F/A-XX could be the Navy's last piloted fighter, bring greater range
NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. — The Navy's upcoming sixth-generation fighter may be its last manned fighter, the director of the service's air warfare division said Tuesday.
F/A-XX will include new capabilities and technologies, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning, Rear Adm. Michael Donnelly said at the Navy League's Sea Air Space conference. The upgrades will provide more battlespace awareness and improve how naval aviators make decisions.
Those technological advancements could help bring the Navy into a new era where piloted and unmanned aircraft operate more closely together, such as with the Navy's planned AI-operated drone wingmen, known as collaborative combat aircraft, or larger, unmanned platforms that might come in the future.
'It could be our last tactical manned fighter that we operate out of the Navy,' Donnelly said. 'It will actually be at a point where we are more man-on-the-loop than man-in-the-loop, and be the bridge to fully integrating towards the hybrid air wing [combining crewed and uncrewed platforms] in the future, in the 2040s.'
Donnelly said the F/A-XX will allow the Navy to operate in contested environments and outmatch adversaries in ways that surpass the Navy's current fighters.
'We do that today, but we do it at parity because of the capabilities we have fielded today,' Donnelly said. 'So F/A-XX is going to be that next improvement.'
Navy officials would not say when an announcement on F/A-XX would be made, but it could come soon. The Air Force's counterpart to the Navy's F/A-XX — the Boeing-made F-47 Next Generation Air Dominance fighter — was announced by President Donald Trump in an Oval Office event March 21. Breaking Defense reported last month that Lockheed Martin had been eliminated from the running for F/A-XX, leaving Boeing and Northrop Grumman as the remaining competitors.
At the Sea Air Space event, Donnelly told reporters that F/A-XX is expected to be able to fly more than 25% farther than Navy's current fighters before having to top up with a refueling tanker.
The F/A-18 Super Hornet has a combat range of about 1,275 nautical miles, and the carrier-based F-35C Joint Strike Fighter can fly more than 1,200 nautical miles.
'That's a core attribute of the F/A-XX,' Donnelly told reporters. 'It will definitely have longer inherent range, and then with refueling, you could say that's indefinite, as long as refueling is available.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Entrepreneur
2 hours ago
- Entrepreneur
How to Use Micro-Acquisitions to Scale Faster and Smarter
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. Most people assume that business acquisitions are reserved for massive companies with deep pockets and teams of M&A lawyers. But here's the truth: You don't need a war chest to buy and grow another business. In fact, you can scale faster, safer and smarter by using micro-acquisitions — small, strategic purchases of businesses that cost less than what most startups raise in a seed round. Micro-acquisitions aren't just a shortcut to growth; they're a powerful way to buy revenue, talent and capabilities without the slow grind of building from scratch. Here's how entrepreneurs can use them to scale without raising millions and without the typical risk that comes with starting everything from zero. Related: Entrepreneurship is Risky. Follow This Less Risky Path For Entrepreneurial Success What exactly is a micro-acquisition? A micro-acquisition typically refers to the purchase of a small business, often in the range of $50,000 to $500,000. These deals usually involve solo founders or very small teams and are often bootstrapped businesses. You'll find them in SaaS, ecommerce, media, digital services and even niche B2B verticals. Unlike larger deals that require complex due diligence and outside investors, micro-acquisitions can often be done quickly and creatively financed, sometimes even with seller financing or revenue-based payments. A great place to browse real-world examples is MicroAcquire (recently rebranded as which has become the go-to marketplace for buying and selling small internet businesses. Why micro-acquisitions make strategic sense When you build a business, you're investing time and money into acquiring customers, building a product and refining operations. But when you buy a business, even a small one, you skip ahead in the game. Here's what a micro-acquisition can instantly provide: Revenue : You're buying cash flow from day one. Customers: You inherit a base of users or clients without the CAC (customer acquisition cost). Product or tech : If you're in software, buying a product that's already functional saves months of development time. Team : Even one or two experienced people onboard can supercharge your capacity. SEO/traffic: Media sites or content businesses often come with valuable search rankings. This is why seasoned entrepreneurs often say, "Build if you have to. Buy if you can." Related: Is Acquiring a Business Right For You? Here's How to Know If You Should Buy a Business or Start From Scratch How to find the right micro-acquisition target The key to smart acquisitions is alignment with your goals, capabilities and existing infrastructure. Here are three practical ways to uncover acquisition targets: Marketplaces : Flippa and Tiny Acquisitions all list small online businesses for sale. You can filter by size, revenue, industry and growth. Your own network : Many small business owners would sell if they knew someone they could trust. Put out feelers in your LinkedIn network, communities and industry groups. Inbound interest: Once people know you're open to acquiring, founders may reach out directly. It happens more often than you think, especially if you're known in your niche. Look for businesses where you can add unique value. Maybe you have distribution they don't have or operational strengths that could increase margins. How to fund a micro-acquisition without VC money You don't need to raise millions — or anything, in some cases. Micro-acquisitions can be financed in surprisingly flexible ways: Seller financing : The seller agrees to let you pay a portion up front and the rest over time. It's common in smaller deals and shows the seller's confidence in the business continuing to perform. Revenue-based financing : Platforms like Pipe or Capchase let you borrow against predictable revenue, especially for SaaS. Cash flow from your existing business : If you already run a profitable company, you may be able to acquire a smaller one with internal cash flow. Partnership or joint acquisition: You can co-acquire a business with a partner who brings cash, skills or time. Because these are small deals, you don't need to be a finance wizard. Just ensure that the business you're buying can at least cover its own debt payments and ideally contribute profit from month one. What to look out for before you buy Not all micro-acquisitions are worth it. Some look good on the surface but are hiding churn, tech debt or founder-driven sales. Here are red flags to watch: No clear documentation : If the financials are murky or inconsistent, move with caution. Customer churn : In SaaS or subscription businesses, ask for cohort data. A leaky bucket is hard to fix. Overdependence on the founder : If the owner is also the top salesperson, developer and customer support agent, you'll have a lot to replace. Platform risk: Is all their revenue coming from a single ad platform or one ecommerce channel? Do your due diligence, even if it's light. Related: What You Need to Know to Buy the Right Business and Acquire Your Empire Post acquisition: Make the first 90 days count Buying the business is only the start. The value is in what you do after the deal closes. Here's how to make your acquisition pay off: Stabilize : Keep existing operations running smoothly and avoid major changes immediately. Communicate : Let existing customers and any team members know what's changing (and what isn't). Integrate : Plug the acquired business into your existing stack, whether it's tools, processes or branding. Optimize: Use your strengths to unlock growth. Can you improve pricing, add new marketing channels or reduce overhead? Think of your acquisition as a new product line or revenue stream and manage it like you would any core part of your business. If you're running a business, you already know how hard it is to build. Buying a business, even a small one, can be one of the smartest, most leveraged moves you make. Micro-acquisitions put growth within reach without the dilution, risk or grind of raising capital. You get to skip the messy zero-to-one phase and jump into something with traction. As more platforms and tools emerge to make small business deals accessible, this strategy is only going to get more popular. The earlier you start learning the playbook, the further ahead you'll be.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Will Tech Tariffs Slow U.S. Growth?
The tariff roller coaster rumbles on, and for American manufacturers, there's no getting off the ride anytime soon. Even with a drastic reduction in duties on China-made goods and a respite from global 'reciprocal' tariffs, the looming threat of taxes on foreign wares will continue to sow confusion. For some footwear, apparel and textile manufacturers based in the United States, tariff turmoil has been a boon to business, and for others, it's resulted in orbiting by brands and retailers that are voicing interest but aren't quite ready to pull the trigger on onshoring. The uncertainty of President Donald Trump's tariff strategy hasn't just paralyzed retail decision-makers, but the supply chain. Without clarity about the future of trade policy, manufacturers are left wondering about when to scale up—and how. More from Sourcing Journal Amazon and FedEx Continue to Up Their Game on AI-Enabled Logistics Robots AGI Denim's Apparel Park: A LEED Platinum Pioneer in Sustainable Denim Manufacturing Tariffs Stall Long Beach Imports, Marking Slowest May Since Pre-Covid Era Much of the U.S. manufacturing landscape, across sectors and applications, relies on advanced, automated technologies that take the place of cobbler's benches and traditional sewing machines. Some next-generation processes, like 3D printing, are on the verge of breaking through as production drivers in the U.S. But all of these activities, new and traditional, rely on machinery, much of which is sourced overseas and, under the current tariff regime, subject to potentially onerous duties. 'There's a combination of issues happening right now. I think uncertainty in the marketplace has stymied some orders from coming to fruition, because people are wondering how the 90-day pause will conclude,' said Kim Glas, president and CEO of the National Council of Textile Organizations (NCTO), regarding the opportunities coming to American producers. According to Glas, the rapid evolution of trade policy may be driving up interest in American manufacturing, but it's not providing any clarity for producers that are trying to understand their place in the puzzle. In the absence of a clear path forward, the textile sector is waiting until July 9—the date that the deferral of reciprocal duties concludes—to see 'what kind of market signals' will materialize. NCTO has long been supportive of holding 'trade predators' like China and Vietnam accountable for non-market activities. 'But we have also advocated, including in the first Trump administration, for a few exceptions that we think are critical,' Glas said. Access to state-of-the-art textile manufacturing equipment is necessary to help improve processes at the nation's plants, both in order to drive efficiency and cost-competitiveness. But those upsides come with a hefty price tag. 'It's very expensive,' Glas said. 'When you apply a 10-percent tariff, or another tariff differential, it can make a real difference about whether or not you can afford to reinvest in your operation,' she explained. 'When you do a big capital expenditure like that, you have to amortize those costs over a period of time.' But duty costs are paid upfront. And on a machine that costs tens, if not hundreds of thousands of dollars, even a 10-percent duty could be make-or-break for a small operation. There are significant limitations to such equipment production in the U.S., Glas explained, and the advanced machinery is essential to most modern operations. Devices used for extruding, drawing, texturing or cutting man-made textile materials aren't made stateside. Many of these technologies hail from Europe, and of course, China. Glas stressed the tightness of margins in a price-competitive industry like textiles, where companies are likely to spring for the lowest-cost option. The risk in not having access to advantageous technologies is that foreign operators will gain those capabilities, underscoring their own attractiveness. 'We have to think about this in a holistic way. If the design is to unleash more U.S. investment, we're all for that. We want to see our U.S. textile industry grow and we need the administration's help,' Glas said. 'But there is a recognition across the industry that a lot of the textile machinery is no longer made here, and will not be made here overnight. So we need to have a special dispensation for that.' The NCTO lead said exemptions for production machinery could be written into potential forthcoming trade agreements or tariff regimes, or an exclusion process could be established after tariffs are reinstated (as was the case with Trump 1.0's Section 301 duties on China). Either way, she hopes decisions surrounding solution for American manufacturers are 'expeditious.' 'The tariffs are definitely making the machinery more expensive,' Mitch Cahn, owner of Newark, N.J.-based apparel and gear manufacturer Unionwear, told Sourcing Journal. The producer, which specializes in items like baseball caps and tote bags, imported machinery earlier this year from Canada, before Trump's tariff announcements. 'We didn't make the investment because we expected tariffs, we actually made the investment to ramp up for the U.S.A.'s 250th birthday' in 2026, he said. Cahn anticipates a surge of business surrounding the occasion, along with events like the World Cup and the Olympics. According to the business owner, doubling down on automated machinery (this time, on an apparatus that sews canvas totes) was a matter of necessity. 'We were having a lot of difficulty hiring more sewers; the pool was dry,' he said. 'We had to invest in machinery to make up the gap between what we were doing and what we want to be able to do next year.' The tote bag machinery, when it's operating at full speed, will do the work of 44 people with a single operator. 'We're still ramping up; the goal is to have it probably operating 18 to 20 hours a day by the end of the year,' he said. 'We didn't do it to speed up or save money. We just did it because there was really no way for us to grow linearly—not even exponentially,' he explained. 'There's no way for us to keep adding sewers to our operation, so we need it.' These planned investments in technology aren't a bid to replace human headcount with machines—in fact, Unionwear is holding on tight to the sewers that it employs. One prevailing issue inhibiting the growth of American manufacturing is the lack of a pipeline for skilled, affordable labor. The group has plans to automate other production processes, and is in talks with American manufacturers for those projects. Since the reciprocal duties on more than 60 countries were announced, Unionwear has seen a 'considerable' increase in interest and sales, Cahn said. 'If the tariffs are here to stay, the return is actually going to be much greater than it would have been without the tariffs,' he said of the investment in new technology. 'And the reason for that—and it's something we didn't expect—is the possibility that with automation, we actually can be competitive with import prices that have tariffs on them.' Cahn said that even if the Canadian-made machinery was tariffed at the 25-percent rate that Trump originally threatened, the company still would have made the buy. 'It really opens up a much bigger market for us,' he added. Kuba Graczyk, founder of Los Angeles-based 3D-printed footwear startup Koobz, agreed that investments in automation are key to expansion as a U.S. producer. The group, which prints mono-material, single-piece shoes, currently operates 60 3D printers and is building out a factory in Ventura, Calif. that Graczyk said will house 4,000 printers at the end of the next two years. This will give the startup the ability to churn out 'a couple million pairs of shoes a year,' he estimates. Since April 2—Trump's so-called 'Liberation Day'—business has picked up, he added. 'Customers who were actively working with us decided to substantially accelerate, customers who were just, like, looking at this as something interesting decided to launch projects with us to see where it could go instead of being hesitant,' Graczyk said. 'And those folks who ghosted me suddenly decided, 'Hey, let's get on that again.'' 'Of course, it tapered down' over the course of the ensuing weeks, which saw reductions in duties on China-made goods, deferrals on all reciprocal duties and a trade deal with the United Kingdom, among other trade developments. 'But out of all of this interest, we were able to create an amazing pipeline which is wired long-term, because one of our gauging questions was, 'If the tariffs get back to [what they were previously] would you still work with us?'' Koobz has decided only to take on business with partners that have a long-term plan for onshoring and budget allocated to the effort. But scaling up from 60 to 4,000 3D printers—which Graczyk said ring in at about $600 apiece—will require significant capital expenditure. While the price tag on the devices is modest, a tariff will add to it, and the group is looking to scale aggressively in a short period of time. Koobz looked into 3D printer options made outside of China, and found that the models made stateside as well as in Europe cost more and came equipped with fewer, less-advanced features. 'There are other sources than China. In Europe, there's still a handful companies that can manufacture equipment of that sophistication, at that scale—maybe not as good, maybe a little bit different architecture,' Graczyk said. But beyond price and performance, the factory owner is also looking to develop a smart and resilient supply chain, starting with machinery. One way to foster this could be to diversify sourcing for machines, but there would be differences between the units and the way they operate, as well as possible differences in quality and output. 'We are fortunate enough that we haven't pulled the trigger on any anybody yet, but we are at risk of slowing down because we would rather take more time to de-risk this as much as possible; to slow our progress instead of building while still thinking about where to source,' he said. 'We know we have to build a system which is very flexible.' Koobz is having discussions with 3D printer manufacturers about the potential of nearshoring printer production to free-trade-agreement countries like Mexico, and some are already considering doing so. 'Short-term, I'm not super worried about securing our next year's growth, because the printers that we're using for the current stage of products are already in the U.S., in distributor warehouses,' he said. 'We've already purchased some of them, so there's some frontloading of this equipment. But thinking forward, we need to add multiple colors, multiple materials—those machines are a little bit more sophisticated, and inventory of those doesn't exist.' The already-bought machines and those available onshore will float the company through to the last quarter of 2026, he believes. After that, Koobz will 'have to start solving the puzzle' of where to source the technology that powers its operations. 'Who are we going with for the next stage of building? Are we keeping the same equipment, the same manufacturer, buying higher-tier machines from them—or are we switching to something else because of the tariffs?' To Graczyk, there are bigger concerns than the added financial burden caused by the import taxes. It's the breakdown in the U.S.-China trade relationship—and the inkling that it could get worse, not better—that gives him pause about eating the cost of potential duties and sticking with Chinese suppliers. 'We already figured out how to work it out with the previous tariffs, the 145 percent, because [the printers] generate so much margin and profits that we can absorb [the tariff cost],' he said. But he worries about a 'complete decoupling' of the world's two biggest economies. 'We believe our business model supports the investment in this equipment, even with those outrageous tariffs, but the biggest threat is to business continuity; whether our business needs can be met long-term with companies based in China,' he added. But machines manufactured outside of China, too, will be subject to trade barriers—even those made in nations the U.S. considers allies. Desma, which crafts direct-injection molding machines used by the footwear industry in Germany, has also felt the impacts of tariff talk. While goods from the country face only a 10-percent duty rate (for now), the intense swings in the administration's tariff strategy are not doing anything to propel what was already a sustained and healthy trend toward onshoring, according to regional sales manager Marco Schafer. 'Many people consider options and discuss scenarios, but we have not experienced a rush into investing into manufacturing capabilities, and going at it full-steam,' he said. 'And I think people are right to be cautious, because you just saw what happened with China—you went from next to nothing to over 100 percent. Now they're back to 30 percent, and it's questionable if that has any effect whatsoever, or if the market will eventually just absorb those costs and not much will change.' Schafer said footwear firms have been eager to bring some portion of their manufacturing closer to home for at least three or four years, and those that understand the business case for doing so didn't need tariffs to push them over the finish line. 'It's not so much the Made in USA label; there are some hard economic figures' that underscore the appetite for reshoring. 'You are in the market you're selling in, so your logistics are shortened. The other thing is capital—if you order container loads of goods from Asia, your capital is tied up for quite a long time, whereas if you manufacture here and you have shorter lead times, your cash flow is actually improved.' But it's a decision every company has to make for itself, and much of it has to do with modeling costs versus output. 'A simplified view: you realistically have to make at least 500 pairs of the same or similar product in a day, in a one-shift operation, to even be able to consider an investment into automation,' he believes. Desma's 'bread and butter'—direct injection molding machines—allow footwear manufacturers to produce foam midsoles for performance shoes and sneakers. The largest, most advanced model can churn out 1,500 to 2,000 pairs per day. All told, it's a big investment, with machines costing hundreds of thousands of dollars. Ergo, the footwear manufacturers who are intent on scaling operations using these machines aren't doing so on a whim. 'All the major projects we're working on—whether those are already projects we have on order, or projects we hope to have on order soon—they all originated in 2024,' Schafer said. 'Those projects don't happen overnight; the machines and calculations are complex, so you have to really be sure that you believe in your product and in your forecast.' In short, tariffs are generating interest, but they're not turning the tides for makers of advanced machinery. Even if an American footwear firm decided today that the unstable trade environment necessitated a sea change in sourcing strategy, they couldn't fast-track that shift. 'We're dealing with six-to-seven-month lead times after we after we get an order, but to get the right configuration of the equipment, whether it's a machine or automation line, you're easily involved with engineering six to 12 months before a company is ready to place a [purchase order]. These are often two-year projects,' he said. 'People know that if they get into this field, it's a big commitment.' There are myriad other factors in the equation, from availability of raw materials (many of which are still sourced from Asia or Europe), to staffing (workers must be trained on robotics and electronics), and facilities, which must be equipped to support the machinery and its output. 'All that needs to be put into consideration,' Schafer added. 'And therefore, the whole tariff thing—yes, it triggered some discussions, but no active projects as of yet.' That could change with more clarity about the future of America's trade relationships. Of the volatility of the past two months, Schafer said, 'We hope that the worst is behind us, and that after the loud time comes the time of more quiet negotiations behind closed doors.' This article ran in SJ's Tech Report. To download the full report, click here. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Business Wire
5 hours ago
- Business Wire
F/m Investments CEO Alex Morris Named Finalist for CEO of the Year at 2025 Wealth Management Industry Awards
WASHINGTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- F/m Investments ("F/m"), an $18 billion investment firm and innovative provider of exchange-traded funds (ETFs), today announced that CEO Alex Morris has been named a finalist for Chief Executive Officer of the Year (Asset Manager) at the 2025 Wealth Management Industry Awards. This prestigious recognition honors executives who exemplify vision, creativity, and integrity while demonstrating measurable business impact and thought leadership within the financial services industry. 'This nomination is a testament to the incredible team at F/m who continue to build practical, transparent solutions for advisors and investors navigating today's markets,' said Alex Morris, CEO of F/m Investments. 'I'm honored to be recognized alongside other leaders who are helping shape the future of asset management.' As CEO of F/m Investments, Morris has led the firm through a period of rapid growth and innovation. Since June 2024, he has overseen the launch of two category-defining ETFs: RBIL, the first ETF to offer ultrashort TIPS exposure, and ZTOP, a high-yield ETF tracking the 100 most liquid issuers. Under his leadership, the firm also submitted a groundbreaking dual-share class application to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, a move that could reshape how investors access mutual funds and ETFs within retirement platforms. Hosted annually by the Wealth Management Industry Awards, commonly known as the 'Wealthies,' recognize firms and individuals whose work is elevating the wealth management space and supporting financial advisors in delivering outstanding client outcomes. This year's winners will be announced at the awards gala on September 4, 2025, in New York City. About F/m Investments F/m Investments is a $18 billion investment firm providing diversified investment strategies to advisors and institutional investors across asset classes, markets, and styles. For more information, please visit Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses before investing. For a prospectus or summary prospectus with this and other information about the Fund, please call 1-800-617-0004 or visit our website at Read the prospectus or summary prospectus carefully before investing. Investments involve risk. Principal loss is possible. Distributed by Quasar Distributors, LLC
