People react to statewide cell phone ban in schools
HUNTSVILLE, Ala. (WHNT) — Wednesday, Governor Kay Ivey signed the FOCUS Act, which prohibits students from using smartphones and other wireless devices in public schools.
News 19 spoke to several people in downtown Huntsville Wednesday evening to get their thoughts on this change. Most people said they think it is a good idea to get rid of distractions in the classroom, but some had concerns about safety and being able to communicate with family members throughout the day.
City of Huntsville facing another discrimination lawsuit from second former police dispatcher
One high school senior said he thinks phones can be distracting.
'I have a lot of friends who just sit on their phone all class period and don't get anything done,' said Jordan Cre.
However, he doesn't necessarily agree with prohibiting phones altogether.
'Honestly, I feel like in some cases phones help,' he said.
📲 to stay updated on the go. 📧 to have news sent to your inbox.
Cre said he has a hard time focusing in class and typically listens to music to help him zone in.
'If I don't have anything to listen to or look at than I can't focus on my work' he said.
However, focus is exactly what Alabama lawmakers want to restore in the classroom. Governor Ivey signed the Freeing Our Classrooms of Unnecessary Screens for Safety (FOCUS) Act on Wednesday.
'I love the intent of the rule, I just think enforcement would be pretty difficult,' said Ethan Alexander.
He said he thinks it could be good for students to be less distracted by their devices, but he isn't sure if this is the way to go.
'I don't know if the state needs to mandate it as a rule, per se,' Alexander told News 19.
Most school systems across North Alabama already have a cell phone and social media policy in place. For example, Huntsville City School's Student Code of Conduct already requires students to have their phones turned off and stored in backpacks, purses or lockers during instructional time.
A spokesperson for Huntsville City Schools said it will make any necessary changes to ensure compliance with the FOCUS Act. Other school systems News 19 reached out to said the same.
We would love your input on this. You can vote here in our poll.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
a day ago
- Chicago Tribune
Former EPA administrator, activists react to 'One Big Beautiful Bill'
As President Donald Trump touts a bill currently making its way through Congress as a win for the public, a former regional Environmental Protection Agency administrator is prepared to see devastating cuts to the office that could negatively impact human health. 'It's proposing severe cuts to both the scientific work that EPA's Office of Research and Development does and to the agency as a whole,' said Debra Shore, former administrator for EPA Region 5. 'It would severely reduce the agency's ability to fulfill its mission of protecting public health and the environment.' As the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' Act has passed the U.S. House of Representatives and moved to the Senate, activists nationwide have worried about the consequences. Shore said it's heartbreaking to see public servants at the EPA go through these cuts, especially as the administration tries to make the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' seem like a win. 'I have never worked with a group of such smart, devoted professionals who had a shared sense of mission as EPA employees,' Shore said. 'I know that's the case across the agency. … They could be working for far higher salaries in many cases, but they are dedicated to the foundational mission of the EPA, which is to protect public health and the environment.' On Tuesday and Wednesday, the EPA posted on Facebook, saying it 'delivers for all Americans.' 'One Big Beautiful Bill is putting American workers, taxpayers and families first,' the EPA's Tuesday post said. 'Under (Trump), the U.S. can unleash American energy while ensuring we have the cleanest air, land and water on (Earth).' The bill eliminates hundreds of billions of dollars in Green New Deal tax credits, repeals former President Joe Biden administration's electric vehicle mandates, and opens federal lands and waters to oil, gas, coal, geothermal and mineral leasing, according to the EPA's Tuesday post. According to the Wednesday post, the bill also 'streamlines onerous permitting processes,' refills the Strategic Petroleum reserve and 'delivers certainty to energy producers, saves and creates energy jobs, lowers energy costs for families.' A spokesperson for Sen. Todd Young, R-Indiana, provided a statement about the bill Friday. 'Senator Young continues to have conversations with his colleagues and stakeholders about improving the House-passed bill and addressing our nation's debt and deficit challenges,' said Leah Selk, spokesperson for Young. Representatives for Sen. Jim Banks, R-Indiana, did not respond to a request for comment Friday. Within the bill, the White House would also have the ability to cut federal agencies and reduce workforce, Shore said. 'This is just an utter abrogation of Congress' authority and power,' Shore said. 'It requires an annual report of planned reorganizational moves, and it also streamlines the ability of any future president to rebuild federal agencies because of some of the language in it.' Susan Thomas, director of policy and press for Just Transition Northwest Indiana, said it's concerning that EPA is treating the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' like a win, especially on social media platforms that are easily accessible. 'No one can take any information for granted anymore,' Thomas said. 'You must do your own research with trusted sources because the amount of greenwashing that's coming down is so dangerous. … This is becoming increasingly difficult, but it's more important than ever.' Thomas and Gary Advocates for Responsible Development board member Carolyn McCrady are both worried about the effects that environmental justice communities will face if the bill passes the Senate. McCrady expects public health to worsen as a result of EPA rollbacks. An October report from Industrious Labs found that most residents in Gary are in the top 10% of U.S. residents most at-risk for developing asthma and at-risk of low life expectancy. In 2020, Indiana had a lung cancer rate of 72.5 per 100,000 people, with Lake County as one of the state's counties with the highest cancer mortality rates, according to the American Lung Association. A 2016 JAMA Network report also found Gary as one of the top five U.S. cities with the lowest life expectancy at one point. 'I think people are going to be sicker faster,' McCrady said. 'I don't think people will be able to be served in the medical community in the same way, because in Indiana, millions of people are going to lose their health insurance because of the Medicaid cuts.' Although McCrady believes the EPA cuts are devastating, she isn't surprised to see them included in 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' Cuts will continue to put communities like Gary at a greater disadvantage, McCrady said. Thomas also believes that Northwest Indiana's environmental justice communities will struggle as a result of the 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' 'They've already stripped away all of the environmental justice provisions that had taken years to recognize and acknowledge and to start to put in place,' Thomas said. 'This is just a very sad state that we're in.'
New York Post
a day ago
- New York Post
Pelosi added millions to net worth last year: report
She might be the She-Wolf of Wall Street. Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-California) raked in between $7.8 and $42.5 million in 2024 — meaning her estimated net worth with venture capitalist hubby Paul Pelosi could now top out at $413 million, new financial disclosures showed. The staggering sum is an eye-popping jump from 2023, when financial disclosures showed the couple's net worth topping out at a possible $370 million. Advertisement 4 The Pelosi's added between $7.8 and $42.5 million to their net worth in 2024. Getty Images Pelosi's exact net worth is not known because lawmakers are only required to disclose ranges. Market research firm Quiver Quantitative, which estimates a single figure based on daily stock values it tracks, placed the pair's 2024 worth at $257 million — up $26 million from a year earlier. Advertisement But the value of their various other ventures — which include but are not limited to a Napa Valley winery, ownership in a political data and consulting firm and a stake in a Bay area Italian restaurant — mean Pelosi's worth could be far higher in the estimated range. A large chunk of the couple's fortune has come from a sizable stock portfolio and timely trades, all done in Paul Pelosi's name. The former House Speaker, who's so infamous for trading Missouri Rep. Josh Hawley named a bill after her, and her husband dumped 5,000 shares of Microsoft stock worth an estimated $2.2 million in July — one of their largest sales in three years — a few short months before the FTC announced an antitrust investigation into the tech giant. They also sold 2,000 shares — worth an estimated $525,000 — of Visa stock, less than three months before the credit card company was hit with a DOJ monopoly lawsuit. Advertisement 4 Some have nicknamed Pelosi the 'Queen of Stocks.' Getty Images for The Museum of Contemporary Art (MOCA) Their best trade though might have been exercising a call option in December they bought in late 2023 at an estimated premium of $1.8 million, allowing them to nab 50,000 shares of hot AI chip stock NVIDIA for $12 a pop — less than one tenth of its market price. In total the couple paid an estimated $2.4 million for the investment, which on paper is now worth more than $7.2 million. NVIDIA wasn't their only AI play of 2024. Advertisement The couple also paid between $600,000 and $1.25 million for a call option on California cybersecurity company Palo Alto Networks in February, the same week it was revealed the White House briefed lawmakers on a serious national security threat related to Russia. The shares rose close to 20% in the days after the move. 4 A bill aiming to ban lawmakers and their spouses from trading individual stocks was named 'The PELOSI Act.' Jack Forbes / NY Post Design The option allowed the pair to scoop up 14,000 shares of Palo Alto in December at a $100 strike price — half its trading value. The company has been crushing earnings over the past year and the investment is now worth around $2.8 million. But the Queen of Stocks did suffer one setback — when she and Paul Pelosi ditched 2,500 shares of former Department of Government Efficiency boss Elon Musk's Tesla in June, losing somewhere between $100,000 and $1 million on the trade. In all, their investment portfolio pulled in an estimated 54% return in 2024, more than double the S&P 500's 25% gain — and beating every large hedge fund, according to numbers in Bloomberg's end-of-year tally of hedge funds' returns. 4 Pelosi and her good fortune have been at the center of arguments about why Congress shouldn't be allowed to trade stocks. Ron Sachs – CNP for NY Post The formidable profits come amid growing calls to ban Congress from trading individual stocks, arguing lawmakers have access to market-moving information ahead of the public. Advertisement Pelosi in the past rejected calls for a ban, stating 'we're a free‑market economy.' She has since softened her stance in the face of growing criticism. When asked in May whether Congress should pass a trading ban, she replied, 'If they do, they do.' 'Speaker Pelosi does not own any stocks, and she has no prior knowledge or subsequent involvement in any transactions,' a spokesperson told The Post. The couple is already off to a rocking 2025. Advertisement In January, they bought call options for then-little-known artificial intelligence health firm, Tempus AI, which has since inked a $200 million deal with AstraZeneca and doubled its stock price. The couple also took out call options for energy company Vistra — whose stock climbed last month after it unveiled a massive $1.9 billion deal to acquire natural gas facilities across the country from a private equity firm, citing rising US power demand.
E&E News
2 days ago
- E&E News
Rule-busting language may return to GOP megabill
After weeks of back-and-forth over a Republican proposal to dramatically expand Congress' veto power over federal regulations, the provision was left out of the Senate's initial version of the GOP's party-line megabill. But advocates fighting the deregulatory provision, based on the 'Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act (REINS) Act,' say they are not yet out of the woods. The language could still return via amendment as final negotiations continue ahead of a floor vote. A senior Republican Senate staffer, granted anonymity to speak candidly, said talks about the deregulatory provisions remain ongoing and that, should a version of the 'REINS Act' be deemed sufficiently budgetary to be eligible, it will be added into the megabill. Advertisement The GOP is looking to pass its tax, energy and border security bill through budget reconciliation. It's a process that allows certain fiscal legislation to bypass the Senate filibuster, but it must follow certain rules.
