Africa's poorest country faces $1 billion battle in U.S. court over war-era loan default from Qatar
Qatar National Bank (QNB) has taken legal action against South Sudan in a U.S court, seeking to enforce a $1 billion arbitration award after the country defaulted on a wartime loan.
Qatar National Bank (QNB) has initiated legal action in the U.S. to enforce a $1 billion arbitration award against South Sudan
South Sudan defaulted on a $700 million wartime loan from QNB, which has accrued additional debt due to penalties and interest.
South Sudan's civil war severely impacted the economy, reducing GDP significantly and causing widespread challenges
The petition, filed in a U.S court in Washington, D.C., follows South Sudan's failure to repay a $700 million loan obtained from Qatar during the height of its civil war, a debt that, with interest and penalties, has now ballooned to over $1 billion.
The original loan was intended to stabilize South Sudan's fragile economy during a period of intense internal conflict.
However, nearly a year after an international tribunal under the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) ruled in favor of QNB, South Sudan and its central bank have reportedly neither paid the award nor challenged it.
QNB's move to seek enforcement in the U.S. has revealed the growing frustrations over the lack of compliance and highlights how sovereign debt disputes are increasingly playing out on global legal stages.
According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), South Sudan had the lowest GDP per capita in 2025, making it one of the poorest countries in Africa. Thus, the $1 billion court case with Qatar National Bank (QNB) over an unpaid wartime loan reflects the severity of the country's economic crisis.
If the U.S. court agrees to uphold the award, South Sudan could face asset seizures or further diplomatic pressure to meet its obligations.
The South Sudan war
The South Sudanese civil war, which ran from December 2013 to February 2020, began as a political clash between President Salva Kiir and former Vice President Riek Machar, but quickly turned into an ethnic conflict between the Dinka and Nuer.
Coming just two years after independence in 2011, the war exposed the country's weak institutions and deep divisions.
Beyond the human cost of over 400,000 deaths and millions displaced, the economy lost more than $28 billion in GDP between 2013 and 2018. Oil production which is South Sudan's main revenue source, plunged, inflation soared, and public services collapsed as the war devastated infrastructure and drove away investors.
The loan dispute
South Sudan's loan dispute with Qatar National Bank (QNB) began after independence in 2011, when the country secured credit to fund essential imports.
Shortly after becoming a nation in 2011, South Sudan and its central bank secured loans from QNB to fund critical imports such as food, medicine, and refined oil. When the civil war erupted in late 2013 and oil revenues collapsed, QNB extended additional credit, including a $250 million top-up.
By 2015, South Sudan began defaulting, prompting two debt renegotiations. The final 2018 agreement consolidated the loans into a $700 million, 15-year facility, with repayments set to begin in March 2019. After drawing down about $659.8 million, South Sudan missed its first payment, triggering a formal arbitration process.
QNB filed a claim in 2020 under ICSID rules. Following hearings in London, the tribunal ruled in January 2024 that both South Sudan and its central bank had breached the loan terms.
A final award issued in May ordered them to pay over $1.02 billion, including principal, interest, and legal costs.
Despite the ruling, QNB says South Sudan has neither paid nor contested the award.
According to court filings reviewed by SudansPost, QNB argues that under U.S. law and the ICSID Convention, the arbitration award must be enforced 'like a final court judgment. ' The bank says South Sudan waived any sovereign immunity t hrough its contract and ICSID membership.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
2 days ago
- Business Insider
Africa's poorest country faces $1 billion battle in U.S. court over war-era loan default from Qatar
Qatar National Bank (QNB) has taken legal action against South Sudan in a U.S court, seeking to enforce a $1 billion arbitration award after the country defaulted on a wartime loan. Qatar National Bank (QNB) has initiated legal action in the U.S. to enforce a $1 billion arbitration award against South Sudan South Sudan defaulted on a $700 million wartime loan from QNB, which has accrued additional debt due to penalties and interest. South Sudan's civil war severely impacted the economy, reducing GDP significantly and causing widespread challenges The petition, filed in a U.S court in Washington, D.C., follows South Sudan's failure to repay a $700 million loan obtained from Qatar during the height of its civil war, a debt that, with interest and penalties, has now ballooned to over $1 billion. The original loan was intended to stabilize South Sudan's fragile economy during a period of intense internal conflict. However, nearly a year after an international tribunal under the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) ruled in favor of QNB, South Sudan and its central bank have reportedly neither paid the award nor challenged it. QNB's move to seek enforcement in the U.S. has revealed the growing frustrations over the lack of compliance and highlights how sovereign debt disputes are increasingly playing out on global legal stages. According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), South Sudan had the lowest GDP per capita in 2025, making it one of the poorest countries in Africa. Thus, the $1 billion court case with Qatar National Bank (QNB) over an unpaid wartime loan reflects the severity of the country's economic crisis. If the U.S. court agrees to uphold the award, South Sudan could face asset seizures or further diplomatic pressure to meet its obligations. The South Sudan war The South Sudanese civil war, which ran from December 2013 to February 2020, began as a political clash between President Salva Kiir and former Vice President Riek Machar, but quickly turned into an ethnic conflict between the Dinka and Nuer. Coming just two years after independence in 2011, the war exposed the country's weak institutions and deep divisions. Beyond the human cost of over 400,000 deaths and millions displaced, the economy lost more than $28 billion in GDP between 2013 and 2018. Oil production which is South Sudan's main revenue source, plunged, inflation soared, and public services collapsed as the war devastated infrastructure and drove away investors. The loan dispute South Sudan's loan dispute with Qatar National Bank (QNB) began after independence in 2011, when the country secured credit to fund essential imports. Shortly after becoming a nation in 2011, South Sudan and its central bank secured loans from QNB to fund critical imports such as food, medicine, and refined oil. When the civil war erupted in late 2013 and oil revenues collapsed, QNB extended additional credit, including a $250 million top-up. By 2015, South Sudan began defaulting, prompting two debt renegotiations. The final 2018 agreement consolidated the loans into a $700 million, 15-year facility, with repayments set to begin in March 2019. After drawing down about $659.8 million, South Sudan missed its first payment, triggering a formal arbitration process. QNB filed a claim in 2020 under ICSID rules. Following hearings in London, the tribunal ruled in January 2024 that both South Sudan and its central bank had breached the loan terms. A final award issued in May ordered them to pay over $1.02 billion, including principal, interest, and legal costs. Despite the ruling, QNB says South Sudan has neither paid nor contested the award. According to court filings reviewed by SudansPost, QNB argues that under U.S. law and the ICSID Convention, the arbitration award must be enforced 'like a final court judgment. ' The bank says South Sudan waived any sovereign immunity t hrough its contract and ICSID membership.
Boston Globe
2 days ago
- Boston Globe
Firms led by US military veterans deliver aid in Africa and Gaza, alarming humanitarian groups
In South Sudan and Gaza, two for-profit US companies led by American national security veterans are delivering aid in operations backed by the South Sudanese and Israeli governments. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The American contractors say they're putting their security, logistics, and intelligence skills to work in relief operations. Fogbow, the US company that carried out last week's air drops over South Sudan, says it aims to be a 'humanitarian' force. Advertisement 'We've worked for careers, collectively, in conflict zones. And we know how to essentially make very difficult situations work,' said Fogbow president Michael Mulroy, a retired CIA officer and former senior defense official in the first Trump administration, speaking on the airport tarmac in Juba, South Sudan's capital. But the UN and many leading nonprofit groups say US contracting firms are stepping into aid distribution with little transparency or humanitarian experience, and, crucially, without commitment to humanitarian principles of neutrality and operational independence in war zones. Advertisement 'What we've learned over the years of successes and failures is there's a difference between a logistics operation and a security operation, and a humanitarian operation,' said Scott Paul, a director at Oxfam America. ''Truck and chuck' doesn't help people,' Paul said. 'It puts people at risk.' Fogbow took journalists up in a cargo plane to watch their team drop 16 tons of beans, co,rn and salt for South Sudan's Upper Nile state town of Nasir. Residents fled homes there after fighting erupted in March between the government and opposition groups. Mulroy acknowledged the controversy over Fogbow's aid drops, which he said were paid for by the South Sudanese government. But, he maintained: 'We don't want to replace any entity' in aid work. Fogbow was in the spotlight last year for its proposal to Since then, Fogbow has carried out aid drops Fogbow says ex-humanitarian officials are also involved, including former UN World Food Program head David Beasley, who is a senior adviser. Operating in Gaza, meanwhile, Safe Reach Solutions, led by a former CIA officer and other retired US security officers, has partnered with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a US-backed nonprofit that Israel says is the linchpin of a new aid system to Advertisement Starting in late May, the American-led operation in Gaza has distributed food at fixed sites in southern Gaza, in line with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's stated plan to use aid to concentrate the territory's more than 2 million people in the south, freeing Israel to fight Hamas elsewhere. Aid workers fear it's a step toward another of Netanyahu's public goals, removing Palestinians from Gaza in 'voluntary' migrations. Since then, several hundred Palestinians have been killed and hundreds more wounded The Israeli military has denied firing on civilians. It says it fired warning shots in several instances, and fired directly at a few 'suspects' who ignored warnings and approached its forces. It's unclear who is funding the new operation in Gaza. No donor has come forward, and the US says it's not funding it. In response to criticism over its Gaza aid deliveries, Safe Reach Solutions said it has former aid workers on its team with 'decades of experience in the world's most complex environments' who bring 'expertise to the table, along with logisticians and other experts.' Last week's air drop over South Sudan went without incident, despite fighting nearby. A white cross marked the drop zone. Only a few people could be seen. Fogbow contractors said there were more newly returned townspeople on previous drops. Fogbow acknowledges glitches in mastering aid drops, including one last year in Sudan's South Kordofan region that ended up with too-thinly-wrapped grain sacks split open on the ground. Advertisement After gaining independence from Sudan in 2011, South Sudan has South Sudan said it engaged Fogbow for air drops partly because of the But two South Sudanese groups question the government's motives. 'We don't want to see a humanitarian space being abused by military actors ... under the cover of a food drop,' said Edmund Yakani, head of the Community Empowerment for Progress Organization, a local civil society group. Asked about suspicions the aid drops were helping South Sudan's military aims, Fogbow's Mulroy said the group has worked with the UN World Food Program to make sure 'this aid is going to civilians.' 'If it wasn't going to civilians, we would hope that we would get that feedback, and we would cease and desist,' Mulroy said. In a statement, WFP country director Mary-Ellen McGroarty said: 'WFP is not involved in the planning, targeting or distribution of food air-dropped' by Fogbow on behalf of South Sudan's government, citing humanitarian principles. Longtime humanitarian leaders and analysts are troubled by what they see as a teaming up of warring governments and for-profit contractors in aid distribution. When one side in a conflict decides where and how aid is handed out, and who gets it, 'it will always result in some communities getting preferential treatment,' said Jan Egeland, executive director of the Norwegian Refugee Council. Advertisement
3 days ago
Trump administration demands action from 36 countries to avoid travel ban
WASHINGTON -- The Trump administration has given 36 countries, most of them in Africa, a Wednesday deadline to commit to improve vetting of travelers or face a ban on their citizens visiting the United States. A weekend diplomatic cable sent by the State Department instructs embassies and consulates in the 36 countries to gauge their host countries' willingness by Wednesday to improve their citizens' travel documentation and take steps to address the status of their nationals who are in the United States illegally. The cable, which was described to The Associated Press, asks the countries to take action to address the U.S. concerns within 60 days or risk being added to the current travel ban, which now includes 12 nations. Of the 36 new countries targeted, 25 are in Africa. It is the latest step by the Trump administration to crack down on those who overstay their visas and tying U.S. entries from certain countries to potential national security risks. Trump has said some countries have 'deficient' screening and vetting or have historically refused to take back their own citizens. Some countries condemned the travel restrictions and vowed reciprocal actions, while some resettlement groups say the ban sows division. State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce declined to comment on the specifics in the cable, which was first reported by The Washington Post. She confirmed that the administration wanted nations to improve their own vetting processes for passport holders, accept their nationals deported from the U.S. and take other steps to ensure their citizens are not a threat to the U.S. 'We're looking at providing a period of time, (where if countries) don't get to that point where we can trust them and they've got to change the system, update it, do whatever they need to do to convince us that we can trust the process and the information they have,' she said. It was not immediately clear if the ban would be imposed on countries that commit to making improvements and are making progress in addressing them but fail to meet the benchmarks within 60 days. The list includes some countries that have been traditional U.S. partners, including Egypt and Djibouti, both of which have military relationships with United States, and others that long been friendly with the U.S., including Liberia, Nigeria and Ethiopia. Syria, which was left off the initial travel ban, as was Congo, are both on the new list. South Sudan is already subject to a separate travel ban imposed by the State Department, which has revoked the visas of most South Sudanese already in the U.S. President Donald Trump this month enacted a travel ban on 12 countries and imposed restrictions on seven others, although no previously issued visas have been revoked. His proclamation instead banned issuing new visas to citizens of the 12 countries. That ban included Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Heightened visa restrictions will apply to citizens of Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. The 36 countries identified in the new cable are: Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Benin, Bhutan, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Djibouti, Dominica, Ethiopia, Egypt, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Kyrgyzstan, Liberia, Malawi, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, South Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, Tonga, Tuvalu, Uganda, Vanuatu, Zambia and Zimbabwe.
