Protect gender non-conforming students. That's what Title IX demands
In classrooms across the country, gender non-conforming students are forced to play roles they never auditioned for. They are pressured to fit into outdated scripts about what boys and girls should look and act like. It's a reality that brings to mind "The Catcher in the Rye's" Holden Caulfield: a young person suffocating under society's expectations, longing for authenticity in a world full of "phonies." But while Holden had the privilege to rebel, gender non-conforming youth today face harassment, fear, and institutional neglect simply for showing up as themselves.
Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 prohibits sex-based discrimination in federally funded schools. Recent legal interpretations, including Bostock v. Clayton County (2020), have made it clear that this includes gender identity and expression. Yet, enforcement remains patchy and inconsistent, and schools too often resort to silence instead of safety.
More: Cincinnati-area trans people, families 'exhausted' from Trump orders against them
According to GLSEN, an education organization working to end discrimination, harassment, and bullying based on sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression, 71.6% of gender non-conforming students report being verbally harassed because of their gender expression. These students are not safe, and they know it. Title IX, originally passed to ensure educational equity, must be enforced to protect all students, including those who challenge gender norms.
We need the U.S. Department of Education to strengthen enforcement and training, Congress to stand firm against rollbacks, and, above all, the public to understand that this isn't about politics. It's about giving every child the freedom to learn without fear, no matter who they are or how they dress.
More: University of Cincinnati's 'biological' bathroom signs removed. 'Error' cost $16K
No student should be punished for refusing to fit into someone else's story.
Elisabeth Sebastian, Fort Wright, Ky.
This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: Title IX means nothing if schools ignore gender identity | Letter
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Associated Press
7 hours ago
- Associated Press
What to know about the Supreme Court ruling 10 years ago that legalized same-sex marriage in the US
COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — A landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling 10 years ago this month, on June 26, 2015, legalized same-sex marriage across the U.S. The Obergefell v. Hodges decision followed years of national wrangling over the issue, during which some states moved to protect domestic partnerships or civil unions for same-sex partners and others declared marriage could exist only between one man and one woman. In plaintiff James Obergefell's home state of Ohio, voters had overwhelmingly approved such an amendment in 2004 — effectively mirroring the federal Defense of Marriage Act, which denied federal recognition of same-sex couples. That laid the political groundwork for the legal challenge that bears his name. Here's what you need to know about the lawsuit, the people involved and the 2015 ruling's immediate and longer term effects: Who are James Obergefell and Rick Hodges? Obergefell and John Arthur, who brought the initial legal action, were long-time partners living in Cincinnati. They had been together for nearly two decades when Arthur was diagnosed with ALS, or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, in 2011. Obergefell became Arthur's caregiver as the incurable condition ravaged his health over time. When in 2013 the Supreme Court struck down the federal Defense of Marriage Act, which had denied federal recognition of same-sex marriages, the pair acted quickly to get married. Their union was not allowed in Ohio, so they boarded a plane to Maryland and, because of Arthur's fragile health, married on the tarmac. It was when they learned their union would not be listed on Arthur's death certificate that the legal battle began. They went to court seeking recognition of their marriage on the document and their request was granted by a court. Ohio appealed and the case began its way up the ladder to the nation's high court. A Democrat, Obergefell made an unsuccessful run for the Ohio House in 2022. Rick Hodges, a Republican, was director of the Ohio Department of Health from August 2014 to 2017. The department handles death certificates in the state. Before being appointed by then-Gov. John Kasich, Hodges served five years in the Ohio House. Acquainted through the court case, he and Obergefell have become friends. What were the legal arguments?The lawsuit eventually titled Obergefell v. Hodges argued that marriage is guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment, specifically the due process and equal protection clauses. The litigation consolidated several lawsuits brought by same-sex couples in Ohio, Kentucky, Michigan and Tennessee who had been denied marriage licenses or recognition for their out-of-state marriages and whose cases had resulted in conflicting opinions in federal circuit courts. In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled the right to marry is fundamental, calling it 'inherent in the liberty of the person,' and therefore protected by the Constitution. The ruling effectively nullified state-level bans on same-sex marriages, as well as laws declining to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other jurisdictions. The custody, property, tax, insurance and business implications of of the decision have also had sweeping impacts on other areas of law. How did the country react to the decision? Same-sex marriages surged in the immediate wake of the Obergefell decision, as dating couples and those already living as domestic partners flocked to courthouses and those houses of worship that welcomed them to legalize their unions. Over the ensuing decade, the number of married same-sex couples has more than doubled to an estimated 823,000, according to June data compiled by the Williams Institute at the University of California Los Angeles School of Law. Not all Americans supported the change. Standing as a national symbol of opponents was Kim Davis, a then-clerk in Rowan County, Kentucky, who refused to issue marriage licenses on religious grounds. She was briefly jailed, touching off weeks of protests as gay marriage foes around the country praised her defiance. Davis, a Republican, lost her bid for reelection in 2018. She was ordered to pay thousands in attorney fees incurred by a couple unable to get a license from her office. She has appealed in July 2024 in a challenge that seeks to overturn Obergefell. As he reflects of the decision's 10th anniversary, Obergefell has worried aloud about the state of LGBTQ+ rights in the country and the possibility that a case could reach the Supreme Court that might overturn the decision bearing his name. Eight states have introduced resolutions this year urging a reversal and the Southern Baptist Convention voted overwhelmingly at its meeting in Dallas earlier this month in favor of banning gay marriage and seeing the Obergefell decision overturned. Meanwhile, more than a dozen states have moved to strengthen legal protections for same-sex married couples in case Obergefell is ever overturned. In 2025, about 7 in 10 Americans — 68% — said marriages between same-sex couples should be recognized by the law as valid, up from 60% in May 2015.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Vance, in L.A., calls Sen. Alex Padilla "José Padilla"
Washington — During a visit with federal law enforcement in Los Angeles on Friday, Vice President JD Vance said the Trump administration still believes a military deployment to the city is necessary. Vance is the highest-ranking Trump administration official to visit the Los Angeles area since protests broke out in the nation's second-largest city over Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids. He gave brief remarks after touring a multi-agency Federal Joint Operations Center and a federal mobile command center, and meeting with leadership and Marines on the ground. President Trump federalized thousands of troops from the California National Guard in response to the Los Angeles-area protests and ordered about 700 Marines to be deployed to protect federal property. The president has directed federal immigration authorities to prioritize deporting individuals from Democratic-run cities, including Los Angeles, and a series of ICE operations in L.A. sparked the protests earlier this month. The deployments drew a lawsuit from California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who argued the presence of military forces could inflame the situation. Late Thursday, a federal appeals court allowed the president to keep control of the National Guard troops he deployed to the Los Angeles region, halting a ruling from a lower court judge who said the president acted illegally when he activated the troops over objections from Newsom. The protests have waned, but the troops remain. In remarks to reporters on Friday, Vance said the situation has "gotten a lot better," but the Marines and National Guard forces are still "very much a necessary part of what's going on here," arguing the protests could "flare back up." The vice president also alleged that Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass had "egged on" violence during the protests. The administration has accused state and local officials of failing to protect federal immigration agents from threats and interference from protesters. Local authorities have pushed back, arguing federal authorities are responsible for the chaos. "I would absolutely say that Gavin Newsom is endangering law enforcement," Vance said. Vance suggested the administration is willing to use the Guard in other places, but that it hopes not to. "If you enforce your own laws and if you protect federal law enforcement, we're not going to send in the National Guard because it's unnecessary," the vice president said. In a news conference Friday night, L.A. Mayor Karen Bass said Vance was "spewing lies and utter nonsense in an attempt to promote division and conflict in our city." Vance calls Sen. Alex Padilla "José Padilla" At one point, Vance referred to Sen. Alex Padilla, a California Democrat, as "José Padilla." "I was hoping José Padilla would be here to ask a question, but unfortunately, I guess he decided not to show up because there wasn't the theater," Vance said. The senator made news last week after he was forcibly removed from a press conference hosted by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, an incident Vance called "pure political theater." "Mr. vice president, how dare you disrespect our senator," Bass said in her news conference. "You don't know his name? But yet you served with him before you were vice president, and you continue to serve with him today. Because last time I checked, the vice president of the United States is the president of the Senate. You serve with him today, but how dare you disrespect him and call him José. But I guess he just looked like anybody to you." Newsom said Friday in a post on X that mixing up Padilla's name was "not an accident," noting that Vance and Padilla served in the Senate together. "It was very generous of the Vice President to take time out of his closed-door fundraiser to stage a photo op in front of a fire truck — where he 'mistakenly' called a Latino U.S. Senator 'Jose,'" Newsom's office said in a statement. A spokesperson for the senator told CBS News the remark was an "unserious comment from an unserious administration." "As a former colleague of Senator Padilla, the Vice President knows better. He should be more focused on demilitarizing our city than taking cheap shots," the spokesperson added. "He must have mixed up two people who have broken the law," Vance spokesperson Taylor Van Kirk told CBS News. One of the more high-profile José Padillas was sentenced to prison on terrorism and conspiracy charges over a decade ago, on allegations that he worked with al-Qaeda. On Thursday, federal agents were seen outside the Los Angeles Dodgers ballpark, after the team said it blocked immigration authorities from entering. Fans protested, and the Department of Homeland Security said Customs and Border Patrol vehicles "were in the stadium parking lot very briefly, unrelated to any operation or enforcement." Federal immigration officers have stepped up enforcement efforts, with White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller saying ICE officers are aiming for at least 3,000 arrests a day. So far, the number of arrests has failed to reach that target, with a daily average of about 1,200 arrests in the month of June as of earlier this week. Back in Washington, Mr. Trump is handling international matters, particularly the Israel-Iran conflict. In a statement on Thursday, the president said he will decide whether the U.S. will join Israel in its strikes in the next two weeks. The president traveled to Bedminster, New Jersey, for a fundraising dinner Friday night after meetings with his national security team at the White House. SpaceX Starship upper stage blows up Hurricane Erick approaches Mexico with destructive winds, major storm surge "Jaws" premiered 50 years ago, but it's a wonder it got made at all
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
DHS to limit lawmaker access to ICE facilities after confrontations with Democrats
Immigration and Customs Enforcement has unveiled new restrictions on members of Congress and their staff members for visiting immigration facilities, following a series of tense clashes between federal agents and Democratic officials attempting to perform oversight visits amid the Trump administration's push to rapidly arrest and deport millions. While members of Congress can show up unannounced for inspections at immigration detention centers, the new rules specify that legislators must provide at least 72 hours of advanced notice before visiting other ICE facilities like field offices, the first point of contact for many detained migrants. The rules also say members of congressional staff must provide a day's notice when visiting detention facilities. Democrats criticized the new rules. 'This unlawful policy is a smokescreen to deny Member visits to ICE offices across the country, which are holding migrants – and sometimes even U.S. citizens – for days at a time,' Rep. Bennie Thompson of Mississippi said in a statement to The Hill. 'They are therefore detention facilities and are subject to oversight and inspection at any time. DHS pretending otherwise is simply their latest lie.' The policy comes after a series of high-profile incidents in which Democrats accused the Trump administration of blocking them from conducting lawful oversight, while the White House alleges lawmakers aren't following proper protocols and are causing security risks. Most recently, New York City comptroller and mayoral candidate Brad Lander was handcuffed by federal agents as he attempted to observe a federal immigration court in Manhattan on Tuesday. The former council member says his brief arrest was an alarming erosion of usual norms. 'I am happy to report I am just fine. I lost a button,' he said after the confrontation. 'The rule of law is not fine. And our constitutional democracy is not fine.' Last week, Senator Alex Padilla of California was forcibly removed and pinned to the floor by federal agents as he interrupted a press conference from Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. At the briefing, which came at the height of Los Angeles-area protests against the administration's immigration policies, Noem was in the middle of saying federal authorities would 'liberate the city from the socialists and the burdensome leadership that this governor and that this mayor have placed on this country and what they have tried to insert into the city.' Padilla, in a floor speech on Tuesday, said the comments inspired him to speak up. 'When I heard something so blatantly un-American from the Secretary of Homeland Security, a cabinet official, of course, I was compelled, both as a senator and as an American, to speak up, but before I could even get out my question, I was physically and aggressively forced out of the room,' he said. The Trump administration accuses Padilla of being aggressive and failing to promptly identify himself or comply with security officers' commands. Last week, New Jersey congresswoman LaMonica McIver was indicted on federal charges over an incident in May, in which members of Congress, protesters, ICE agents, and the Democratic mayor of Newark, Ras Baraka, pushed and shoved outside of an ICE facility in New Jersey, after officials declined to let Baraka join an inspection of the building. McIver has called the charges 'a brazen attempt at political intimidation,' while Acting U.S. Attorney for New Jersey Alina Habba said in a statement that conduct like McIver's alleged actions 'endangers law enforcement and the communities those officers serve.' Previous federal charges against Baraka over the May incident were dropped, a reversal a federal judge called an 'embarrassing retraction.' Even with the new restrictions, the issue of detention center access looks set to remain. On Wednesday, Democratic lawmakers in Illinois and New York both criticized the administration for allegedly denying them access to ICE facilities. 'ICE just blocked @RepDanGoldman and me from inspecting their detention center at 26 Federal Plaza, where migrants are reportedly being forced to sleep on the floor for days at a time,' Rep. Jerry Nadler of New York wrote on X. 'Congress has a duty to conduct oversight, and the American people deserve transparency. ICE doesn't get to lie about the nature of this facility to dodge oversight and hide behind masks while doing it. This is completely unacceptable, and we will not back down.' Also today, Rep. Chuy Garcia alleged he was denied entry for an oversight visit to the Broadview ICE Processing Center. Democrats and immigration observers have alleged a decline in conditions inside ICE facilities since Trump took office and began pushing for a record pace of deportations. At least nine people have died in ICE custody since Trump took office, quickly outpacing the data from the worst year of deaths under the Biden administration. Federal officials say ICE agents have faced a spike in threats in recent months amid widespread protests over immigration raids, justifying the use of face masks and other security precautions. Protesters have also targeted ICE facilities for protests, including a demonstration in Portland over the weekend that police declared a riot and used crowd-control munitions to disperse.