165,000 Flee South Sudan Amid Renewed Conflict: UN
GENEVA: More than 165,000 people have been displaced by violence in South Sudan in the last three months, with around 100,000 fleeing abroad, the United Nations said Tuesday.
South Sudan has been beset by political instability and ethnic violence since it gained independence from Sudan in 2011.
'Over 165,000 people have fled increasing tensions and conflict in South Sudan in the past three months, seeking safety both within the country and across borders and deepening an already dire humanitarian situation across the region,' UNHCR, the UN refugee agency, said in a statement.
Of those, around 100,000 have sought safety in the neighbouring countries of the Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Sudan and Uganda.
UNHCR said it needed $36 million to support up to 343,000 displaced people within South Sudan and in neighbouring countries over the next six months.
'This emergency could not have come at a worse time,' said Mamadou Dian Balde, UNHCR's East and Horn of Africa and Great Lakes regional director.
'Many of the refugees are seeking safety in countries which have challenges of their own or are already dealing with emergencies amidst ongoing brutal funding cuts, straining our ability to provide even basic life-saving assistance.'
The poverty-stricken nation has faced months of localised clashes between forces loyal to President Salva Kiir and his long-time rival, First Vice President Riek Machar.
'South Sudan cannot afford yet another crisis,' Dian Balde said.
Fighting and movement restrictions in Upper Nile state and other areas have hindered aid access to an estimated 65,000 newly internally displaced people, UNHCR said.
The flow of aid, including medicine and material to tackle surging cholera cases, 'has ground to a halt', with looming rains likely to exacerbate the situation, the agency said.
South Sudan remains one of the largest displacement crises in the region with more than 2.3 million South Sudanese living as refugees in the DR Congo, Ethiopia, Kenya, Uganda and Sudan, UNHCR said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
7 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Foreign minister meets counterparts from Syria, Azerbaijan, Yemen
KUALA LUMPUR: Foreign Minister Datuk Seri Mohamad Hasan held bilateral meetings with his counterparts from Syria, Azerbaijan and Yemen on the sidelines of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) Council of Foreign Ministers Meeting in Istanbul, Türkiye on Sunday. Mohamad met with Syria's Minister of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates, Asaad Hassan al-Shaibani. During the meeting, Al-Shaibani briefed Mohamad on the current situation in Syria following the fall of the Assad regime, as well as the Syrian government's aspirations to rebuild the country. "This meeting is important for strengthening Malaysia–Syria bilateral relations," Mohamad said in a post on his official Facebook page. Mohamad also held a bilateral meeting with the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Azerbaijan, Jeyhun Bayramov. "Alhamdulillah, this meeting served as an important platform to strengthen Malaysia–Azerbaijan relations and to discuss regional and international developments of mutual interest," he said. He also had a bilateral discussion with Yemen's Minister of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates, Dr Shaya Mohsin Zindani. "This meeting opened the door to enhancing Malaysia–Republic of Yemen bilateral ties and to discuss regional issues of shared concern," he said. Meanwhile, Mohamad held a brief meeting with Saudi Arabia's Foreign Minister, Prince Faisal Farhan Al-Saud, where they exchanged views on Malaysia–Saudi Arabia bilateral matters and regional issues of mutual concern. "The close relations between both countries continue to be strengthened through strategic cooperation and strong mutual understanding at various levels, including on the OIC platform," according to the Facebook post. Despite a packed schedule, Mohamad also held a bilateral meeting with the United Nations Assistant Secretary-General for the Middle East, Asia and the Pacific, Mohamed Khaled Khiari, on the sidelines of the meeting. "This engagement provided an opportunity for in-depth discussion on regional issues and closer multilateral cooperation," he said. Mohamad also met with the Permanent Observer of the State of Palestine to the United Nations, Dr Riyad H. Mansour. "I conveyed Malaysia's continued commitment to defending the rights of the Palestinian people during this brief meeting," he said. In addition, he held talks with Oman's Deputy Foreign Minister for Political Affairs, Sheikh Khalifa bin Ali bin Issa Alharthy, and the Foreign Affairs Adviser to the Interim Government of Bangladesh, Md Touhid Hossain. – Bernama
New Straits Times
13 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Despite clashes with US presidents, Netanyahu usually gets his way
A little over a month ago, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appeared to have been shunted to the shadows by US President Donald Trump, who hopscotched the Middle East without visiting Israel, traditionally Washington's closest regional ally. Worse still, from Netanyahu's perspective, Trump lifted sanctions on neighbouring Syria - something Israel opposed - and talked up the prospects of securing a nuclear deal with Iran, something the prime minister has always cautioned against. Fast forward five weeks and the United States has bombed Iran's main nuclear installations, fulfilling a decades-old dream of Netanyahu to convince Washington to bring its full military might to thwart Teheran's atomic ambitions. The US attack underscores a broader truth that has defined Netanyahu's career: no matter how fraught his relationships with successive presidents, he normally ends up getting what he wants. For over three decades, Netanyahu has clashed - often spectacularly - with American leaders. He has lectured them, defied them, embarrassed them publicly and privately. And yet, across Democratic and Republican administrations, US military aid has flowed largely uninterrupted to Israel. Washington remains Israel's chief arms supplier and diplomatic shield. "He probably has concluded that he always gets away with it," said a senior United Nations official in Jerusalem who declined to be named. "It's hard to argue otherwise." Just one month ago, opposition leader Yair Lapid accused Netanyahu of destroying Israel's relations with the United States. This weekend's action represents the closest US-Israeli military alignment yet against a common adversary. Netanyahu's belief in his ability to advance his agenda, and withstand American pressure when needed, has deep roots. Barely a month after becoming prime minister for the first time in 1996, he met President Bill Clinton in Washington and immediately rubbed him up the wrong way. "Who the f–- does he think he is? Who's the f–-ing superpower here?" Clinton asked his aides afterwards, according to US diplomat Aaron David Miller, who was present. But vital US aid to Israel continued to flow - something that would remain a constant over the years. Netanyahu was voted out of office in a 1999 election and did not return to power until a decade later, by which time Barack Obama, a Democrat like Clinton, was in the White House. Relations between the two turned openly hostile, initially over Israeli settlement building in occupied territory that Palestinians claim for a future stake - a constant thorn in US-Israeli relations. Matters deteriorated further as Obama entered negotiations with Iran to curb its nuclear drive - a project that Israel said is aimed at creating atomic bombs and that Teheran has said is for purely civilian purposes. Netanyahu spoke to Congress in 2015 at the invitation of Republicans to denounce the prospective deal, without informing the White House. "(The accord) doesn't block Iran's path to the bomb; it paves Iran's path to the bomb," he said. Obama was widely reported to have been furious, but still, the following year Washington delivered the largest military aid package to Israel in US history - US$38 billion over 10 years. Political analysts say Netanyahu takes US support as a given, confident that backing from evangelical Christians and the small Jewish-American community will guarantee that Israel remains well-armed, however much he antagonises the White House. When Hamas fighters launched a surprise attack on Israel in October 2023, then-President Joe Biden flew to Israel to show his support, authorising a huge flow of weapons to help with the conflict unleashed in Gaza. But relations between Netanyahu, a right-winger, and Biden, a Democrat, deteriorated rapidly, as Washington grew alarmed by the spiralling number of civilian deaths and the burgeoning humanitarian crisis in the Palestinian enclave. Biden held back on some heavy munitions deliveries and imposed sanctions on a number of violent Israeli settlers, so his defeat at the hands of Trump in last November's presidential election was celebrated by Netanyahu. Finally, he had a Republican in office at a crucial moment for Israel. However, things did not go smoothly, at least to start with. Like Biden before him, Trump was unhappy at the protracted conflict in Gaza and then he blindsided Netanyahu during a meeting on April 7, when he revealed that he was launching direct talks with Teheran aimed at finding a diplomatic solution to the protracted nuclear stand-off with Iran. But while Trump publicly positioned himself as a peacemaker, Netanyahu consistently pushed for military intervention. Although it is unclear if Netanyahu ever got him to say "yes" to Israel's war plans, it was at least not a "no", according to two senior US officials and a senior Israeli source. As soon as Israel launched its aerial war on Iran in the early hours of June 13, Israel pushed the United States to join in, urging Trump to be on the winning side of history, two Israeli officials said last week. The sense of relief when the US bombers struck Iran's most protected nuclear sites on Sunday was palpable. "Congratulations, President Trump. Your bold decision to target Iran's nuclear facilities with the awesome and righteous might of the United States will change history," Netanyahu said in a brief video address.
Barnama
13 hours ago
- Barnama
Iran Condemns US Attack On Nuclear Sites, Calls On Un Security Council To Act
WORLD Satellite image over Fordow, before the U.S. struck the underground nuclear facility, near Qom, Iran, June 2, 2025. 2025 Planet Labs PBC via REUTERS ANKARA, June 22 (Bernama-Anadolu) -- Iran condemned on Sunday United States (US) airstrikes on three nuclear sites and called on the United Nations Security Council to act, Anadolu Ajansi (AA) reported. In a statement, the Iranian Foreign Ministry said Iran reserves the right to resist 'US aggression and the crimes committed by this rogue regime' in defence of its national security following the US attacks. It called on the UN member states to condemn the US attack and urged restraint to avoid further escalation, warning that the situation could have far-reaching impacts on regional and global stability. 'The United States, a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, has committed a grave violation of the UN Charter, international law and the NPT (Non-Proliferation Treaty) by attacking Iran's peaceful nuclear installations,' Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in a statement. 'The events this morning are outrageous and will have everlasting consequences. Each and every member of the UN must be alarmed over this extremely dangerous, lawless and criminal behaviour,' he said. Highlighting Iran's right to respond, Araghchi emphasised, 'In accordance with the UN Charter and its provisions allowing a legitimate response in self-defence, Iran reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interests, and people.' Iran's delegation to the United Nations also formally called for an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council on Sunday to discuss the US strikes. In a letter submitted to the Council carried by Fars News Agency, the Iranian delegation urged 'immediate action and the adoption of necessary measures under the framework of the United Nations Charter.' The letter emphasised the need to hold 'the perpetrators of these heinous crimes fully accountable' to ensure that such acts do not go unpunished.
