Court ruling further complicates Trump's anti-DEI push
President Trump's plans to rid the country's education system of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) were thrown further into chaos this week when a judge ruled against the Education Department's directives.
States, fiercely divided on the issue, were already dealing with a delayed certification deadline and murky enforcement mechanisms before federal Judge Landya McCafferty issued her preliminary injunction on Trump's anti-DEI measures.
'Thankfully, many schools and districts and colleges and universities have been waiting to see what would happen because they knew and understood that what they were being asked to do was blatantly unlawful and nonsensical,' said Liz King, senior director of education equity at the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights.
'And so, hopefully this gives the assurance that schools need that they should not be bending to the whims of this administration,' King added.
On Feb. 14, the Department of Education sent a 'Dear Colleague' letter to universities, saying they could risk losing federal funding if they do not get rid of DEI efforts.
Weeks later, state education and K-12 district leaders were told they needed to certify their schools had no DEI programs or also risk losing federal funding.
The Education Department also created a 'DEI portal' to allow parents and others to report programs or initiatives they feel are in violation of Trump's executive orders.
All these efforts resulted in lawsuits and were blocked by three judges on Thursday, including two that were appointed by Trump.
District Judge Dabney Friedrich, a Trump appointee, called the efforts unconstitutionally vague and said the letter did not 'delineate between a lawful DEI practice and an unlawful one.'
The Education Department is likely to appeal the decision, with supporters encouraging it to get more specific when it does.
'As part of the appeal, my guess is that they are going to point […] at the actual practices that result in racial discrimination,' said Jonathan Butcher, the Will Skillman senior research fellow in education policy at the Heritage Foundation.
'From teacher trainings to types of programs that compel or ask someone to state that they are oppressive based on their skin color or otherwise […] some sort of racial favoritism,' Butcher added. 'Frankly, it's a step in the process.'
The Hill has reached out to the Department of Education for comment.
The lack of clarity on DEI in schools has been an issue since Education Secretary Linda McMahon's confirmation hearing, where she was unable to say if classes focusing on Black history would be allowed under her leadership.
In the case of the 'Dear Colleague' letter, the department had to send out a follow-up memo after some universities were unclear if the guidance meant student groups based on race or ethnicity were still allowed.
Meanwhile, multiple blue states were openly refusing to certify that their schools were DEI-free.
'As noted at the outset, MDE [Minnesota Department of Education] has already provided the requisite guarantee that it has and will comply with Title VI and its implementing regulation, and that includes our assurance that we do and will comply with Supreme Court cases interpreting the same. We submit this letter to serve as our response to this specific request,' Minnesota wrote to the federal government.
The Department of Education is seeking to expand on the 2023 affirmative action Supreme Court ruling that said universities could not take race into account in admissions, holding that the decision reaches beyond the student application process.
'Unfortunately, we have seen too many schools flout or outright violate these obligations, including by using DEI programs to discriminate against one group of Americans to favor another based on identity characteristics in clear violation of Title VI,' Craig Trainor, acting assistant secretary for civil rights at the Education Department, wrote in the K-12 certification letter.
Federal funding only makes up around 10 percent of money that goes to K-12 schools, although lower-income districts get a bit more help.
At universities, the Trump administration has shown it is not afraid to pull millions or even billions of dollars in federal funding from schools it alleges have committed civil rights violations, even before any investigation takes place.
One of those schools, Harvard University, is suing the administration over funding cuts that were announced after it refused to bow to a list of demands from Trump, including eliminating DEI policies.
The day after the suit was filed, the leaders of more than 100 colleges and universities, including Cornell, Tufts and Princeton, issued a joint letter condemning Trump's 'political interference' and 'coercive use of public research funding.'
But as some colleges have lost funding, others have preemptively began dismantling some of their DEI efforts.
The University of Michigan said last month it would be closing its DEI offices.
'I understand the fear […] They've basically been blackmailing institutions with federal funds. They've created deliberate chaos with the [executive orders] and vague instructions so that people are preemptively complying with things,' said Andrea Abrams, executive director of the Defending American Values Coalition.
'The reasons [they] are afraid are sound, but the reasons to be brave are also sound,' she added.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Botches His Own Name In The Most Awkward Typo You'll Ever See
President Donald Trump on Sunday posted a message on his Truth Social website thanking the B-2 pilots who took part in this weekend's attack on Iran. But the president's message had one key flaw: He misspelled his own name. 'The GREAT B-2 pilots have just landed, safely, in Missouri. Thank you for a job well done!!!' Trump wrote, then signed his message in all caps: 'DONAKD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!' Trump deleted the message and replaced it with a corrected version, but a website that archives his posts shows the typo. Trump has a long and colorful history of typo-ridden social media posts, including the infamous 'covfefe' message of 2017, along with his references to a 'stollen' election, 'Wirch Hunt,' and 'hamberders.' He's bungled his own name before, referring to himself in 2019 as 'Donald Ttump,' and that of his wife, whom he called 'Melanie' Trump in 2018. It's not clear if Trump typed the message himself. A former aide, Madeleine Westerhout, testified during his criminal trial last year that when Trump was on Twitter, he preferred to dictate his messages, down to his trademark use of capitalizations and exclamation points. Footage released last year also showed him dictating and supervising his social media posts. Trump's critics called him out over the awkward typo: This is the man calling for regime change and with his hand on the nuclear codes, marching us into war: DONAKD J. TRUMP. To my Republican colleagues with the power and numbers to stop this, what say you? — Rep. Melanie Stansbury (@Rep_Stansbury) June 22, 2025 If Joe Biden has misspelled his own name in a tweet, Fox would be calling for his removal and running it on a loop 24/7. — Jo (@JoJoFromJerz) June 22, 2025 Hmmm beginning to worry that the guy who cannot even bother to spell check whether he got his own name correct is not doing the most rigorous research before he decides to get us in to a war. — Centrism Fan Acct 🔹 (@Wilson__Valdez) June 22, 2025 New coffeve just dropped — Tamoor Hussain (@tamoorh) June 22, 2025 While thanking the B-2 pilots for their service, Trump misspelled his own name while signing off in a new statement 'DONAKD J. TRUMP.' He can't even spell his own name. — Harry Sisson (@harryjsisson) June 22, 2025 Donakd? — Wu Tang is for the Children (@WUTangKids) June 22, 2025 Bring back covfefe — Karly Kingsley (@karlykingsley) June 22, 2025 Donakd strikes again. — Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) June 22, 2025 Even my phone tries to autocorrect Donakd… And this is the president of the United States. Sad. — Jesus Freakin Congress (@TheJFreakinC) June 22, 2025 The incompetence of this administration is like a renewable energy source—it's inexhaustible. — greg cantwell (@gregmcantwell) June 22, 2025 Hey everyone!! Let's call him DONAKD J. TRUMP. — Lucas Sanders 💙🗳️🌊💪🌈🚺🟧 (@LucasSa56947288) June 22, 2025
Boston Globe
22 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Will Iran again sip the ‘poison' of a forced peace, or escalate?
At 86, with much of his life's work in ruins around him, he may prefer martyrdom to the surrender that President Trump and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel are demanding of him. Advertisement Iran's first response was defiant. 'The Islamic Republic of Iran is resolved to defend Iran's territory, sovereignty, security and people by all force and means against the United States' criminal aggression,' the foreign ministry said in a statement. Iran has launched a serious barrage of missiles on Israel. It may, as it has warned, attack some of the 40,000 US soldiers in the region. What will be crucial is whether Iran's retaliation is prolonged. If it does enough to convince the Iranian people that it has not capitulated, Khamenei may then decide to enter talks with the United States about a settlement of the war. After all, in January 2020, when Trump ordered the assassination of a key Iranian figure in his first term, General Qassem Soleimani, with a drone strike in Iraq, Iran responded with a punishing wave of missile attacks against US troops in Iraq. It then stopped, fearing a wider war that could threaten the regime. Advertisement Iran has a variety of responses if it chooses, that show both resistance and restraint, said Sanam Vakil, director of the Middle East and North Africa Program at Chatham House, a London-based think tank. Khamenei could approve leaving the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and expelling the nuclear inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency who have been monitoring Iran's nuclear facilities. He could target those US bases in the region that have largely been evacuated and activate the Houthis in Yemen to resume their attacks on American ships in the Red Sea. 'This would be actually a cautious mix of options designed to show that Iran has the ability and the daring to stand up to Trump, but is still trying to avoid full-scale regional escalation,' Vakil said. 'If Khamenei sidesteps strikes on the US, this lays the pathway for diplomacy and will signal to Trump his intention to de-escalate,' she said. Trump, too, by warning Iran of the strikes in advance and limiting them, at least so far, to the three main Iranian nuclear sites, also showed restraint, she said. The US attacks, for instance, spared political targets and military bases. But Khamenei hardly trusts Trump after he unilaterally pulled out of the 2015 nuclear deal that Iran agreed to with the Obama administration and other governments in 2018. Even if there were a new pact agreed upon now, Vakil asked, 'could he trust Trump to provide sanctions relief and ensure Israel is on board?' Iran could do much more, of course. It could try to close the Strait of Hormuz to shipping, a move that could drive up oil prices by blocking oil tankers from leaving or entering the Persian Gulf. It could attack the energy infrastructure of Gulf states, as it did in 2019. It has a sophisticated cyberwarfare program that it could activate. And it could work with Al Qaeda to hit Israeli and US interests in the region and abroad, from bases to embassies. Advertisement Iran will do more, and aggressively, said Ellie Geranmayeh, an Iran specialist at the European Council on Foreign Relations, a think tank. 'Iran knew this was coming and will have prepared a chain of responses,' she said, with an immediate escalation of attacks against Israel. But Trump's efforts to draw a line now will fail, she said. Attacks against the United States 'are now inevitable and will be swift and multilayered,' Geranmayeh said. 'Iran knows it cannot win this war — but wants to ensure that the US and Israel also lose.' A lot will depend on the assessment of the damage done, which is still unclear. It is also unclear where Iran's large stock of highly enriched uranium is. Iran has enough to make up to 10 nuclear warheads with a bit more enrichment, according to the US military. Many analysts assume that Iran has dispersed it, perhaps where IAEA inspectors cannot access it. The IAEA said Sunday that there had been no indication of radioactive leakage, which would be the case if the uranium stockpiles had been hit, said Vali Nasr, a professor at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies and author of 'Iran's Grand Strategy: A Political History.' That is one reason the United States and Europe should do all they can to keep Iran in the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and the IAEA, he said, so the world does not lose its eyes and ears on Iran's nuclear program. Advertisement For Nasr, the conflict is just beginning, not ending. For Iran, he said, 'it will be live to fight again.' There is 'no one grand gesture after which everything will change,' he added. Most important, he said, 'the larger lesson for Iran is that it needs serious deterrence, and a bomb is the only one that will work.' Iran's missiles and proxies did not protect it, Nasr said. Even if Khamenei dies, the country has been shown to be vulnerable, he said, and nuclear deterrence is the most likely response. Geranmayeh agrees. 'This is the great irony,' she said. 'Although Trump has sought to eliminate the nuclear threat from Iran, he has now made it far more likely that Iran becomes a nuclear state.' And that could mean a future of continued bombing campaigns and Iranian counterstrikes, she said. Still, Geranmayeh believes that diplomacy is the best way out for all parties. After a week of violence in the region, she said, 'there could be a window for Tehran and Washington to come to their senses.' Matthew Kroenig of the Atlantic Council, a think tank, is skeptical. With so much damage to their expensive nuclear program, he said in an email, 'they probably won't rebuild.' Iran has 'spent billions of dollars and decades only to invite sanctions and a devastating war with the most powerful country in the world. Why hit replay on that tape?' Advertisement If Iran does rebuild, he said, the United States 'can hit them again.' This article originally appeared in
CNN
32 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump: U.S. Strikes on Iran a 'Spectacular Military Success' - Inside Politics with Dana Bash and Manu Raju - Podcast on CNN Audio
Trump: U.S. Strikes on Iran a 'Spectacular Military Success' CNN Inside Politics 43 mins CNN's Wolf Blitzer joins Manu Raju to discuss the United States' attack on three Iranian nuclear facilities.
