US, Philippines launch drills with 5,000 soldiers
MANILA: Soldiers from the Philippine and the US armies began three weeks of joint military exercises on Monday, with drills focused on territorial defence and commanding large-scale deployments of forces, the Philippine Army said. Around 5,000 soldiers from the Philippine Army and the US Army Pacific will take part in warfighting and exchange of expertise in the first phase of this year's Exercise Salaknib. A second phase is scheduled for later this year.
US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth is expected to travel to Manila this week to meet Philippine leaders and forces, the Pentagon announced last week. The exercises will focus on enhancing combined operations between their army, large-scale manoeuvres, live-fire exercises and territorial defence, the Philippine Army said.
The Salaknib exercises began in 2016 and are annual engagements between the two treaty allies, part of the broader Balikatan (shoulder-to-shoulder) training drills. Security engagements between the two nations have soared under Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., who has pivoted closer to the United States. Hegseth is the first Cabinet official to visit Manila since US President Donald Trump took office in January. — Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
2 days ago
- Observer
Trump on Iran action: ‘Nobody knows what I'm going to do'
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump is not committing to a clear course of action regarding Iran. "Nobody knows what I'm going to do," Trump said on Wednesday in front of the White House when asked if he was considering a US strike against Iranian nuclear facilities. "I may do it. I may not do it," said Trump. The US President reiterated his demand for Iran's "unconditional surrender", but on the other hand, he did not completely rule out further negotiations. He said it was not too late. Trump stated that Tehran has "a lot of trouble". Trump claimed that the Iranian side had even suggested coming to the White House. "That's... courageous, but you know, it's... not easy for them to do, but they suggested [it]." Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has rejected Trump's demand for unconditional surrender. Six days into the conflict, Khamenei warned the US would face "irreparable damage" if it intervenes in support of Israel. Asked for his response to Khamenei rejecting his demand to surrender, Trump said: "I say, good luck." Meanwhile, Wall Street's main indices advanced in late morning trading as investors also awaited the Federal Reserve rate decision, although they were mixed elsewhere. The US military is ready to carry out any decision that President Donald Trump may make on Iran, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said on Wednesday, suggesting that the US direction could become more clear in the coming days. Testifying before a Senate committee, Hegseth was very cautious in his public testimony, declining to say whether the Pentagon had prepared strike options against Iran. "They should have made a deal, President Trump's word means something. The world understands that. And at the Defence Department, our job is to stand ready and prepared with options and that's precisely what we're doing," Hegseth told the Senate Armed Services Committee. In its latest bombing run, Israel said its air force had destroyed Iran's police headquarters. Traffic was backed up on highways leading out of the capital Tehran, a city of 10 million people, as residents sought sanctuary elsewhere. Inside Iran, authorities are intent on preventing panic and shortages. Fewer images of destruction have been allowed to circulate than in the early days of the bombing, when state media showed pictures of explosions, fires and flattened apartments. A ban on filming by the public has been imposed. The state has placed limits on how much fuel can be purchased. Oil Minister Mohsen Paknejad told state TV that restrictions were in place to prevent shortages, but there would be no problem supplying fuel to the public. — Agencies
Observer
3 days ago
- Observer
US fighter jets move to ME as Israel-Iran war rages
- Trump calls Iranian Supreme Leader Khamenei 'easy target,' rules out assassination for now - US President is convening a meeting of his National Security Council to discuss the ongoing war in Middle East - EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas has warned against US involvement in the conflict between Israel and Iran - G7 accord backsIsrael's self-defence, opposes nuclear Iran; Israel act violation of UN charter, says tehran WASHINGTON: The US military is deploying more fighter aircraft to the Middle East and extending the deployment of other warplanes, bolstering US military forces in the region as the war between Israel and Iran rages, three US officials said. One of the officials said the deployments include F-16, F-22 and F-35 fighter aircraft. Two of the officials stressed the defensive nature of the deployment of fighter aircraft, which have been used to shoot down drones and projectiles. The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Reuters was first to report on Monday the movement of a large number of tanker aircraft to Europe as well as the deployment of an aircraft carrier to the Middle East, providing options to President Donald Trump as Middle East tensions soar. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth described the deployments as defensive in nature, as Washington looks to safeguard forces in the Middle East from potential blowback from Iran and Iran-aligned forces in the region. A fourth US defence official on Tuesday raised the possibility of the deployment to the Eastern Mediterranean of additional US Navy warships capable of shooting down ballistic missiles. The sudden eastward deployment of over two dozen US Air Force tankers is not business as usual. It's a clear signal of strategic readiness," said Eric Schouten at Dyami Security Intelligence. "Whether it's about supporting Israel, preparing for long-range operations, logistics is key, this move shows the US is positioning itself for rapid escalation if tensions with Iran spill over." AirNav systems said the US military flights had landed in Europe, including at Ramstein air base in Germany and airports in the United Kingdom, Estonia and Greece. Another source familiar with the issue said the United States has told regional countries that it is making defensive preparations and would switch to offensive operations if Iran strikes any US facilities. The United States already has a sizeable force in the Middle East, with nearly 40,000 troops in the region, including air defence systems, fighter aircraft and warships that can help bring down missiles. Last month, the Pentagon replaced B-2 bombers with another type of bomber at a base in the Indo-Pacific that is seen as being an ideal location to operate in the Middle East. The B-52 bombers can carry large bunker-busting munitions, which experts say can be used against Iran's nuclear facilities. — Reuters
Observer
4 days ago
- Observer
Israel's war with Iran may last weeks, not days
When Israel and Iran clashed last year, they fought in short and contained bursts that usually ended within hours, and both sides looked for off-ramps that allowed tensions to ebb. Since Israel started a new round of fighting on Friday, the two countries have said they will continue for as long as necessary, broadening the scope of their attacks and leading to much higher casualty counts in both countries. This time, the conflict appears set to last for at least a week, with both Israel and Iran ignoring routes toward de-confliction. FORCED TALKS Israel seems motivated to continue until the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment programme, either by force or renewed negotiations. Yet Iran has shown no sign of voluntarily ending enrichment, a process crucial to building a nuclear bomb, and Israel has no known ability to destroy a pivotal enrichment site that is buried deep underground. 'We're weeks rather than days away from this ending,' said Daniel B. Shapiro, who oversaw Middle Eastern affairs at the Pentagon until January. 'Israel will keep going until, one way or another, Iran no longer retains an enrichment capability,' added Shapiro, now a fellow at the Atlantic Council, a Washington-based research group. 'It's now clear that if Israel leaves this unaddressed, its campaign will have failed.' Want to stay updated on what's happening in Iran and Israel? Sign up for Your Places: Global Update, and we'll send our latest coverage to your inbox. While Israel has easily struck Iran's main enrichment site at Natanz, central Iran, it lacks the American-made 'bunker-buster' bombs needed to destroy a smaller subterranean site dug deep into a mountain near Fordo, northern Iran. Israeli officials hope that their strikes on other targets — including Iran's top military commanders, nuclear scientists and its energy industry — will inflict enough pain to encourage Iran to willingly end operations at Fordo. For now, Iran seems far from such a capitulation, even if Israel has shown increasing dominance in Iranian airspace, according to Sanam Vakil, who leads analysis of the Middle East at Chatham House, a London-based research group. Though Israel hopes to prompt its collapse, the Iranian government remains in full control of Iran and still has substantial stocks of ballistic missiles, even if Israel has limited its ability to fire some of them. 'I don't see any surrender coming from Tehran right now — there are no white flags being waved,' said Dr Vakil. 'It's very hard to see Iran walking back its enrichment rights while Iran's programme still looks operational and Iran is intact as a state,' she added. 'Their goal is to survive, to inflict damage and show their resilience.' TRUMP's STAND Much depends on how President Trump reacts. Unlike Israel, the US has the munitions and the aircraft to destroy Fordo. Analysts like Shapiro say that Trump could consider such an approach if Iran chooses to accelerate its efforts to build a nuclear bomb instead of reaching a compromise. 'That will create a critical decision point for Trump, about whether the United States should intervene,' Shapiro said. It may also now be easier for Trump to intervene without serious security consequences, given that Israel's attacks have already degraded Iran's defensive abilities. Others say that Trump is likelier to avoid direct confrontation with Iran unless the Iranian military shifts its attacks from Israel to US interests and personnel in the Middle East, narrowing Trump's room for manoeuvre. Since Friday, Iran has avoided providing such a pretext for US involvement. The president's statements since Friday indicate that his current preference is to use Israel's military gains as leverage for renewed talks with Tehran. Trump has overseen negotiations with Iran, hoping that Tehran would agree to end its enrichment programme without Israel's military intervention. Those talks stumbled after Iran refused to back down. In comments over the weekend, Trump suggested that Iran, chastened by Israel's attacks, might finally make compromises that it had not previously considered. As a result, some analysts say that Trump could press Israel to end its attacks — when and if he judges that Iran has become more malleable. 'This will end when Trump decides to end it, which will probably happen when he thinks Iran is ready to compromise,' said Yoel Guzansky, an expert on Iran at the Institute for National Security Studies in Tel Aviv. IRAN U_TURN? Such a U-turn has historical precedent, even if it feels unlikely for now, experts said. The Iranian leadership made a similarly unexpected compromise at the end of the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s, according to Meir Javedanfar, who teaches Iranian studies at Reichman University in Israel. After rejecting numerous offers to end the war, Ayatollah Khomeini eventually agreed to a deal after the costs of the war became too great, Dr Javedanfar said. 'Khomeini made a 180-degree change,' he said. 'This is again what Israel is hoping for.' But history also suggests this may take time. The deal that ended the Iran-Iraq war took eight years to reach.
