logo
Supreme Court's Skrmetti decision bolsters legacy of protecting children's health

Supreme Court's Skrmetti decision bolsters legacy of protecting children's health

The Hill3 days ago

News cycles don't have a very long shelf life. Who remembers Chinese spy balloons or toxic train spills in Ohio? Though events like these typically occupy just a short time in the national spotlight, there are some stories that have measurable results we're still seeing today.
One example is a story from three years ago when conservative commentator Matt Walsh uncovered that Vanderbilt University Medical Center was performing so-called gender procedures on children. Through a chain of events set off by that controversy, the school shut down its gender clinic. Tennessee lawmakers then passed a law that protects children from those dangerous procedures. Now, the U.S. Supreme Court has just upheld that law's constitutionality in a decision released today in U.S. v. Skrmetti.
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in his majority opinion that Tennessee's law is 'plainly rationally related' to 'the state's objective of protecting minors' health and welfare.' He continued: 'After Tennessee enacted SB1, a report commissioned by England's National Health Service characterized the evidence concerning the use of puberty blockers and hormones to treat transgender minors as 'remarkably weak,' concluding that there is 'no good evidence on the long-term outcomes of interventions to manage gender-related distress.''
It's important to appreciate what a monumental win this is. So many children have been rushed into injecting cross-sex hormones that are not meant for their developing bodies. And some have had otherwise healthy body parts removed. As a result of these procedures, they are subjected to deeper health complications and lifetimes as medical patients.
Those who change course and accept their biological sex (known as 'detransitioners') all too often explain that the doctors who pushed them down this path did little to no looking into their underlying issues, such as mental health struggles or unresolved childhood trauma. To protect these children, Tennessee passed its law. With the Supreme Court's ruling in Skrmetti, more children are likely to get the treatment they deserve instead of being rushed down a destructive road by adults who should know better.
It hasn't been a smooth journey getting to this point. Gender ideologues have aggressively advanced their vision for their next generation. One of the earliest experts sounding the alarm was Dr. Allan Josephson, who headed up the University of Louisville's Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and turned it into one of the nation's most respected programs. In 2017, Dr. Josephson spoke in his personal capacity at a Heritage Foundation event, warning that treating children as the opposite sex is ineffective.
University officials received complaints about his presentation, harassed him for it, and ultimately refused to renew his contract. Alliance Defending Freedom, where I serve as chief legal counsel, represented Dr. Josephson in a lawsuit against the university. After many years of litigation, the school decided to settle the case to the tune of $1.6 million just a few months ago.
There have been other signs that gender ideology is losing steam. The seemingly daily headlines of males displacing women in their own sports has resulted in two-thirds of Americans saying that males who identify as women should not be allowed to compete in women's sports. A lawsuit in England brought by a young woman against the National Health System led to the closure of the Tavistock Gender Clinic, which then resulted in the study by Dr. Cass mentioned by Roberts in his opinion in Skrmetti.
States have an interest in seeing that children are not subject to risky and unproven medical procedures. That's why laws like Tennessee's law is constitutional and why the Supreme Court upheld Tennessee's effort to protect kids.
States also have an interest in upholding the constitutional right to speak freely on the issue of gender ideology. This freedom extends to licensed professionals who work with children struggling with gender dysphoria and desiring to grow comfortable with their sex. Colorado, however, has a law that does just the opposite. If a youth walks into a counselor's office and says she has begun to identify as the opposite sex but she's worried about the path of 'transition,' the counselor has only one option — to encourage the child to embrace the new identity. The law prohibits counselors from helping that young person achieve her goal of being comfortable with her own body.
The Supreme Court will soon consider Chiles v. Salazar, a case that will be argued in the fall and in which ADF represents licensed professional counselor Kaley Chiles in her challenge to Colorado's law. The obvious question is: If Tennessee's law is constitutional, why is Colorado's unconstitutional? The answer: The Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment.
Colorado's law violates free speech guarantees because it forbids counselors from engaging in counseling conversations that they and their young clients desire. In contrast, the Tennessee law regulates only the conduct of administering drugs and performing medical procedures, neither of which the First Amendment protects. That's why Tennessee's law was upheld, whereas Colorado's should fall.
Headlines come and go, but the courageous people who defend our children — and the politicians and professionals who offer them real care — leave a lifetime legacy worth applauding.
Jim Campbell is chief legal counsel with Alliance Defending Freedom (@ADFLegal).

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Louisiana Classroom Ten Commandments Requirement Blocked by Court
Louisiana Classroom Ten Commandments Requirement Blocked by Court

Miami Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Louisiana Classroom Ten Commandments Requirement Blocked by Court

A three-judge panel from the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday struck down Louisiana's requirement for displaying the Ten Commandments in public school classrooms. Newsweek reached out to the office of Governor Jeff Landry via email on Saturday for comment. The ruling represents a decisive legal victory for advocacy groups challenging the state mandate on constitutional grounds. This constitutional challenge reflects broader national tensions over religious expression in public education, with the mandate previously receiving support from President Donald Trump and Republican lawmakers. The ruling's implications extend beyond Louisiana, as Texas advances comparable legislation that affects nearly 6 million students in the nation's second-largest school system, while Arkansas faces parallel legal challenges as well. Louisiana Republican Governor Jeff Landry enacted the classroom display requirement in June 2024, mandating poster-sized presentations of the Ten Commandments across all public-school facilities. The law was quickly challenged by parents of Louisiana school children from various religious backgrounds, who filed a lawsuit arguing it violates First Amendment language that guarantees religious liberty and forbidding government establishment of religion. The ruling by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals marked a major win for civil liberties groups who said the mandate violates the separation of church and state. The decision upholds an order issued last November by U.S. District Judge John deGravelles who declared the mandate unconstitutional and ordered state education officials not to enforce it. In a court with more than twice as many Republican-appointed judges, two of the three judges involved in Friday's ruling were appointed by Democratic presidents. Historical precedent shows the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1980 that a Kentucky law requiring the posting of the Ten Commandments in public school classrooms violated the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution, finding it had no secular purpose but served a plainly religious purpose. In 2005, the Court held that displays in Kentucky courthouses violated the Constitution, while simultaneously upholding a Ten Commandments marker on the grounds of the Texas state Capitol in Austin. American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) senior staff attorney Heather L. Weaver told the Associated Press: "This is a resounding victory for the separation of church and state and public education. With today's ruling, the Fifth Circuit has held Louisiana accountable to a core constitutional promise: Public schools are not Sunday schools, and they must welcome all students, regardless of faith." Americans United for Separation of Church and State spokesperson Liz Hayes told the AP: "All school districts in the state are bound to comply with the U.S. Constitution. Thus, all school districts must abide by this decision and should not post the Ten Commandments in their classrooms." Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry wrote in a statement on Friday: "The Ten Commandments are the foundation of our laws—serving both an educational and historical purpose in our classrooms." Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill said she would appeal the ruling, including taking it to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary. Landry stated Friday that he supports the attorney general's plans to appeal. Reporting from the Associated Press contributed to this article. Related Articles Mahmoud Khalil Blasts Trump After Release: 'They Chose The Wrong Person'Trump Admin Gives Update on Using Military to Support ICE in 3 StatesMahmoud Khalil Cannot Be Detained or Deported, Judge RulesLouisiana Father Charged With Murder After Toddler Dies in Hot Car 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

Trans and LGBTQ+ community take to streets to protest gender-affirming care ban
Trans and LGBTQ+ community take to streets to protest gender-affirming care ban

Chicago Tribune

time4 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Trans and LGBTQ+ community take to streets to protest gender-affirming care ban

Jey McCreight underwent hormone replacement therapy and top surgery in their mid-30s to transition into a transmasculine person. They said the medical treatment helped them 'live life to the fullest.' 'It was like my depression was magically cured after struggling with it my entire life — going to therapy, being on other medications,' they said. 'Gender-affirming care is what made me happy.' When the U.S. Supreme Court upheld Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for minors on Wednesday, McCreight said they were unsurprised, but sad and angry nonetheless. McCreight, 37, joined about 200 others who braved the Saturday afternoon heat to protest the court's decision in U.S. v. Skrmetti. Demonstrators started the 12:30 p.m. rally in Federal Plaza in the Loop to the tunes of Chappell Roan's 'Pink Pony Club' and Nipsey Hussle's 'FDT' from loudspeakers. Under the blistering sun, protesters demanded equal rights for trans and gender-nonconforming people. They pointed to the importance of gender-affirming care in helping trans youth who face higher rates of mental health issues, including depression and suicide. 'We need to show up for our youth,' said Asher McMaher, executive director of Trans Up Front Illinois and one of the protest's organizers. 'Because they deserve to be the incredible human beings that they're meant to be, and we need every single one of them to grow up.' Advocates blasted the court's decision in the Skrmetti case, where families and a doctor challenged Tennessee's ban on puberty blockers and hormones to help minors transition. They argued the law deprived them of their constitutional right to equal protection under the law, but the state contended it was necessary to protect children. For Keerthi Nan, a trans Chicago schoolteacher, the decision 'further dehumanized' young trans and gender-diverse people. 'It sucks to be a trans adult right now,' Nan told the crowd. 'But it is so much harder, so much scarier, to be a trans kid, a trans adolescent in this moment.' Nan added that though Illinois and Chicago appear to be safe places for trans youth, they still hear Chicago Public School students calling their peers slurs for gay and trans people. They called on protesters to raise continued attention for trans rights. 'Show up to the school board meeting,' she said. 'Show up when people aren't watching. Fight like our students' futures depend on it because they do.' State Rep. Kelly Cassidy, D-Chicago, the only openly lesbian member of the Illinois House, also called for more action from the broader LGBTQ+ community. She said not only were trans rights and abortion rights at risk — other liberties for LGBTQ+ people could also be in danger. 'You don't get to take your wedding cake and go home, boys,' Kelly said. 'They are not just coming for trans kids.' At the rally, the parents of trans children stressed the importance of accepting their kids for their identities. Evanston Mayor Daniel Biss, who has two children who have received gender-affirming care, said letting his kids lead their treatment in consultation with medical professionals wasn't 'hard' nor 'emotionally complicated.' 'At no moment in that process did it make a bit of sense for a politician to insert themselves,' he said. After speeches from trans and LGBTQ+ rights' advocates and local politicians, protesters marched for about a half hour, circling downtown, from Dearborn Street to Michigan Avenue and Adams Street to Washington Street. The crowd chanted slogans including 'Health care is a human right' and 'Trans rights are human rights' for about half an hour as it moved. Onlookers on the sidewalks stopped to cheer, clap and record the march. McCreight said they felt 'reinvigorated' by the event. 'You're seeing your rights being stripped away and wondering, 'Am I going to lose access to my health care next as an adult, the thing that I know has literally saved my life?'' they said. 'But I come out here and I know that people aren't going to give up, and honestly, I feel like we're going to eventually win.'

How Women Can Prevent Hair Loss by Nourishing the Liver and Kidneys
How Women Can Prevent Hair Loss by Nourishing the Liver and Kidneys

Epoch Times

time6 hours ago

  • Epoch Times

How Women Can Prevent Hair Loss by Nourishing the Liver and Kidneys

Hair health reflects overall physical well-being. Women often experience hair loss due to various causes, including postpartum recovery, menopause, alopecia areata, or scalp issues such as itchiness and dandruff, exacerbated by summer heat. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) offers a holistic approach, emphasizing a blend of targeted dietary supplements, meticulous scalp care, and proper hair-washing techniques to reduce hair loss effectively. Dr. Chen Hsin-hung, a TCM practitioner at Hanyitang Chinese Medicine clinics in Taiwan, shared a case of hair loss. A woman in her 20s developed alopecia areata (patchy baldness) after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, which left her deeply distressed when her hair almost entirely fell out. Through 6 to 8 months of TCM treatment, she regrew dark, vibrant hair. Exploring Hair Loss Causes With TCM From the perspective of TCM, the liver and kidneys are closely related to hair health as they play a vital role in the internal organ-centered energy system.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store