The most effective way to use fasting to lose weight
Fasting every other day could be the most effective diet to help shave off the pounds, according to a BMJ study.
The analysis found that restricting calories by fasting on alternate days was more effective than a continuous diet reducing intake every day.
The review of data from 99 separate studies involving more than 6,500 people found that on average, those fasting every other day lost 1.29kg more than those dieting each day.
Alternate day fasting involves a 24-hour fast on alternate days and has become more popular in recent years.
Other intermittent fasting approaches to dieting have also grown in popularity, including time restricted eating, where people only eat for a certain number of hours in the day, such at the 16:8 diet involving a 16-hour fasting period followed by an eight-hour eating; and whole day fasting, which includes the 5:2 diet involving five days of eating and two days of fasting periods.
Researchers from Scotland, the US, Canada and Germany wanted to compare fasting methods to continuous energy restriction diets by looking at all of the available evidence.
People involved in the studies had an average body mass index (BMI) of 31 and almost nine in 10 (89 per cent) had pre-existing health conditions.
The research team found that both intermittent fasting diets and calorie restricted diets led to weight loss.
But compared with continuous energy restriction, alternate day fasting was the only strategy to show benefit in body weight reduction, with people on this diet losing 1.29kg more.
The authors said that alternate day fasting showed a 'trivial' reduction in body weight compared with both time restricted eating and whole day fasting.
'Minor differences were noted between some intermittent fasting diets and continuous energy restriction, with some benefit for an alternate day fasting strategy with weight loss in shorter duration trials,' the authors wrote.
'All intermittent fasting strategies and continuous energy restriction diets showed a reduction in body weight when compared with an ad-libitum diet
'Of three intermittent fasting diets, alternate day fasting showed benefit in body weight reduction compared with continuous energy restriction,' they said.
Naveed Sattar, a professor of cardio-metabolic medicine at the University of Glasgow, and who was not involved in the study, said the findings were not surprising 'as there is nothing magical about intermittent fasting for weight loss beyond being another way for people to keep their total calorie intake lower than it would be otherwise'.
'It becomes another lifestyle option for weight management,' he said.
'Whether it is sustainable over the longer term is worth to examine, whereas for those who need to lose much more weight, other options are now clearly available.'
Almost one in three adults in the UK are obese while a further third are considered overweight.
Last week, Prof Sir Stephen Powis, the NHS's top doctor, said that weight-loss jabs such as Wegovy and Mounjaro could be as transformative as statins.
From later this month, GPs in England will be allowed to prescribe Mounjaro, also known as tirzepatide, for the first time.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Anger over anti-drugs quango which accepts cash from firms that produce... methadone
A taxpayer-funded drugs lobbying group has been accused of a 'conflict of interest' as The Mail on Sunday today reveals it is sponsored by pharmaceutical companies which make heroin replacements. The Scottish Drugs Forum (SDF) has consistently called for SNP ministers to introduce 'harm reduction' methods over abstinence-based recovery. Interventions include putting vulnerable addicts onto methadone programs which critics say trap sufferers in the cycle of addiction. Analysis by The Mail last year showed methadone had killed more people over a five year period than heroin. Now, we can reveal the SDF, which is a registered Scottish charity, is being sponsored by pharmaceutical giants Ethypharm and Camurus. Ethypharm makes a number of drugs, including methadone, which is prescribed for opioid addiction treatment as part of NHS Scotland's medication-assisted treatment (MAT) program. Meanwhile Camurus makes Buvidal, another heroin substitute in the form of a slow release injection that can last for seven to 28 days. It is currently available for Scottish prisoners. A recent job application for a full-time content creator and editor states a new SDF magazine is being paid for by the companies. It read: 'This new project has been made possible thanks to unrestricted educational grants from Ethypharm and Camurus.' Last night, Annemarie Ward, chief executive of Faces and Voices of Recovery, said the revelations had laid bare a 'dangerous' conflict of interest within the SDF, which is predominantly funded by the public purse. She said: 'These companies make their money from the very medications this magazine business model depends on maintaining — not solving — mass dependency. 'This is a glaring and dangerous conflict of interest. 'SDF does not deliver treatment, support families, or provide long-term recovery programmes. It is a policy actor masquerading as a public service. This is not about evidence. It's about influence. And it's time we called it what it is.' Scottish Conservative shadow drugs minister Annie Wells MSP said: 'The source of this quango's funding gives rise to legitimate questions over its advice to the SNP government on drugs policy. 'The SNP have shamefully failed to tackle Scotland's drugs death epidemic. They should do the right thing and back the Right to Recovery bill, which would enshrine in law a right to treatment for those suffering from addiction.' Latest SDF company accounts show the group is majority funded by the taxpayer and received around £1.9m from the Scottish Government, local drug partnerships and the NHS last year alone. Since 2018, it has received at least £6,281,237 from the taxpayer, according to FOI documents and accounts. It has pushed for a number of harm reduction practices to be adopted by the Scottish Government and the NHS in Scotland, including the introduction of heroin safe consumption rooms. Its position is that abstinence-based recovery, which has saved the lives of millions of people across the world for decades, is not the end goal of treatment. That is despite addiction being defined by the NHS as not having 'control over doing, taking or using something to the point where it could be harmful'. Instead, it has been a fierce advocate for MAT - or opioid replacement therapies - using drugs such as methadone - as well as safe consumption rooms and even full-scale decriminalisation. Serious concerns have been raised about methadone prescriptions, which is prescribed to an estimated 20,540 people in Scotland. Campaigners fear thousands of addicts have been 'parked' on the substitutes rather than receive residential rehabilitation to help them live free from mind and body altering substances. Analysis of health records by The Mail last year showed there were 284,951 methadone scripts handed out over a 12 month period up to 2024, worth £4.1million. Looking back over equivalent data for the previous five years, the total cost of methadone to the NHS was £19.9million. Yet over five years, heroin claimed 2,544 lives, while methadone proved more deadly, responsible for 2,898 fatal overdoses. Last night, Kirsten Horsburgh CEO of Scottish Drugs Forum said: 'Scottish Drugs Forum is open and transparent about all sources of funding. 'The vast majority of our funding comes from public bodies. 'On occasion, we have received a small percentage of project-specific, unrestricted educational grants from pharmaceutical companies. 'This is always under strict conditions that ensure complete independence over the work undertaken, with no influence on its content, conclusions or public messaging.'
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Deadly waterborne bacteria reaches dangerous levels at two popular family beaches
Those looking to swim in two popular beaches on Lake Erie this weekend have been warned of high E. coli levels infecting the waters. Edgewater and Villa Angela Beach, located on the edge of Cleveland, Ohio, have been issued a water quality advisory due to high levels of waterborne bacteria, according to the Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District. Edgewater Beach had an E. coli reading of 90 MPN/100 mL, while the water of Villa Angela read a whopping 315 MPN/100 mL. E. coli is measured in a measurement called MPN (most probable number), which estimates the amount of E. coli cells in a liquid sample. The E. coli threshold for Edgewater is set at 80 MPN/100 mL, and Villa Beach is 135 MPN/100 mL. Since both beaches had an E. coli measurement above their threshold, experts have advised against swimming in the water. Both beaches are still open, but patrons are advised that swimming in the water could result in contact with the potentially deadly bacteria. The Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District collects data on contaminated water using the Nowcast system. The system uses rainfall patterns and wind direction to predict the water quality of the lakes. This weekend's Nowcast system predicted poor water quality, urging children, the elderly, and those with health concerns to stay away from swimming. E. coli infections impact your gut and urinary tract, resulting in symptoms such as diarrhea, vomiting, and a fever. Around 17 percent of those who contract E. coli die from the infection, according to the Cleveland Clinic. Although the percentage isn't high, vulnerable populations are at an enhanced risk. Those with diabetes, weakened immune systems, who are over the age of 65, or are young children are at the greatest risk of infection. If the infection spreads to the urinary tract system, it can cause pelvic pain, a burning sensation during urination, and cloudy, foul-smelling urine. E. coli is mostly spread through fecal-oral transmission when the bacteria are too small to see. Sepsis is the most common cause of death for those infected with E. coli. The condition occurs when the body's immune system can't fight off an infection and can lead to organ failure. The infection is contagious and can spread by touching contaminated objects, surfaces, or food. E. coli typically infects lakes and water sources after a rainstorm when animal feces are washed into the water. Aging sewage pipes can also leak contaminated water into lakes.
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Key RFK Jr advisers stand to profit from a new federal health initiative
Federal health officials are seeking to launch a 'bold, edgy' public service campaign to warn Americans of the dangers of ultra-processed foods in social media, transit ads, billboards and even text messages. And they potentially stand to profit off the results. Ultra-processed foods are a fixation for the US health and human services (HHS) secretary, Robert F Kennedy Jr, a vaccine skeptic who believes the US industrialized food supply is a 'primary culprit' behind many chronic diseases. 'We need to fix our food supply. And that's the number one thing,' Kennedy said at his confirmation hearing. Bringing healthier foods to Americans has proved to be one of the most resonant issues of Kennedy's 'Make America healthy again' (Maha) campaign – and arguably the only one that Democrats and Republicans agree on in principle. Kennedy has spent most of his tenure as health secretary dismantling key components of US vaccine infrastructure, instituting mass firings and defunding chronic disease prevention programs, such as for tobacco use. The secretary has been less successful in reigning in food makers. Food advocates have described voluntary changes between the government and manufacturers 'disappointing'. Kennedy was criticized by congressional Republicans for targeting agricultural pesticides in the 'Maha' report before it was even released – showing the limits of Republicans appetite for regulation, then the report itself was riddled with errors, likely generated by AI. 'The campaign's creative content will turn heads, create viral moments on social media, and – above all else – inspire Americans to take back their health through eating real food,' said a document published by the federal government that described the campaign. The campaign is expected to cost between $10m to $20m, according to documents. Anyone seeking to apply for the award will have a quick turnaround – the deadline is 26 June. 'The purpose of this requirement is to alert Americans to the role of processed foods in fueling the diabetes epidemic and other chronic diseases, inspire people to take personal responsibility for their diets, and drive measurable improvements in diabetes prevention and national health outcomes,' it continued. The new public relations campaign also highlights the Trump administration's unconventional approach to hiring – including its reliance on special government employees. A key adviser to Kennedy, Calley Means, could directly benefit from one of the campaign's stated aims: popularizing 'technology like wearables as cool, modern tools for measuring diet impact and taking control of your own health'. Calley Means is a senior Kennedy adviser, and was hired as a special government employee to focus on food policy, according to Bloomberg. He founded a company that helps Americans get such wearable devices reimbursed tax-free through health savings accounts. Casey Means is Calley's sister. She also runs a healthcare start-up, although hers sells wearable devices such as continuous glucose monitors. She is Kennedy's nominee for US surgeon general, and a healthcare entrepreneur whose business sells continuous glucose monitors – one such wearable device. Calley Means's company also works with Casey's company. Due to Calley Means's status as a special employee, he has not been forced to divest from his private business interests – a situation that has already resulted in an ethics complaint. Consumer advocates, such as the non-profit group Public Citizen, had warned such hiring practices could cause conflicts of interest. HHS did not respond to a request for comment about Calley Means's private business interests, or his role in crafting the publicity campaign. Although the publicity campaign focuses on the ultra-processed foods connection to diabetes, at least one high profile nutritionist was queasy about its focus. 'The ultra-processed foods – some of those include breakfast cereals that are ultra-processed because they are fortified with vitamins,' said Walter Willett, a professor of epidemiology and nutrition at the Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health. 'Those are good if they're whole grain breakfast cereals and whole grain breads,' he said. Ultra-processed foods are generally recognized as sodas, salty snacks and frozen meals engineered to be shelf-stable, convenient and inexpensive. Such foods are associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes – or insulin resistance. The mechanism by which such foods could increase risk of diabetes is unknown, a problem that extends in part from the 'heterogeneous category' of foods that the ultra-processed category encompasses. The publicity campaign proposal does not venture into defining the category, even as Kennedy has fixated on it 'poisoning the American people'. 'When you say processed foods you don't envision a Coke in your brain, and that's the biggest problem,' said Willett, who added that most public service campaigns are carefully crafted and tested for effectiveness.
