New premium collection: ‘Tommy Hilfiger New York' premieres in Florence
US clothing retailer Tommy Hilfiger expanded its range. On Tuesday, June 17, 2025, the brand, which belongs to the textile group PVH Corporation (PVH Corp), presented its new premium collection, 'Tommy Hilfiger New York', at the Pitti Uomo menswear trade show in Florence.
A total of 19 looks were shown during a presentation at the historic Palazzo Portinari Salviati. According to the company, the new designs combined the brand's preppy tradition and classic New York tailoring codes with a modern perspective. Tommy Hilfiger returns to his roots
Brand founder and designer Tommy Hilfiger explained the background of the collection. "The art of dressing elegantly is back," he emphasised in a statement. "All the inspiring icons of today's culture are opting for an upscale look, and this has given renewed energy to the traditions of tailoring and the timelessness of Savile Row."
The 74-year-old also harked back to the beginnings of his career: "When I founded my brand 40 years ago, I wanted to give these traditional codes a playful American touch," Hilfiger explained. "That's exactly what we're doing again today, opening a new chapter in the history of our menswear." Collection arrives in stores in February 2026
The new collection was set to arrive in stores at the beginning of next year. From February 2026, it would be available worldwide in selected Tommy Hilfiger stores, in the brand's online shop and at key retail partners, the company stated. Impression of the Tommy Hilfiger presentation in Florence Credits: Tommy Hilfiger This article was translated to English using an AI tool.
FashionUnited uses AI language tools to speed up translating (news) articles and proofread the translations to improve the end result. This saves our human journalists time they can spend doing research and writing original articles. Articles translated with the help of AI are checked and edited by a human desk editor prior to going online. If you have questions or comments about this process email us at info@fashionunited.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
BRIAN READE: 'There's no stopping America destroying English football'
You may have failed to notice that there's something going on in America called the Club World Cup of football. It's not the club football you're used to seeing in the Premier League, where two psyched-up teams go like the clappers for 90 blood-curdling minutes in front of packed, passionate stadiums. This newly invented competition is quite the opposite. Take Chelsea 's game against Los Angeles FC on Monday in Atlanta, when there were so many gaps in the stands you could have played a five-a-side game as 50,000 tickets went unsold. FIFA's latest month-long, out-of-season, vanity exercise comprises hopeless mismatches between minnows and giants and slow-paced bore-a-thons in the searing heat. Which leaves European players wishing their knackered bodies and minds were recovering on a beach after a gruelling nine-month season before training starts for another one next month. Like the recent equally pointless and anaemic England games, the only reason footballers and fans are being denied a vital summer break from the sport is that those in charge of it are hopelessly consumed with greed. Spy a blank date in the calendar and a rich, relatively-untapped market like the USA, and they will pull out all the stops to squeeze more sweat from the players and money from the audiences. And, sadly, it's only going to get worse. When US tycoon Todd Boehly bought Chelsea for £4billion in 2022, he told a private equity conference: 'The global footprint of soccer is really underdeveloped' and needs 'an American mentality' to fully realise its financial possibilities. Boehly is just another Yank moneyman who sussed that the earning potential of American football had been maxed out and the hugely-popular English Premier League was the certain route to unlocking sport's global riches. Next season 11 Premier League clubs will be run by Americans, and when it reaches 14, which it soon will, they will run the show as that is the number required to rewrite the rules. Which they will swiftly do. And thus the top echelon of English football will become a closed shop run by, and for, US hedge funds. Looking at what they have already hinted at there's every chance relegation will be scrapped, eliminating financial jeopardy and demolishing the 136-year-old pyramid that sees money flow down to the lower leagues and grass roots. You can expect rounds of Premier League games played in America, or even a global day of games spread across the world's different time zones. Domestic kick-off times will be changed to suit global audiences and a cup final could be played in Baltimore or Beijing where, for one night, the teams who, for example, played in last season's FA Cup final, could be renamed The Crystaldelphia Eagles and the Manchester Dolphins. I wouldn't bet against the two top teams in the league eventually being forced into a Superbowl -style finale, with cheerleaders, Taylor Swift, tailgate parties and adverts popping up during stoppages where sponsors announce 'this substitution break is brought to you by StayHard erectile dysfunction pills'. And any complaint from the paying fans whose life revolves around following their team, will not register. They will simply be told that the Premier League is now a US-owned, blue-chip, global brand like McDonald's or Disney and, like Coca-Cola, you old school, legacy dudes will just have to suck it up. Have a nice day, y'all. Feeding naturally nourishing food shouldn't come with a side of hassle - Forthglade's subscription service takes care of your dog and your to-do list.
Spectator
3 hours ago
- Spectator
Is Dutch tolerance dying?
Campaigners across southern Europe are protesting against 'touristification'. Meanwhile, in the Netherlands, wealthy expats are in the firing line. Businesses in Amsterdam could be asked to foot the bill for local housing if they employ highly-skilled internationals. Alongside paranoia about asylum seekers, there is a rising feeling that expats and even holidaymakers are unwelcome in parts of the continent. The Netherlands was once an outward-looking, tolerant, trader nation. Is that still the case? It's not much fun to live in a place – or even visit somewhere – that resents your presence, especially if you have bothered to learn the local language and swallowed the high tax rates that fund northern Europe's generous social benefits. But this 'me-first' sentiment in Europe is great news for London and anywhere else in the market for scarce global talent. Post-Brexit 'trading volumes shifting to Amsterdam appear to be here to stay,' Dutch financial paper Het Financieele Dagblad jubilantly announced earlier this year. The paper claimed that 'Amsterdam is now bigger than London'. In the aftermath of Britain's departure from the EU, there certainly appeared to be some evidence that London's dominance as a global financial centre might be at risk. But – unlike the years after the 2016 EU referendum, in which the European Medicines Agency relocated to Amsterdam, and the Netherlands Foreign Investment Agency loudly boasted about winning businesses, jobs and investments – there has been a change of tone. The Netherlands was once an outward-looking, tolerant, trader nation that advertised for foreign students and was proud of its English-language proficiency. Is that still the case? Last week, Amsterdam council voted to pass a motion to ask international businesses based in the Dutch capital to contribute to solving a general housing shortage and pay for programmes to get their 'lonely' foreign workers to integrate. The policy, 'Make Amsterdam your home', sounded friendly enough, but the message behind it was anything but. 'In short, internationalisation is part of our city but it also brings challenges, such as driving up house prices, the emergence of a parallel world and the transformation of neighbourhoods, for example because more and more English is spoken,' it declared. Foreign companies, said the accompanying Labour press release, should be expected to give something back. As the Netherlands remembers 80 years of liberation from the Nazis – thanks to Allied troops, speaking that awful language of English – foreigners are being blamed for driving up house prices and sabotaging social cohesion. The facts are less important than nationalist gut feeling: the Dutch government offers 110,000 highly-skilled migrants (including footballers) a temporary tax break to compensate for its high income taxes. But despite the expats, who don't even have a vote, benefitting our country, they are far from popular. It doesn't seem to matter that a government analysis found the tax break raises €128.5million (£110 million) a year, has a 'very modest impact' on house prices and 97 per cent of the highly-skilled professionals work full time, compared with 52 per cent of the Dutch. Nor that Statistics Netherlands research suggests that Germans and Brits lead the least segregated lives and wealthy locals the most. The Dutch government recently collapsed in a row over asylum created by far-right veteran Geert Wilders. Universities are scrapping English-language courses and capping international student numbers. Now, Amsterdam councillors are pointing the finger at internationals for the consequences of the Netherlands' part-time lifestyle, lack of house-building and preference for single-person households. Meanwhile, the country continues to ignore calls from the European Commission, Dutch central bank and its own economists to reduce home owner tax breaks that inflate its housing market. It's easy – if absurd – to vilify other people and treat hard-working foreigners who do the jobs you can't or won't do as 'exploiting' your system. But the result is obvious: when places like the Netherlands become hostile to international business and talent, it will go elsewhere. The failure of Dutch tolerance is a marvellous opportunity, in other words, for a place like London – where you can be judged by what you can do instead of by your name; where a finance minister doesn't have to admit the tax office has a problem with 'institutional racism'; and a government doesn't fall after falsely accusing some 40,000 families of childcare benefits fraud. Non-doms might not be welcome in the UK – and Wise, the British fintech, might be leaving for New York – but filthy-rich talent is not a problem in London. Some Dutch experts, at least, recognise that their golden age is tarnishing. To the concern of the Confederation of Netherlands Industry and Employers (VNO-NCW), the country dropped from 4th in 2021 to 10th this year in the IMD's world competitiveness ranking. The Netherlands might be ahead of the UK (29th) with the help of its international trade, but tax policy is rated a dismal 67th – well under Britain. The general-director of the VNO-NCW Focco Vijselaar tells The Spectator that there is cause for concern. 'For quite some time, we have been pointing out the concrete rot in our business climate,' he said. 'And you see the cracks in these kinds of lists. If you look at international investment, we are at 41st place, an unprecedentedly low spot. We are struggling with major bottlenecks in the Netherlands: a housing market that is locked down, nitrogen pollution problems and high energy prices.' Flip-flopping on highly-skilled migrant tax breaks does not help, he added: 'We need the expats.' Liberal democrats in Amsterdam are also worried about scapegoating the international community. 'That social cohesion is under pressure is not solely due to the expats,' said Democrats 66 economics spokesman Erik Schmit last week. 'Housing prices are rising: it is not proven that this is solely due to the international community…As a government, we have other priorities.' But after constant changes to the 30 per cent highly skilled migrant tax-free allowance and the removal of its non-dom ruling, the Netherlands is increasingly out of favour. New foreign student numbers have plunged, threatening various courses. Data from jobs site Indeed shows a drop of 48 per cent in applications from India and 40 per cent from the UK this year. Emigration appears to have peaked and highly-skilled migrant numbers are tumbling. Britain might have creaking infrastructure and complex regulation, but it is remarkably open and far less corrupt than many of its neighbours. If the Dutch want to drive out innovators, talent and factories with high energy prices, punitive taxes and cultural suspicion – and if southern Europe is busy fighting with tourists – other cities have a chance. Now is the time to declare Britain open for business.
The Herald Scotland
5 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
'Emerging markets no longer on the periphery of progress'
Over the past decade, many investors have looked at EM with a mixture of caution and nostalgia, haunted by memories of currency crises and political turmoil. But today's EM landscape looks very different. Structural reform, rising domestic consumption, and tech-led innovation are combining to produce companies and economies that are adaptable and profitable. This transformation is perhaps best captured by businesses like a 'super-app' used by the majority of the adult Kazak population for everything from banking and bill payments, to shopping and ride-hailing. It has fundamentally reshaped the country's economy. Or take Luckin Coffee in China, which now has many more outlets than Starbucks and continues to grow rapidly into an underpenetrated market. These aren't speculative moonshots. They are scaling in key domestic markets with improving profitability and thus operational resilience. Two key headwinds - the strong US dollar and negative sentiment towards China - have been turning. An increasing amount of EM-to-EM trade is being done in non-dollar currencies. The weak dollar is not only supportive of EM financial conditions but also creates favourable sentiment at a time when there are plenty of reasons to ask questions of the traditional safe-haven countries of the world. With over $22 trillion held by non-US investors in American assets - much of it unhedged - even a small shift in allocation could drive renewed EM demand. Meanwhile, China's trajectory is not solely about geopolitics or trade policy, as some doomsayers posit. In fact, this may be the wrong focus completely. It's about a massive, increasingly self-sufficient domestic economy. Retail sales in China are over ten times greater than its exports to the US - a fact that should redirect our focus from tariffs to the consumer. Companies like Meituan and DeepSeek are testament to China's technological resilience. And for what it's worth, over 70% of the world now trades more with China than with the US. On top of this, Chinese consumer spending is visibly starting to recover. Read more: We often talk about EM as if it were a single monolith. It is not. What binds these regions is clearly not geography or even income level. But the quality of opportunity and scale of ambition across such a vast set of countries is trending upwards and worth shouting about. There are many more world class EM companies than before, in a range of industries: in semiconductors, gaming, fintech, and green energy, to name a few. For example, CATL in electric vehicle batteries, SK Hynix in High Bandwith Memory (memory chips used for high-performance computing and AI), and Tencent and SEA in gaming. The best companies earn their place in portfolios through world-class execution, deep competitive moats, high returns on capital, and often, scarcity of competition. EM's best companies are, in many cases, the only game in town for investors seeking exposure to essential themes like electrification, digital transformation, and resource resilience. Perhaps the most dangerous risk for investors today is underexposure to this transformation. Valuations remain modest. Domestic markets are deepening. Currency, debt, and governance risks - while still present - are far better managed than in previous cycles. And most importantly, these companies are not all reliant on a rebound in global trade or commodity prices. Many are thriving in local ecosystems, with local customers, on local capital. This is not to say the path ahead is smooth. Politics is messy (though isn't that true in developed markets too?). Markets are often volatile. But the direction of travel is clear. Emerging markets are no longer on the periphery of progress - they are increasingly the protagonists. To ignore them is not caution, it's more likely negligence. Andrew Keiller is a partner at Baillie Gifford
