China pushes cease-fire at UN as Asia echoes call to end Iran war
The United Nations Security Council meets after the U.S attack on Iran's nuclear sites, at U.N. headquarters in New York on June 22. © Reuters
Nikkei staff writers
TOKYO -- China's ambassador to the United Nations issued a fresh rebuke of U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities at an emergency Security Council meeting, as governments across Asia warily assessed a new era in the Middle East.
U.S. President Donald Trump's decision to enter the Israel-Iran conflict by bombing three key nuclear sites over the weekend "seriously violated the purposes and principles of the UN Charter and international law, infringed upon Iran's sovereignty, security and territorial integrity, aggravated tensions in the Middle East and severely impacted the international nuclear non-proliferation system," Ambassador Fu Cong said on Sunday at the U.N. in New York, according to China's Xinhua state news agency.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
an hour ago
- Japan Times
Israel keeps up Iran attacks with debate raging on when to stop
Israeli warplanes kept up their attacks on Iranian missiles systems, airfields and the Fordo nuclear site following U.S. strikes at the weekend, as debate raged in the country over how long the campaign should continue. "Israel is striking regime targets with unprecedented force,' Defense Minister Israel Katz said in a statement Monday, including the internal security headquarters and the infamous Evin Prison for political prisoners. At a news conference on Sunday night, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declined to be specific on a timeline for ending the war, saying: "Once we achieve the goals, we will not continue beyond what is necessary. But we won't end it prematurely either.' Before the U.S. joined the battle, Netanyahu declared three goals: eliminate Iran's nuclear program, end its ballistic missile capability and prevent it from sponsoring anti-Israeli militias such as Palestinian group Hamas, Lebanon-based Hezbollah and Yemen's Houthis. For some commentators, those sound like open-ended goals that won't lead to a swift end to a war costing Israel tens of billions of dollars in weapons systems and lost productivity and driving residents daily into bomb shelters. "We need to say to the American president, 'Thank you. We'll never forget what you did for us,'' wrote Nahum Barnea, a columnist for the centrist Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper. But Donald Trump now needs to "impose a ceasefire on Iran and us. Not in another two weeks, and not in another month, but now.' Israel's home command says that in the past week and a half, hundreds of Iranian ballistic missiles have driven some 10,000 Israelis from their damaged homes. That is reason enough to find an off-ramp and declare victory, Barnea and others say, along with concerns of further Iranian retaliation and the prospect of a perpetual war of attrition. But Caroline Glick, a top adviser to Netanyahu, said Iran's ability to counterattack is precisely the reason Israel won't be hurried. "They keep attacking Israel, and we need to eliminate their ability to do that,' she said by phone. "No one is standing with a stopwatch saying end it. We have our objectives and we are achieving them. The public gets it. It's not rushing us.' The fear is that Iran will continue to do what it did Monday — launch highly destructive ballistic missiles, forcing everyone into safe rooms and damaging infrastructure such as electrical facilities. The debate is whether Iran's capacity can be ended militarily or whether it would be better to allow diplomacy to take over. Some TV panel experts argue that Israel should seek a mutual pause in hostilities after all its military targets in Iran have been hit. This is possible, they note, in part due to the damage Israel has inflicted on Iran's regional proxies over the past year, particularly Hezbollah and Hamas, both designated terrorist organizations by the U.S. and many other governments. "This is the time to end the war in Iran, to end the war in Gaza, and to turn inside Israel,' Ehud Olmert, a former Israeli prime minister and critic of Netanyahu, told Bloomberg TV on Monday. It's necessary "to recuperate and to build up again that which was broken in the hearts and minds and spirits of the Israeli people after two years of fighting with Hamas and with the Iranians,' he added. Others closer to the center of power — including Netanyahu — have floated the idea that Israel's war on Iran could result in regime change, without stating that that's the goal. Many in the region fear what a power vacuum in the country of 90 million people could mean, given the extremism and sectarian violence that followed the Iraq War and the Arab Spring. "We very much hope that we will succeed in heading up a process that will ultimately lead to Iran continuing to be isolated,' Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said in a radio interview. "As a result of this, it can certainly happen that the regime will be destabilized to the point of collapse.' But, ultimately, many analysts say, the direction of the war is in the hands of Iran's leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. He's yet to indicate how the Islamic Republic will respond to the U.S. or plans for about 400 kilograms of highly enriched uranium that could be turned into bombs and thought to still be in Iranian hands. On Monday, Iran said the U.S. should await "severe consequences.' Ehud Yaari, a veteran Israeli commentator on the region, said on Channel 12 that Khamenei can use the uranium as a card at the negotiating table but, ultimately, he's got the weaker hand. "Khamenei must decide whether to try to resume holding negotiations in the hope that Trump will back down from his demand for total surrender,' he said. Or "to persist in fighting, to suffer more and more, and to reach the moment at which he will agree to hold negotiations under worse conditions.'
NHK
an hour ago
- NHK
June 23 NEWSROOM TOKYO Bangkok Live
Lineup: 1. Pakistan, Taliban condemn US strikes on Iran 2. Thai PM claims coalition support after gaffe 3. Global stretch for peace and wellness
NHK
2 hours ago
- NHK
Pakistan, Taliban condemn US strikes on Iran
Pakistan and the Taliban have condemned US attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities. On Sunday, thousands of protesters marched in Karachi, Pakistan's largest city, and in the capital, Islamabad, denouncing the US airstrikes and what they called Israeli aggression in the Middle East. Pakistan's foreign ministry said in a statement on the same day that there is an "imperative need to respect civilian lives and immediately bring the conflict to end." It marked a shift in tone from Islamabad, which just a day earlier said it would nominate Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize for helping end a four-day conflict between Pakistan and India. Afghanistan's Taliban interim government also condemned the strikes, calling them a violation of Iran's sovereignty and territorial integrity.
