Fearing Trump, academics worldwide issue anti-fascist manifesto
LONDON — In the spring of 1925, a group of academics, researchers and writers in Italy published an open letter in multiple newspapers, hoping to ring alarm bells over the creeping authoritarianism of Benito Mussolini and his Fascist party. It called for 'intrinsic goodness' and recognizing the value of 'liberal systems and methods' over 'violence and bullying and the suppression of freedom of the press.'
Spoiler: It didn't work. Mussolini wasn't stopped, fascism plunged Europe into darkness, and the letter signers were variously fired, sidelined and beaten.
But exactly a century later, a modern group of academics, researchers and writers around the world is giving it another go — fearing that the world is once again sleepwalking into dictatorship and violence. More than 400 scholars from dozens of countries, including at least 30 Nobel laureates, are reprising the 1925 Manifesto of the Anti-Fascist Intellectuals to warn that 'the threat of fascism is back.'
'In the past two decades we have witnessed a renewed wave of far-right movements,' the new letter states, 'often bearing unmistakably fascist traits: attacks on democratic norms and institutions, a reinvigorated nationalism laced with racist rhetoric, authoritarian impulses, and systematic assaults on the rights of those who do not fit a manufactured traditional authority.'
Organizers said the open letter — published Friday by media outlets in Britain, France, Italy, Australia, Argentina and other countries — was inspired by rising influence of, as they see it, a growing roster of would-be demagogues and dictators around the world and their followers.
The essay does not name names. But in interviews, organizers cited Russian President Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine; the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol by rioters trying to block the peaceful transfer of power; and myriad crackdowns on press, protesters and professors in Hungary, Brazil, Israel and other democracies. Their fears have been supercharged by the early actions of the second Trump administration, they said.
'What we are witnessing at the moment is extremely concerning for people who want to defend democracy,' Andrea Pisauro, an Italian professor of neurology at the University of Plymouth in England and one of the organizers, said in an interview. 'It looks to us like authoritarianism is on the march throughout the world and now in the United States.'
The group timed the specific release of the letter to coincide with the military parade that President Donald Trump planned to roll through Washington on Saturday, his 79th birthday, which organizers of the letter characterized as a ritual of authoritarian pomp.
'We thought, 'That's perfect. A person is trying to be a king and wants a parade,'' said another organizer in the United States, who would only speak on the condition of anonymity out of fear of reprisal. 'It's the classic mix of ridiculous and scary.'
Publication of the letter also coincides with the Trump administration's ongoing push to exert greater control over universities, including Harvard, by cutting research grants, seeking to block the enrollment of international students and threatening to raise taxes on school endowment funds.
The idea of an updated manifesto began mostly among hard-science researchers from Italy, who were familiar with their country's own descent into dictatorship and the noble, if futile, efforts by intellectuals to stop it.
Support for it quickly spread to other disciplines and nationalities. Dozens of political scientists, legal scholars, historians and economists added their names. The list is growing, and the organizers plan to keep the letter open for new supporters.
Those already signed up include some renowned thinkers, among them historian Garry Wills, New York University's Ruth Ben-Ghiat — the author of 'Strongmen,' a history of authoritarian rulers — and tyranny expert Timothy Snyder of Yale.
'I think it's important to remember that there is a history of university professors and other intellectuals taking risks in the name of principles,' Snyder said in an interview about why he joined the signatories. 'Secondly, it was important to me for people to have this historical reference to fascism, that things today might be more explicable when we have clear references to the past.'
The project was launched in February by a loose confederation of academic colleagues who had been wary of rising autocracies for years. They saw Trump's moves to deport international students, threaten sanctions on unfavored law firms and ignore judicial restraints as another check-engine light on democracy's dashboard.
The Trump administration has also pulled research funding for the National Institutes of Health and other scientific bodies, they noted, and has co-opted federal watchdog agencies long viewed as independent monitors. Among the most concerning, Pisauro said, were actions by Elon Musk's U.S. DOGE Service to erase decades of irreplaceable research on climate change, sexuality and other suddenly taboo topics.
'We are researchers,' Pisauro said. 'That really shocked us.'
Fully aware that academics were already in the crosshairs of powers from Washington to Budapest, they decided to reprise the 1925 letter, which condemned Mussolini's 'bizarre mixture of appeals to authority and demagogy, of proclaimed reverence for the laws and violations of the laws.'
The modern version was largely written by an international medical researcher at an American university, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. He said the atmosphere of fear and mistrust that has enveloped academic institutions under Trump makes him afraid to go public.
He isn't alone. Several signatories of the letter opted to remain anonymous. That alone should be seen as a warning sign that the United States is descending into the wary chill that characterized the former Soviet Union and other totalitarian regimes, said the researcher, whose identity and credentials were verified by The Washington Post.
'I don't want my colleagues to know what I'm doing,' he said. 'That is definitely not something I thought would happen when I moved to the United States many years ago.'
The organizers are quick to say that current events in the U.S. and elsewhere are not exact parallels to the rise of dictators like Mussolini and Adolf Hitler. By 1925, many opposition figures were imprisoned and a growing number of dissidents were dead, part of a wave of violence that grew to engulf Europe.
Still, even though there is debate over the definition of 'fascist' — a label easily deployed in political arguments — the letter writers see echoes of it in the actions of today's strongman leaders and the conditions that enable their rise.
'These movements have reemerged across the globe, including in long-standing democracies, where widespread dissatisfaction with political failure to address mounting inequalities and social exclusion has once again been exploited by new authoritarian figures,' the letter states. 'True to the old fascist script, under the guise of an unlimited popular mandate, these figures undermine national and international rule of law, targeting the independence of the judiciary, the press, institutions of culture, higher education, and science.'
Some of those who signed the manifesto did so while also arguing for universities and institutions to address their own shortcomings. Among them is a widespread intolerance of political and cultural views that many academics don't like when it comes to hiring experts and setting curriculum, said Pippa Norris, a longtime political scientist at Harvard's John F. Kennedy School of Government.
'We need to make sure all viewpoints are heard and taught,' Norris said. 'At present we don't have the balance right.'
Norris said she signed the open letter because she also recognized the rising threat to academic freedom coming from governments. Her institution has seen federal funding stripped by the Trump administration and its international students blocked from applying for visas.
'Everyone can speak up in different ways,' she said. 'And this is something I can do.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
22 minutes ago
- CNBC
Some lawmakers in both parties question the legality of Trump's Iran strikes
WASHINGTON — Several members of Congress in both parties Saturday questioned the legality of President Donald Trump's move to launch military strikes on Iran. While Republican leaders and many rank-and-file members stood by Trump's decision to bomb Iran's major nuclear enrichment facilities, at least two GOP lawmakers joined Democrats across the party spectrum in suggesting it was unconstitutional for him to bomb Iran without approval from Congress. "While President Trump's decision may prove just, it's hard to conceive a rationale that's Constitutional," Rep. Warren Davidson, R-Ohio, who usually aligns with Trump, said on X. "I look forward to his remarks tonight." Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., said in response to Trump's social media post announcing the strikes: "This is not Constitutional." Massie introduced a bipartisan resolution this week seeking to block U.S. military action against Iran "unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or specific authorization for use of military force against Iran" passed by Congress. In brief remarks from the White House on Saturday night, Trump defended the strikes but did not mention the basis of his legal authority to launch them without Congress' having given him that power. Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., reacted in real time during a speech in Tulsa, Oklahoma, slamming Trump's actions as "grossly unconstitutional." "The only entity that can take this country to war is the U.S. Congress. The president does not have the right," Sanders told the crowd, which broke out in "no more war!" chants. Some Democrats called it an impeachable offense for the president to bomb Iran without approval from Congress. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., said Trump's move is "absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment." "The President's disastrous decision to bomb Iran without authorization is a grave violation of the Constitution and Congressional War Powers," she said on X. "He has impulsively risked launching a war that may ensnare us for generations." Rep. Sean Casten, D-Ill., said on social media: "This is not about the merits of Iran's nuclear program. No president has the authority to bomb another country that does not pose an imminent threat to the US without the approval of Congress. This is an unambiguous impeachable offense." Casten called on House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., to "grow a spine" and protect the war powers reserved for Congress. Johnson said Trump respects the Constitution as he sought to lay the groundwork to defend his decision to act unilaterally. "The President fully respects the Article I power of Congress, and tonight's necessary, limited, and targeted strike follows the history and tradition of similar military actions under presidents of both parties," he said in a statement. Johnson's remarks, along with support for Trump's move offered by Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., indicate that Trump may have sufficient political cover to avoid blowback from the Republican-controlled Congress. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said Trump "failed to seek congressional authorization for the use of military force and risks American entanglement in a potentially disastrous war in the Middle East." But he stopped short of labeling the military action illegal or unconstitutional. House Minority Whip Katherine Clark, D-Mass., was more direct on the legal question. "The power to declare war resides solely with Congress. Donald Trump's unilateral decision to attack Iran is unauthorized and unconstitutional," said Clark, the No. 2 Democrat. "In doing so, the President has exposed our military and diplomatic personnel in the region to the risk of further escalation." Appearing Saturday night on MSNBC, Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., who co-authored the resolution with Massie, wondered whether the anti-war voters who support Trump would back his move. "This is the first true crack in the MAGA base," he said, noting that Trump's rise in the 2016 primaries was aided by his move to slam President George W. Bush for the Iraq war.
Boston Globe
26 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Senators Markey and Warren decry Trump's Iran strikes as unconstitutional
'Only Congress can declare war — and the Senate must vote immediately to prevent another endless war,' Warren said. Fellow Massachusetts Senator Ed Markey agreed, calling the strike 'illegal' for having lacked congressional approval. He said in a statement that Saturday's attack may set back Iran's nuclear ambitions, but added that not only can the country 'rebuild its program,' it 'will now be highly motivated to do so.' 'A diplomatic solution remains the best way to permanently and verifiably prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon,' Markey said. Chants of 'No More War' broke out at a Bernie Sanders rally in Tulsa, Okla., after the Vermont Senator read Trump's 'alarming' social media post announcing the strikes. 'The American people do not want more war, more death,' he said. Advertisement Massachusetts Peace Action, a Cambridge-based advocacy group, called for state leaders to speak out. The organization specifically called on Congressional leaders to pass the war power resolutions filed by Senator Tim Kaine and Representative Thomas Massie to prevent further US military action. 'We call on Massachusetts political leaders to speak out strongly against President Trump's lawless military adventure,' the organization wrote on Saturday night, shortly after the US attack on Iran. Brian Garvey, the organization's executive director, said an 'emergency event' was being planned outside Park Street Station at 1 p.m. Sunday, in protest of the strikes. Advertisement 'This direct attack by the United States on Iran a dramatic escalation by President Trump,' Garvey said in a phone call Saturday night. 'It's incredibly dangerous, it's unnecessary, and frankly, it's illegal.' Garvey said the founding fathers were explicit in giving Congress the power to declare war, adding that this is 'not how the government is supposed to work.' 'It is perhaps especially terrible because this is a president who ran saying he was going to seek peace,' he said. 'Back in 2016, he said the Iraq War was a big fat mistake. I fear that what he is leading us into could be even worse than that debacle and quagmire.' Garvey said he was 'fearful' for the US service members stationed in the Middle East, and 'outraged' that the strikes threatened their safety. Camilo Fonseca can be reached at
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump faces backlash from Maga base after strikes on Iran
President Donald Trump faced a fierce backlash from parts of his Maga movement over his decision to launch strikes against Iran, with Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
