Taliban hang up Kalashnikovs to pen memoirs of Afghan war

Author Khalid Zadran, a member of the Haqqani network, long viewed as one of the most dangerous militant factions in Afghanistan, is the Kabul's police force spokesman. Photo AFP
Since trading the battlefield for Afghanistan's halls of power, some Taliban members have also swapped their weapons for pens to tell their version of the 20-year conflict with Western forces, who they accuse of distorting "reality".
A flood of books has been written, mostly from a Western perspective, about the war between the US-led forces that invaded Afghanistan in the wake of the September 11 attacks until the Taliban's return to power in 2021.
But in the years since, a proliferation of writings by Taliban figures — praising their exploits and the achievements of the "Islamic Emirate" — is now the reigning narrative in Afghanistan.
"No matter what foreigners have written... they have largely ignored the reality of what happened to us and why we were forced to fight," author Khalid Zadran told AFP.
A member of the Haqqani network — long viewed as one of the most dangerous militant factions in Afghanistan — he now serves as the spokesman for the capital's police force.
In his 600-page tome in Pashto published in April, he recounts US incursions in his home province of Khost, his childhood steeped in stories of soldiers' "atrocities", and his desire to join the Taliban in the name of his country's "freedom".
"I witnessed horrific stories every day — mangled bodies on the roadside," he writes in "15 Minutes", a title inspired by a US drone strike he narrowly escaped.
Muhajer Farahi, now a deputy information and culture minister, penned his "Memories of Jihad: 20 Years in Occupation" to "state the facts", he said.
"America, contrary to its claims, has committed cruel and barbaric acts, destroyed our country with bombs, destroyed infrastructure, and has sown discord and cynicism between nations and tribes," he told AFP from his office in central Kabul.
Little attention is paid in either book to the thousands of civilians killed in Taliban attacks — many of them suicide bombings that entrenched fear across the country for nearly two decades. Farahi insists the Taliban "were cautious in saving civilians and innocent" lives, while criticising fellow Afghans who collaborated with the pro-Western police as a "stain" on the country.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Express Tribune

3 hours ago

• Express Tribune

Calls grow in Congress to halt Trump's military actions in Iran

U.S. President Donald Trump delivers an address to the nation alongside U.S. Vice President JD Vance, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S. June 21, 2025, following U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. Photo:REUTERS Listen to article Some Democratic and Republican lawmakers on Sunday called on Congress to rein in President Donald Trump's use of military force in Iran and prevent US involvement in a deepening Middle East conflict. With Republican leaders in the Senate and House of Representatives strongly backing the US attacks on key Iranian nuclear sites, it seemed unlikely any resolution that asserts the power of Congress to declare war and restricts Trump's actions could pass both chambers. US Democratic Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia said he expects to force the Senate to vote this week on his measure requiring Trump to terminate hostilities against Iran unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war from Congress. Republican Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Democratic Representative Ro Khanna of California said they want a vote on similar legislation they introduced in the House. "This is the US jumping into a war of choice at Donald Trump's urging, without any compelling national security interest for the United States to act in this way, particularly without a debate and vote in Congress," Kaine told CBS' Face the Nation program. The White House did not respond to a request for comment on the criticism from lawmakers. House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune were both notified of the US military action ahead of time, according to sources familiar with the matter. Members of Congress are expected to be briefed on Tuesday. Read: Make Iran Great Again, says Trump as Tehran vows response to US strikes Thune's office declined to comment on Kaine's measure. The attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities on Saturday divided Trump's populist MAGA movement, with some leaders rallying behind the president and others calling for an end to hostilities after so-called US "forever wars" in Iraq and Afghanistan following the September 11, 2001, attacks on US soil. "I represent part of the coalition that elected President Trump. We were tired of endless wars," Massie told CBS. "We were promised that we would put our veterans, our immigration policies and our infrastructure first." Massie and Kaine each said there was no urgency requiring Trump to act unilaterally. "There was no imminent threat to the United States," Massie said. "We haven't been briefed." Intelligence reports and analysts have reached different conclusions on how close Iran was to building a nuclear bomb. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said on Friday that the US had intelligence that should Iran decide to do so, it could build a nuclear weapon in weeks or months. US officials say they do not believe Iran had decided to make a bomb. Iran claims its nuclear ambitions are peaceful and focused on energy production and medical research. But its program, which began in the late 1950s with US support, has fallen under suspicion in recent years, with Tehran ramping up enrichment to 60%, just below the weapons-grade of 90%, and restricting the access of international inspectors to its sites. Trump vowed on Sunday to support Massie's primary challenger in the 2026 midterm elections, saying the Kentucky congressman's criticism of the Iran attack and opposition to Trump's legislative efforts proved he was not aligned with the party's new base. "MAGA is not about lazy, grandstanding, nonproductive politicians, of which Thomas Massie is definitely one," Trump posted to Truth Social. Read More: World reacts to US bombing of Iran Another Trump loyalist, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, also criticized Trump's decision on Sunday, but insisted she was not being disloyal. "I can also support President Trump and his great administration on many of the great things they are doing while disagreeing on bombing Iran and getting involved in a hot war that Israel started," the Georgia Republican wrote on X. Other Trump allies pushed back on claims that his actions against Iran violated the US Constitution and a federal law that restricts unilateral action by a president to conditions involving an attack on the United States. "He had all the authority he needs under the Constitution. They are wrong," said Senator Lindsey Graham, a staunch Trump ally who has long been a leading voice on US foreign policy matters in Congress. "If you don't like what the president does in terms of war, you can cut off the funding," the South Carolina Republican told NBC's "Meet the Press" program. The attacks on Iran generally drew accolades from Republican lawmakers who declared that the operation set back Iran's ability to obtain a nuclear weapon. "The President made the right call, and did what he needed to do," Johnson said in a post on X late Saturday. "The Commander-in-Chief evaluated that the imminent danger outweighed the time it would take for Congress to act." The US Constitution divides war powers in the federal government by making the president the commander-in-chief of the armed forces but leaving sole authority to declare war to Congress. The balance has shifted, with Congress relinquishing the use of military power to presidents of both parties in recent years. But Democrats said it was too early to tell whether the mission had succeeded, warning that Iran could have moved its nuclear material to other sites far from US targets. "The tragedy in this country is that we keep entering these overseas wars. We triumphantly declare the mission is accomplished the day after, and then we're left with Americans bearing the consequences for decades," Khanna told CBS.

Business Recorder

6 hours ago

• Business Recorder

South Korean shares off 3-1/2-year high after US strikes on Iran

SEOUL: Round-up of South Korean financial markets: South Korean shares fell on Monday as tensions escalated in the Middle East following the US strikes on Iran. The benchmark KOSPI lost 19.10 points, or 0.63%, to 3,002.74 as of 0243 GMT. On Friday, the index climbed above a key milestone of 3,000 points for the first time in 3-1/2 years. On Sunday, the world braced for Iran's response after the US attacked key Iranian nuclear sites, joining Israel in the biggest Western military action against the Islamic Republic since its 1979 revolution. South Korea's acting finance minister said authorities will closely monitor the financial markets and energy supplies and respond if needed. The country's exports for the first 20 days of June jumped 8.3% year-on-year after falling for the first time in four months in May, early data showed. South Korea's top trade negotiator said on Sunday he would raise concerns about potential US curbs on chipmakers in China at the meeting with US officials in Washington this week for the third round of technical discussions in tariff talks. Among index heavyweights, chipmaker Samsung Electronics fell 2.61% and peer SK Hynix lost 0.39%. Battery maker LG Energy Solution slid 3.93%. Hyundai Motor and sister automaker Kia dropped 4.05% and 3.14%, respectively. Steelmaker POSCO Holdings slid 3.62% and drugmaker Samsung BioLogics fell 2.17%. Of the total 936 traded issues, 246 advanced and 664 declined. Foreigners were net sellers of shares worth 345.6 billion won ($250.4 million). The won was quoted at 1,380.0 per US dollar on the onshore settlement platform, 0.43% lower than Friday's close of 1,374.0.

Business Recorder

6 hours ago

• Business Recorder

China says US attack on Iran has damaged its credibility

HONG KONG: China said the US attack on Iran's nuclear facilities has damaged Washington's credibility and Beijing was concerned that the situation 'may go out of control', its state broadcaster reported, following a UN Security Council meeting on Sunday. President Donald Trump said the US had 'obliterated' Tehran's key nuclear sites, joining Israel in the biggest Western military action against the Islamic Republic since its 1979 revolution. The UN Security Council met on Sunday to discuss U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear sites as Russia, China and Pakistan proposed the 15-member body adopt a resolution calling for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire in the Middle East. China's UN Ambassador Fu Cong said parties should restrain the 'impulse of force, avoid exacerbating conflicts and adding fuel to the fire,' according to the state broadcaster CCTV. Fu said parties, especially Israel, 'should immediately cease fire to prevent the situation from escalating and avoid the spillover of war.' Iran weighs retaliation against US for strikes on nuclear sites Iran was hurt 'but the United States credibility was also damaged- both as a country and as a participant in any international negotiations,' Fu said. State media commentary late on Sunday said the US move was extremely dangerous and provocative. The Global Times newspaper in an opinion piece, said external military interference would never bring peace, and only 'deepen regional hatred and trauma.' Separately China's embassy in Iran said late on Sunday that most Chinese citizens in Iran had been evacuated safely, and those remaining were not in high-risk areas.