SC treasurer avoids being ousted this year over $1.8B accounting error
South Carolina Treasurer Curtis Loftis spoke to reporters ahead of the Greenville County GOP convention in Greenville on Monday April 14, 2025. The Republican appears to have survived attempts to remove him from office for his role in a $1.8 billion state accounting error.(File photo by Mark Susko/Special to the SC Daily Gazette)
COLUMBIA — South Carolina's treasurer will keep his job, at least for now.
That's despite the state Senate voting last week to remove state Treasurer Curtis Loftis from office for his role in a $1.8 billion accounting blunder. The error involved almost no actual money but went unreported for nearly a decade.
House Democrat calls for SC treasurer's impeachment over $1.8B accounting debacle
But as the clock runs out on the 2025 legislative session, House GOP leaders said their chamber won't take the matter up this year.
'We're going to concentrate on passing legislation now, and then we'll make a decision after session concludes on the path forward with the treasurer,' House Speaker Murrell Smith told South Carolina Public Radio in an interview that aired Wednesday.
In the House on Wednesday, Republicans shut down a last-ditch effort by a House Democrat to initiate impeachment proceedings on the state's banker.
Rep. Heather Bauer, D-Columbia, rose from her seat to ask her colleagues to take up the bill she introduced in January and start the process. The request required unanimous approval by the chamber.
But Rep. Bill Taylor, R-Aiken, quickly objected, halting the attempt without further explanation.
Just four days remain in the 2025 legislative calendar. By state law, the regular session must end at 5 p.m. May 8.
In the Public Radio interview, Smith said the House has not totally ruled out taking action, but work remains on what that process might look like.
'This is the busiest time of the legislative session and so we're going to have to get through our legislative business,' the Sumter Republican said.
Meanwhile, Loftis has said he plans to run in 2026 for a fifth term in office.
'I am ready to turn my focus back to doing the people's work — to stabilize our state's financial system and put this unfortunate chapter of fighting baseless claims by a few politically-motivated senators behind us,' the Republican treasurer wrote in a late Tuesday statement.
SC Senate votes to remove state treasurer over $1.8B accounting error
Loftis stands accused of 'willful neglect' of his duties after he and other financial officials failed to alert the General Assembly of the accounting issues in the state's books. The Senate voted 33 to 8 for his removal.
The error in question stemmed from the changeover from the state's legacy accounting system to a new one.
During that process, a series of electronic ledger entries made it appear the state had $1.8 billion sitting untouched in a fund with no record of where it was supposed to go.
A forensic accounting firm hired by the state ultimately found the entries were made in error, and all but $200 million of the money was never real. Their work cost taxpayers $3 million.
Loftis has continuously said he did nothing wrong, as no money went missing, and has instead laid the blame for the problem outside his office.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
37 minutes ago
- New York Post
For a change, Primary Day won't decide NYC's next mayor
Don't expect a final answer on New York's future when the Primary Day polls close Tuesday night. Between absentee ballots, ranked-choice voting and the city's glacial vote-transfer process, it may take weeks to know who won the Democratic nomination. But even once the party's mayoral candidate is officially named, voters may be in for a surprise the city hasn't seen in decades. 4 Zohran Mamdani could realistically run on the Working Families Party is he loses Tuesday's primary. Robert Miller In a deep-blue city where Democrats are used to wrapping up elections in June by default, this year might be different. Advertisement That's because the Democratic frontrunners, former Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani, may both appear on the general-election ballot regardless of Tuesday's outcome. Cuomo already secured his own 'Fight and Deliver' party line. Mamdani could keep himself in contention on the leftist Working Families Party ticket if he falls short. Advertisement After all, the party already crowned him as its No. 1 rank for mayor, suggesting its leaders are comfortable with the pro-intifada firebrand carrying their banner in November. 4 Democratic mayoral candidate Andrew Cuomo speaking at a press conference in the Bronx on June 21, 2025. Kyle Mazza/NurPhoto/Shutterstock If both Cuomo and Mamdani continue past the primary, they'll likely face Mayor Eric Adams (who's seeking reelection on his own independent line), Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa and lesser-known independent Jim Walden. That would create a volatile five-way general election with overlapping coalitions, unpredictable math in a five-way split of the vote and what could be Gotham's first truly competitive multi-candidate general mayoral election since 1969. Advertisement For once, New Yorkers might actually get a real choice come November. But no matter how things shake out in the coming weeks, one thing is certain: Big Apple voters are fed up. A recent Manhattan Institute poll finds 62% of likely 2025 voters say the city is on the wrong track. Advertisement That number isn't just ambient gloom — it translates into sharp concerns about safety and quality of life. Most New Yorkers want more police on the streets. Even more support cracking down on fare evasion, open-air drug use and vandalism. Democrats are no exception — a majority agree. These aren't abstract culture-war issues. They're everyday frustrations in neighborhoods that experience chronic public disorder, even as citywide crime rates begin to tick down. That's the context behind Cuomo's lead heading into Primary Day. He's running against absurdities — government-run grocery stores, letting mentally ill homeless people take over the subways and a far-left political movement that seems intent on fanning the flames of antisemitism. Who is Cuomo's base? Older women, outer-borough moderates and black and Latino voters. 4 New York Mayor Eric Adams stands silently as NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch speaks during a press conference on Public Safety at City Hall on June 03, 2025 in New York City. Getty Images Among primary voters who rank crime as their top issue, 71% pick Cuomo first; Mamdani gets just 6%. Advertisement Cuomo's critics aren't wrong — he has baggage. But Democratic voters aren't rallying around him out of adoration or nostalgia. Rather, they see him as the only viable option left who seems remotely capable of running the largest city government in the nation. Advertisement Mamdani, by contrast, is a millennial socialist with an ideological fanbase and little broader appeal. He's activated highly educated white voters and the under-35 crowd cloistered in the city's most progressive geographic enclaves along the East River. But appealing to that coalition alone won't let you sail to Gracie Mansion. 4 Guardian Angels founder and mayoral candidate Curtis Sliwa attends a small protest outside a vacant lot at 2481 McDonald Avenue on Sunday, April 6, 2025. Luiz C. Ribeiro for New York Post Advertisement For years, New York's left believed it could define the terms of debate by default. This race has exposed the limits of that theory. Voters aren't rejecting progressivism because they watch too much Fox News — they're rejecting it because they live here and see its disastrous results. They've watched their neighborhoods deteriorate while elected officials chase viral moments and utopian plans. (Remember then-Mayor Bill de Blasio's promise to end the Tale of Two Cities?) Meanwhile, Sliwa and Adams both appeal to less liberal, working-class voters who disdain the progressive left. Advertisement If both campaigns go the distance, they risk splitting that vote — unless something, or someone, steps in to consolidate it. One possibility? Donald J. Trump. The president, who won 30% of the NYC vote in 2024, could intervene somehow, say by endorsing one of them — and maybe offering the other a federal appointment to take him off the board, clearing the field for a single 'law-and-order' candidate. Something like that isn't guaranteed. But in this topsy-turvy political environment, nothing can be ruled out. A creative political maneuver could redraw the entire race. The potential shakeup should not be underestimated. Tuesday may be the first vote — but it won't be the final word. As the general-election season begins, the question now is who can win over the city's exhausted middle. Voters don't want a revolution, just a mayor who can stretch their budgets and keep the streets safe and clean. That may not be a glamorous mandate. But it's the one that matters. Jesse Arm is the executive director of external affairs and chief of staff at the Manhattan Institute.
an hour ago
Top House Intel Democrat says it's ‘too early to tell' impact of Iran strikes
Rep. Jim Himes, the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said it was still too soon to know the status of the Iranian nuclear program in the aftermath of a series of U.S. attacks against Iran. Calling the strikes by American bombers a 'massive gamble' on the part of President Donald Trump, Himes noted that the impact of the attack was still being assessed. 'It's way too early to tell what the actual effect on the nuclear program is. And, of course, it's way too early to tell how this plays out, right? I mean, we've seen this movie before,' Himes told ABC News' 'This Week' co-anchor Jonathan Karl. 'If you look at the history of our military involvements in the region, they almost never end with the best-case scenario. In fact, they usually end in something approximating the worst-case scenario,' he added. Himes also said that he was 'disturbed' by the fact that the strikes were undertaken without the approval of Congress, which holds the sole authority to declare war. 'There's not much ambiguity in the Constitution about who gets to approve these things,' Himes said.
Indianapolis Star
an hour ago
- Indianapolis Star
Mike Pence, other Indiana politicians praise Trump's decision to bomb Iran's nuclear sites
Indiana's top Republican leaders applauded U.S. President Donald Trump's decision to attack three Iranian nuclear sites, saying the strikes potentially dismantling Iran's nuclear program are a step toward peace. Gov. Mike Braun and most of the Republican caucus have voiced their support for the president's move. Even Mike Pence, Trump's former vice president who ran against him in 2024, praised the move. However, U.S. Rep. Andre Carson and Democrats are condemning the strikes, specifically criticizing Trump for not first seeking congressional approval. After the attacks on June 21, the United States is now intertwined with Israel's war with Iran. In an address to the nation later Sunday evening, Trump said there could be further and larger attacks if peace isn't maintained.
