
Calls grow in Congress to halt Trump's military actions in Iran
U.S. President Donald Trump delivers an address to the nation alongside U.S. Vice President JD Vance, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S. June 21, 2025, following U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. Photo:REUTERS
Listen to article
Some Democratic and Republican lawmakers on Sunday called on Congress to rein in President Donald Trump's use of military force in Iran and prevent US involvement in a deepening Middle East conflict.
With Republican leaders in the Senate and House of Representatives strongly backing the US attacks on key Iranian nuclear sites, it seemed unlikely any resolution that asserts the power of Congress to declare war and restricts Trump's actions could pass both chambers.
US Democratic Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia said he expects to force the Senate to vote this week on his measure requiring Trump to terminate hostilities against Iran unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war from Congress. Republican Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Democratic Representative Ro Khanna of California said they want a vote on similar legislation they introduced in the House.
"This is the US jumping into a war of choice at Donald Trump's urging, without any compelling national security interest for the United States to act in this way, particularly without a debate and vote in Congress," Kaine told CBS' Face the Nation program.
The White House did not respond to a request for comment on the criticism from lawmakers.
House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune were both notified of the US military action ahead of time, according to sources familiar with the matter. Members of Congress are expected to be briefed on Tuesday.
Read: Make Iran Great Again, says Trump as Tehran vows response to US strikes
Thune's office declined to comment on Kaine's measure.
The attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities on Saturday divided Trump's populist MAGA movement, with some leaders rallying behind the president and others calling for an end to hostilities after so-called US "forever wars" in Iraq and Afghanistan following the September 11, 2001, attacks on US soil.
"I represent part of the coalition that elected President Trump. We were tired of endless wars," Massie told CBS. "We were promised that we would put our veterans, our immigration policies and our infrastructure first."
Massie and Kaine each said there was no urgency requiring Trump to act unilaterally.
"There was no imminent threat to the United States," Massie said. "We haven't been briefed."
Intelligence reports and analysts have reached different conclusions on how close Iran was to building a nuclear bomb. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said on Friday that the US had intelligence that should Iran decide to do so, it could build a nuclear weapon in weeks or months. US officials say they do not believe Iran had decided to make a bomb.
Iran claims its nuclear ambitions are peaceful and focused on energy production and medical research. But its program, which began in the late 1950s with US support, has fallen under suspicion in recent years, with Tehran ramping up enrichment to 60%, just below the weapons-grade of 90%, and restricting the access of international inspectors to its sites.
Trump vowed on Sunday to support Massie's primary challenger in the 2026 midterm elections, saying the Kentucky congressman's criticism of the Iran attack and opposition to Trump's legislative efforts proved he was not aligned with the party's new base.
"MAGA is not about lazy, grandstanding, nonproductive politicians, of which Thomas Massie is definitely one," Trump posted to Truth Social.
Read More: World reacts to US bombing of Iran
Another Trump loyalist, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, also criticized Trump's decision on Sunday, but insisted she was not being disloyal.
"I can also support President Trump and his great administration on many of the great things they are doing while disagreeing on bombing Iran and getting involved in a hot war that Israel started," the Georgia Republican wrote on X.
Other Trump allies pushed back on claims that his actions against Iran violated the US Constitution and a federal law that restricts unilateral action by a president to conditions involving an attack on the United States.
"He had all the authority he needs under the Constitution. They are wrong," said Senator Lindsey Graham, a staunch Trump ally who has long been a leading voice on US foreign policy matters in Congress.
"If you don't like what the president does in terms of war, you can cut off the funding," the South Carolina Republican told NBC's "Meet the Press" program.
The attacks on Iran generally drew accolades from Republican lawmakers who declared that the operation set back Iran's ability to obtain a nuclear weapon.
"The President made the right call, and did what he needed to do," Johnson said in a post on X late Saturday. "The Commander-in-Chief evaluated that the imminent danger outweighed the time it would take for Congress to act."
The US Constitution divides war powers in the federal government by making the president the commander-in-chief of the armed forces but leaving sole authority to declare war to Congress. The balance has shifted, with Congress relinquishing the use of military power to presidents of both parties in recent years.
But Democrats said it was too early to tell whether the mission had succeeded, warning that Iran could have moved its nuclear material to other sites far from US targets.
"The tragedy in this country is that we keep entering these overseas wars. We triumphantly declare the mission is accomplished the day after, and then we're left with Americans bearing the consequences for decades," Khanna told CBS.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Bilawal condemns US attack on Iran, warns India over IWT breach
Listen to article Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairperson Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said on Monday that Pakistan would consider war if India refused to honour the Indus Waters Treaty, while condemning recent US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, calling them "based on lies," Express News reported. Addressing the National Assembly during the ongoing budget session, Bilawal said the attacks on Iran's nuclear sites and the targeting of scientists and journalists were unjustified and violated international norms. He said his party was consulted on the budget this time, and some of its inputs had been incorporated into the budget. He appreciated the government for expressing consent to PPP's recommendations, including leaving the digital tax on services to the jurisdiction of the provinces and reducing the sales tax on solar panels from eighteen percent to ten percent. Bilawal expressed satisfaction over improvements in economic indicators, especially the reduction in inflation as a result of the government's policies. He commended the twenty percent increase in the budget of the Benazir Income Support Program. Read: India failed both militarily and diplomatically against Pakistan: Bilawal He demanded the declaration of an agricultural emergency, saying that it would provide relief to farmers and protect the economy's backbone. Bilawal Bhutto Zardari mentioned that the defence budget had been enhanced by twenty percent because of India's hostile posture. He said Pakistan had once again internationalized the Kashmir dispute. Referring to the visit of a high-level delegation led by him to various capitals, Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said Pakistan had defeated India on the battlefield, as well as on the diplomatic and narrative fronts. He said they presented Pakistan's stance and narrative based on peace. He said India had only two options: either to comply with the Indus Water Treaty, or Pakistan would wage a war to secure water from all six rivers. He added that such actions were part of a broader pattern of aggression that started with Gaza, continued in Yemen, and has now reached Iran. Read More: 'No military solution to Pak-India disputes' He warned, 'If India does not respect the Indus Waters Treaty, Pakistan will go to war,' stressing that India has already lost and Pakistan has already won on the diplomatic and political fronts. Tension between Pakistan and India began on April 22, when an attack in Pahalgam killed 26 people. India blamed Pakistan for the incident. However, Pakistan categorically rejected the Indian blame. In response, India undertook a series of hostile actions the next day on April 23, including suspending the 65-year-old Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), cancelling visas for Pakistani citizens, closing the Wagah-Attari border crossing, ordering the shutdown of the Pakistan High Commission in New Delhi, and reducing diplomatic staff at each other's embassies. Criticising previous Pakistani leadership for what he described as weak responses to Indian actions in Kashmir, Bilawal said the current government had demonstrated resolve by downing six Indian fighter jets in response to Indian incursions, asserting that the issue of Kashmir had been internationalised once again. He further alleged that both Indian and Israeli lobbies were actively working to malign Pakistan globally, including attempts to place the country back on the FATF grey list — efforts he said had failed. Bilawal called for peace between Pakistan and India but underlined the need for military preparedness, citing India's refusal to officially acknowledge the ceasefire. He praised the increase in Pakistan's defence budget and supported funding for non-controversial dams, while advocating for reduced taxes on solar energy and increased social support through the Benazir Income Support Programme. Responding to opposition heckling, Bilawal said his party, though not in the federal cabinet, remained committed to representing the people's concerns and bringing constructive criticism and proposals to the table.


Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
NSC condemns Israeli strikes on Iran, warns of regional instability
Pakistan's National Security Committee (NSC) on Monday strongly condemned Israel's recent attacks on Iran, warning that the aggression could trigger a broader regional conflict and derail ongoing diplomatic efforts. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif chaired the high-level meeting, which reviewed the evolving regional situation in the wake of Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan on June 22. The NSC expressed regret that the attacks coincided with a constructive negotiation process between Iran and the United States, calling Israel's actions 'reckless' and 'escalatory.' 'These reckless actions have escalated tensions, threatening to ignite a wider conflict and diminishing the opportunities for dialogue and diplomacy,' the Committee said in a statement issued by the Prime Minister's Office. National Security Committee to meet today The NSC reaffirmed Iran's right to self-defence under the United Nations Charter and extended condolences to the Iranian government and people over the loss of innocent lives. It also prayed for the speedy recovery of those injured in the attacks. Calling the Israeli strikes a violation of International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) resolutions, international law, and the UN Charter, the NSC voiced deep concern over the potential for further escalation in the region. The Committee reiterated Pakistan's commitment to regional peace and stability, emphasising the importance of dialogue and diplomacy. It also reaffirmed Islamabad's readiness to engage with relevant parties and support initiatives aimed at de-escalation. 'The Committee underscored the need for strict adherence to international human rights and humanitarian laws,' the statement added. The National Security Council is Pakistan's top decision-making forum on matters of national security and foreign policy, comprising senior civilian and military leadership.


Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Israel assassinates IRGC members in Iran as missile strikes hit nuclear sites
Members of the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) navy participate in an exercise in Abu Musa Island, in this picture obtained on August 2, 2023. IRGC/WANA (West Asia News Agency)/Handout via REUTERS/File Photo Listen to article At least 10 members of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) were assassinated in Israeli air strikes on the central province of Yazd on Sunday, Iranian media stated. Iran has not yet responded publicly to the reported deaths in Yazd. The IRGC, a powerful branch of Iran's military reporting directly to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, plays a central role in the country's foreign operations and oversees its ballistic missile and nuclear programmes. It comprises around 190,000 active personnel and was designated a terrorist organisation by the United States in 2019. An unspecified number of other IRGC personnel were also wounded in the strikes, which mark one of the deadliest Israeli attacks on Iranian territory since tensions escalated earlier this month, reported semi-official Tasnim News Agency. Israel has not officially confirmed the strike in Yazd but claims it has assassinated around two dozen Iranian military commanders and nuclear scientists since June 13. Israeli air strikes have killed several top Iranian military officials and nuclear scientists, including the commander of the IRGC Hossein Salami, in one of the most direct and deadly escalations between the two countries to date. IRGC has begun using the Kheibar Shekan missile—also known as the Khorramshahr-4—which was unveiled in 2022 and is believed to carry the heaviest payload among Iran's ballistic missiles. IRGC said its latest missile strikes targeted Ben Gurion International Airport and several research sites in Israel. Read: Timeline of Iran's nuclear programme Meanwhile, Iranian state media has confirmed the deaths of at least four senior military officials in Israeli strikes, including Salami, Armed Forces chief of staff Mohammad Bagheri, IRGC aerospace commander Amir Ali Hajizadeh, and General Gholamali Rashid. The attacks also killed six prominent nuclear scientists and wounded hundreds, as Israel targeted key infrastructure sites across Iran, including the uranium enrichment facility in Natanz. After the assasinations, Khamenei appointed Ahmad Vahidi as the new IRGC chief and Majid Mousavi as head of its aerospace division. The initial wave of Israeli strikes, involving approximately 200 fighter jets, hit multiple Iranian cities, including Tehran, Isfahan, Arak, Tabriz, and Kermanshah. In Kermanshah, near the Iraqi border, an underground ballistic missile storage facility was reportedly destroyed. Iranian authorities initially reported at least 80 people killed and over 320 wounded in the first round of attacks. However, updated figures from Human Rights Activists (HRA), a Washington-based monitoring group, indicate that Israeli strikes have killed at least 950 people and injured more than 3,450 across Iran to date. Read more: Global turmoil If Iran shuts Strait of Hormuz — but Pakistan may get a pass HRA reported that among the dead are 380 civilians and 253 members of Iran's security forces. The group, known for documenting the 2022 Mahsa Amini protests, cross-checks local reports with an independent network inside the country. Iran's government has not issued consistent nationwide casualty updates during the conflict. Its most recent count, released by the Health Ministry, reported 400 deaths and over 3,000 injuries—figures significantly lower than HRA's estimates. Among the injured is senior Iranian diplomat Ali Shamkhani, who has been leading negotiations with the United States. He is reported to be in critical condition following the strikes.