are now offered a blood spot test for their babies, normally when the child is five days old, to check whether they have any of nine rare but serious conditions. The newborn's heel is pricked to collect a few drops of blood on a card that is sent away to be tested. Along with a greater focus on prevention, the 10-year plan is expected to include Streeting's other 'shifts' in the NHS, from hospitals towards more community-focused care and from analogue to digital services. Last week the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, announced that the government would increase NHS funding by £29bn a year in real terms over the next three years. A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'Our 10-year health plan will be published soon and will set out details for a range of initiatives to advance the NHS and make it fit for the future.' In October, the NHS in England announced it was to screen 100,000 newborn babies for more than 200 genetic conditions in a world-first scheme aimed at bolstering early diagnosis and treatment.

The Independent

an hour ago

• The Independent

Every baby's DNA ‘to be screened' on the NHS in bid to detect and prevent disease

All babies could have their DNA mapped to test for future illnesses under a plan unveiled by the government, it has been reported. Labour is set to pour £650 million into DNA technology in an effort to treat serious illnesses before they become a problem. In comments first reported in the Daily Telegraph, health secretary Wes Streeting said new technology in areas such as genomics would help 'leapfrog' illnesses. The outlet says, within a decade, every baby will undergo whole genome sequencing as part of the drive. The investment in genomics is expected to support the Government's 10-year plan for the NHS, which will see a greater focus on technology and prevention. Mr Streeting said: 'The revolution in medical science means that we can transform the NHS over the coming decade, from a service which diagnoses and treats ill health to one that predicts and prevents it. 'Genomics presents us with the opportunity to leapfrog disease, so we're in front of it rather than reacting to it.' Mr Streeting has previously spoken about his desire to make the NHS more preventative, reducing rates of serious illness and saving money in the process. The plan is also likely to see a greater role for artificial intelligence and other technologies to predict illness and allow treatment or medication to be offered much earlier. He added: 'With the power of this new technology, patients will be able to receive personalised healthcare to prevent ill health before symptoms begin, reducing the pressure on NHS services and helping people live longer, healthier lives.' Along with a greater focus on prevention, the Government's 10-year plan is expected to include Mr Streeting's two other 'shifts' in the NHS. That will see a shift away from hospitals towards more community-focused care, and from analogue to digital services. It follows Chancellor Rachel Reeves' announcement that the Government would increase NHS funding by £29 billion per year in real terms over the next three years as it tries to cut waiting lists in line with its election promises.

Sky News

an hour ago

• Sky News

The assisted dying debate has been politics – but not as we know it

The House of Commons is a place defined by confrontation where political battles play out and engage more actively with their constituents. But the atmosphere could not have been more different on Friday, as those on both sides of the assisted dying debate listened respectfully, almost solemnly, to one another in the final hours before the crucial vote. As MPs headed for the division lobbies, the bill's supporters seemed confident but nervous. When the voting was completed and the result imminent, a long and profound silence fell over the House. From the press gallery, it seemed that the entire Commons was holding its breath together, collectively aware of the historic moment we were all about to witness, whatever the outcome. The woman at the centre of this seismic moment, the bill's sponsor Kim Leadbeater, braced herself as the result came in. Many months of pressure and responsibility appeared to be lifted from her shoulders as the win was announced and colleagues gathered to commend her efforts. Throughout the process this been politics but not as we know it, with party divisions put aside and MPs asked to search their own consciences and come to their own conclusions. It has created a more collaborative atmosphere in parliament and encouraged MPs to engage more actively with their constituents. 3:06 In the end there was still anger, frustration and disappointment among those who were against the law change, either on principle or because they believed the legislation was flawed. And of course, politics will go back to being combative and voices in the Commons will be raised once again. But for a brief period, historic change was calmly ushered in. The challenge for the proponents now is to take the legislation through the next phases and deliver it with the same smoothness and determination.