'I was always with them': Man separated from family after deportation from Ireland to Nigeria
A MAN DEPORTED by the Irish government on a chartered flight to Nigeria last week has said he has been separated by his family because of the move.
Rasheed Dimeji Ismail is challenging the deportation on the grounds that the State accepted that his wife Basirat and their three daughters faced threats of female genital mutilation if returned to Nigeria – yet he was still sent there.
Rasheed – who is a chairman of a community garden organisation in Clondalkin in Dublin, after coming to Ireland three years ago – was among the
35 people deported to the west African country on the flight
. It's the third such chartered deportation flight in the lifetime of the government.
The 43-year-old was among a group of people deported last week who spoke to The Journal over a Zoom call today.
He said he believes that the deportations are largely down to the government making them a 'scapegoat' because of the 'far-right and the anti-immigrant protests'.
Rasheed and his solicitor are seeking for Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan to reverse the deportation. They have also expressed serious concern over the welfare of his wife who was receiving hospital treatment for a respiratory condition.
'I need to see my family,' Rasheed said. 'After my wife gave birth to my first born, I've never missed one week – I was always with them and if I was not with them, I would be with them on the phone.'
He also called on O'Callaghan to come face to face with the men, women and children he had deported. 'The minister should see what they are doing to people,' he said.
Advertisement
'My children were doing well in school, I was doing well, my wife was working, I was working before the deportation order. These are the people contributing to the country. We are all human.'
Maeve Murphy, the chief executive of Clondalkin Global Garden where Rasheed volunteered and elected as chairman, told
The Journal
that it was important to see him returned. She said he was a respected member of the community in Clondalkin, even attending Áras an Uachtaráin last year for an event honouring volunteer groups with the president.
Rasheed and Sabina Higgins at Áras an Uachtaráin in 2023.
His wife and three daughters – aged 13, ten and seven – were saved from deportation thanks to a last-minute injunction secured by the family's solicitor, on grounds that they faced threats of female genital mutilation if returned to Nigeria.
Despite this reprieve for his family, Rashid was still deported as his solicitor could not make an application in time.
Legal challenge
Faisal Sadiq Khan, of FSK Solicitors, said that his firm is contending Rasheed's deportation on the grounds that it was not in compliance with the spirit of the law and international protection rules.
'His family in the state are also at a greater risk, and they're not able to look after themselves. His wife is really ill, and she's not able to look after their children without his help,' Khan said.
Rashid's efforts to protect his wife and children from female genital mutilation have made him a target of the same groups, Khan said.
'Because of the brutality of the practice and the location where he is at, and the level of political support for that kind of practice, he is a specific target now because of what he had done,' Khan said.
Rasheed would be able to return if the State approves his wife Basirat's application to remain, but another route exists if the State accepts that his removal and the separation of the family was incorrect.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
Historic vote sees MPs back legalising assisted dying in England and Wales
ASSISTED DYING IS a step closer to being made legal in England and Wales after the proposed legislation cleared the House of Commons in a historic vote – albeit with a narrower majority. More than 300 MPs backed a Bill that would allow terminally ill adults with a life expectancy of less than six months to end their lives. Yes campaigners wept, jumped and hugged each other outside parliament as the vote result was announced, while some MPs appeared visibly emotional as they left the chamber. Others lined up to shake hands with Kim Leadbeater, the Bill's sponsor through the Commons. Kim Leadbeater has been the MP behind the assisted dying bill PA PA Last October, the Dáil voted to 'note' a report completed by the Oireachtas committee on assisted dying. That vote was not to approve recommendations in the report but rather 'take note' at the fact that the report had been completed and published. The Assisted Dying Bill was tabled by People Before Profit TD Gino Kenny in 2020. Kenny lost his seat in last year's General Election. In a post on social media today, Kenny described the Westminster vote as a 'monumental decision'. He described assisted dying as a 'profound issue that transcends politics and needs careful navigation through legislation'. He called on the Irish government to 'take note and prepare a legal framework for voluntary assisted dying'. 'Compassion and dignity has won,' he added. Meanwhile, Northern Ireland's Department of Health said it has no plans to propose new laws in the Stormont Assembly. 'In Northern Ireland, assisting or encouraging suicide or killing someone on compassionate grounds remains a criminal offence,' it adds. Commons vote Despite warnings from opponents around the safety of a Bill they argued has been rushed through, the proposed legislation has taken another step in the UK parliamentary process. MPs voted 314 to 291, majority 23, to approve Leadbeater's Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill at third reading. Advertisement This means the Bill has completed its first stages in the Commons and will move to the House of Lords for further debate and scrutiny. Both Houses must agree the final text of the Bill before it can be signed into law. Due to the four-year implementation period, it could be 2029 – potentially coinciding with the end of this Government's Parliament – before assisted dying is offered. Encouraging or assisting suicide is currently against the law in England and Wales, with a maximum jail sentence of 14 years. Supporters of assisted dying have described the current law as not being fit for purpose, with desperate terminally ill people feeling the need to end their lives in secret or go abroad to Dignitas alone, for fear loved ones will be prosecuted for helping them. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer remained supportive of the Bill, voting yes today as he had done last year. Campaigners in Parliament Square, central London, ahead of the vote PA PA Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch voted no and urged MPs to vote against the legislation. She described it as 'a bad Bill' despite being 'previously supportive of assisted suicide'. Today was the first time the Bill was debated and voted on in its entirety since last year's historic yes vote, when MPs supported the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales by a majority of 55 at second reading. Labour MP Leadbeater has argued her Bill will 'correct the profound injustices of the status quo and to offer a compassionate and safe choice to terminally ill people who want to make it'. During an hours-long date, MPs on both sides of the issue recalled personal stories of loved ones who had died. Conservative former minister James Cleverly, who led the opposition to the Bill in the Commons, spoke of a close friend who died 'painfully' from cancer. He said he comes at the divisive issue 'not from a position of faith nor from a position of ignorance', and was driven in his opposition by 'concerns about the practicalities' of the Bill. MPs had a free vote on the Bill, meaning they decided according to their conscience rather than along party lines. The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. Public support for a change in the law remains high, according to a YouGov poll published on the eve of the vote. The survey of 2,003 adults in Britain suggested 73% of those asked last month were supportive of the Bill, while the proportion of people who feel assisted dying should be legal in principle stood at 75%.
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Assisted dying set to become law in England and Wales after bill passed by MPs
Terminally ill people in England and Wales are to be given the right to an assisted death in a historic societal shift that will transform end-of-life care. After months of argument, MPs narrowly voted in favour of a private member's bill introduced by Labour's Kim Leadbeater, which could become law within four years. Her bill, which passed by 314 to 291 votes, a majority of 23, was hailed by campaigners as 'a day for the history books, where facts have prevailed over fear'. The emotional debate in parliament was dominated by pleas from opponents of the bill for stricter safeguards against coercion by abusers, concern from disabled people and warnings about the fundamental change in the power of the state when granted new rights over life and death. British prime minister Keir Starmer voted in favour of the bill, while MPs were given a free vote. It will head to the House of Lords and peers are not expected to block its progress, though opponents said they would continue to fight the bill there. Royal assent is widely expected by the end of the year. It will give people with less than six months to live in England and Wales the right to an assisted death after approval from two doctors and a panel including a psychiatrist, social worker and senior lawyer. — The Guardian Read More Tánaiste orders evacuation of Irish embassy staff in Iran
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Tánaiste orders evacuation of Irish embassy staff in Iran
Irish embassy staff are being evacuated from Iran amid the 'deteriorating situation' in the Middle East, Tánaiste Simon Harris has said. Mr Harris has confirmed the work of the embassy would now be taken over by officials at the department of foreign affairs in Dublin. 'I have become increasingly concerned about the operational environment for our embassy in Tehran, and the ability of our diplomatic staff to perform their functions safely,' Mr Harris said. 'In light of the deteriorating situation, following consultation with my officials and in close consultation and coordination with EU partners, I have decided to temporarily relocate our personnel from Tehran.' One source indicated the embassy officials would be leaving the country. 'This is not a decision that I have taken lightly,' Mr Harris added. The Tánaiste added that officials in the Department of foreign affairs would 'remain in contact with the small number of Irish citizens remaining in Iran'. 'These arrangements will continue until it is possible for our personnel to return to Iran,' he said. On citizens leaving the country, Mr Harris said they might consider doing so through a land border, as airspace remains closed. However, Mr Harris said travelling by land border should only be done if it 'remains safe to do so'. Mr Harris said the Government's travel advice remained that Irish citizens should avoid travelling to Iran. 'My hope is that a diplomatic solution can be found to resolve this conflict, without further escalation or further loss of life in Iran or in Israel. I continue to call for restraint and de-escalation by both Israel and Iran,' the Tánaiste said. Read More Iran says no nuclear talks while under Israeli fire as Trump considers options
