"Can't Be Mute Spectators": Court Appoints Daughters As Guardians Of Bedridden Man

Mumbai:
The Bombay High Court has appointed two daughters as guardians of their 73-year-old bedridden father, who suffered a brain injury during a cardiac arrest, noting that he was unable to take care of himself or his property.
A bench of Justice Abhay Ahuja, in its order of May 8, a copy of which was made available on Wednesday, said courts cannot remain a mute spectator to such situations.
The high court, while appointing the two daughters as guardians of their father, noted that the man was suffering from mental illness and was a "person in a state of lunacy who is incapable of taking care of himself or managing his property".
"The higher courts of our country exercise the 'parens patriae' jurisdiction (legal protector of citizens unable to protect themselves) as they cannot be mute spectators to a real life situation of the nature before this Court," Justice Ahuja said.
As per the plea, the senior citizen suffered a brain injury in 2024, resulting in deprivation of oxygen and blood supply, during a cardiac arrest. As a consequence, he has been in a semi-conscious and incapacitated state and is bedridden till date.
The petition sought HC to appoint the two daughters as guardians of their father, as he is incapable of communication and is not even able to take care of his basic personal needs.
The petition was initially filed under the Guardian and Wards Act, by which a guardian can be appointed for the welfare of a minor alone.
The plea was later amended and sought for the daughters to be appointed as guardians of the senior citizen under Clause XVII of the Letters Patent.
Under Clause XVII of the Letters Patent, the high court has the power and authority with regard to the person and estate of "infants, idiots and lunatics".
A Letters Patent is a specific law under which an HC derives its subordinate piece of legislation and is a special law which prevails over the general law.
The high court said under the Mental Healthcare Act, mental illness means a substantial disorder of thinking, orientation that grossly impairs judgment and the ability to meet with the ordinary demands of life.
The court in its order noted that the man was unable to understand or take informed decisions, and that he requires constant care and attention.
The bench noted that this was definitely not a case of mental retardation. "However, it can be said that this is a case of mental illness although the same may have arisen as a result of a cardiac arrest," HC said.
"Lunacy refers to unsoundness of mind sufficient to incapacitate a person from civil transactions. It can also refer to a mental disorder as described in the definition of mental illness," Justice Ahuja said.
Such mental illness where the person is incapable of taking care of himself or managing his assets, can be said to be a "state of lunacy" and hence under the Letters Patent, the high court would have authority and jurisdiction with respect to the person and the estate of such a "lunatic", HC said.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

NDTV

4 hours ago

• NDTV

Can't Force Sex Assault Victim To Continue Unwanted Pregnancy: High Court

Mumbai: A victim of sexual assault cannot be compelled to continue her unwanted pregnancy, the Bombay High Court has said while allowing a 12-year-old girl to abort her 28-week pregnancy despite an adverse report from medical experts. If forced to give birth to a child against her wish, the court would be depriving her of the right to decide the "path of her life", it said. A medical board, after examining the girl, had opined that the process of termination of pregnancy would be highly risky, considering the girl's age and the stage of the growth of the fetus. A bench of Justices Nitin Sambre and Sachin Deshmukh, however, held in its June 17 order that abortion will have to be permitted. "This court cannot force the victim to carry her pregnancy against her wishes, as in such an eventuality, the state would be stripping her of the right to determine the immediate and long-term path of her life," the High Court said. "We are equally required to be sensitive to the fact that a woman can become pregnant by choice irrespective of her marital status; however, in case of unwanted or incidental pregnancy, the burden invariably falls on the pregnant woman/victim," the court said. The girl had been sexually assaulted by her uncle, following which a case was registered against him. The girl's father moved the high court seeking to terminate her pregnancy, the result of the sexual assault. The court, while permitting the termination of pregnancy, said all safety protocols shall be followed during the procedure to ensure no complication arises. The procedure should be carried out by a medical team including a paediatric surgeon, the High Court said. Under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, abortion after 20 weeks of pregnancy is prohibited unless allowed by a court. A court can allow abortion in such cases if there is abnormality in the fetus, the health of the expectant month is at risk, or she is a sexual attack victim.

The Hindu

4 hours ago

• The Hindu

Can not force sexual assault victim to continue unwanted pregnancy: Bombay HC

A victim of sexual assault cannot be compelled to continue her unwanted pregnancy, the Bombay High Court has said while allowing a 12-year-old girl to abort her 28-week pregnancy despite an adverse report from medical experts. If forced to give birth to a child against her wish, the court would be depriving her of the right to decide the "path of her life", it said. Also Read | Delhi HC issues guidelines for rape victims whose pregnancy exceeds 24 weeks A medical board, after examining the girl, had opined that the process of termination of pregnancy would be highly risky, considering the girl's age and the stage of the growth of the fetus. A Bench of Justices Nitin Sambre and Sachin Deshmukh, however, held in its June 17 order that abortion will have to be permitted. Also Read | Supreme Court permits abortion for 14-year-old rape survivor to protect her mental, physical well-being "This court cannot force the victim to carry her pregnancy against her wishes, as in such an eventuality, the state would be stripping her of the right to determine the immediate and long term path of her life," the HC said. "We are equally required to be sensitive to the fact that a woman can become pregnant by choice irrespective of her marital status, however, in case of unwanted or incidental pregnancy the burden invariably falls on the pregnant woman/victim," the court said. The girl had been sexually assaulted by her uncle, following which a case was registered against him. The girl's father moved the High Court seeking to terminate her pregnancy, the result of the sexual assault. The court, while permitting the termination of pregnancy, said all safety protocol shall be followed during the procedure to ensure no complication arises. The procedure should be carried out by a medical team including a paediatric surgeon, the HC said. Under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, abortion after 20 weeks of pregnancy is prohibited unless allowed by a court. A court can allow abortion in such cases if there is an abnormality in the fetus, the health of the expectant mother is at risk, or she is a sexual attack victim.

Hindustan Times

2 days ago

• Hindustan Times

Doctors are not slaves: Himachal high court

'The public interest in retaining manpower cannot override the individual's right to professional advancement,' ruled Himachal Pradesh high court (HC), while directing state government to issue a No Objection Certificate (NOC) to a doctor for pursuing a super specialty course. Disposing of petition filed by Dr Pankaj Sharma, who challenged the rejection of his request for an NOC to pursue a DNB SS Medical Oncology course under the All India Quota, justice Sandeep Sharma quoted order of division bench from another petition: 'Doctors are not slaves and cannot be compelled to serve against their wishes if they are willing to forfeit bond money.' Advocate general Anup Rattan had argued that the state was facing an acute shortage of medical officers and could not afford to relieve specialists. Unimpressed by the submission, the court said: 'No doubt, this court cannot lose sight of the fact that there is a shortage of doctors in the state but that cannot be sole ground to stop progression of individual who, after his PG course, wants to do super specialty, that too at his own expense.' 'Needless to say, once bond money is deposited, person concerned cannot be compelled to work against his wishes,' read the HC order. Dr Sharma, currently posted as senior resident at Pt Jawahar Lal Nehru Government Medical College, Chamba, had completed his post-graduate degree in radiotherapy and was selected for a super specialty seat at Paras Hospital, Punjab. However, his application for NOC was denied by the director of health services on May 26 on the ground that he had not completed the mandatory one-year field posting after PG. Setting aside the order denying him NOC, the court directed the state to issue the NOC subject to his depositing ₹40 lakh as bond amount within a week and submitting a written undertaking that he would return to serve the state for five years after completing his course.