Iran weighs retaliation against U.S. for strikes on nuclear sites
ISTANBUL/WASHINGTON/JERUSALEM, June 23 (Reuters) - Iran and Israel traded air and missile strikes as the world braced on Monday for Tehran's response to the U.S. attack on its nuclear sites and U.S. President Donald Trump raised the idea of regime change in the Islamic republic.
Iran vowed to defend itself on Sunday, a day after the U.S. joined Israel in the biggest Western military action against the country since its 1979 Islamic Revolution, despite calls for restraint and a return to diplomacy from around the world.
Commercial satellite imagery indicated the U.S. attack on Saturday on Iran's subterranean Fordow nuclear plant severely damaged or destroyed the deeply buried site and the uranium-enriching centrifuges it housed, but the status of the site remained unconfirmed, experts said.
In his latest social media comments on the U.S. strikes, Trump said "Monumental Damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran."
"The biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye!!!" he wrote on his Truth Social platform.
Trump earlier called on Iran to forgo any retaliation and said the government "must now make peace" or "future attacks would be far greater and a lot easier."
The U.S. launched 75 precision-guided munitions including bunker-buster bombs and more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles against three Iranian nuclear sites, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Caine, told reporters.
The U.N. nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, said no increases in off-site radiation levels had been reported after the U.S. strikes. Rafael Grossi, the agency's director general, told CNN that it was not yet possible to assess the damage done underground.
A senior Iranian source told Reuters that most of the highly enriched uranium at Fordow had been moved elsewhere before the attack. Reuters could not immediately corroborate the claim.
Tehran, which denies its nuclear programme is for anything other than peaceful purposes, sent a volley of missiles at Israel in the aftermath of the U.S. attack, wounding scores of people and destroying buildings in Tel Aviv.
But it had not acted on its main threats of retaliation, to target U.S. bases or choke off oil shipments that pass through the Strait of Hormuz.
Attempting to strangle Gulf oil supply by closing the strait could send global oil prices skyrocketing, derail the world economy and invite conflict with the U.S. Navy's massive Fifth Fleet based in the Gulf.
Oil prices jumped on Monday to their highest since January. Brent crude futures LCOc1 rose $1.88 or 2.44% at $78.89 a barrel as of 1122 GMT. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude CLc1 advanced $1.87 or 2.53% at $75.71.
Iran's parliament has approved a move to close the strait, which Iran shares with Oman and the United Arab Emirates. Iran's Press TV said closing the strait would require approval from the Supreme National Security Council, a body led by an appointee of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
Caine said the U.S. military had increased protection of troops in the region, including in Iraq and Syria. The U.S. State Department issued a security alert for all U.S. citizens abroad, calling on them to "exercise increased caution."
The United States already has a sizeable force in the Middle East, with nearly 40,000 troops and warships that can shoot down enemy missiles.
The Israeli military reported a missile launch from Iran in the early hours of Monday morning, saying it was intercepted by Israeli defences.
Air raid sirens blared in Tel Aviv and other parts of central Israel. Iran has repeatedly targeted the Greater Tel Aviv - a metropolitan area of around 4 million people - the business and economic hub of Israel where there are also critical military assets.
Iranian news agencies reported air defences were activated in central Tehran districts to counter "enemy targets", and that Israeli air strikes hit Parchin, the location of a military complex southeast of the capital.
In a post to the Truth Social platform on Sunday, Trump raised the idea of regime change in Iran.
"It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!" he wrote.
Trump's post came after officials in his administration, including U.S. Vice President JD Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, stressed they were not working to overthrow Iran's government.
Israeli officials, who began the hostilities with a surprise attack on Iran on June 13, have increasingly spoken of their ambition to topple the hardline Shi'ite Muslim clerical establishment.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi is expected to hold talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Monday. The Kremlin has a strategic partnership with Iran, but also close links with Israel.
Speaking in Istanbul on Sunday, Araqchi said his country would consider all possible responses and there would be no return to diplomacy until it had retaliated.
Russia's foreign ministry condemned the U.S. attacks which it said had undermined the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.
"The risk of the conflict spreading in the Middle East, which is already gripped by multiple crises, has increased significantly," it said.
The U.N. Security Council met on Sunday to discuss the U.S. strikes as Russia, China and Pakistan proposed the 15-member body adopt a resolution calling for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire in the Middle East.
U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres told the Security Council the U.S. bombings in Iran marked a perilous turn in the region and urged a return to negotiations over Iran's nuclear programme.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
13 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
UK gives chilling two-word warning to Iran over nuclear site retaliation
David Lammy warned Iran it would be a 'catastrophic mistake' to strike back at US bases and said Iran must be stopped from getting its hands on a nuclear weapon David Lammy has warned Iran it would be a "catastrophic mistake" to fire at US bases in the Middle East in revenge for strikes on its nuclear sites. The Foreign Secretary urged Tehran to step from the brink, "get serious, and calm this thing down" after Donald Trump's weekend bombings fanned the flames in the region. Mr Lammy said he was "crystal clear" to Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi, "it would be a huge catastrophic mistake to fire at US bases in the region at this time". The Foreign Secreary stressed that the UK played no role in the US or Israeli bombings, and repeatedly refused to be drawn on whether the US action was legal. Mr Lammy said: " I can tell you, as Foreign Secretary that we were not involved. It is for the Americans to discuss those legal issues. "What we are involved in alongside the Americans, alongside Europe, alongside our Arab partners, is attempting to get the Iranians to take seriously our longstanding concerns about their nuclear program and their nuclear ambition." Mr Lammy urged Iran against launching its own missiles or blockading the crucial Strait of Hormuz shipping route - a move that would send oil price soaring. He added: "We have forces in the region at this time... it would be a mistake to blockade the Strait of Hormuz, I think he gets that and understands that. But clearly the Supreme Leader is somewhere in Iran in a bunker, messaging to him cannot be easy. I would urge them to step back at this time." The US and Israel have struck Iranian nuclear sites amid fears the regime is enriching uranium with a view to building a weapon. Mr Lammy said there was "no credible civilian justification" for Iran to be enriching to 60%. He told BBC Radio 4's Today Programme: "Every single one of your listeners will understand that if Iran gets nuclear weapons, others will follow in the region. "And as night follows day, we will be living in a more dangerous world. On behalf of, the planet. It is our obligation to do all we can to get that compliance, and that is why we're engaged in intense diplomacy." The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) found that at the Fordow site, Iran had enriched uranium to 83.7% - close to the 90% needed to make nuclear weapons. The Foreign Secretary's comments came just hours after the erratic US President Donald Trump floated the prospect of regime change in Tehran to "make Iran great again". He attempted to play this down, stating: "Well, I had extensive discussion with Secretary of State (Marco) Rubio yesterday and the day before I listened to the press conference that was given by him and JD Vance. "It's clear that the acts on Saturday were targeted solely at the nuclear facilities. It's clear from both Israel and the United States that they're not going after the civilian leadership. I recognise that there's a discussion. about regime change, but that is not what's under consideration. Keir Starmer meanwhile is scrambling with European allies to de-escalate the situation and get the Islamic Republic around the negotiating table. Iran reportedly warned Mr Trump that it would activate sleeper cell attacks within America if the United States launched an attack on their country.
The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump says he should get Nobel Peace Prize - hours before US bombs Iran
Donald Trump reignited his claim for the Nobel Peace Prize, asserting his pivotal role in resolving various global conflicts. Hours before the US bombed nuclear sites in Iran's Furdow, a reporter questioned the US President about a suggestion from Matt Gaetz regarding peace efforts between Israel and Iran. Mr Trump highlighted his involvement in the India - Pakistan conflict, saying, 'I mean the big one is India and Pakistan. You could, I should have gotten it four or five times.' While Pakistan has publicly thanked Trump for his intervention in the ceasefire, India has consistently maintained its stance, affirming it would 'never accept third-party negotiation.'
The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
Vance says difference between this Middle East attack and others is that previous presidents were ‘dumb'
Vice President JD Vance has attempted to draw a distinction between Donald Trump 's attack on Iran and George W Bush 's War on Terror by arguing that 'back then, we had dumb presidents.' Speaking to Kristen Welker on NBC's Meet the Press on Sunday morning, hours after the U.S. launched airstrikes against three Iranian nuclear sites in support of Israel 's Operation Rising Lion offensive, Vance attacked Bush's administration and those of Democrats Barack Obama and Joe Biden without directly naming them. 'I certainly empathize with Americans who are exhausted after 25 years of foreign entanglements in the Middle East,' he said. 'I understand the concern, but the difference is that, back then, we had dumb presidents and now we have a president who actually knows how to accomplish America's national security objectives. So this is not going to be some long, drawn-out thing. 'We've gone in, we've done the job of setting their nuclear program back, we're going to now work to permanently dismantle that nuclear program over the coming years, and that is what the president has set out to do.' The Bush administration's decision to invade Iraq and topple Saddam Hussein in the aftermath of 9/11 was based on what proved to be the false premise that the dictator was harboring weapons of mass destruction. The war coincided with a period in which the U.S. was also involved in removing the Taliban in Afghanistan, which proved to be an even longer commitment that only ended, chaotically, in 2021, helping inspire an aversion to 'forever wars' to which Trump himself has previously given voice. Vance himself enlisted in the U.S. Marine Corps after graduating from high school in 2003. He was sent to Iraq in a non-combat role for six months, an experience that is understood to have left him disillusioned and influenced his non-interventionist stance on foreign policy ever since. Trump's actions on Saturday night have already drawn comparisons with the defining blunder of the Bush era. The vice president's critique of those earlier administrations has, in turn, invited an angry response. 'This is one of the dumbest arguments I have heard any top U.S. official make,' said Michael McFaul, the former American ambassador to Russia under Obama. 'Embarrassing.' Vance's claim in the same interview that 'We're not at war with Iran, we're at war with Iran's nuclear program' was also met with incredulity. 'As war heats up, the propaganda always gets progressively dumber,' said journalist Michael Tracey. 'Imagine if some other country bombed nuclear installations in the U.S., and then tried to claim they were 'not at war with the U.S.'' On Sunday, U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth called the bombing raids on Iran's Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan sites an 'incredible and overwhelming success' that had 'devastated the Iranian nuclear programme.' Tehran has vowed to retaliate and could do so by closing the Strait of Hormuz, driving up global oil prices, or by targeting American military bases on its doorstep in the Gulf. Trump has since thrown fuel on the flames by declaring on Truth Social: 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???'
