logo
Cash, Cartels, and the Chinese Connection: How Drug Money Flows into American Banks

Cash, Cartels, and the Chinese Connection: How Drug Money Flows into American Banks

Federal Investigators Uncover a Sophisticated Laundering Network Fueling the U.S. Drug Trade Through Teller Windows Across Los Angeles
LOS ANGELES — In a sweeping federal investigation that reads like a thriller, U.S. law enforcement has exposed a transnational money laundering operation linking Chinese underground bankers with Mexico's deadliest drug cartels. The operation, which involved the regular deposit of six-figure sums—often in gym bags stuffed with cash—into major U.S. financial institutions, highlights a dangerous evolution in global financial crime.
The laundering ring's primary targets? Mainstream bank branches belonging to JPMorgan Chase, Citibank, and Bank of America, across Los Angeles County. The financial system, it seems, has become the silent accomplice in a multi-billion-dollar drug and capital flight scheme stretching from Shanghai to Sinaloa to California.
A Modern Money Laundering Blueprint
At the center of the conspiracy is a mutually beneficial relationship between Chinese money brokers and Mexican cartels. The cartels needed to 'clean' the massive amounts of U.S. currency made from fentanyl, methamphetamine, and cocaine sales. Simultaneously, Chinese nationals, restricted by China's strict capital controls, sought methods to get large sums of money out of the country.
The method is simple, yet devastatingly effective: Drug money in U.S. dollars is handed to Chinese operatives on American soil. That money is deposited into U.S. bank accounts under front companies or borrowed names. Chinese citizens inside China pay the equivalent value in yuan to launderers through apps like WeChat Pay or Alipay. Cartels retrieve clean funds in pesos, bitcoins, or property from Chinese-controlled accounts in Mexico or other jurisdictions.
By separating the currency movements from physical cross-border transactions, criminals bypass customs enforcement, anti-money laundering (AML) systems, and traditional detection models.
Bags of Cash and Teller Blind Spots
Federal court documents reveal that over $300 million was laundered using this strategy between 2019 and 2023. Deposits were frequently made in structured amounts just below the $10,000 CTR (Currency Transaction Report) threshold to avoid automatic reporting.
Individuals often walked into retail bank branches across Alhambra, Monterey Park, Arcadia, and other L.A. suburbs with grocery bags, backpacks, or duffel bags filled with tightly rubber-banded $100 bills.
A former branch manager, speaking anonymously, recalled, 'The deposits didn't make sense. We saw someone walk in with $200,000 in cash, claiming it was for a 'retail export business,' but there were no corresponding wire transfers or invoices. We flagged it, but nothing ever came of it internally.'
The same pattern repeated across institutions, and whistleblower reports indicate internal compliance teams either missed or ignored red flags in dozens of locations.
Case Study: U.S. v. Chen & Zhen (2024)
A major federal indictment filed in Los Angeles in late 2024 highlights the operations of Justin Zhen, a Chinese-American real estate developer, and his associate, Hao Chen, an international logistics manager. According to the Department of Justice, the two operated a network of couriers—mostly international students or recent immigrants-who deposited cartel cash into more than 50 different accounts in 12 banks across Southern California.
Case Facts: Total laundered funds: $84 million
$84 million Banks used: Chase (Alhambra), Bank of America (Pasadena), Citibank (Rowland Heights)
Chase (Alhambra), Bank of America (Pasadena), Citibank (Rowland Heights) Period: 2021–2023
2021–2023 Seized evidence: 27 burner phones, 11 fake passports, and $2.1 million in U.S. currency
Undercover agents captured footage of couriers rehearsing deposit conversations, being trained to avoid suspicion, and using rotating IDS. Zhen allegedly boasted on a recorded call, 'You can launder $10 million without a single wire transfer.'
Underground Banking Meets High-Stakes Laundering
Chinese underground banking systems, often called fei qian (flying money), have existed for centuries. But today's version has gone digital, blending cryptocurrency, WeChat payments, and virtual private wallets. These networks thrive in the grey areas of international finance, notably where Chinese law prohibits outbound transfers over $50,000 per year per citizen.
The cartels have capitalized on this by offering access to offshore liquidity, promising launderers quick profits for helping cycle dirty money into Asia's shadow economy.
The result is a parallel global economy in which vast sums move without touching the regulated financial system but still manage to pass through trusted institutions.
National Response and Policy Failures
The U.S. Treasury Department, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency have launched joint investigations into the banks involved. While no charges have been filed against the financial institutions as of May 2025, the scrutiny is intense.
Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) called for immediate hearings, stating, 'This is not just a regulatory failure. It's a national threat when fentanyl profits are flowing freely through American banks.'
A joint task force, including the FBI, DEA, and Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), has since been established to focus solely on Chinese money laundering and cartel collaborations in the U.S.
Case Study: The Fresno Drop-Off
In another ongoing case, DEA agents intercepted a courier who had driven from Las Vegas to Fresno carrying $600,000 in cash wrapped in heat-sealed food storage containers. The courier had instructions to deposit the funds in $9,000 increments across five banks within two days.
Digital logs show that the operation was coordinated via WeChat voice notes, using code names like 'water delivery' and 'temple donations.' Surveillance later uncovered a dozen similar couriers operating in California's Central Valley, each believed to have laundered between $2 million and $5 million over a year.
The Human Cost of Dirty Money
Behind every laundered dollar is a trail of overdose deaths, broken communities, and shattered families. Fentanyl, the cartels' product of choice, has killed more than 70,000 Americans per year, according to the CDC.
When drug profits are laundered successfully, cartels reinvest in larger shipments, deadlier chemicals, and more sophisticated smuggling techniques. By facilitating laundering—knowingly or not—banks indirectly enable the scourge law enforcement is fighting to stop.
Amicus International Consulting's Role in Financial Defence
Amicus International Consulting offers solutions grounded in compliance, security, and legal integrity in an environment where individuals and institutions can become unknowing enablers of criminal networks.
Amicus provides: Strategic consulting for high-risk account monitoring
Corporate structuring services to prevent shell-company fraud
Legal second citizenship and offshore banking setup compliant with FATF/OECD standards
Intelligence briefings on geopolitical laundering threats
AML and KYC training for financial institutions
'Today, the line between criminal and legitimate financial activity has never been thinner,' said a senior compliance advisor at Amicus. 'Our job is to ensure clients never cross it—intentionally or otherwise.'
A Call for Reinforcement, Not Just Reform
The Chinese cartel laundering pipeline has revealed gaping holes in the U.S. anti-money laundering regime—holes that have allowed billions in criminal proceeds to pass through the front doors of some of America's largest banks.
As regulators scramble to modernize detection systems and enforce stricter oversight, financial institutions must shift from reactive to proactive, from automated red flagging to human-centred risk evaluation.
Because when cartels walk in with bags of cash and walk out with digital legitimacy, the system is broken.
📞 Contact InformationPhone: +1 (604) 200-5402Email: info@amicusint.ca
Website: www.amicusint.ca

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ROSEN, LEADING INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages Reddit, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action
ROSEN, LEADING INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages Reddit, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action

Business Upturn

time18 minutes ago

  • Business Upturn

ROSEN, LEADING INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages Reddit, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action

NEW YORK, June 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces the filing of a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of securities of Reddit, Inc. (NYSE: RDDT) between October 29, 2024 and May 20, 2025, both dates inclusive (the 'Class Period'). A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than August 18, 2025. SO WHAT: If you purchased Reddit securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Reddit class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for more information. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than August 18, 2025. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers. DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) changes in Google Search's algorithm and features like AI Overview were causing users to stop their query on Google search; (2) these algorithm changes were materially different than prior instances of reduced traffic to the Reddit website; (3) defendants were aware that the increase in the query term 'Reddit' on search engines was because users were getting the sought after answer from Google Search without having to go to Reddit, and not because they intended to visit Reddit; (4) this zero-click search reality was dramatically reducing traffic to Reddit in a manner Reddit was unable to overcome in the short term; and (5) defendants, therefore, lacked a reasonable basis for its outlook on user rates and advertising revenues. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. To join the Reddit class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for more information. No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: on Twitter: or on Facebook: Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. ——————————- Contact Information: Laurence Rosen, Esq. Phillip Kim, Esq. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. 275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel: (212) 686-1060 Toll Free: (866) 767-3653 Fax: (212) 202-3827 [email protected]

Gavin Newsom Challenges JD Vance: 'How About Saying It to My Face?'
Gavin Newsom Challenges JD Vance: 'How About Saying It to My Face?'

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Gavin Newsom Challenges JD Vance: 'How About Saying It to My Face?'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. California Governor Gavin Newsom on Friday challenged Vice President JD Vance to a debate after the vice president visited Los Angeles and accused him of "egging on" violent disorder in the city. In a post on his X, formerly Twitter, account, the governor wrote: "...Since you're so eager to talk about me, how about saying it to my face?" Newsweek contacted Vance for comment on Saturday via email to the White House press office outside of regular office hours. Why It Matters U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) have expanded their operations in Los Angeles and across the country as President Donald Trump seeks to deliver on his campaign promise to carry out the largest deportation operation in United States history. ICE conducted raids in Los Angeles and faced large protests in the city that largely remained peaceful with some instances of violence that prompted Trump to order the deployment of 4,000 members of California's National Guard and 700 U.S. Marines to assist in stopping violence, even as Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass insisted local law enforcement had the matter under control and a legal battle has pursued. The raids are following legal directive from federal authorities, but critics have raised concerns about the treatment of migrants by federal authorities as well as the tactics used by immigration agents during the raids. What To Know During his visit to Los Angeles on Friday to meet with troops, including Marines who have been deployed to protect federal buildings in the city, Vance said rioters had been "egged on" by Newsom and Bass, telling reporters: "The president has a very simple proposal to everybody in every city, every community, every town whether big or small. If you enforce your own laws and if you protect federal law enforcement, we're not going to send in the national guard because it's unnecessary. He added: "But if you let violent rioters burn great American cities to the ground, then of course we're going to send in federal law enforcement to protect the people the president was elected to protect." Vance also referred to Senator Alex Padilla, a California Democrat who was handcuffed and forcibly removed from a press conference DHS Secretary Kristi Noem was holding in Los Angeles earlier this month, as "Jose Padilla." Noem has said Padilla did not identify himself when he arrived at the conference, but Padilla disputes the claim. Responding on X, Newsom wrote: "Hey @JDVance — nice of you to finally make it out to California. Since you're so eager to talk about me, how about saying it to my face? Let's debate. Time and place?" In a separate X post, the governor shared a clip of Vance calling Padilla "Jose Padilla," adding: "JD Vance served with Alex Padilla in the United States Senate. Calling him 'Jose Padilla' is not an accident." California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks on March 26 in Los Angeles. Vice President JD Vance addresses the press following a tour of the multiagency Federal Joint Operations Center at the Wilshire Federal Building on June... California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks on March 26 in Los Angeles. Vice President JD Vance addresses the press following a tour of the multiagency Federal Joint Operations Center at the Wilshire Federal Building on June 20 in Los Angeles. More Frazer Harrison/WireImage/Scott Olson/GETTY What People Are Saying Referring to the Padilla incident, a Vance spokesperson previously told Newsweek that: "He must have mixed up two people who have broken the law." Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said: "Mr. Vice President, how dare you disrespect our senator. You don't know his name," Bass questioned. "But yet you served with him before you were vice president and you continue to serve with him today, because the last time I checked, the vice president of the United States is the president of the U.S. Senate." She added: "You serve with him today and how dare you disrespect him and call him 'Jose.' But I guess he just looked like anybody to you. Well, he's not just anybody to us. He is our senator." President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social last week: "I campaigned on, and received a Historic Mandate for, the largest Mass Deportation Program in American History. Polling shows overwhelming Public Support for getting the Illegals out, and that is exactly what we will do. As Commander-in-Chief, I will always protect and defend the Heroes of ICE and Border Patrol, whose work has already resulted in the Most Secure Border in American History. Anyone who assaults or attacks an ICE or Border Agent will do hard time in jail. Those who are here illegally should either self deport using the CBP Home App or, ICE will find you and remove you. Saving America is not negotiable!" What Happens Next? Vance has yet to respond to Newsom's offer of a debate and it remains to be seen if he will do so. In December 2023, Newsom debated against Florida's Republican Governor Ron DeSantis after the two went back-and-forth on their policies. Meanwhile, a U.S. appeals court on Thursday unanimously blocked a lower court ruling that put Newsom back in control of National Guard troops that Trump deployed to Los Angeles. The appeals court ruled that the president can keep control of the guardsmen while legal proceedings in the case continue.

The 4.4% return this week takes Range Resources' (NYSE:RRC) shareholders five-year gains to 766%
The 4.4% return this week takes Range Resources' (NYSE:RRC) shareholders five-year gains to 766%

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

The 4.4% return this week takes Range Resources' (NYSE:RRC) shareholders five-year gains to 766%

For many, the main point of investing in the stock market is to achieve spectacular returns. While not every stock performs well, when investors win, they can win big. To wit, the Range Resources Corporation (NYSE:RRC) share price has soared 739% over five years. This just goes to show the value creation that some businesses can achieve. In more good news, the share price has risen 9.9% in thirty days. We love happy stories like this one. The company should be really proud of that performance! After a strong gain in the past week, it's worth seeing if longer term returns have been driven by improving fundamentals. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. To quote Buffett, 'Ships will sail around the world but the Flat Earth Society will flourish. There will continue to be wide discrepancies between price and value in the marketplace...' One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price. During the last half decade, Range Resources became profitable. That kind of transition can be an inflection point that justifies a strong share price gain, just as we have seen here. The graphic below depicts how EPS has changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image). It's probably worth noting that the CEO is paid less than the median at similar sized companies. It's always worth keeping an eye on CEO pay, but a more important question is whether the company will grow earnings throughout the years. Before buying or selling a stock, we always recommend a close examination of historic growth trends, available here.. As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. It's fair to say that the TSR gives a more complete picture for stocks that pay a dividend. In the case of Range Resources, it has a TSR of 766% for the last 5 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence! It's nice to see that Range Resources shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 30% over the last year. Of course, that includes the dividend. However, that falls short of the 54% TSR per annum it has made for shareholders, each year, over five years. The pessimistic view would be that be that the stock has its best days behind it, but on the other hand the price might simply be moderating while the business itself continues to execute. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Even so, be aware that Range Resources is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about... For those who like to find winning investments this free list of undervalued companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket. Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store