More than 80% of new California properties are in high fire-risk areas
The Los Angeles wildfires last month destroyed thousands of homes, killed dozens of people and left a city reeling. They also raised serious questions about the region's future – and where Americans choose to build.
A rapidly increasing share of US homes are built in areas that are at risk of fire. In 1990, about 13% of new homes were built in places at high risk of fire. By 2020, that number had more than doubled to 31%. The numbers come from ClimateCheck, a for-profit research company that compiles risk by studying trends including rainfall, wind and temperature. But the climate crisis is just one of the reasons that more homes are unsafe.
The Covid pandemic changed the way people work and live. Some workers who were able to continue their jobs remotely wanted out of dense cities. New York alone has lost half a million residents since 2020. Many of these domestic migrants relocated to smaller cities and rural areas, often choosing homes that were at greater risk of wildfire.
Maximilian Stiefel, a risk expert at ClimateCheck, explains: 'In California, especially, there's a difficulty in building dense housing, so a lot of people are forced into single unit housing, and that just accelerates this spread into the wildland urban interface, because you can't build up another unit on your property if you have a single family house. And then there's a lot of nimbyism in California, where people don't want denser developments being built.' Over 80% of properties built in California between 2020 and 2022 were in high fire risk areas, compared with just 28% of the properties built between 1920 and 1929.
Related: After the fire, the insurance battles: LA victims' ordeal may just be beginning
Insurance companies are well aware of these trends. Experts study data to build 'catastrophe models', predicting how disasters will affect profits. And lately, the numbers haven't looked good. Two giants from the industry, AllState and State Farm, announced in 2022 and 2023 that they wouldn't accept any new home insurance applications in California, in large part because of the high risk of wildfire. Meanwhile, the state, which also has its own last-resort insurance program, has engaged in a complex back-and-forth with private companies. LA residents who lost everything – and who are fortunate enough to have insurance – now must grapple with these companies to avert financial disaster.
Even for the most rigorous of insurance experts, wildfires are hard to model statistically. Unlike earthquakes, hurricanes or flooding, they are much more dependent on humans. Humans can start them (wildfires spike on the Fourth of July each year) and humans can stop them with better policies such as better funding for fire departments. Despite the key role that humans play in individual wildfires, the rising overall trend in their frequency is clearly attributable to the climate crisis – long periods of drought, strong winds and high temperatures mean that fires spread faster, last longer and cause far more destruction. Even before the latest LA fires, expected to be the costliest ever, nine of the 10 most expensive wildfires in US history had taken place since 2017.
Stiefel explains his own personal experience with these numbers: 'I lived in Santa Barbara during the Thomas fire, which traveled 30 miles up the coast over three weeks, and we were evacuated.' He says he eventually left California in part because there were 'too many hazards there with climate change'.
Of course, people have greater mobility when they don't have dependents, aren't disabled and don't have a longstanding attachment to a city.
The answer, according to experts like Varun Sivaram, a fellow at the Council for Foreign Relations, is 'more stringent building codes and regulations'. Stiefel agrees, noting: 'It's not just about zoning and land use. It's also about resource sharing and emergency planning, collaboration among all these different levels of government, and educating the community about fire risk.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Upturn
an hour ago
- Business Upturn
ELV FRAUD ALERT: Elevance Health, Inc. Investors are Reminded of Ongoing Securities Fraud Class Action — Contact BFA Law by July 11 Legal Deadline (NYSE:ELV)
NEW YORK, June 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a lawsuit has been filed against Elevance Health, Inc. (NYSE: ELV) and certain of the Company's senior executives for potential violations of the federal securities laws. If you invested in Elevance you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting Investors have until July 11, 2025, to ask the Court to be appointed to lead the case. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of investors who purchased Elevance common stock. The case is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana and is captioned Miller v. Elevance Health, Inc., et al. , No. 25-cv-0092. Why was Elevance Sued for Securities Fraud? Elevance provides health insurance plans. This includes contracting with states to administer Medicaid benefits. States routinely review Medicaid eligibility, but during COVID, the federal government paused this process. The pause ended in 2023, and states resumed redetermining Medicaid eligibility. During the relevant period, Elevance represented that it was closely monitoring the cost trends associated with the redetermination process and that the rates Elevance was negotiating were sufficient to address the risk profiles of those patients staying on Medicaid. As alleged, in truth, the redeterminations caused a significant increase in the acuity and utilization of Elevance's Medicaid members. What's more, the shift occurred to a degree that was not reflected in Elevance's rate negotiations or in its financial guidance for 2024. The Stock Declines as the Truth is Revealed On July 17, 2024, Elevance stated that it was now 'expecting second-half utilization to increase in Medicaid' and that it was 'seeing signs of increased utilization across the broader Medicaid population.' On this news, the price of Elevance stock declined $32.21 per share, or nearly 6%, from $553.14 per share on July 16, 2024, to $520.93 per share on July 17, 2024. Then, on October 17, 2024, Elevance announced its Q3 2024 financial results, revealing that its missed consensus earnings per share ('EPS') expectations by $1.33, or 13.7%, 'due to elevated medical costs in [its] Medicaid business.' On this news, the price of Elevance stock declined $52.61 per share, or nearly 11%, from $496.96 per share on October 16, 2024, to $444.35 per share on October 17, 2024. Click here if you suffered losses: What Can You Do? If you invested in Elevance you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm. All representation is on a contingency fee basis, there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses. Submit your information by visiting: Or contact:Ross Shikowitz [email protected] 212-789-3619
Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Another Fed official reveals when you might expect interest rate cuts
There's been a bit of a kerfuffle among Federal Reserve Board officials over the forecast for interest rate cuts. These are the same rate cuts that rattle and roll every aspect of the U.S. economy right down to your household. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter These interest rates are having a moment from consumer wallets and price increases to mortgage rates and housing starts to Treasury bonds and investments. Related: Fed official sends shocking message on interest rate cuts Millions of Americans – including President Donald Trump – want immediate relief. Federal Reserve Board Chair Jerome Powell urges patience as the full impact of Trump's tariffs and trade wars pass through inflation and employment numbers over the next three months. Hours after a Fed governor called for more immediate action in a move that gobsmacked Fed and market watchers, another Fed official chimed in with an the sixth month in a row, the central bank opted to hold the Federal Funds Rate steady at 4.25%-4.50% at its June meeting last week. Fed Chair Jerome Powell said the expected lagging impact of tariff inflation on the economy's supply chain, while likely short term, led to the prudent waiting period. Trump's proposed tariffs – essentially an external sales tax to U.S. trading partners that we pay one way or another – face a July 9 deadline. Data shows the overall U.S. economy is "solid,'' Powell said at the June meeting. The Fed's biannual Monetary Policy Report to Congress, released June 20, supports this assertion. "Growth in private domestic final demand was moderate, reflecting a modest increase in consumer spending and a jump in capital spending,'' the report said. "However, measures of household and business sentiment have declined this year amid concerns about the effects of higher tariffs on inflation and employment as well as heightened uncertainty about the economic outlook.'' The Fed's dual mandate: prudent monetary policy that keeps both inflation and unemployment relatively stable to avoid a recession or worse. The Federal Open Meeting Committee controls the Federal Funds Rate, which banks charge each other overnight to borrow money. The funds rate is tied to the cost of borrowing money for consumers, investors and businesses. Related: Forget tariffs, Fed interest rate cuts may hinge on another problem The Federal Open Meeting Committee said July 18 it would keep the Federal Funds Rate at 4.25% to 4.50% for June. Data over the next few months will indicate if the Fed will decide on two or fewer rate cuts in 2025, portfolio manager Chris Versace said in a TheStreet Pro post after the FOMC released its quarterly "dot plot" on July 18. The Fed continues "to telegraph that two 25-basis point rate cuts remain on the table for this year,'' Versace wrote. Both Fed and market watchers forecast the next probable rate cut could appear at the September FOMC meeting. San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank President Mary Daly concurred with the FOMC and Powell. In a July 20 interview with CNBC, Daly said monetary policy is in "a good place." Inflation is coming down, which is "great news for American families." Daly took the long walk with Powell's slower stance. "Rate cuts might be necessary in the fall,'' Daly said. The FOMC meets in September. In a contrarian viewpoint, Fed Governor Christopher Waller, a Trump appointee, said the same day that a cut could come as early as July. The current economic data "has been fine" and the tariff inflation bump may follow historical trends to prove transitory in the short term, Waller said in a CNBC interview. "I don't think it's going to be very big," Waller said. His July forecast shocked Fed and market watchers. Both he and Daly agreed attention must be paid to the tariff impact on the jobs market. More Federal Reserve: Fed interest rate cut decision resets forecasts for the rest of this yearFederal Reserve prepares strong message on long-term interest ratesFed official revamps interest-rate cut forecast for this year "Additional softening could turn into weakening. We don't want to see that," Daly said. If it does, Waller said the Fed could pause the rate cut process. "We'll be very interested in the inflation commentary contained in Monday's Flash June PMI data from S&P Global,'' Versace wrote in his TheStreet Weekly Roundup. "Should those comments for input and output prices show rising pressures compared to April and May, they would support Powell's assertion for what's to come.'' The widely watched CME FedWatch tool puts the likelihood of a July cut in the Federal Funds Rate at 10.3% The Fed last cut the Federal Funds Rate in December 2024. The FOMC's next meeting is July 29-30, 2025. Related: Fed official revamps interest-rate cut forecast for rest of this year The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Miami Herald
4 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Why More Boomers Are Deciding to Rent
Baby boomers are redefining the rental market, a new study has found, with millions more older Americans now renting homes than was the case a decade ago. Over the past 10 years, the number of renters aged 65 and older has surged by nearly 30 percent, adding 2.4 million senior renters across the country-by far the largest growth of any age group, according to new research conducted by Point2Homes. While the number of renters declined in other age groups, particularly those aged 18 to 54, the number of seniors opting to rent has boomed. Past generations viewed homeownership as a hallmark of independence, but today's older adults are embracing the flexibility of renting. Downsizing, relocating to warmer climates, and avoiding the burdens of home maintenance are just a few of the more positive reasons behind the trend. But rising housing costs, inflation, and limited affordable inventory also play a critical role. As more seniors navigate retirement on fixed incomes, renting is becoming not only a practical alternative, but in many cases, a financially imperative one. The reasons behind the growing number of senior renters are varied, a mix of both lifestyle choices and financial necessity. "Seniors value the flexibility renting provides, which can allow them to downsize, move to better locations, or avoid the responsibility that comes with owning a home and its expenses," Alexei Morgado, a Florida realtor and CEO of Lexawise Real Estate Exam Preparation, told Newsweek. "Owning a home can take a lot of physical energy and money. When renting, you can simply enjoy life without worrying about major repairs, the uncertainty of property taxes, or if your home will lose value or be hard to sell." Shifting cultural attitudes toward aging and independence are also influencing this trend. "In the past, homeownership was viewed as a key indicator of independence in retirement," says Morgado. "The cultural shift in the thinking surrounding aging has moved rapidly, however, and seniors no longer feel as though homeownership is a mainstay of independence and a comfortable life in retirement." He notes that the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated this rethinking. "Seniors began to focus on flexibility and ease rather than stability and predictability, which is often associated with homeownership," Morgado said. "Many seniors have begun seeking smaller properties or apartments in more desirable areas away from their long-time homes and may prefer urban and suburban environments even if there is additional cost or a long-term rental lease. "In this way, renting allows for added freedom of movement if they feel they need to move or relocate." The study found that many senior renters are relocating to warmer climates, particularly in Florida, which is well-known for its large retirement community. Other southern states, such as Louisiana and Texas, are also experiencing an increase in the number of graying renters. In Baton Rouge, the percentage of properties rented by older Americans has boomed by 88.7 percent over the last ten years. Similar numbers are reported in Jacksonville, Florida, and Round Rock, near Austin, Texas. But for many, the switch to renting isn't just a matter of lifestyle-it's a financial necessity, Morgado explained. "The gap between owning and renting is widening, especially for seniors who rely on a fixed income. Home prices have skyrocketed in many parts of the country over the last 10 years with continued high mortgage interest rates," he said. "Rapid changes in housing demand mean that local areas with very limited affordable housing options have both renters and former homeowners looking for an affordable lifestyle. Seniors that once owned homes are now renting for value." Steve Sexton, CEO of Sexton Advisory Group, agrees. "This trend is fueled by both convenience and necessity; however recent economic uncertainty is the more likely driver of seniors renting in retirement," Sexton told Newsweek, noting that many retirees live on fixed incomes that have failed to keep pace with rising housing costs and inflation. "Utilities, insurance, property taxes, and maintenance costs associated with owning a home continue to increase, while Social Security and pensions struggle to keep up," he said. This is exacerbated by a lack of affordable homes on the market, even for those who may prefer to own, Sexton said, a problem that is getting worse over time. As a result, "for many seniors, renting offers a more predictable and/or simplified budget in which they don't have to account for repairs and certain housing expenses." Yet the underlying issue of housing affordability remains a serious concern. A 2024 report by the Joint Center for Housing Studies found that more than 40 percent of renters aged 65 and older spend more than 30 percent of their income on rent, the threshold at which the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development considers a household "cost burdened." "The availability of affordable housing, however, is a glaring reality for many seniors," Morgado said, noting that it's "a barrier obstacle to seniors maintaining their independence." Boomers having to rent out of financial necessity is likely to continue. For now, most adults aged 65 and older are homeowners, according to the Joint Center for Housing Studies at Harvard University. However, more than one in five older households, some 7 million, choose to rent, according to the 2023 Housing America's Older Adults study by JCHS. Jeff Lichtenstein, CEO and broker at Echo Fine Properties, said the trend "will get worse in the next decade," with "inflation being the main culprit." "With increased costs coming from tariffs and with cuts in the new bill and from DOGE, it puts seniors in a tough situation," he told Newsweek. "In the next decade, there will be an explosion of baby boomers in that age group. As one loses a spouse or looks at financing, there should be more of a need to rent." Related Articles Gen Z Is Significantly More Afraid of This Trend Than Older GenerationsSocial Security Claims SkyrocketIt's Not Gold-Digging, but Gen Z Will Marry for Money, Predicts ExpertGen Z's Trauma Therapy Compared to Millennials, Boomers 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
