Private Moon City Dreams Stumble After Another Failed Landing
Before humanity can vacation or settle on the moon, we need to land there safely—and that's proving harder than it sounds. A private Japanese space firm's second attempt to place a probe on the lunar surface has failed, bringing its ambitious dream of a 1,000-person moon colony another step back.
The company, ispace, lost communication with its Resilience lander Thursday, ABC News reported. The loss happened mere moments before its scheduled touchdown in a region of the moon known as the Sea of Cold.
After months in space and years of preparation, the mission is officially over with no objectives met. The lander, which launched on Jan. 15 aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket, had spent nearly five months in transit before the high-stakes descent.
It marks the company's second failure. In 2023, ispace lost its first lander in the final moments of its descent. Engineers are now combing through telemetry data to identify what went wrong this time.
'Given that there is currently no prospect of a successful lunar landing, our top priority is to swiftly analyze the telemetry data we have obtained,' said founder and CEO Takeshi Hakamada.
Resilience was carrying commercial and scientific payloads, including a water electrolyzer to extract hydrogen and oxygen from lunar ice, a deep-space radiation probe, and an algae module to explore potential food sources. If it had landed, it would've also deployed a rover called Tenacious, which was equipped with a miniature sculpture titled 'Moonhouse.'
The ultimate goal is to mine water on the moon and convert it into fuel, enabling frequent lunar transport and, eventually, habitation. It's a bold vision, but until ispace proves it can land on the moon, the dream remains out of reach.
'We strongly believe this endeavor and its long-term success will contribute to making life on Earth sustainable for all humanity,' said Hakamada.Private Moon City Dreams Stumble After Another Failed Landing first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 6, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
NASA spacecraft around the moon photographs the crash site of a Japanese company's lunar lander
CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. (AP) — A NASA spacecraft around the moon has photographed the crash site of a Japanese company's lunar lander. NASA released the pictures Friday, two weeks after ispace's lander slammed into the moon. The images show a dark smudge where the lander, named Resilience, and its mini rover crashed into Mare Frigoris or Sea of Cold, a volcanic region in the moon's far north. A faint halo around the area was formed by the lunar dirt kicked up by the impact. NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter captured the scene last week. The crash was the second failure in two years for Tokyo-based ispace. Company officials plan to hold a news conference next week to explain what doomed the latest mission, launched from Cape Canaveral in January. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Here's Why Sony (SONY) Fell More Than Broader Market
Sony (SONY) closed at $24.75 in the latest trading session, marking a -4.37% move from the prior day. This move lagged the S&P 500's daily loss of 0.22%. On the other hand, the Dow registered a gain of 0.08%, and the technology-centric Nasdaq decreased by 0.51%. The electronics and media company's shares have seen an increase of 2.17% over the last month, surpassing the Consumer Discretionary sector's loss of 0.1% and the S&P 500's gain of 0.45%. The investment community will be closely monitoring the performance of Sony in its forthcoming earnings report. On that day, Sony is projected to report earnings of $0.23 per share, which would represent a year-over-year decline of 4.17%. For the full year, the Zacks Consensus Estimates project earnings of $1.16 per share and a revenue of $79.87 billion, demonstrating changes of -5.69% and -6.09%, respectively, from the preceding year. It is also important to note the recent changes to analyst estimates for Sony. Such recent modifications usually signify the changing landscape of near-term business trends. As a result, we can interpret positive estimate revisions as a good sign for the business outlook. Empirical research indicates that these revisions in estimates have a direct correlation with impending stock price performance. To utilize this, we have created the Zacks Rank, a proprietary model that integrates these estimate changes and provides a functional rating system. The Zacks Rank system, spanning from #1 (Strong Buy) to #5 (Strong Sell), boasts an impressive track record of outperformance, audited externally, with #1 ranked stocks yielding an average annual return of +25% since 1988. Within the past 30 days, our consensus EPS projection has moved 2.31% lower. Sony is currently a Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell). With respect to valuation, Sony is currently being traded at a Forward P/E ratio of 22.26. This signifies a discount in comparison to the average Forward P/E of 33.66 for its industry. Meanwhile, SONY's PEG ratio is currently 12.44. The PEG ratio is similar to the widely-used P/E ratio, but this metric also takes the company's expected earnings growth rate into account. SONY's industry had an average PEG ratio of 12.44 as of yesterday's close. The Audio Video Production industry is part of the Consumer Discretionary sector. With its current Zacks Industry Rank of 193, this industry ranks in the bottom 22% of all industries, numbering over 250. The Zacks Industry Rank is ordered from best to worst in terms of the average Zacks Rank of the individual companies within each of these sectors. Our research shows that the top 50% rated industries outperform the bottom half by a factor of 2 to 1. Make sure to utilize to follow all of these stock-moving metrics, and more, in the coming trading sessions. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Sony Corporation (SONY) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Intel claims 18A, the node Pat bet the company on, is either 25% faster or 38% more efficient than Intel 3. Though that's a node Intel didn't have enough faith in to release for desktops or laptops
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Intel has been deep diving on its upcoming 18A chip node at the VLSI Symposium in Japan. And if the company's claims are to be believed, 18A is looking pretty sweet. Among other factoids, Intel says it's either up to 25% faster at the same power level, or up to 38% more efficient at the same frequency compared with the Intel 3 node. That's very promising for laptop battery life in particular. Of course, Intel 3 is a node of which we have absolutely zero experience. That's because Intel has never used Intel 3 for a consumer chip, choosing instead to go with TSMC's N3 node for both its Lunar Lake laptop chip and latest Arrow Lake desktop and mobile CPU family, as used for the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K. The most advanced Intel node in the PC is Intel 7, which is a rebrand of Intel's infamous 10nm technology, which ended up arriving the better part of a decade late. Anyway, what to make of these claims from Intel? Specifically and compared to Intel 3, Intel says that in low voltage 0.65 V operation, 18A is either 18% faster or 38% more efficient, while in high voltage 1.1 V mode, it's 25% faster or 36% more efficient. In other words, in low voltage mode you can either run the same clock speed as Intel 3 and use 38% less power, or use the same power and enjoy 18% faster clocks. Meanwhile, in the high performance, high voltage mode, you can choose between either 25% higher clocks for the same power consumption as Intel 3 or the same clocks with 36% lower consumption. Any way you slice it, these are very nice numbers. It's just hard to draw too many conclusions given the scarcity of comparable Intel chips on the Intel 3 node. For now, it's only the Xeon 6 Granite Rapids server CPU, launched earlier this year, that's built on Intel 3. Moreover, the fact that Intel passed over Intel 3 for Lunar Lake and Arrow Lake hardly seems like a vote of confidence in its own manufacturing tech. The point being that Intel also made some bullish claims about Intel 3 and an 18% performance-per-watt increase over Intel 4, but it seems like we'll never get an Intel 3 chip in a PC. What's more, even if these claims are accurate, there's the question of yields. Can Intel actually produce 18A chips at scale? Answers to all these questions will presumably come later this year when the Panther Lake mobile CPU with an 18A CPU die is supposed to be released. If Intel's numbers are accurate, Panther Lake ought to be a much more efficient laptop CPU, enabling clearly improved battery life. At least, that's compared to Intel 3. Exactly how 18A compares with TSMC N3, which is the node used by Intel for Lunar Lake's CPU cores is a separate matter. The takeaway here, then, is that this is all very complicated. Intel has released some very promising numbers. But they involve comparison with another Intel node which itself is only available in a range of server chips and it's unclear how 18A stacks up against TSMC's competing technology. The proof will be in the processing, so to speak, when Panther Lake arrives at the end of this year. It's been a long time coming, but no CPU has ever felt as critical for Intel as Panther Lake.
