logo
Now, Kavitha rivets eyes on irri projects to take on Revanth govt

Now, Kavitha rivets eyes on irri projects to take on Revanth govt

Hans India6 hours ago

Hyderabad: Telangana Jagruthi President Kalvakuntla Kavitha has now focused on the irrigation front to target the Revanth Reddy led government in the state, raising issues concerning projects like Bollapalli in Nallamala and the oustees of the Polavaram submergence area, among others.
According to Jagruthi leaders, Kavitha has been keenly studying the irrigation sector with the aim of cornering the current administration. Along with opposing the Banakacherla project, Kavitha has been vocal against the proposed Bollapalli project in the Nallamala Forest area. During a recent press conference, Kavitha stated that the forest area faces submergence due to the Bollapalli project, proposed by the Andhra Pradesh government.
She also challenged the narrative that Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu was never opposed to Telangana projects, recalling his past letters and petitions filed in the Supreme Court against them. She criticised the Chief Minister's 'paper tiger' stance, asserting that although he calls himself the 'Nallamala Tiger', he has failed to act against projects like the proposed 150 TMC Bollapalli reservoir, which threatens to submerge the Nallamala forest.
Kavitha is organising a roundtable meeting on Friday to discuss submergence in Telangana due to the Polavaram project. Jagruthi General Secretary Naveen Achari confirmed that leaders of various parties, public organisations, and flood victims would participate and speak at the roundtable meeting, scheduled from 10 am to 2 pm on Friday.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Calcutta High Court stops Bengal's stipends for non-teaching staff move
Calcutta High Court stops Bengal's stipends for non-teaching staff move

India Today

time36 minutes ago

  • India Today

Calcutta High Court stops Bengal's stipends for non-teaching staff move

The Calcutta High Court on Friday paused the Bengal government's decision to offer stipends to non-teaching staff of the 2016 batch after the Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of their jobs in April in the jobs-for-cash Amrita Sinha, who had reserved the order last Monday, halted the payment of stipends for Group C and D non-teaching Mamata Banerjee-headed Bengal government announced a Rs 25,000 stipend for Group C staff, and Rs 20,000 for Group D after the top court's massive April Separate petitions were filed at the Calcutta High Court, challenging the format of the fresh selection process for teachers and also Banerjee's decision to provide non-teaching staff with a monthly April, the Supreme Court had blasted the Bengal government as it upheld the High Court's decision to reject the appointments of more than 25,000 teaching and non-teaching staff by the West Bengal School Service Commission (WBSSC) in 2016 in connection with the jobs-for-cash scam.A bench of former Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna, and Justice PV Sanjay Kumar called the selection process fraudulent, amounting to cheating."We find no reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court that the services of tainted candidates and their appointment be terminated. Since their appointment was by fraud, this amounts to cheating," the bench High Court had cited serious irregularities such as OMR sheet tampering and rank manipulation, thereby dismissing the appointments of 25,753 teachers and non-teaching staff in state-run and state-aided schools. In its April ruling, the Supreme Court, however, said that candidates already appointed need not hand over the salary given so far. IN THIS STORY#West Bengal#Mamata Banerjee

Revanth has less knowledge, more venom, alleges BRS MLA Harish Rao
Revanth has less knowledge, more venom, alleges BRS MLA Harish Rao

New Indian Express

time37 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Revanth has less knowledge, more venom, alleges BRS MLA Harish Rao

HYDERABAD: A day after the state government held an all-party meeting on the Andhra Pradesh government's Godavari-Banakacherla project, BRS MLA T Harish Rao alleged that Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy lacked knowledge on irrigation. Speaking to reporters here on Thursday, Harish said: 'Revanth Reddy has less knowledge and more venom when it comes to Telangana water projects.' 'Lies flowed like water at the meeting,' he said and added that the meeting tried to blame BRS president and former chief minister K Chandrasekhar Rao for AP's proposed Godavari-Banakacherla (G-B) project. Stating that the all-party meeting was turned into a 'political platform', the former irrigation minister said that the chief minister 'neither knows the basics of the irrigation sector nor has any knowledge of the basins of various rivers'. 'Revanth Reddy was seen asking the officials in which river basins Devadula and Banakacherla were located. It shows his lack of knowledge. Even schoolchildren know that Devadula was constructed across the Godavari,' he added. Harish alleged that the way Revanth spoke at the meeting indicated that he was giving a green signal to the G-B project. 'That's why the CM said that they would be satisfied with 1,000 tmcft in Godavari and 500 tmcft in Krishna,' he alleged.

Andhra High Court pulls up state govt over delay in setting up PCA cells
Andhra High Court pulls up state govt over delay in setting up PCA cells

New Indian Express

time38 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Andhra High Court pulls up state govt over delay in setting up PCA cells

VIJAYAWADA: The Andhra Pradesh High Court on Thursday directed the State government to file a counter over delay in setting up the Police Complaint Authority (PCA) cells at district level. Hearing a petition filed by a differently-abled person Tirumala Krishna of Mahanandi in Kurnool district, who claimed that 13 FIRs were filed against him across the State for a single social media post, Justice Nunepally Harinath found fault with the government for failing to set up the State and district-level PCA cells. The petitioner alleged that the 'Red Book' rule prevailed in the State, with unchecked police high-handedness. Representing the petitioner, advocate V Surender Reddy argued that the police were acting arbitrarily and unreasonably. He noted that Section 111 of BNS was invoked against his client merely for a social media post, despite the clear ruling from both the Supreme Court and the High Court against such misuse. He further emphasised that the Supreme Court had previously issued clear instructions to set up PCA cells at both the State and district levels to address grievances against police harassment, but these directives have not been implemented by the State. Later, the matter was posted to July 17.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store