2025 Suzuki Burgman 400 breaks cover with stylish new shades: Features, specs and more
Suzuki has officially revealed the 2025 iteration of its popular maxi-scooter, the Burgman 400, for the European market.
While the new model remains mechanically unchanged, it receives a fresh palette of colour options aimed at enhancing its visual appeal and staying relevant in an increasingly competitive segment.
For the upcoming model year, the Burgman 400 will be available in three newly introduced shades: Pearl Matte Shadow Green paired with gold-finished wheels, an all-Black version also featuring golden rims, and a striking Bright Metallic Blue that lends the scooter a sportier and more youthful presence.
Despite the cosmetic refresh, the mechanical package carries over from the previous version. At its heart is the tried-and-tested 400cc single-cylinder, liquid-cooled engine, which continues to be mated to a CVT gearbox. The scooter is constructed on a steel underbone frame, offering a blend of strength and agility, and rides on 15-inch front and 13-inch rear alloy wheels.
On the features front, the Burgman 400 continues to offer a mix of analogue and digital instrumentation via a twin-pod cluster with a central LCD screen. Riders will also benefit from a traction control system, a generous under-seat storage area, and a full LED headlamp. Suspension duties are managed by telescopic forks at the front and a monoshock at the rear, while braking responsibilities are handled by disc brakes at both ends, supported by dual-channel ABS for enhanced safety.
Although the 2025 Burgman 400 is set to go on sale in Europe in the coming weeks, it is unlikely to be introduced in the Indian market. Suzuki currently remains focused on its smaller-capacity scooters in India, with no indications of a shift in strategy at present.
The latest updates are expected to appeal to urban riders and long-distance commuters alike, offering a blend of style, performance, and practicality.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Hervé Delphin at Idea Exchange: ‘EU-India is not just a relationship, it's become a tangible commodity'
Hervé Delphin, EU Ambassador to India, on how the EU-India partnership has made global ties more compelling and where Russia-Ukraine and Israel-Iran conflicts are headed. The session was moderated by Shubhajit Roy, Diplomatic Editor, The Indian Express. Shubhajit Roy: In the context of India-EU relationship, how do you see the journey of two-and-a-half decades? The EU and India have had a long journey. We established relations in 1962 and in 2004, we formally established a strategic partnership. At the time, the world was rather flat, now it's a different environment. We are today the largest trading bloc and partner of India. It's close to $200 billion in goods and services. We've been converging in our assessment of security, as well. The Indo-Pacific and the Indian Ocean are cases in point. We also have been converging people to people. Last year, there were about over 1 million visa applications of Indians to Europe, with an approval rate of 85 per cent. You also have an expanded footprint of European companies in India, about 6,000. Likewise, you've got more Indian companies investing in Europe. So what I see is this multi-layered relationship. The EU College of Commissioners visit in February helped to break the last hesitations that may have been there on both sides. Can we really trust each other? You know that in politics, even though you advance your relations, trust is the rarest commodity. So, we are now in what I would call a year cycle. If you consider that the College visit was the starting point, the end point will be the EU-India Summit in Delhi in about a year. The EU and India together represent 25 per cent of world GDP and 25 per cent of world population. It sends out a message to the rest of the world that we are two partners invested in looking at the world through the lens of cooperative engagement and cooperative multipolarism. It's not just a relationship, it's become a tangible commodity. Shubhajit Roy: One of the key elements that the two sides decided to work on was defence and security partnerships. What are the next steps going forward? The key pillars of this new strategic agenda are trade and economy, security and defence, technology, mobility and global partnerships, including connectivity. Arguably, security and defence were not so much in the landscape a few years ago. But, now we are a continent at war. There is an aggressor that decided to launch a war of choice on a sovereign country which is really a European neighbour. And that sent shockwaves through our system. In security and defence, the EU collectively has increased its expenditures by 30 per cent, between 2021 and 2024. Now it's about $350 billion. Looking at strategic and defence partnerships, the authorisation to have one with India is on the table of the Council and we are confident that will be authorised. This is what I call the political pathway. Shubhajit Roy: The Trade and Technology Council (TTC) is a new mechanism between India and the EU. Is there a possibility of technological transfer or partnership? If FTA (free trade agreement) is the game changer in terms of creating the environment, TTC is the upscaler. What the College visit to India has meant is a sharper focus on certain key supply chains, semiconductors, AI, space and biotech. Arguably, some of them are dual use. But what we are working on with India is really on the civilian part. The EU has a 300 billion plan called Invest AI and we are keen to develop cooperation. The human-centred approach of AI resonates quite well with the EU approach. We have differences, but I think there is a norm. Shubhajit Roy: What are the differences? It has to do with the ecosystem. It's the way you sort of leverage your own champions, the way you develop your ecosystem. We probably have a similar concern that big tech defines the rules of the game. But harnessing the different elements of our respective ecosystems and understanding the kind of protocols we are developing is interesting. Shubhajit Roy: On the FTA, how close or far are India and EU from concluding this particular agreement? This is the only way to bring the two economic constituencies together. It would, probably, be the largest-ever FTA India will conclude. For the EU, it's more or less the same. Since we are at different levels of development, the complexity of the negotiation is significant. There is so much determination on both sides to have it done. Just look at the pace of negotiating rounds. The next one is on July 7 in Brussels. Shubhajit Roy: The UK has beaten the EU on the FTA with India. The US is saying it will conclude it within the next month or so, before July 9. Is the EU lagging behind? Is it a race? Honestly, I prefer to be slower but bring larger goodies than being fast and having a small bag. What is important is not about being fast and furious, but resolute and substantial, for both constituencies. Europeans are not necessarily the sexiest or the most fun, but we are steady. We are reliable, we are predictable, and these days, these kinds of qualities have a higher value than before. So indeed, we may be a bit slower, we are a bit bureaucratic, we are not shining, but at the end of the day, we deliver. And all the FTAs we have signed have delivered positively for both sides. We are not in a zero-sum game, we are in a positive-sum game. And that is characteristic of our FTAs. On Israel-Iran conflict | Israel has a right to protect itself. That they have taken this rather dramatic action is serious. The only way to bring us away from the brink is the diplomatic track. But the onus is on Iran Shubhajit Roy: How confident are you that the US negotiations will lead to an agreement between Russia and Ukraine to end the war? The EU has made its position very clear. We support President (Donald) Trump's efforts for a ceasefire. But what has become abundantly clear is that Russia is stalling and is not engaging seriously and earnestly in any peace arrangement. They want to stay. For us, this is in blatant violation of the UN charter and it represents a threat to our security interests. So, if there is a serious peace process that is in place, we will engage. And, of course, we want the Ukrainians to be part. This is where the initiative of President Trump has created a space. But what we've seen in the last month is that Russia doesn't come to the table or comes to the table with deflecting arguments. We will continue to support peace efforts and Ukraine's right to defend itself. There's 135 billion Euro worth of assistance that have been channelled towards Ukraine, micro-financial assistance, humanitarian aid, military assistance. We will continue to try to degrade the war economy of Russia. We had the 18th package that has just been presented. And we believe that these sanctions are biting. Rakesh Sinha: You are well-versed in Middle Eastern affairs. Where is the Iran-Israel conflict headed? The sober lesson for anyone working with the Middle East is: It's always the same, but every time it's getting worse. This is really bringing us to the brink. The EU is also part of the JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action), an agreement that offered a framework to address the single-most concerning issue of Iran developing a nuclear programme for military purposes. Sadly, Iran has not used that framework to ensure its compliance with the International Atomic Energy Agency, with the Non-Proliferation Treaty, and has shown no respect for the benchmarks that have been set. It's Iran who closed the door on diplomacy and put itself in this situation. Now, clearly, the window for diplomacy has narrowed. It doesn't mean that this should not be tried. The EU statement, at G7, was clear that Iran has to get back to the negotiating table. Israel took action. This is a fact. We have stated very clearly that Israel has a right to protect itself. That they have taken this rather dramatic action is serious. The only way to bring us away from the brink is the diplomatic track. But the onus is on Iran. Ravi Dutta Mishra: Under the EU's 18th sanctions package on Russia, Europe has decided to stop importing refined Russian petroleum via third countries. India exported over $20 billion worth of refined petroleum to the EU in FY24. What is your take on India-EU relations in light of these sanctions? When the EU decided to take action against Russia through sanctions, they were designed to minimise the impact on fuel, fertilisers, and food. We wanted the sanctions to affect Russia, not others. That's why we imposed a price cap on oil rather than a ban. India is a net importer of oil, and we never blamed India for importing Russian crude. However, when it comes to refined products derived from Russian crude oil, perhaps, economic operators acted opportunistically. But from the EU's perspective, our policy has always been clear: we will not import Russian oil, whether crude or refined. These sanctions are not directed against India; they are part of a blanket policy. Those who made money during these years — good for them — but this opportunity will no longer exist. Ravi Dutta Mishra: Europe and Indian negotiators are talking about carbon tax. Will there be a middle ground? I have come to discover that Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) is one of the most-known acronyms in India. First, CBAM is not a trade measure. It is not part of trade and FTA. It's about compliance with our climate agenda to accelerate decarbonisation. It applies to our European economic actors. This is a societal and political choice of the EU. If you want to do business in Europe, you cannot import carbon. On Russia-Ukraine conflict | We support President Trump's efforts for a ceasefire. But what is clear is that Russia is stalling and is not engaging seriously and earnestly in any peace arrangement. They want to stay We reached out to Indian businesses last year, to medium and small enterprises. They will now have what they called a mass volume. Instead of going through every single transaction, it'll be treated in bulk. You have a sort of mass, 50 tons of carbon, when you are below that, you don't do anything. We also heard that Indian businesses see decarbonisation as the way forward. No one wants to be stuck in a high-carbon content industry because it's a story of the past, it's not the story of the future. What you see in India is actually a very bullish approach with technological solutions that will help decarbonisation. Nikhil Ghanekar: A few weeks ago, Commerce minister (Piyush) Goyal spoke about a retaliatory tariff to this non-barrier tariff. Would you like to weigh in on what he said on CBAM, that he won't accept it and there will be retaliation? The EU will not carry out exceptions for anyone. On one end, we have the FTA and on the other end, we have CBAM, an instrument of acceleration of decarbonisation. We are truly impressed by what India is doing in decarbonising its economy and its industry. Not any people realise the kind of challenges India is facing in ramping up and developing its economy while at the same time decarbonising. The leader of a big cement company in India was explaining to me how he's developing or importing a technology to ensure that his cement will have 60 per cent less carbon content. I'm quite confident that India will embrace the path of decarbonisation and it will do great. Rinku Ghosh: You are looking to expand your trade volume with India and make it an alternative supply chain. China is one of your biggest trade partners, so are their anxieties about the India-China dynamic? China is one of our largest trade partners. But it's a trade which runs with over $300 billion deficit. And that is a cause of concern for the EU, the same way India has over $100 billion trade deficit with China. So we're engaging and expecting concrete deeds from China to rebalance the market distortion. The second talking point with China is its support to Russia in the war. We are telling them that it cannot be business as usual if these two things are not addressed. In parallel, we are in the business of increasing diversification because every shock we have faced in the past has shown that whether Covid or wars or China, it is not a good policy to be over-dependent on one single provider. This is also a positive element in the EU-India equation. If India can ramp up the production of photovoltaic panels, of legacy microchips at competitive prices, the world will be better for everyone. Saptarshi Basak: Why does the West not hold Netanyahu to the same standard as Vladimir Putin? As Ambassador, I can only stand by the statements that have been made by the EU. We have not condoned or encouraged these strikes. The fact that Israel, on its own, has decided to strike Iran and precisely because of the consequential nature of these strikes, makes the case for diplomacy even more compelling. This is the single-most important objective today. It's not about qualifying the actions of one or the other, it's really to bring diplomacy on track. On India-EU FTA I prefer to be slower but bring larger goodies than being fast and having a small bag. All the FTAs we have signed have delivered positively for both sides. We are in a positive-sum game Arjun Sengupta: What do you think of the situation in Gaza? Is Europe in some way complicit with Israel's actions? The concerns expressed by the EU regarding the plight of the Palestinian population in the Gaza Strip, is clear, which is repeatedly engaging with Israel, directly discussing with the US to ask Israel to be compliant with international humanitarian law. There is a Foreign Affairs Council shortly, where there will be a review on whether Israel has been compliant with international law. At this point in time, what I can say for sure is that the dramatic developments in Gaza have been fully registered, and for the first time, the question of the suspension of the association agreement between the EU and Israel is on the table, but the first step is the review of evidence. Shubhajit Roy: On the India-Pakistan tensions last month, how concerned were you then and now about any possible sort of escalation in future? On the EU side, there is an understanding of Operation Sindoor as a consequence to the act of terror, of abject attack on civilians. And the way this terror attack was conducted, it was not just to take lives but to inflict pain and create ground for polarisation. The EU recognises India's right to defend itself and are engaging to bring the parties to a ceasefire. We are not in the business of mediation. We are passing on the message that the risk of escalation has to be considered. Now it's for the two parties to engage, to find ways to bring the situation to a level of stability that can benefit not only the two countries but also the region. We have relations with India which are profound, dense, strategic and forward-looking. We also have relations with Pakistan which are certainly not on the same level. We just had a dialogue with Pakistan on non-proliferation, on security and are engaging with them in the fight against terrorism.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Soccer-From fallen giants to giant-killers: Botafogo's remarkable revival
By Fernando Kallas HT Image June 22 - Once Brazilian football royalty, Botafogo had languished for decades as a debt-ridden sleeping giant before they toppled Paris St Germain at the Club World Cup to cap a resurrection tale three years in the making. When American entrepreneur John Textor acquired the club in 2022, fresh from their promotion back to Brazil's first division, he took on a training ground so decrepit that then-coach Luis Castro dismissed it as "good for parking cars," alongside crushing liabilities exceeding one billion reais . Botafogo were a storied but shattered institution. The club that once nurtured Brazilian greats - Garrincha, Zagallo, Jairzinho and Nilton Santos, architects of three World Cup triumphs - was drowning in debt, having endured the humiliation of relegation three times in just over a decade. On Thursday, they outplayed European champions Paris St Germain to win 1-0 in the Club World Cup's most eye-catching upset, propelling themselves to the top of the tournament's "group of death" and on the verge of the knockout stage. Their squad, assembled through shrewd bargain-hunting in football's forgotten corners, now faces Diego Simeone's Atletico Madrid in Los Angeles on Monday, sitting comfortably, knowing even a two-goal defeat would still secure their passage to the round of 16. The victory over PSG vindicated Textor's vision, outlined in a Reuters interview three years prior, of "beating the system" through astute scouting in under-explored talent pools. The architects of Thursday's victory exemplified this approach. Match-winner Igor Jesus arrived as a free agent after three anonymous years in the UAE and was transformed into a Brazil international. Argentine defender Alexander Barboza, who neutralised PSG's vaunted attack, was plucked from Paraguay's Club Libertad for nothing. Captain Marlon Freitas came from second-division Atletico Goianiense, while experienced European campaigners Alex Telles and Allan were revitalised after spells in Middle Eastern leagues. Gregore, Jefferson Savarino, John and Cuiabano were all signed for under two million euros each. "The goal is to be sustainably competitive every year," Botafogo CEO Thairo Arruda told Reuters. "With a top six payroll, we produce like a top three." The transformation extends far beyond the pitch. Revenues have soared from 140 million reais in 2022 to projected earnings exceeding 1.1 billion by 2025, while liabilities have been slashed by 40%. Textor's Eagle Football empire also encompasses stakes in Ligue 1's Olympique Lyonnais and Premier League Crystal Palace. Botafogo's renaissance - crowned by last year's domestic and continental double - has breathed new life into a club motto once heavy with self-pity: "There are things that only happen to Botafogo." After outclassing Europe's elite, those words now carry an altogether sweeter resonance. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
European auto companies fail to rev up sales in India
Renault, Volkswagen, and Skoda are facing challenges in India's automotive market, experiencing sales declines over the past three financial years. Their initial focus on sedans, slow product refreshes, and limited network reach, particularly in smaller cities, have hindered their growth. India's tax structure, favoring sub-4-meter vehicles, further disadvantages these European brands known for larger models. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads European mass market automotive brands Renault, Volkswagen, and Skoda continue to struggle to enhance presence in the Indian market, witnessing sales decline in the last three financial years, industry data to data by JATO Dynamics, a leading provider of data and analytics to the global automotive industry, Renault saw the biggest sales dip in India to 37,900 units in 2024-2025 from 45,439 units in 2023-2024, and 78,926 units in Skoda's sales in India in 2024-2025 were at 44,866 units, marginally higher from 44,522 units in 2023-2024, but down from 52,269 units in the other hand, the Volkswagen brand posted sales of 42,230 units in 2024-25, down from 43,197 units in 2023-2024. The brand had clocked sales of 41,263 units in 2022-2023."Renault, Skoda, and Volkswagen faced several headwinds in India despite their tenure," JATO Dynamics India President Ravi G Bhatia told why these brands have struggled in India, he said, "Initially, these brands focused heavily on sedans -- Vento, Rapid, and Scala -- which limited their exposure to the fast-expanding SUV segment."Simultaneously, Bhatia said, "They were slower in refreshing product lines, with many models remaining unchanged over extended periods. Network reach has also remained narrow, particularly in Tier 2 and Tier 3 markets, restricting access to a broader audience."Adding to the woes of these brands is "India's unique tax structure, where sub-4-metre vehicles benefit from significantly lower levies"."This has favoured Japanese and Korean OEMs known for cost-effective compact cars. European brands, by contrast, traditionally build larger models and have struggled to deliver competitive offerings within this constraint," Bhatia the current policy, passenger vehicles (petrol, CNG, LPG) up to 4 metres in length and up to 1200cc engine attract GST of 28% and 1% compensation vehicles (diesel) up to 4 metres in length and up to 1500 cc engine is levied 28% GST and 3% compensation cess.
