A call to action: Upholding human dignity in a changing world
Prince El Hassan bin Talal In an era of rapid technological, social and geopolitical change, the fundamental principle of human dignity has never been more vital. As the world confronts new challenges, from widening inequality to the erosion of democratic norms, compromised implementation of international law, the inherent worth and rights of every individual must remain at the forefront.
For decades, UN-affiliated NGOs such as the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), alongside international bodies like the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and non-governmental organisations such as Mercy Corps, have played an unequivocally crucial role in delivering essential services—including education, healthcare and emergency relief assistance. UNRWA alone is responsible for the delivery of essential humanitarian services to 6.7 million Palestinian refugees in its five fields of operation across the region. Other international donors – each in their own capacity – provided much needed assistance and critical services to their targeted populations too, thus playing a stabilizing role in the host communities that they operate in.
Today, these organisations are finding themselves at the crossroads of increasing political scrutiny, misinformation/disinformation campaigns, funding cuts, and mounting regional instability. The recent decision to freeze aid and funding of some of these organisations is deeply alarming, leaving the future of humanitarian efforts uncertain.
A recent UN survey highlighted the far-reaching consequences of these funding reductions, warning of significant disruptions to major UN agencies such as the World Food Programme (WFP), the World Health Organization (WHO), and UNICEF. The results of this survey are indeed alarming, whether ethically or from a humanitarian and developmental perspective. The world through its members states at the UN General Assembly has committed to the 2030 Agenda and the full implementations of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals – above all, Goal 17, which emphasises partnership.
The United States, traditionally the largest single donor of aid globally, provided more than 40 per cent of the UN's humanitarian aid budget last year. For instance, USAID has provided over $600 million in economic assistance to Palestinians in Gaza and the Occupied West Bank since 2021. The erosion of financial support for these vital institutions threatens to deepen the suffering of vulnerable populations worldwide. However, USAID itself has also come under growing scrutiny. As former USAID Administrator Samatha Powers recently emphasised, the politicization of aid poses a serious threat to long-standing diplomatic and humanitarian efforts, undermining the stability and effectiveness of global assistance programmes.
In a similar case, UNRWA's mandate to provide education, healthcare, and emergency assistance to over 6.7 million Palestinian refugees today, underscore the vital importance of the Agency's mission. A funding shortfall could leave over 700,000 Palestinian children without access to education and disrupt essential healthcare services for more than 3 million refugees who rely on UNRWA for primary care. The international community must recognise that UNRWA's mandate is a lifeline, not a political tool, and its continued operation is a testament to the world's dedication to upholding human dignity of the most vulnerable. Preserving the Agency's ability to operate is an investment in regional and global stability, in peace, and in the future.
What these vital institutions face today undermines their ability to fulfill their core missions. The 'weaponization of aid' and the erosion of international cooperation threaten to exacerbate the suffering of vulnerable populations, rather than resolving underlying political disputes. This is a new era where the ethics of war and peace are being revised.
In the 1980s, Jordan led the call for the implementation of a New International Humanitarian Order (N.I.H.O). 28 members, including the five permanent members of the Security Council joined the call, where they prioritised the safeguarding of dignity and right to life of every person and of the future generations.
The responsibility to defend human dignity does not rest solely with policymakers and international bodies. Educators, religious and community leaders, and engaged citizens all have a role to play. By fostering values of empathy and justice in future generations, leveraging moral authority, and mobilising collective action, we can work toward a world where humanitarian principles prevail over political divisions, and where core humanity is preserved at all times.
Safeguarding these vital institutions and the principles they embody is not just a moral imperative—it is a necessity for navigating the complexities of the 21st century with compassion, cooperation and a steadfast commitment to international law and human dignity.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Roya News
3 hours ago
- Roya News
Iran threatens 'more devastating' response to 'Israeli' attacks
Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian warned Saturday of a "more devastating" retaliation should 'Israel's' nine-day bombing campaign continue, saying the Islamic republic would not halt its nuclear programme "under any circumstances". 'Israel' said on Saturday it had killed three more Iranian commanders in its unprecedented offensive, while Foreign Minister Gideon Saar claimed Tehran's alleged progress towards a nuclear weapon had been set back by two years. "We will do everything that we can do there in order to remove this threat," Saar told the German newspaper Bild, asserting 'Israel' would keep up its onslaught. 'Israel' and Iran have traded wave after wave of devastating strikes since 'Israel' launched its aerial campaign on June 13, saying Tehran was on the verge of developing a nuclear weapon. On Saturday, 'Israel' said it had attacked Iran's Isfahan nuclear site for a second time, with the UN nuclear watchdog reporting that a centrifuge manufacturing workshop had been hit. Iran denies seeking an atomic bomb, and on Saturday Pezeshkian said its right to pursue a civilian nuclear programme "cannot be taken away... by threats or war". In a phone call with French President Emmanuel Macron, Pezeshkian said Iran was "ready to discuss and cooperate to build confidence in the field of peaceful nuclear activities". "However, we do not agree to reduce nuclear activities to zero under any circumstances," he added, according to Iran's official IRNA news agency. Referring to the 'Israeli' attacks, he said: "Our response to the continued aggression of the Zionist regime will be more devastating." Iran's armed forces threatened to strike shipments of military aid to 'Israel' from any country. 'Israel's' main arms supplier is the United States, whose President Donald Trump warned on Friday that Tehran had a "maximum" of two weeks to avoid possible American air strikes as Washington weighed whether to join Israel's campaign. 'Not prepared to negotiate' Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi was in Istanbul on Saturday for a meeting of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation to discuss the conflict. Top diplomats from Britain, France and Germany met Araghchi in Geneva on Friday and urged him to resume nuclear talks with the United States that had been derailed by the war. But Araghchi told NBC News that "we're not prepared to negotiate with them (the Americans) anymore, as long as the aggression continues". Trump, dismissive of European diplomatic efforts, said he was unlikely to ask 'Israel' to stop its attacks to get Iran back to the table. "If somebody's winning, it's a little bit harder to do," he said of Israel's campaign. Any US involvement would likely feature powerful bunker-busting bombs that no other country possesses to destroy an underground uranium enrichment facility in Fordo. US B-2 stealth bombers capable of carrying bunker busters were flying across the Pacific Ocean, according to tracking data and media reports, fuelling speculation over their intended mission.
Jordan News
8 hours ago
- Jordan News
21 Palestinians Martyred by Israeli Gunfire in Gaza, Including 11 Waiting for Aid - Jordan News
21 Palestinians Martyred by Israeli Gunfire in Gaza, Including 11 Waiting for Aid At least 21 Palestinians were martyred and several others injured on Saturday as a result of Israeli occupation forces' gunfire in the Gaza Strip, including 11 individuals who were waiting to receive humanitarian aid. اضافة اعلان According to Palestinian medical sources, six people were killed and at least 10 injured by Israeli gunfire while waiting near an aid distribution point west of Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip. Al-Awda Hospital in Nuseirat reported the deaths of five Palestinians and the injury of 15 others as they attempted to obtain aid near the Al-Shohada Junction in central Gaza. Additionally, three Palestinians were killed and others wounded in an Israeli airstrike targeting the Zaytoun neighborhood in southern Gaza City, with victims transferred to Ahli Arab (Al-Maamadani) Hospital. Another three Palestinian brothers were martyred in an Israeli airstrike on Al-Mansoura Street in the Shuja'iyya neighborhood in eastern Gaza City, while one more Palestinian was killed by Israeli forces northwest of Khan Younis, in southern Gaza. Since October 7, 2023, Israel has carried out what has been widely condemned as genocidal acts in Gaza, involving killing, starvation, destruction, and forced displacement, in defiance of international appeals and orders from the International Court of Justice to halt the aggression. The ongoing assault has resulted in over 186,000 casualties, including martyrs and wounded — the majority being women and children — in addition to more than 11,000 missing persons, hundreds of thousands displaced, and widespread famine that has claimed the lives of many, including children. — (WAFA)
Roya News
12 hours ago
- Roya News
Iran accuses nuclear watchdog chief of bias in formal complaint to UN
Iran's Ambassador and Permanent Representative to the UN, Amir-Saeid Iravani, has submitted an official letter of protest to the UN Security Council and Secretary-General António Guterres, accusing the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Rafael Grossi, of failing to uphold his duties with neutrality and professionalism. The letter, delivered in New York on Friday, centers on what Iran views as Grossi's inaction and biased conduct surrounding Israel's recent strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, sites Tehran insists are entirely peaceful and under IAEA supervision, the Mehr News Agency reported. According to the letter, Grossi's public remarks prior to and following the 'Israeli' attacks 'constitute a clear and serious breach of the standard of impartiality required of his Office.' The ambassador argues that Grossi not only failed to condemn the strikes but also refrained from identifying 'Israel' as the responsible party despite its public acknowledgment of the attacks. The Iranian envoy criticized Grossi's June 9 press conference in particular, during which he referred to 'Israel's' "concerns that need to be addressed" while, Iran says, ignoring binding international resolutions that prohibit any threat or use of force against nuclear facilities designated for peaceful purposes. Iravani cited IAEA General Conference Resolutions GC(34)/RES/533 and GC(44)/RES/444, both of which explicitly forbid such actions. Iravani further stated that Grossi's silence in response to these violations amounts to "de facto complicity, by omission," in what Tehran calls acts of aggression 'unprecedented in the history of the Agency.' The letter also highlighted a pattern of what Iran claims is selective enforcement. Iravani pointed out Grossi's swift public condemnation in 2023 when Iran legally withdrew accreditation from certain nuclear inspectors, a right it holds under its safeguards agreement. According to the letter, this contrasts with Grossi's lack of response to more serious threats, such as what Iran and OIC members characterized as an 'unprecedented' nuclear threat from 'Israeli' officials against Palestinian civilians last year. 'The Director General has consistently adopted a politicized, selective, and discriminatory posture towards the Islamic Republic of Iran,' the letter reads, asserting that his actions undermine the legitimacy of the IAEA and violate the principle of impartiality enshrined in Article III of the agency's Statute.
