'Remarkable' astrophysicist praised by top scientist
A Nobel Prize winning scientist has praised the "remarkable" work of an astrophysicist at the University of Central Lancashire (UCLan).
PhD student Dr Alexia Lopez discovered the Giant Arc - a gigantic, ring-shaped structure in space, made up of galaxies and galaxy clusters that scientists say is so big it challenges our understanding of the universe.
Sir Roger Penrose, who won the Nobel Prize for Physics for his work on black holes, has invited her to meet in person at Oxford University, where he is an Emeritus Professor.
Ms Lopez, 28, said she "thought someone was playing a joke at first" when she heard he got in touch to say he was "fascinated by my findings".
"I couldn't believe someone of such gravitas was interested in my work," she said, adding he is "so passionate about his research and it's infectious to see how excited he is about the possible links" between their findings.
Sir Roger, a world-renowned mathematician and physicist who mentored Professor Stephen Hawking, has a keen interest in the cosmological discoveries because they could show signs of his theory of the origin and development of the universe.
He has cited Ms Lopez in his latest research publication, The Physics of Conformal Cyclic Cosmology.
He said: "Alexia Lopez has discovered a remarkable effect which appears to substantiate the conformal cyclic cosmological model that I originally suggested in the early years of the 21st Century.
"Her observations provide what appears to be a very strong challenge to conventional cosmology which had not been previously anticipated."
Ms Lopez, who is now a postdoctoral researcher at UCLan in Preston, has been with the university since 2015 when she began an undergraduate degree in physics with astrophysics.
She then went on to complete a Masters and PhD with the University's Jeremiah Horrocks Institute for Maths and Physics (JHI).
Professor Derek Ward Thompson, director of the JHI, said: "We're very proud of what Alexia has achieved so far and she's still only at the beginning of her scientific career.
"To have the backing of Sir Roger Penrose is amazing and really highlights the significance of her research."
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Lancashire on BBC Sounds and follow BBC Lancashire on Facebook, X and Instagram and watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer.
Huge galaxy ring challenges thinking on universe
Astronomers discover 'the perfect solar system'
US issues first ever fine for space junk
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Write, submit an idea, learn: Don't wait or hold back, just do it
We often imagine that the people who achieve great things in life – whether in science, art, or any field of impact – do so only when everything is in place. When they feel ready. When they have the resources. When confidence arrives like a green light. But that's rarely the case. If you wait until you feel fully skilled, fully prepared, fully sure – you'll be waiting forever. Because readiness isn't a moment that arrives before action. It's something that is built through action. The truth is, nobody has it all figured out from the start. Not even the ones who changed the world. Take Marie Curie. When she first began her groundbreaking research on radioactivity, she worked in what could barely be called a laboratory – just a leaky, unheated shed behind a school in Paris. Her equipment was rudimentary, her working conditions far from ideal. But she started anyway. Slowly, painstakingly, she uncovered the elements polonium and radium, and changed the course of science forever. She didn't wait to be invited into the halls of recognition. She walked in with curiosity and courage, even when everything around her said, not yet. Or consider Paul Lauterbur and Peter Mansfield, awarded the 2003 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their work on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). When Lauterbur first proposed his idea of spatial encoding of MRI signals – basically tracking movements of water molecules in our body under changing magnetic fields – he was told by several peers that the concept wouldn't work. His initial paper was even rejected by academic journals. But he didn't stop. He kept refining, experimenting, pushing forward. Peter Mansfield, working independently in the UK, added mathematical precision and practical applications to Lauterbur's vision. Together, through trial, failure, and persistence – not certainty – they helped create a medical breakthrough that has saved millions of lives. No one handed them a perfect roadmap. They began with what they had and allowed the process to show them the rest. The same is true of the Wright brothers. Neither Wilbur nor Orville had formal engineering training. They were bicycle mechanics with an obsession for flight. When they began designing their first aircraft, they had no guarantees. What they did have was a workshop, a windy field, and an unshakable willingness to try. And fail. And try again. On Dec 17, 1903, after years of trial and error, they achieved powered flight. What united these individuals wasn't certainty – it was movement. Because progress doesn't come from waiting for the perfect moment. It comes from doing what you can with what you have. From taking the first step, even when the second is unclear. That's where clarity comes from. That's where confidence begins – not before action, but after you begin. But too often, we let hesitation wear the mask of wisdom. We say we're preparing. Planning. Waiting for 'the right time.' But behind that delay often lives fear. Fear of getting it wrong. Fear of judgment. Fear of being seen before we feel complete. Yet what's worse than failing is never starting at all. Perfection is a seductive illusion. It convinces us that we need one more certificate, one more tool, one more dose of courage before we begin. But all perfection really does is delay progress. Because messy beginnings still move you forward. The first draft is always rough. The early stages of anything – be it a project, a paper, a plan – are supposed to feel shaky. That's not failure. That's momentum. Even in technology and research, we rarely launch with a finished product. Software goes live in beta. Hypotheses evolve mid-experiment. Scientific understanding is always, by nature, iterative. So why should we expect our personal or creative pursuits to be perfectly formed from the outset? Start before you feel ready. That's not recklessness. It's wisdom wrapped in action. Because here's the truth: you cannot think your way into certainty. But you can act your way into it. Each step you take reveals the next. Each small effort sharpens your direction. And over time, the fear that once held you back gets replaced by something far more valuable: belief in your ability to adapt. So if you've been holding back – waiting to feel smarter, braver, richer, more experienced – consider this your permission to begin. With shaky hands. With limited resources. With uncertainty still in the air. Start writing the thing. Submit the idea. Try the method. Take the class. Launch the version you have now. Imperfect action beats perfect procrastination every single time. Just stop waiting. The views expressed here are the personal opinion of the writer and do not necessarily represent that of Twentytwo13.
Newsweek
a day ago
- Newsweek
French Scientists Discover New Blood Group
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A group of French researchers have discovered a new, "ultra rare" blood group in a Guadeloupean woman after years of researching and sequencing her blood, the French Blood Establishment (EFS) said in a Friday press release. Newsweek has reached out to EFS's press team for comment via email on Saturday. Why It Matters The discovery marks the 48th known blood group system in the world. Understanding blood types is critical for ensuring safe and effective transfusions and organ transplants, as well as identifying certain health risks. Blood classification helps medical providers determine compatibility—or lack thereof—between donors and recipients. There are approximately 14 million units of blood transfused annually in the United States, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Outside of the well-known ABO system, there are a series of rare blood groups. What To Know In a social media post on LinkedIn, the EFS said in French that "this discovery was officially recognized in early June in Milan by the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT)." The woman is the only known carrier of a rare blood type called "Gwada negative." The case first drew attention in 2011 when she required a blood transfusion, but no compatible donor could be found. Researchers later revisited her case in 2019 and identified the unique blood type through further analysis, according to the EFS's Friday press release. Thierry Peyrard, a medical biologist at the EFS involved in the discovery, told Agence France-Presse (AFP) that a "very unusual" antibody was found in the patient's blood in 2011. She was 54 years old at the time when she underwent a series of tests prior to surgery, according to Le Monde. Due to limited resources at the time, research into her blood type had been halted. Peyrard said the woman inherited the blood type from her parents who had the mutated gene. EFS, in French, said that the discovery "brings hope to patients, especially those with a rare blood type. Remember that the safety of a transfusion depends on the compatibility of blood groups." The group says it has been responsible for identifying 10 of the past 17 blood group systems discovered in the past decade. Karl Landsteiner discovered the first blood groups in the early 1900s and was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1930 for his work. Serum tubes with blood samples from patients are processed in the central medical laboratory of the St. Georg Clinic in Leipzig. Serum tubes with blood samples from patients are processed in the central medical laboratory of the St. Georg Clinic in Leipzig. Waltraud Grubitzsch/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images What People Are Saying The official Nobel Prize account posted on X, formerly Twitter, on June 17: "The discovery of blood groups completely changed the view on blood transfusions, and it didn't take long before the first successful attempts were carried out. During WWI, blood transfusions were first performed on a large scale. Countless lives were also saved through surgeries, which previously had been unfeasible due to the blood loss involved." What Happens Next? Scientists continue to study blood types, advancing global health care and improving the precision and effectiveness of transfusions.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Nobel laureate concerned about AI-generated image of black hole at the center of our galaxy
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The monster black hole at the center of our galaxy is spinning at ear "top speed," according to a new artificial intelligence (AI) model. The model, trained partially on complex telescope data that was previously considered too noisy to be useful, aims to create the most detailed black hole images ever. However, based on the questionable quality of the data, not all experts are convinced that the AI model is accurate. "I'm very sympathetic and interested in what they're doing," Reinhard Genzel, an astrophysicist at the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics in Germany and one of the winners of the 2020 Nobel Prize in physics, told Live Science. "But artificial intelligence is not a miracle cure." For decades, scientists have been trying to observe and characterize Sagittarius A*, the supermassive black hole at the heart of our galaxy. In May 2022, they unveiled the first-ever image of this enormous object, but there were still a number of questions, such as how it behaves. Now, an international team of scientists has attempted to harness the power of AI to glean more information about Sagittarius A* from data collected by the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT). Unlike some telescopes, the EHT doesn't reside in a single location. Rather, it is composed of several linked instruments scattered across the globe that work in tandem. The EHT uses long electromagnetic waves — up to a millimeter in length — to measure the radius of the photons surrounding a black hole. However, this technique, known as very long baseline interferometry, is very susceptible to interference from water vapor in Earth's atmosphere. This means it can be tough for researchers to make sense of the information the instruments collect. "It is very difficult to deal with data from the Event Horizon Telescope," Michael Janssen, an astrophysicist at Radboud University in the Netherlands and co-author of the study, told Live Science. "A neural network is ideally suited to solve this problem." Janssen and his team trained an AI model on EHT data that had been previously discarded for being too noisy. In other words, there was too much atmospheric static to decipher information using classical techniques. Through this AI technique, they generated a new image of Sagittarius A*'s structure, and their picture revealed some new features. For example, the black hole appears to be spinning at "almost top speed," the researchers said in a statement, and its rotational axis also seems to be pointing toward Earth. Their results were published this month in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics. Pinpointing the rotational speed of Sagittarius A* would give scientists clues about how radiation behaves around supermassive black holes and offer insight into the stability of the disk of matter around it. RELATED STORIES — New view of the supermassive black hole at the heart of the Milky Way hints at an exciting hidden feature (image) — Sagittarius A* in pictures: The 1st photo of the Milky Way's monster black hole explained in images — The 1st Milky Way black hole image was groundbreaking — the next could be even better However, not everyone is convinced that the new AI is totally accurate. According to Genzel, the relatively low quality of the data going into the model could have biased it in unexpected ways. As a result, the new image may be somewhat distorted, he said, and shouldn't be taken at face value. In the future, Janssen and his team plan to apply their technique to the latest EHT data and measure it against real-world results. They hope this analysis will help to refine the model and improve future simulations. This story was provided by a sister site of
