The best use cases for each ChatGPT model

Calvin Wankhede / Android Authority
While ChatGPT has existed in various forms for some time, its true mainstream success began with the release of GPT-3 in 2020. Since then, ChatGPT has evolved significantly, both for better and worse. Although the tool is now more useful than ever before, it's also become somewhat confusing.
Depending on your subscription level, you might have up to eight different models to choose from, making it tricky to identify which is best suited for your task.
As someone who has been a ChatGPT Plus user since subscriptions first became available, I rely on ChatGPT frequently. Sometimes it's for brainstorming, proofreading, personal organizing, or other productive activities. Other times, it's purely for entertainment — such as creating alternate timelines or pondering random philosophical ideas. Setting aside the fact that I clearly need more friends, these interactions have given me ample experience with which model works best in various situations.
The truth is, there isn't one perfect use case for each ChatGPT model, as many overlap. Still, let's take a closer look at the seven models currently available, exploring the ideal scenarios for each.
GPT-4o is great for generalist tasks, especially for free users
Kaitlyn Cimino / Android Authority
Best for : General-purpose tasks, including editing, questions, and brainstorming
: General-purpose tasks, including editing, questions, and brainstorming Availability: Free or higher
ChatGPT defaults to GPT-4o for a good reason: it's a solid generalist. This multimodal model can process and analyze text, images, audio, and even video, making GPT-4o ideal for a wide range of tasks, including: Composing emails
Basic brainstorming and creative content
Summarizing text, and basic creative content
Basic editing and proofreading
Simple questions
That's some of the official use cases, but your imagination is the true limit. Personally, I've used GPT-4o extensively for my creative writing projects. It's also been my go-to for: Creating alternate timelines and similar role-playing scenarios
Fetching general information, such as gardening tips and simple queries
Performing straightforward edits and summarization
Although I'm not a coder, I've heard many people successfully use GPT-4o for basic coding projects, thanks to its looser usage limits. That said, the newer GPT-4.1 is generally a much better choice for coding tasks, as we'll discuss shortly.
Overall, GPT-4o is a reliable tool for just about anything, but it's important to note that, based on my experience, it becomes more prone to hallucinations as queries grow more complex. For straightforward requests with clear outcomes, GPT-4o works very well, but it struggles significantly with genuine reasoning and complex logic, making occasional errors more likely.
For example, while working on an alternate timeline about Rome, GPT-4o mistakenly pulled information from a previous, unrelated timeline project I created months earlier involving a divergent North America. Despite obvious differences in divergence points, nations, and events, GPT-4o sometimes couldn't distinguish these separate contexts clearly.
The key takeaway is that you should always verify any ChatGPT response independently, but this is especially important with GPT-4o, at least in my experience. Additionally, free users are limited to 10 messages every three hours, though paid Plus subscribers have an increased limit of 80 messages every three hours.
GPT-4.1: Great for coding and a better generalist for Plus, Pro, and Team members
Best for : Coding and detailed generalist tasks that require greater accuracy
: Coding and detailed generalist tasks that require greater accuracy Availability: Plus or higher
While GPT-4o remains the default, those with paid subscriptions might consider the newer GPT-4.1 as their daily driver instead. Initially accessible only via third-party software or OpenAI's API, GPT-4.1 is now fully integrated into ChatGPT for users with a Plus subscription or higher.
The improved intelligence and speed of GPT-4.1 mean it can handle all the scenarios listed previously under GPT-4o, with notable enhancements. Other advantages include: It's a great option for coders looking for a balance between speed, accuracy, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness.
Significantly better performance than GPT-4o for detailed proofreading, editing, and brainstorming on slightly more complex topics.
Clearer and faster responses, reducing the need for extensive back-and-forth corrections.
The primary downside of GPT-4.1 compared to GPT-4o is its tighter usage restriction, capped at 40 messages every three hours for Plus users. Still, this limit is likely sufficient for most users, aside from particularly extensive projects. In my personal and entertainment projects, I've occasionally reached the cap, but in those cases, I simply switch back to GPT-4o to complete the job.
GPT-4.1 shares the same multimodal capabilities as GPT-4o, but delivers clear improvements across the board. According to OpenAI's official metrics, the new model offers: 21.4% higher coding accuracy : GPT-4.1 scores 54.6% versus GPT-4o's 33.2%.
: GPT-4.1 scores 54.6% versus GPT-4o's 33.2%. 10.5% improvement in instruction-following accuracy : GPT-4.1 achieves 38.3% compared to GPT-4o's 27.8%.
: GPT-4.1 achieves 38.3% compared to GPT-4o's 27.8%. 6.7% better accuracy for long-context tasks: GPT-4.1 scores 72% versus GPT-4o's 65.3%.
As of this writing, GPT-4.1 has only been available to Plus users for about a week, so I haven't fully explored every scenario. However, my initial experiences indicate that GPT-4.1 hallucinates far less often and maintains greater consistency when staying on topic. Unlike GPT-4o, it doesn't randomly blend ideas from previous projects, a frequent issue I encountered with alternative timelines. Additionally, GPT-4.1 follows instructions more carefully and refrains from improvising unnecessarily — a tendency I've noticed in other models.
OpenAI 01 Pro Mode: Powerful and precise, but best for specialized business tasks
Calvin Wankhede / Android Authority
Best for : Complex business and coding tasks demanding exceptional detail and accuracy
: Complex business and coding tasks demanding exceptional detail and accuracy Availability: Pro or higher
As you might guess, OpenAI's 01 Pro Mode requires an expensive Pro membership and therefore targets companies, independent professionals, or freelancers who handle specialized business and enterprise tasks. Although there's no firm cap, sustained, intensive use can temporarily restrict your access. For example, according to user Shingwun on Reddit, sending more than around 200 messages during a workday can quickly trigger temporary restrictions.
Potential use cases for 01 Pro Mode include: Drafting highly detailed risk-analysis reports or internal memos.
Creating multi-page research summaries.
Developing sophisticated algorithms tailored to specific business requirements.
Building specialized applications or plug-ins.
Parsing complex STEM topics directly from detailed research papers.
These represent just a few possible applications, but ultimately, this model is designed for extremely complex tasks. For everyday programming assistance or quicker queries, there are honestly faster and more suitable tools. Due to its advanced reasoning capabilities, 01 Pro Mode typically takes more time per response, which can become a significant bottleneck, even though the end results are often worth the wait.
GPT-03 is great for general business productivity and beyond
C. Scott Brown / Android Authority
Best for : Business productivity, Plus-level tasks that need advanced reasoning
: Business productivity, Plus-level tasks that need advanced reasoning Availability: Plus or higher
If you're working on a complex, multi-step project, you'll find that models like GPT-4o are more prone to producing responses riddled with logic errors or outright hallucinations. While such mistakes can occur with any AI, GPT-03 is specifically designed with advanced reasoning in mind, making it typically better suited for tasks such as: Risk analysis reports and similarly detailed documents.
Analyzing existing content more deeply and objectively, compared to the overly positive responses typical of other models.
Drafting strategic business outlines based on competitor and internal data.
Providing more thorough explanations for concepts related to math, science, and coding than GPT-4o or GPT-4.1.
Personally, I often use GPT-03 for deeper analysis of both my personal and professional projects. I've found it particularly helpful as a tool for working through my own thoughts and ideas. While I would never fully entrust an AI to serve as a genuine advisor, GPT-03 is valuable when you want to explore or develop an idea with AI assistance. Just be sure to verify any conclusions or ideas you reach with outside sources and additional scrutiny. For example, I've used GPT-03 to help refine my own ethical and philosophical viewpoints, but always confirm these ideas by consulting both online resources and real people.
Remember, AI models are very good at providing logical-sounding answers, but they can also mislead, exaggerate, or even unintentionally gaslight you. Therefore, exercise caution when using GPT-03 in this manner.
AI models might provide logical-sounding answers, but they can also mislead, exaggerate, or even unintentionally gaslight you.
It's also important to recognize GPT-03's other limitations. First, because GPT-03 prioritizes reasoning, responses are typically slower compared to some of the other models. Additionally, Plus, Team, or Enterprise subscribers are limited to just 100 messages per week. Depending on your project's complexity, this could be sufficient, but it also means you'll need to be more selective when choosing to use this model. Pro-level accounts, however, enjoy unlimited access to GPT-03.
Lastly, although OpenAI promotes GPT-03 as ideal for advanced coding tasks, my research across Reddit and other online communities suggests a different perspective. The consensus seems to be that while GPT-03 excels at very specific coding scenarios, it can also be prone to hallucination unless prompts are crafted carefully. Most coders find GPT-4.1 to be a generally better fit for typical coding tasks.
GPT-4o-mini and GPT-4.1-mini: Best for API users or when you hit usage limits
Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority
Best for : API users, or anyone needing a backup when other model limits are reached
: API users, or anyone needing a backup when other model limits are reached Availability: Free or higher
I'm grouping these two models together, as they're even more similar to each other than GPT-4o and GPT-4.1. According to OpenAI, GPT-4o-mini is best suited for fast technical tasks, such as: Quick STEM-related queries
Programming
Visual reasoning
In reality, while it performs well enough for these cases, its limitations can become apparent for anyone doing intensive coding or using the model daily. Even though the 300-message-per-day limit sounds generous, it really depends on your workflow and the size of your projects. Ultimately, GPT-4o-mini works well as a backup if you hit message caps on other models, but I think its best use case is actually outside of ChatGPT — as a cost-effective choice for API users running larger projects.
As for GPT-4.1-mini: this newer model is the default for all ChatGPT users (replacing GPT-4o-mini), though you'll still have access to both on Plus or higher tiers. One big change is that 4.1-mini also supports free accounts, so you're not restricted by payment tier.
GPT-4.1-mini works much like GPT-4o-mini but with better coding ability and improved overall performance. It's a useful fallback when you max out your limit on other models, but in my opinion, both mini variants still shine brightest as affordable, lower-power options for API-based projects rather than as your main engine for regular ChatGPT queries. Still, 4.1-mini is gradually rolling out to all free users and will automatically be selected if you hit the GPT-4o cap.
GPT-4o-mini-high: Best as a backup for GPT-03 and for faster reasoning
Kaitlyn Cimino / Android Authority
Best for : Faster reasoning than o3, and as a backup
: Faster reasoning than o3, and as a backup Availability: Plus or higher
GPT-4o-mini-high (formerly known as GPT-03-mini-high) used to be a favorite among those looking for less restrictive coding and more flexibility for unique projects. The current version doesn't have quite the same reputation for coding, but it still has a few official OpenAI use cases: Solving complex math equations with full step-by-step breakdowns—great for homework and learning
Drafting SQL queries for data extraction and database work
Explaining scientific concepts in clear, accessible language
Based on my experience and what I've read in community forums, the best way to use GPT-4o-mini-high is as a backup: when you run out of credits or hit your message cap on GPT-03, mini-high offers a similar experience, though it's not quite as robust. This model is limited to 100 messages per day for Plus, Teams, and Enterprise users, while Pro users get unlimited access.
GPT-4.5: Powerful generalist, but best for refinement or high-value queries
Mishaal Rahman / Android Authority
Best for : Final refinement, editing, or as a premium alternative to GPT-4.1
: Final refinement, editing, or as a premium alternative to GPT-4.1 Availability: Plus or higher
GPT-4.5 is arguably the most powerful generalist model available, offering a noticeable leap over GPT-4.1 and GPT-4o in many scenarios. However, its strict usage limits mean you'll want to be selective. While GPT-4.5 used to allow for 50 messages per week, Plus users are now limited to just 20 weekly messages.
Pro users also have a cap, but OpenAI hasn't published exact numbers. From what I've seen, most people don't reach the Pro limit easily, but if you're passionate about using GPT-4.5, you'll need to spring for the $200/month Pro tier. For more casual users like me, that's a pretty tough sell.
So, what do I mean by refinement? Essentially, I like to use GPT-4o or GPT-4.1 to rough out a project and get it where I want it, then bring in GPT-4.5 for the final polish. For instance, when working on an alternate history timeline for a fiction series, I used GPT-4.1 for the main draft, then uploaded the result to GPT-4.5 to help refine the language and catch any logic gaps. The finished product was much tighter, and I only had to use a few of my 20 weekly messages.
Whether it's for last-step editing, advanced review, or double-checking a critical project, GPT-4.5 excels as a finishing tool. Just keep in mind that it's not practical for multi-step, back-and-forth work unless you're on the Pro plan.
My favorite workflow: Mixing models for the best results
Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority
While GPT-4.5 is my go-to for final refinement, I actually hop between models quite a bit depending on the project. The web version of ChatGPT makes it easy to switch models mid-conversation (even if you sometimes need to re-explain the context).
For creative projects, I usually start with GPT-4.1 for drafting, then jump to GPT-03 if I need deeper reasoning or want to double-check my thinking. After narrowing things down further in GPT-4.1, I'll finish the project in GPT-4.5 for a final pass. This model dance helps catch mistakes, uncover new ideas, and produce cleaner, more reliable results.
Ultimately, there's no one 'right' combination for everyone. You'll want to experiment with the models to find a workflow that fits your needs. For example, programmers might use a cheaper model like GPT-4.1 for initial coding, then switch to 01 Pro Mode for an advanced review of their work. Writers and researchers might prefer the blend of GPT-03's reasoning with GPT-4.5's editing finesse.
How do you cross-utilize the different models? Maybe you have a hot take you can share in the comments that I didn't previously consider.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

2 hours ago

• Yahoo

AI tools collect, store your data – how to be aware of what you're revealing

Like it or not, artificial intelligence has become part of daily life. Many devices — including electric razors and toothbrushes — have become "AI-powered," using machine learning algorithms to track how a person uses the device, how the device is working in real time, and provide feedback. From asking questions to an AI assistant like ChatGPT or Microsoft Copilot to monitoring a daily fitness routine with a smartwatch, many people use an AI system or tool every day. While AI tools and technologies can make life easier, they also raise important questions about data privacy. These systems often collect large amounts of data, sometimes without people even realizing their data is being collected. The information can then be used to identify personal habits and preferences, and even predict future behaviors by drawing inferences from the aggregated data. As an assistant professor of cybersecurity at West Virginia University, I study how emerging technologies and various types of AI systems manage personal data and how we can build more secure, privacy-preserving systems for the future. Generative AI software uses large amounts of training data to create new content such as text or images. Predictive AI uses data to forecast outcomes based on past behavior, such as how likely you are to hit your daily step goal, or what movies you may want to watch. Both types can be used to gather information about you. Generative AI assistants such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini collect all the information users type into a chat box. Every question, response and prompt that users enter is recorded, stored and analyzed to improve the AI model. OpenAI's privacy policy informs users that "we may use content you provide us to improve our Services, for example to train the models that power ChatGPT." Even though OpenAI allows you to opt out of content use for model training, it still collects and retains your personal data. Although some companies promise that they anonymize this data, meaning they store it without naming the person who provided it, there is always a risk of data being reidentified. Beyond generative AI assistants, social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram and TikTok continuously gather data on their users to train predictive AI models. Every post, photo, video, like, share and comment, including the amount of time people spend looking at each of these, is collected as data points that are used to build digital data profiles for each person who uses the service. The profiles can be used to refine the social media platform's AI recommender systems. They can also be sold to data brokers, who sell a person's data to other companies to, for instance, help develop targeted advertisements that align with that person's interests. Many social media companies also track users across websites and applications by putting cookies and embedded tracking pixels on their computers. Cookies are small files that store information about who you are and what you clicked on while browsing a website. One of the most common uses of cookies is in digital shopping carts: When you place an item in your cart, leave the website and return later, the item will still be in your cart because the cookie stored that information. Tracking pixels are invisible images or snippets of code embedded in websites that notify companies of your activity when you visit their page. This helps them track your behavior across the internet. This is why users often see or hear advertisements that are related to their browsing and shopping habits on many of the unrelated websites they browse, and even when they are using different devices, including computers, phones and smart speakers. One study found that some websites can store over 300 tracking cookies on your computer or mobile phone. Like generative AI platforms, social media platforms offer privacy settings and opt-outs, but these give people limited control over how their personal data is aggregated and monetized. As media theorist Douglas Rushkoff argued in 2011, if the service is free, you are the product. Many tools that include AI don't require a person to take any direct action for the tool to collect data about that person. Smart devices such as home speakers, fitness trackers and watches continually gather information through biometric sensors, voice recognition and location tracking. Smart home speakers continually listen for the command to activate or "wake up" the device. As the device is listening for this word, it picks up all the conversations happening around it, even though it does not seem to be active. Some companies claim that voice data is only stored when the wake word — what you say to wake up the device — is detected. However, people have raised concerns about accidental recordings, especially because these devices are often connected to cloud services, which allow voice data to be stored, synced and shared across multiple devices such as your phone, smart speaker and tablet. If the company allows, it's also possible for this data to be accessed by third parties, such as advertisers, data analytics firms or a law enforcement agency with a warrant. This potential for third-party access also applies to smartwatches and fitness trackers, which monitor health metrics and user activity patterns. Companies that produce wearable fitness devices are not considered "covered entities" and so are not bound by the Health Information Portability and Accountability Act. This means that they are legally allowed to sell health- and location-related data collected from their users. Concerns about HIPAA data arose in 2018, when Strava, a fitness company released a global heat map of users' exercise routes. In doing so, it accidentally revealed sensitive military locations across the globe through highlighting the exercise routes of military personnel. The Trump administration has tapped Palantir, a company that specializes in using AI for data analytics, to collate and analyze data about Americans. Meanwhile, Palantir has announced a partnership with a company that runs self-checkout systems. Such partnerships can expand corporate and government reach into everyday consumer behavior. This one could be used to create detailed personal profiles on Americans by linking their consumer habits with other personal data. This raises concerns about increased surveillance and loss of anonymity. It could allow citizens to be tracked and analyzed across multiple aspects of their lives without their knowledge or consent. Some smart device companies are also rolling back privacy protections instead of strengthening them. Amazon recently announced that starting on March 28, 2025, all voice recordings from Amazon Echo devices would be sent to Amazon's cloud by default, and users will no longer have the option to turn this function off. This is different from previous settings, which allowed users to limit private data collection. Changes like these raise concerns about how much control consumers have over their own data when using smart devices. Many privacy experts consider cloud storage of voice recordings a form of data collection, especially when used to improve algorithms or build user profiles, which has implications for data privacy laws designed to protect online privacy. All of this brings up serious privacy concerns for people and governments on how AI tools collect, store, use and transmit data. The biggest concern is transparency. People don't know what data is being collected, how the data is being used, and who has access to that data. Companies tend to use complicated privacy policies filled with technical jargon to make it difficult for people to understand the terms of a service that they agree to. People also tend not to read terms of service documents. One study found that people averaged 73 seconds reading a terms of service document that had an average read time of 29 to 32 minutes. Data collected by AI tools may initially reside with a company that you trust, but can easily be sold and given to a company that you don't trust. AI tools, the companies in charge of them and the companies that have access to the data they collect can also be subject to cyberattacks and data breaches that can reveal sensitive personal information. These attacks can by carried out by cybercriminals who are in it for the money, or by so-called advanced persistent threats, which are typically nation/state-sponsored attackers who gain access to networks and systems and remain there undetected, collecting information and personal data to eventually cause disruption or harm. While laws and regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation in the European Union and the California Consumer Privacy Act aim to safeguard user data, AI development and use have often outpaced the legislative process. The laws are still catching up on AI and data privacy. For now, you should assume any AI-powered device or platform is collecting data on your inputs, behaviors and patterns. Although AI tools collect people's data, and the way this accumulation of data affects people's data privacy is concerning, the tools can also be useful. AI-powered applications can streamline workflows, automate repetitive tasks and provide valuable insights. But it's crucial to approach these tools with awareness and caution. When using a generative AI platform that gives you answers to questions you type in a prompt, don't include any personally identifiable information, including names, birth dates, Social Security numbers or home addresses. At the workplace, don't include trade secrets or classified information. In general, don't put anything into a prompt that you wouldn't feel comfortable revealing to the public or seeing on a billboard. Remember, once you hit enter on the prompt, you've lost control of that information. Remember that devices which are turned on are always listening — even if they're asleep. If you use smart home or embedded devices, turn them off when you need to have a private conversation. A device that's asleep looks inactive, but it is still powered on and listening for a wake word or signal. Unplugging a device or removing its batteries is a good way of making sure the device is truly off. Finally, be aware of the terms of service and data collection policies of the devices and platforms that you are using. You might be surprised by what you've already agreed to. Christopher Ramezan is an assistant professor of cybersecurity at West Virginia University. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. This article is part of a series on data privacy that explores who collects your data, what and how they collect, who sells and buys your data, what they all do with it, and what you can do about it. This article originally appeared on Erie Times-News: AI devices collect your data, raise questions about privacy | Opinion

Android Authority

2 hours ago

• Android Authority

Fastmail replaced my Gmail and I'm never going back

Nathan Drescher / Android Authority I had the digital equivalent of an epiphany the other day. I opened my inbox and saw…email. Only email. There were no ads, no AI-generated summaries, and no prompts. It was a strange, yet welcome, feeling after years of using Gmail. Checking my inbox no longer felt like an argument with an algorithm. That's because I switched to Fastmail earlier this year. It all began when I started distancing myself from American big tech platforms, where Google sits high on the list. I wanted something more private and more personal, with less bloat. Fastmail, an Australian company, caught my eye as a well-regarded alternative to Gmail. Six months in, I am confident I made the right choice. Would you leave Gmail for something more private? 0 votes Yes, already have. NaN % I'm thinking about it. NaN % Maybe, if Gmail gets worse. NaN % No, I'm staying with Google. NaN % Why I left Gmail and Google Calendar Nathan Drescher / Android Authority It wasn't only because Gmail is part of a big monopolistic American tech corporation. It wasn't only the insane amounts of data it collected. It was the cluttered UI and the push towards AI-driven features I never asked for. Google Calendar, meanwhile, does its job, but has begun to feel like it's trying to be something more than it is. Gemini is snooping more and more in Calendar, trying to be helpful but getting in the way. All of it felt more corporate than personal. What I wanted was a fast, private email that respected my time and let me work. I wanted a calendar that synced reliably across platforms without becoming another vector for distraction. I seriously considered Proton Mail. I have great respect for what the company is building. However, I have heard from others about occasional delivery hiccups, and I can't afford to miss an interview with a subject or an important follow-up with a client. Reliability was non-negotiable. Proton was out. How Fastmail fits into my daily life Nathan Drescher / Android Authority Fastmail handles all my email needs. The interface is clean and responsive. No tabs, no promotions. Just email. I can choose between a folder or tag structure, and I went with tags. It's one of the things I enjoy about Gmail. The Fastmail app is more than just email. There's a dropdown in the top left that allows me to switch to Calendar, Contacts, Notes, and even a cloud drive. The base plan comes with 50GB of storage, which isn't bad for $60 a year. The built-in calendar has been surprisingly strong. It syncs perfectly with the email side of the app, so appointments and meetings can be quickly added. I can share calendar events with others, even if they don't use Fastmail, and it looks great, as well. The base plan comes with 50GB of storage, which isn't bad for $60 a year. One feature I didn't expect to appreciate so much was the filtering system. I can control exactly how messages are sorted and what gets archived and flagged. It's like Gmail's labels, but with the user in mind. Notes are simple, but they work, and sync instantly between all devices. However, they're not as powerful or quick as Google Keep, so I still use that as my primary notetaking app. That said, I wasn't looking for a notes replacement. What I gained by switching Nathan Drescher / Android Authority The biggest gain in my life has been peace of mind. Fastmail isn't tracking me. My messages aren't being profiled, and Fastmail isn't trying to sell me anything. I pay it once a year, and it delivers my emails. I also gained reliability. Everything feels faster, with messages loading instantly and folders responding immediately. The search works great. There's no AI engine or smart features getting in the way. There's no AI engine or smart features getting in the way. Nathan Drescher Fastmail gives me control. I have control over my email and my calendar, and I can decide how things look and behave. That kind of ownership is preciously rare in modern digital services. Of course, there are still limits Nathan Drescher / Android Authority Nothing is perfect. Notes are barebones, and like I said, I don't use it often. It's certainly not a replacement for Keep. There's no deep integration with voice assistants, which could be a dealbreaker for some. I'm okay with it myself. There's also a learning curve when it comes to setting it up. I use a custom domain and had to mess around with my host's MX records, something I know little about. Once set up, however, it stayed out of the way. And it's not free. In this case, I'm happy to pay for something that works. I don't like being the product, after all. Fastmail gives me what I want Nathan Drescher / Android Authority It's a private and reliable alternative to Google's suite of apps. Sure, it doesn't have all the AI bells and whistles, but I see that as a selling point. I still use Google Keep, and I'm fine with that. I didn't set out to replace it, and the built-in notes feature that comes with Fastmail is more of an added bonus than a core feature for me. This was about finding tools that weren't American and respected my time and privacy. Fastmail has done exactly that. Fastmail is more than capable if you're looking to step away from the big tech oligopolies. You don't need to sacrifice usability, because Fastmail isn't trying to be clever. It just does its job well.

Android Authority

3 hours ago

• Android Authority

This new Chrome feature has forever changed the way I shop online

Ryan Haines / Android Authority As an avid runner in the middle of marathon training, I go through a lot of shoes — like, a lot of shoes. When averaging 50 miles per week, I can burn through a pair in a little over a month, and then it's time to treat myself. That said, I'm not made of money. I can't just run out and pay full price every time I need fresh foam under my feet. So, I have to be careful about looking for deals and spending wisely. And now, a new Chrome extension has made that easier than ever. Here's how. Chrome keeps tabs on my tabs for me Ryan Haines / Android Authority The idea of an extension to track product prices in a web browser is nothing new. My colleague Rita praised the popular Amazon tracker CamelCamelCamel when she asked me if I'd tried Google's version. At the time, I hadn't given Google's shopping insights a shot yet, but I'd used (and liked) the version that Microsoft introduced to Edge a while back. The only problem is that I mostly work on a MacBook Air, and the last thing I need is a third browser kicking around. When I found out that Google had added a similar feature to Chrome, which I use across my Android phone of the week and my laptop, I was ready to try it out. And, as it turns out, the setup process couldn't be more straightforward — open a product page, tap the Track Price button, and wait to see how it fluctuates over time. Naturally, I took it as a sign to monitor about half a dozen running shoes. I always liked Edge's shopping insights, but they're much more useful on Chrome... because I actually use it. See, right now, I'm in the market for a faster daily trainer that I can use for a few workouts. That means a relatively new launch like the Adidas AdiZero Evo SL, New Balance Rebel v5, or the Asics Novablast 5. So, I opened all their product pages, added the Skechers Aero Spark for good measure, and set up my price tracking reminders. At this point, I've only been following my selected footwear for about a week, so there hasn't been much movement. That said, a few of the shoes — the Evo SL and the Aero Spark — have been on the market for long enough that they've gained pricing history. I can slide along a timeline for both shoes, noting when they've been discounted and hoping for new deals. Would you use a Google-based shopping tracker? 0 votes Yes, I use shopping insights in Chrome already NaN % No, I use another shopping tracker NaN % No, I'm not interested NaN % Different tasks for different screens Ryan Haines / Android Authority As an elder member of Gen-Z, I've reserved different screens in my life for different purposes — or rather, purchases. Basically, the more important the product, the bigger the screen I have to buy it on. Surprisingly, it seems like Google feels the same way. For me, price tracking on my phone is mainly reserved for monitoring how much something will cost. I probably won't go through the checkout process on my Pixel, but I'll always know what I'm about to pay. With Google's price tracking in Chrome, that's perfectly fine. If you have tracked products open in other tabs, whenever you go to the Switch Tabs menu, you'll see a quick pricing badge pop up, indicating either a price increase or decrease that you can reference quickly. When you're ready to buy, it seems like Google would rather you switch to a medium screen like a Chromebook or Windows laptop. I say so because instead of throwing out price change badges, Chrome for desktop offers discount badges. When you see one, you can easily copy and paste the discount code to your cart, taking some guesswork from checking sites like RetailMeNot or SimplyCodes. I've yet to see one of these coveted discount codes, though, probably because I'm looking for relatively new running shoes. Also, as expected, Google treats iOS and iPadOS like Android in terms of shopping insights. Both platforms get price alerts and easy history tracking over discounts, which is helpful for research purposes before you open the same tab on your laptop to finish the job. How much tracking is too much? Ryan Haines / Android Authority Unfortunately, though, I think Google's shopping insights are sometimes a bit too focused. In this extended running shoe example that you're probably tired of reading about — as are many of my friends — it's pretty clear that I've narrowed down which models I'm interested in. However, I'm not nearly as picky when it comes to colors, so I've just been setting up tracking notifications for the first colorway that pops up. Sometimes it's fine, like the Novablast 5 that defaulted to an easy-to-wear beige I won't mind dirtying up. Other times, it's not so easy. I opened the product page for the Adidas Evo SL in a bright yellow colorway — think as neon as a middle school boy would wear — and set up notifications right away. At first, I thought nothing of it, figuring Chrome would also track the other colorways on Adidas's website. I was wrong. At least with shoes, when you set up notifications for one colorway, that's all you get — and only from that site. I would much prefer to know if another colorway dropped so I could consider it, or even be sent to another retailer, but that's not how Google rolls right now. And, with how I carefully research before buying, it looks like I'll have two dozen tracking insights set up before I buy a new pair of shoes. Is that too many? Yes, probably, but at least I know I'll get the best price along the way.