Trump's Trouble With Tulsi

This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here.
Back in March, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard delivered a view of Iran to the House Intelligence Committee that was in line with Trump-administration policy: hostile toward Tehran, but also skeptical of the need for American intervention. Unfortunately for her, though, things have changed in the past three months.
'Iran continues to seek to expand its influence in the Middle East,' Gabbard said. Nevertheless, she said, the U.S. Intelligence Community (IC) 'continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khomeini has not authorized the nuclear-weapons program that he suspended in 2003.' (Presumably she was referring to Ali Khamenei and not his long-dead predecessor, Ruhollah Khomeini.)
That may have been President Donald Trump's view in March too, but this week, Trump told reporters that Iran is on the verge of getting a nuclear bomb. When asked about Gabbard's testimony, Trump dismissed it. 'I don't care what she said,' he said. 'I think they were very close to having one.'
This kind of harsh dismissal of American intelligence was a hallmark of Trump's first term in office. Shortly before his inauguration, he compared intelligence agencies to Nazis, and somehow things got worse from there. He infamously sided with Russia's Vladimir Putin rather than the intelligence community on the question of Russian interference in the 2016 election, accused former officials of treason, and reportedly clashed with DNI Dan Coats over his unwillingness to take his side in political conflicts.
That problem was supposed to be solved in his second term. Rather than choose someone like Coats, a former senator who had experience with intelligence, or his successor, John Ratcliffe, who claimed he did, Trump nominated Tulsi Gabbard, a former Democratic member of Congress who had endorsed him for president. (Ratcliffe, having proved his loyalty to Trump in the first term, was named CIA director.)
Gabbard shared a few things with Trump: an odd affinity for Putin's government, and a public stance of opposing American intervention. But above all, her qualification for the job was that she, like Trump, bore a huge grudge against the intelligence agencies, making her an ideal pick in his Cabinet of retribution.
Now the limits of this approach to appointments are coming into view. Gabbard's beef with the IC was her sense that it was too belligerent and interventionist, especially with regard to her pals in places such as Syria and Russia; she was also angry because she had reportedly been briefly placed on a government watch list for flying. Gabbard opposes foreign wars, and it appears that she doesn't want intelligence to implicate her friends overseas. But when the intelligence points against American intervention, as it does with Iran, she is happy to stand behind it despite her skepticism of the analysts.
Trump, by contrast, doesn't want the intelligence to complicate his choices at all. The president was fine with the IC assessment from earlier this year, when his line was that he opposed wars and would keep the United States out. But now that he has made a quick shift from trying to restrain Israel from striking Iran to demanding Iran's 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER'—a baffling demand of a country with which the U.S. is not at war—and contemplating American attacks, the conclusion that Iran isn't that close to a bomb is a real hindrance.
Politico reports that Trump was annoyed by a video Gabbard posted earlier this month in which she warned about 'political elite and warmongers' risking nuclear war, and she was reportedly excluded from a Camp David meeting. (The White House has insisted that all principals are on the same page, though Trump's dismissive comments about Gabbard earlier this week are telling.) Cutting out the DNI at a crucial moment like this is an unusual choice, though the role has never been well defined: Although it was created to sit atop the U.S. intelligence agencies and coordinate among them, officials such as the director of the CIA have often wielded more power.
Trump's saber-rattling has created rifts within the MAGA coalition, as my colleagues Jonathan Lemire and Isaac Stanley-Becker reported yesterday. In reality, Trump was never the dove that he made himself out to be. He has consistently backed American involvement overseas. During the 2016 election, he claimed that he had been against the Iraq War from the start, placing the idea at the center of his campaign even though there is no evidence for it. As president, he escalated U.S. involvement in Syria, backed the Saudi war in Yemen and vetoed Congress's attempt to curtail it, and—in one of his major foreign-policy successes—assassinated Iranian General Qassem Soleimani. Throughout his first term, he treated the troops as a political prop.
These tendencies have become more pronounced in his second term, though Trump's favorite places to send troops remain within national borders: in the streets of Los Angeles or parading through Washington, D.C. He launched a series of major strikes against Yemen's Houthi rebels, despite the misgivings of his dovish vice president, and then abruptly stopped them when it became clear that no easy victory was forthcoming. This is the crux of the matter with Iran too. Although he may be hesitant about American involvement overseas, Trump loves displays of strength. He sees one in Israel's attacks on Iran, and he wants in on the action.
Whether the MAGA doves believed Trump really was one of them or simply hoped they could persuade him in the moment is something only they can answer. But his actions this week show that his real resentment was not toward intervention or even intelligence itself. It was toward anything and anyone who might restrain his caprices.
Today's News
The Federal Reserve will hold interest rates steady. Earlier today, President Donald Trump called Fed Chair Jerome Powell 'stupid' and contemplated installing himself at the Reserve.
Trump said that he 'may' or 'may not' strike Iran, adding that 'nobody knows' what he's going to do.
The Supreme Court upheld Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for transgender minors.
Evening Read
The Dumbest Phone Is Parenting Genius
When Caron Morse's 9-year-old daughter asked for a smartphone last year, her reaction, she told me, was unambiguous: ' A hard hell no.' Morse is a mental-health provider in the Portland, Maine, public-school system, and she was firmly against smartphones, having seen how social media and abundant screen time could shorten students' attention spans and give them new anxieties. But she wanted her children to have some independence—to be able to call friends, arrange playdates, and reach out to their grandparents on their own. She also needed a break. 'I was so sick,' she said, 'of being the middle person in any correspondence.'
So when her daughter turned 10, Morse did get her a phone: a landline.
Read the full article.
More From The Atlantic
Read. In her new book, Murderland, Caroline Fraser offers a provocative argument about what creates serial killers.
Listen. Clifton Chenier changed music history. On the centennial of his birth, musicians from across genres are paying homage to the King of Zydeco, Reya Hart writes.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Newsweek

16 minutes ago

• Newsweek

Satellite Images Show 'Unusual' Activity at Iran Nuclear Site Before Strikes

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Satellite imagery captured ahead of U.S. strikes on three major Iranian nuclear sites showed "unusual" movement around the entrance to Iran's Fordow enrichment facility. Pictures captured on Thursday and Friday showed "unusual truck and vehicular activity" close to the entrance of the underground Fordow complex south of Tehran, satellite imagery giant Maxar said late on Saturday U.S. time. A total of 16 cargo trucks were spotted on the access road leading up to the Fordow tunnel entrance on Thursday, but most of the trucks had relocated to one kilometer (0.6 miles) northwest of the access road by the following day, Maxar said. New trucks and multiple bulldozers had appeared close to the main entrance by Friday, with one truck very close to the main tunnel entrance, the satellite imagery provider said. U.S. President Donald Trump said on Saturday evening the U.S. had bombed the Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan sites in central Iran in "massive precision strikes" to take out Tehran's nuclear enrichment facilities and Iran's ability to make a nuclear weapon. Satellite imagery captured by Maxar on June 19 showing cargo trucks close to the underground entrance of the Fordow fuel enrichment facility, prior to U.S. air strikes on the underground complex. Satellite imagery captured by Maxar on June 19 showing cargo trucks close to the underground entrance of the Fordow fuel enrichment facility, prior to U.S. air strikes on the underground complex. Satellite image ©2025 Maxar Technologies The strikes were a "spectacular military success," Trump said. "Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated." Israel launched strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities and scientists, as well as the country's ballistic missile sites and other military assets, late on June 12 U.S. time. Iran responded with drone and ballistic missile barrages. Israel targeted Natanz and Isfahan, but experts said only the U.S.'s B-2 heavy stealth bombers and 30,000lb "bunker buster" bombs could successfully take out Fordow, a complex built deep into a mountain roughly 60 miles from Tehran. Fordow's existence was secret until 2009. This is a developing story and will be updated.

CBS News

17 minutes ago

• CBS News

U.S. strikes on Iran nuclear facilities see Hamas and the Houthis vow retaliation, as world leaders react

The U.S. strike on Iran's nuclear sites has fueled fears that Israel's war with Tehran could escalate into a wider regional conflict, and other countries reacted Sunday with calls for diplomacy and words of caution. President Trump had said Thursday that he would decide within two weeks whether to get involved. In the end, it took just days, and Washington inserted itself into Israel's campaign with its early Sunday attack­­­. It remained unclear early on how much damage had been inflicted, but Mr. Trump lauded the "massive precision strikes on the three key nuclear assemblies in the Iranian regime: Fordo, Natanz and Esfahan," as a "massive military success." Iran had pledged to retaliate if the U.S. joined the Israeli assault, and President Trump reiterated his stern warning to the Islamic Republic on Sunday night against targeting any U.S. assets in the region. President Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio are seen in the White House Situation Room, June 21, 2025, amid strikes on Iran. White House/Handout Some have questioned whether a weakened Iran would capitulate or remain defiant and begin striking with allies at U.S. targets scattered across the Gulf region. There are roughly 40,000 American troops deployed in the Middle East, many of them based within easy striking distance of Iran's missiles, though its stockpile of such weapons has been depleted by a week of Israeli attacks. Below is a look at reactions from various governments and other officials around the world. Israeli leaders laud U.S. strikes on Iran Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke following the strikes, the officials said. And in a video address, Netanyahu praised the president for conducting the strikes. "President Trump and I often say peace through strength. First comes strength, then comes peace. And tonight President Trump and the United States acted with a lot of strength." Israeli President Isaac Herzog, in a post on social media, called the U.S. strikes "a moment when the principles of liberty, responsibility, and security have triumphed. A decisive moment between the axis of terror and evil and the axis of hope." He thanked the U.S. and President Trump specifically, saying: "This brave step serves the security and safety of the entire free world. I hope it will lead to a better future for the Middle East — and help advance the urgent release of our hostages held in captivity in Gaza." U.N. chief says he's "gravely alarmed," pushes for diplomacy U.N. Secretary General Antonio Guterres said he was "gravely alarmed" by the use of force by the United States. "There is a growing risk that this conflict could rapidly get out of control — with catastrophic consequences for civilians, the region, and the world," he said in a statement posted on social media. "I call on Member States to de-escalate." "There is no military solution. The only path forward is diplomacy." Iran's allies Hamas, Houthis condemn "American aggression," vow to join retaliation Both the Houthi rebels in Yemen and Hamas have condemned the U.S. strikes. The Houthis vowed to support Iran in its fight against "the Zionist and American aggression." In a statement on Sunday, the Houthi political bureau called on Muslim nations to join "the Jihad and resistance option as one front against the Zionist-American arrogance." Hamas and the Houthis are part of Iran's so-called "Axis of Resistance," the collection of pro-Iranian proxies stretching from Yemen to Lebanon that for years gave Iran considerable power across the region. Hamas, long designated a terrorist organization by the U.S., Israel and the European Union, has ruled the Gaza Strip for almost 20 years. It has been under blistering attack by Israeli forces since it launched its unprecedented Oct. 7, 2023, terrorist attack on Israel, sparking the ongoing war in the Palestinian territory. Virtually all of Hamas' senior leaders have been killed, and it remains unclear how much capacity the group still has to mount major attacks on Israel. The Houthis, too, have seen their missile and other military assets in Yemen pounded by Israeli warplanes for months, along with U.S. and British strikes aimed at reducing the Houthi threat to shipping in the region. Lebanon's leader says country must avoid being drawn in Prime Minister Nawaf Salam said that Lebanon needs to stay away from any possible regional spillover from the conflict. "It is increasingly important for us to adhere strictly to the supreme national interest, which is the need to avoid Lebanon being ... drawn into the ongoing regional confrontation in any way," Salam said in a post on X. Lebanon, which sits just north of Israel, is the long-time home of the Iranian-backed, Hamas-allied Hezbollah group. Long designated a terrorist organization by the U.S., Hezbollah has also engaged in warfare with Israel since the Hamas-orchestrated, Oct. 7, 2023, terrorist attack. Hezbollah has for many years been considered one of Iran's best-armed and most potent proxy forces in the region, but much of its leadership has been killed and its fighting capacity reduced by successive Israeli strikes and months of cross-border ground operations that saw Israeli forces push deep into southern Lebanon. It remains unclear whether Hezbollah will join in any Iranian retaliatory strikes against Israel or U.S. installations in the region, or what capacity it retains to do so. China's state-run media say U.S. could repeat "Iraq mistake" A flash commentary from China's government-run media asked whether the U.S. is "repeating its Iraq mistake in Iran." The online piece by CGTN, the foreign-language arm of the state broadcaster, said the U.S. strikes mark a dangerous turning point. "History has repeatedly shown that military interventions in the Middle East often produce unintended consequences, including prolonged conflicts and regional destabilization," it said, citing the American invasion of Iraq in 2003. It said a measured, diplomatic approach that prioritizes dialogue over military confrontation offers the best hope for stability in the Middle East. U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer calls on Iran to negotiate "Iran's nuclear program is a grave threat to international security. Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the U.S. has taken action to alleviate that threat," British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Sunday on a statement posted on social media. "The situation in the Middle East remains volatile and stability in the region is a priority," he added. "We call on Iran to return to the negotiating table and reach a diplomatic solution to end this crisis." EU urges dialogue, with bloc's foreign ministers set to meet "Iran must not be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon, as it would be a threat to international security. I urge all sides to step back, return to the negotiating table and prevent further escalation," European Union foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said in a tweet. She added that Foreign Ministers from the EU's 27 member states would meet Monday, "to discuss the situation." New Zealand's leader says it's "critical further escalation is avoided" New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters urged "all parties to return to talks." He wouldn't tell reporters Sunday whether New Zealand supported President Trump's actions, saying they had only just happened. The three-time foreign minister said the crisis is "the most serious I've ever dealt with" and that it was "critical further escalation is avoided." "Diplomacy will deliver a more enduring resolution than further military action," he said. Australia appeals for "dialogue and diplomacy" Australia, which shuttered its embassy in Tehran and evacuated staff Friday, pushed for a diplomatic end to the conflict. "We have been clear that Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile program has been a threat to international peace and security," a government official said in a written statement. "We note the U.S. President's statement that now is the time for peace." "The security situation in the region is highly volatile. We continue to call for de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy."

Fox News

22 minutes ago

• Fox News

Watch: Bernie Sanders reacts to Trump's Iran strikes in real time at 'Fighting Oligarchy' rally

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., was delivering remarks at a "Fighting Oligarchy" rally in Tusla, Okla., on Saturday night when President Donald Trump announced the United States had successfully attacked three nuclear sites in Iran. An aide interrupted Sanders' remarks to deliver the message Trump had just blasted off on Truth Social. "We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan," Trump said in the post. Sanders read the piece of paper with Trump's Truth Social post to his supporters, shaking his head as the socialist senator processed what the president had just announced. "No more wars!" the crowd chanted. Trump added in the post: "All planes are now outside of Iran air space. A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow. All planes are safely on their way home. Congratulations to our great American Warriors. There is not another military in the World that could have done this. NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE! Thank you for your attention to this matter." Sanders nodded along as the crowd continued to chant, "No more wars!" before responding to the news in real time. He said the news was not only "alarming," but "so grossly unconstitutional." "All of you know that the only entity that can take this country to war is the U.S. Congress. The president does not have the right," Sanders shouted. Sanders joins the bipartisan coalition in Congress who have called out the "unconstitutionality" of Trump striking Iran without congressional approval. A bipartisan War Powers Resolution was introduced in the House of Representatives this week as strikes between Israel and Iran raged on, and the world stood by to see if Trump would strike. Congress has the sole power to declare war under Article I of the Constitution. The War Powers Resolution seeks to "remove United States Armed Forces from unauthorized hostilities in the Islamic State of Iran" and directs Trump to "terminate" the deployment of American troops against Iran without an "authorized declaration of war or specific authorization for use of military forces against Iran." "The American people do not want more war, more death!" Sanders said. "It might be a good idea if we concentrated on the problems that exist in Oklahoma and Vermont rather than getting involved in another war that the American people do not want." But Sanders told the crowd not to give up on their vision for America's future. "In this moment in American history, what we have got to do in Vermont and Oklahoma, in Texas, all over this country, is stand up and fight back, and tell them this is our country!" Sanders said. Sanders has been a vocal opponent of the United States joining Israel in its war against Iran as Trump weighed striking its nuclear facilities. "Netanyahu is not the President of the United States," Sanders said on social media earlier this week. "He should not be determining U.S. foreign and military policy. If the people of Israel support his decision to start a war with Iran, that is their business and their war. The United States must not be a part of it," he added. The democratic socialist has been a vocal opponent of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's war against Gaza since Israel retaliated following Hamas' terrorist attacks on Oct. 7, 2023. After Israel launched preemptive strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities last week, Sanders said it was "just his latest violation of international law," likening Netanyahu to a "war criminal." The Vermont senator was speaking at his second rally of the day, part of his southern swing of the "Fighting Oligarchy" tour that Sanders started in response to Trump's sweeping second-term agenda. Rep. Greg Casar, D-Tx., and former Rep. Beto O'Rourke, D-Tx., are slated to join the Vermont senator at his rallies in Texas on Sunday. And Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., joined Sanders on his Western swing of the tour earlier this year. The tour targets deep red districts currently held by Republicans, a strategy picked up by Gov. Tim Walz, D-Minn., who hosted town halls in Republican congressional districts, and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) through their "People's Town Halls" across the United States. Sanders also held a rally in House Speaker Mike Johnson's hometown of Shreveport, La., on Saturday.