Opinion: Let's not worsen L.A.'s inequality when recovering from the fires

Among the countless homes lost in the Palisades fire, one was my mother's. For most of my life, that place was my refuge where I would return to feel safe. Now, like so many others, it bears the fire's uniform mark — a charred chimney in a sea of blue sky.
For the last four years, I worked on climate change in the Biden administration, focusing on mitigating climate risk so that communities would not have to face the indescribable grief Los Angeles is feeling. I traveled to more than 30 countries to invest U.S. funds in climate solutions and bolster community resilience. I saw firsthand how climate disasters land hardest on the most vulnerable, deepening the gulf between the haves and the have-nots. That is happening in the wake of the L.A. fires, too.
In Pacific Palisades, some schools and the public library burned while a real estate billionaire hired private firefighters to save his property. Across town in Altadena, the fires leveled one of L.A.'s most diverse communities, where Black and Latino families thrived after the end of redlining. California's recovery plan should aim to shrink such inequalities, not deepen them.
Read more: Column: Recovery will be tempered by hard decisions and, if we aren't careful, inequality
It would be a second calamity if the fires intensified the housing crisis. My Palisades neighbors and friends in Altadena, many of them already isolated from their support networks, are fearful that private equity firms will buy up and consolidate housing lots. State and city officials should work hard to prevent this, including by issuing moratoriums on foreclosures for fire-affected properties and, where people still have homes to return to but are experiencing financial hardship from the fires, barring evictions and rent hikes.
If handled carefully, this disaster can actually help solve the housing crisis by spurring the production of affordable units. The state should expand efforts such as the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee, which promotes private investment in low-income rental housing. Apartment building lots should not be repurposed for single-family development, which would only worsen the homelessness crisis.
Our leaders must also protect the workers who will make recovery possible, including by providing resources and protections for 'second responders' — the largely immigrant day laborers who perform hazardous and essential debris removal and cleanup. One of the hard lessons from Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy, and from the terrorist attack on Sept. 11, 2001, is that health impacts play out in the months and years after the initial disaster from exposure to pollution and other dangers. Los Angeles County should therefore provide not only basic protective resources, like masks and breathing equipment, but also longer-term services such as Spanish language translation and training in disaster response and mental health counseling.
L.A. must also shore up serious weaknesses in air quality monitoring. Our local network of air monitors effectively measures air particulates and ozone, but it was not built for modern megafires and does not comprehensively measure the air toxins they produce. Parents are now unsure whether it is safe for kids to play outside or go back to schools near the burn zones. The state, which regulates air quality here through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, should update its monitoring to generate better data on pollutants that emanate from urban fires. It should also support innovative technologies to link real-time air monitoring to popular apps for tracking the fires and the weather, such as Watch Duty and AirCare.
Read more: Column: Los Angeles is a climate disaster. The fires will change nothing
Additionally, state and federal officials should reform our approach to insurance and risk management. In my travels around the world, I've seen data-driven insurance approaches that are vastly superior to the drawn-out claims processes that burden and frustrate victims in the U.S. Policies that use 'parametrics,' for example, trigger automatic payments in response to events such as a fire or flood. This provides better access to insurance and makes reimbursement faster.
Local and federal government should also support private sector-led solutions to expand insurance markets, mitigate risk and lower costs. California can use some of its significant resources to invest public money in early warning technology, rapid response capabilities and, when it comes time to rebuild, home hardening through the use of fire-resistant materials and design strategies. Funding those solutions now will return dividends in avoiding megafires later. The state should also dramatically expand support for community development financial institutions — lenders that support investment in underserved neighborhoods by providing patient, flexible credit to small businesses and entrepreneurs. I've seen the federal government use this type of investment to deploy billions through financial intermediaries around the world, supporting job creation and projects in developing economies.
Finally, the county, which contains both the Palisades and Altadena, should shepherd their respective recoveries together. By offering joint hearings, and opportunities for information sharing and collaboration, our leaders can maximize equality, efficiency and learning across Los Angeles.
My family was drawn to the Palisades in the 1970s because of its striking proximity to nature, wedged between the Pacific Coast and the Santa Monica Mountains chaparral. It inspires awe — and, when the Santa Anas come, fright. We settled here not in spite of that quality, but because of how its beauty and power render us more human.
Maybe that spirit helped create the community that took care of my family, and me, for decades. It still gives me hope that we can rebuild — and in doing so create opportunities for everyone.
Jake Levine most recently served as special assistant to the president and senior director for climate and energy at the National Security Council.
If it's in the news right now, the L.A. Times' Opinion section covers it. Sign up for our weekly opinion newsletter.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Los Angeles Times

31 minutes ago

• Los Angeles Times

Sen. Padilla claps back after JD Vance calls him ‘Jose': ‘ He knows my name'

Sen. Alex Padilla blasted the Trump administration Saturday, calling it 'petty and unserious' after Vice President JD Vance referred to him as 'Jose' during a news conference in Los Angeles the previous day. 'He knows my name,' Padilla said in an appearance on MSNBC on Saturday morning. Vance visited Los Angeles on Friday for less than five hours after several weeks of federal immigration raids in the city and surrounding areas, sparking protests and backlash from state and local officials. Padilla was thrown into the heated nationwide immigration debate when he was dragged to the ground by federal law enforcement officers and briefly detained when he attempted to ask U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem a question during a news conference earlier this month. Vance characterized the move by California's first Latino senator as 'political theater' in his remarks. 'I was hoping Jose Padilla would be here to ask a question, but unfortunately I guess he decided not to show up because there wasn't a theater, and that's all it is,' Vance said. Vance served alongside Padilla in the Senate and is now the president of the upper chamber of Congress. Vance's press secretary, Taylor Van Kirk, told Politico that the vice president misspoke and 'must have mixed up two people who have broken the law.' Padilla, in his TV interview, said he broke no laws. He suggested the misnaming was intentional — and a reflection of the administration's skewed priorities. 'He's the vice president of the United States.' Padilla said. 'You think he'd take the the situation in Los Angeles more seriously.' Padilla said Vance might instead have taken the opportunity to talk to families or employers affected by raids carried out by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Other California Democrats rallied behind Padilla after the misnaming incident. 'Calling him 'Jose Padilla' is not an accident,' California Gov. Gavin Newsom said in a Friday post on the social media platform X. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass highlighted racial undertones in Vance's comments. 'I guess he just looked like anybody to you, but he's not just anybody to us,' she said during a press conference on Friday. 'He is our senator.'

New York Post

an hour ago

• New York Post

Bill Maher says Dems need to ‘do something' about ‘The View' after Whoopi Goldberg's Iran comments

'Real Time' host Bill Maher and Rep. Wesley Hunt, R-Texas, hammered Whoopi Goldberg and 'The View' on Friday after the co-host claimed that life for Black Americans is equivalent to women living under Iran's oppressive theocratic regime. Maher claimed that Democrats took a step 'back to sanity' after The New York Times took a more 'sensible liberal, not crazy woke' position on transgender issues. He then asserted that the second step Democrats should take is to 'do something about 'The View'' after Goldberg's comment comparing life for Black Americans to living under Iran's brutal regime. Goldberg sparked backlash during a heated argument with her fellow 'The View' co-host Alyssa Farah Griffin on Wednesday. Griffin elaborated on the many human rights violations perpetrated by the Ayatollah's regime in Iran, including executions of gay people and imprisonment of women who go outside with their hair uncovered. 'Let's not do that, because if we start with that, we have been known in this country to tie gay folks to the car. Listen, I'm sorry, they used to just keep hanging Black people,' Goldberg insisted as Griffin pushed back and said the situations weren't comparable. 3 Maher claimed that Democrats took a step 'back to sanity' after The New York Times took a more 'sensible liberal, not crazy woke' position on transgender issues. FOX News Hunt shot down Whoopi's assessment of life in America for Black people, noting the success he's found in the United States as a Black man. 'My district in the great state of Texas is actually a white majority district that President Trump would have won by 25 points. As I said, I'm a direct descendant of a slave, my great-great-grandfather, who was born on Rosedown Plantation. I am literally being judged not by the color of my skin but by the content of my character,' he explained. Hunt continued, adding, 'That's the progress because — like a lot of white people had to vote for me — a lot. So I don't ever want to hear Whoopi Goldberg's conversation about how it's worse to be black in America right now.' 3 Whoopi Goldberg and Alyssa Farah Griffin on life in the US and Iran The View, June 18, 2025. ABC 3 Hunt shot down Whoopi's assessment of life in America for Black people, noting the success he's found in the United States as a Black man. FOX News The Texas congressman also pointed out that his father, who grew up under Jim Crow, is now the father of a United States congressman in a white majority district who ran as a Republican. 'That's America,' Hunt stated. CNN Contributor Paul Begala brought up the fact that America has a holiday to celebrate the freedom of Black Americans from slavery — Juneteenth — but questioned why President Donald Trump 'doesn't want to honor' the occasion. 'I don't want it,' Hunt replied. 'I don't want Black History Month. I don't want all these days to make everybody feel special. I'm an '80s baby. Everybody's too sensitive anyway. We're all Americans anyway.'

Forbes

2 hours ago

• Forbes

How The Big Beautiful Bill Will Handicap Clean Energy

The Capitol Building, home of the United State Congress. Green Technologies At Risk In Current Mega Bill As it was written, the Big, Beautiful Bill (Mega Bill) passed by The House of Representatives in May would handicap certain green projects (solar, wind, and batteries) that are in line to receive tax credits made available by the Biden government. The handicap is hard to understand because in the U.S. over 90% of new energy projects in 2023 and 2024 was generated by solar, wind, and batteries. What is the handicap? The Mega Bill mandates that such projects must begin within two months of passage of the bill, and would have to be completed, and in service, by the last day of 2028, or the tax credits would be canceled. To see what impact this would have on green projects, one analysis looked at clean electrical projects that are currently in the interconnection queue, and due to go online during 2028 or later (it wouldn't be uncommon for projects slated to complete in 2028 to spill over to 2029, which would cancel the tax credits.) The total for all these at-risk projects in Figure 1 amounts to 600 GW (gigawatts). The largest three projects are CAISO of California at 183 GW, ERCOT of Texas at 128 GW, and MISO (Midwest and South) at 111 GW. Figure 1. The truth is, current electrical production in U.S. is 1200 GW, and this will need to grow rapidly to power new AI data centers. So, if all these seven green projects lost their tax credits and dropped out of the interconnection queue, it would represent a huge loss that is 50% of current electrical production in the U.S. This loss would be like tossing away 600 traditional power plants that added up to 50% of current U.S. electricity supply. Granted, a number of projects in Figure 1 would drop out of the queue anyway, due to other factors such as financial commitments that fall through. But still, a loss of remaining projects that would stand to boost current U.S. power by 30% or 40% or 50% would be an unforgiveable loss—especially since solar, wind and battery projects have all the market momentum in the past few years. Speaking of momentum, in 2023 and 2024 in the U.S., the vast majority (93%--94%) of new energy sources were solar, wind, and batteries. The only commercially proven competitor is gas-fired power plants, which are facing serious delays, and they cost more. What if projects that lost their tax credits were to go ahead to completion? They might, but it's obvious this would translate to higher cost of electricity for consumers. Mega Bill Changes Suggested By Senate. The House Mega Bill has gone to the Senate, and on Monday June 16 they have proposed some changes. UtilityDive reports that the harsh 'start by – complete by' House requirement to access the tax credits has been removed. In one box, nuclear, geothermal and hydropower can claim the tax credits so long as they start construction by 2033. But in another box, wind and solar can obtain only 60% of the tax credits and only if they break ground by 2026. Or 20% if by 2027. Or zero if after that. This is a serious handicap for the frontrunners, solar and wind, that have provided over 93% of new electrical capacity in 2023 and 2024. And it comes at a crucial time, because the U.S. needs to quickly boost its power capability by a massive amount to supply AI data centers. One positive: battery storage or BESS (battery energy storage systems) can access tax credits until 2036, although the credits will be tapered down, according to Canary Media. Also, some solar and wind projects would be able to keep the tax credits beyond the end of 2028—provided they exist on federal land, generate 1 GW or more power, and have obtained right-of-way approval from the BLM (Bureau of Land Management). The next steps are: the Senate as a whole has to pass these changes, and then attempt to reconcile with the House. The timeline is short as the goal is to get the final version of the Mega Bill to President Trump's desk by July 4. Coming out of all the discussion and debate, it seems the Mega Bill wants to handicap wind and solar and batteries. But why? Reasons Why The Mega Bill Would Handicap Wind And Solar Energy. First, the Bill will cause electricity prices to rise. If cheap wind, solar and batteries are handicapped in preference to expensive almost-defunct coal power plants, commercially unproven SMRs (small modular nuclear reactors), and next-gen geothermal methods, then prices of electricity will rise. Table 1 lays this out, using the most recent LCOE data from Lazard. Table 1. Most recent LCOE estimates for various electrical sources. With tax credits and based on a utility scale, solar PV + BESS and wind + BESS are cheaper than geothermal with tax credits, and much cheaper than gas-fired power, nuclear, and coal. If the Mega Bill handicaps wind and solar in the race, electrical costs will zoom upwards. Second, the Bill seems to be unaware of green energy success in Australia. In the state of South Australia renewables plus batteries have been providing 72% of grid electricity continuously for three years, and this is expected to rise to 100% by 2027. Solar, wind, and batteries have proven the stability and reliability of renewables commercially. The first grid-scale BESS was started in 2017 by Elon Musk in South Australia, and BESS are expanding rapidly in the U.S. as well as in Australia. Intermittent power is no longer a reason to dismiss renewables, despite what the Energy Secretary says, because BESS have solved this problem and electricity from solar and wind renewables with BESS is dispatchable. Third, the Bill assumes new investments in old energy (coal, natural gas, and nuclear) will be embraced by the U.S. population. However, global spending on low-carbon power has doubled in the past five years. Solar PV is the leader in this space, with investments that will reach $450 billion in 2025. Coal is too dirty when it burns, and in the U.S. the market share has dropped from 50% in 2011 to 11% in 2024. Natural gas burns cleaner than coal, but the market for new gas-fired power plants has dropped out in the past two years, due to cost and delays in permitting and supply chains. The cost of new nuclear reactors, whether traditional reactors or SMRs, is substantially higher than renewable energies (Table 1). There is also the ubiquitous threat of being exposed to nuclear radiation, either from nuclear accidents or from underground storage of nuclear waste. It has been reported that U.S. nuclear reactors that were decommissioned some time ago can be recommissioned, but at a heavy cost of around $1 billion per unit. Fourth, the Bill enables China to forge ahead with a green energy economy, while the U.S. goes backward. Energy from solar, wind, and batteries is cheap, and has a short new-build time. It will continue to provide jobs and grow the economy, and benefits include lower electricity prices and less pollution. A key advantage is already-commercialized power for data centers that will enable the U.S. to compete with China in the race for AI. The handicap and setbacks of a thriving clean industry in the U.S. would be China's gain. Fifth, the Bill will force job losses by handicapping green industries. If projects in the above list of seven in Figure 1 were to be canceled due to the Mega Bill handicaps, there could be serious job losses. To illustrate by results in 2024, one report quotes $80 billion invested in clean power in 2024, which supported 1.4 million jobs in the U.S. Another answer is that current tax credits would enable strong economic growth by 2035: almost $2 trillion of monetary growth and almost 14 million jobs. This amounts to a return on the federal investment by four-times. The green energy benefits and financial returns of wind and solar with battery storage apply to both Republican and Democratic states in the U.S.. But so do the losses, if Congress decides to handicap wind and solar renewables. The biggest losses may be soaring electricity costs in the U.S., and the U.S. bending to China's clean energy boom of surging solar and BESS projects that will reliably service their AI data center programs.