German lawmakers criticize plan to curb refugee family reunification
German lawmakers have criticized the government's plans to suspend family reunification for some groups of refugees.
The German lower house of parliament held its first consultation on a draft bill on the suspension on Friday, at which Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt reiterated his desire to limit irregular migration.
There is "no single switch that can be flipped to solve the problem of illegal migration," Dobrindt said. Instead, he said, a variety of measures at the national and European level were necessary.
His comments sparked outrage from lawmakers from the Greens and The Left party, who argued that family reunification was not irregular migration, but an orderly procedure in which it was clear who was entering the country.
Green Party lawmaker Schahina Gambir criticized the planned reform as inhumane, saying that "families belong together" and charging that anyone who blocks legal routes is promoting human trafficking.
Clara Bünger, of The Left party, described the draft bill as "anti-Christian" and "anti-family."
The proposed bill aims to suspend family reunification for two years for people holding so-called "subsidiary protection status," who are allowed to remain in Germany due to the threat of political persecution in their homelands, despite lacking formal refugee status.
The bill says that almost 400,000 residents have subsidiary protection. Around three-quarters are reportedly Syrian nationals.
The bill foresees that these people will only be able to bring close family members - spouses, children and, in the case of unaccompanied minors, parents - to Germany in exceptional cases.
Family reunification for people with subsidiary protection is already restricted to 1,000 relatives in total per month, unlike for those with refugee status.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The reason Trump is spending as little time as possible at the Nato summit
Donald Trump will spend as little time as possible on European soil next week when he heads to a crucial Nato summit for just 24 hours. He was set to arrive in The Hague on Monday evening before returning to Washington on Wednesday, but the White House says he will now arrive on Tuesday. A week after he left a meeting of the G7 in Canada early, apparently irritated at having to sit through a meeting on wildfires when his mind was on the Middle East, it will raise fears among allies that he has no time for the sorts of summits that underpin international diplomacy. Karoline Leavitt, White House press secretary, said the shortened trip was not a snub, but a reflection of how Nato has tightened the schedule. 'The president is a man of efficiency. He wants to get things done,' she said. 'More action, less talk.' Mr Trump has expressed his irritation with Nato in the past, even threatening to withdraw the US in protest at the way allies were shirking spending targets. But relations have improved in recent years as member states have accepted Mr Trump's arguments. His new schedule means he will still arrive in time for a leaders' dinner and will attend a session devoted to discussing allies' efforts to spend the equivalent of five percent of their gross domestic product on defence. 'He wants to see that happen,' said Ms Leavitt. At the same time, the tight turnaround reflects Mr Trump's impatience with big, multilateral groups. The president upended this week's G7 summit in Kananaski, Canada, hurrying home on Monday night to deal with the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran. He had hinted at his frustration as he addressed the media beside Sir Keir Starmer during the afternoon. He was asked about the chances of reaching a deal with Iran and said: 'As soon as we leave here we are going to do something. But I have to leave here. I have, you know, this commitment. I have a lot of commitments.' With the Middle East in flames, he then had to sit through a session on tackling wildfires. A former White House official said: 'He already thinks these meetings are a waste of time. I think you can see the timeline of a wildfire meeting followed by the announcement that he was leaving and draw your own conclusions.' Nato had already accounted for Mr Trump's mercurial nature, condensing its format from three sessions to a single two-and-a-half-hour meeting. Ms Leavitt said the president's travel plans simply reflected that shift. 'Nato has shortened its schedule,' she said. 'The president is rolling with the schedule that Nato has given us.' Organisers have shortened the summit and drafted an abbreviated joint statement in part to avoid a repeat of Mr Trump's last Nato meeting. In 2019, he left early, abandoning a planned press conference after other leaders were caught on camera joking about him. Brett Bruen, a former Obama official and president of the Global Situation Room, said the shortened trips were 'becoming a pattern.' 'He may not want to sit through a session on wildfires but it is the prerogative of the host of any of these summits to decide the agenda,' he said. More to the point, side meetings and other interactions were the place where a lot of business got done. He said: 'If we are no longer to use summits for substance then I think it begs the question: Where else are leaders getting together?' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

26 minutes ago
Israel-Iran live updates: Iranian FM open to continue discussions after Geneva talks
European leaders were meeting with Iranian diplomats in Geneva on Friday, attempting to reach a diplomatic resolution that would prevent Iran from developing its nuclear weapons program. "No one should deny the risk of Iran getting a nuclear weapon," French President Emmanuel Macron said Friday. "It's a real risk. We have never denied this."


Time Magazine
an hour ago
- Time Magazine
European Leaders Seek Diplomacy in Talks With Iran as Trump Weighs Strike
Officials from Europe met with their Iranian counterparts on Friday in hopes of reaching a diplomatic solution to the ongoing conflict between Iran and Israel, even as attacks continued. U.K. Foreign Secretary Daivd Lammy said ahead of the meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, that a 'window now exists' to end the crisis. After the talks concluded with no apparent breakthrough, Lammy said European ministers were 'keen to continue ongoing discussions and negotiations with Iran,' and urged the country to continue talks with the U.S. 'This is a perilous moment,' he said, 'and it is hugely important that we don't see regional escalation of this conflict.' Added uncertainty was cast on the possibility of reaching an agreement on Friday when Iran launched a fresh barrage of missile strikes on targets in the south of Israel, and on the northern city of Haifa. The attacks came after the Israel Defense Forces said that it struck a number of military targets in Iran overnight, including facilities used for missile manufacturing. The Israeli military says it has now destroyed around half of Iran's missile launchers, as well as killing a number of military personnel since last week. President Donald Trump has also been weighing whether to launch a military strike on Iran. He is expected to make a decision within two weeks, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Thursday, reading a statement from Trump in which the President said 'there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future.' The U.S. and Iran have been engaged in protracted talks over a possible nuclear deal for the past two months, but a scheduled round of negotiations was cancelled after Israeli strikes began. 'There is no room for negotiations with the U.S. until Israeli aggression stops,' Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi reportedly said while speaking on Iranian state TV on Friday. Before negotiations in Geneva began, French President Emmanuel Macron said while talking to reporters in Paris that 'Iran must show that it is willing to join the platform for negotiations we are putting on the table.' Macron outlined particular focus points of the discussions, which included working towards zero uranium enrichment in Iran, the oversight of Iranian ballistic missiles, Iranian funding of proxy groups in the Middle East, and the release of foreign nationals in Iranian prisons. As negotiations took place, a spokesperson for Iran's Presidency said: 'Iran believes in civilian dialogue … Directly or indirectly is not important.' The spokesperson, Majid Farahani, added: 'President Trump can easily stop the war by only one telephone [call] to [the] Israelis.' Macron and Trump exchanged barbs earlier in the week after Trump departed the G7 summit early as the conflict between Iran and Israel mounted. Trump called the French President 'publicity seeking' after Macron told press that the U.S. had assured 'they will find a cease-fire, and since they can pressure Israel, things may change.' 'President Emmanuel Macron, of France, mistakenly said that I left the G7 Summit, in Canada, to go back to D.C. to work on a 'cease fire' between Israel and Iran,' Trump said in a post on Truth Social. 'Wrong! He has no idea why I am now on my way to Washington, but it certainly has nothing to do with a Cease Fire. Much bigger than that.' Trump's latest stance on direct U.S. involvement comes after some uncertainty earlier this week, during which the President said: 'I may do it, I may not do it, nobody knows what I'm going to do' when asked if he was moving closer to striking Iranian nuclear facilities. Iranian Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, warned on Wednesday that 'the harm the US will suffer will definitely be irreparable if they enter this conflict militarily.' European officials began talks with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi at around 4p.m local time (11a.m ET) on Friday. Before talks began, Araghchi addressed the United Nations Security Council, calling last week's initial attack from Israel as "an outrageous act of aggression" and a "stark violation of the U.N. charter" in his remarks. Israel's Ambassador to the U.N. Daniel Meron criticized the body for allowing Araghchi the floor at the meeting, saying in a letter addressed to council president Jurg Lauber, "Affording the Iranian foreign minister the floor before this body continues to undermine the council's credibility and constitutes a blatant betrayal of the many victims of this regime worldwide.' Israeli foreign minister Gideon Sa'ar was dismissive of the talks in Geneva in an interview on Friday. 'All diplomatic efforts until now were not successful,' he said. 'They usually use these talks in order to deceive, in order to waste time.'