Keep Colorado Wild Pass helps fund search and rescue drone conference

DENVER (KDVR) — Douglas County Search and Rescue partnered with Colorado Parks and Wildlife for the first-ever Rocky Mountain SAR UAS Conference, held May 31 at the Highlands Ranch Law Enforcement Training Facility.
The event focused on search and rescue teams' usage of unmanned aerial systems, aka drones, during operations. The SAR team can use the tool to search large areas quickly, get an overhead look at a situation, scan the area using thermal cameras and communicate remotely with the people once located with a drone.
Parker police use drone to find child who didn't return from playground
It's something the Douglas County team is familiar with: In March, the Douglas County SAR was called to Roxborough State Park for two teenagers who got lost near Carpenter Peak. The team used drones to search for the teens and quickly located them after seeing a flashing light. Using the drone's technology, the team was able to have a family member communicate with the teenagers.
'From their standpoint, here they are lost in the wilderness, you know, you could hear dad coming over the speaker with some positive words of encouragement. I think it really uplifted their spirits,' drone lead Darren Keralla of DCSAR told FOX31's Kasia Kerridge. 'We can't receive audio, but we typically ask them if you're OK, give me a thumbs up, and they'll respond with a thumbs up. We can interpret a lot from their motions and what they're communicating back to us physically.'
The conference drew together over 60 drone professionals from over 25 agencies in Colorado, where they shared best practices and lessons learned.
'This event was an outstanding success,' said Brent Lounsbury, Emergency Management Coordinator for CPW, in a release. 'Douglas County SAR identified the need for an event where SAR UAS professionals could collaborate and learn from each other; it clearly hit the mark. We're really looking forward to this event coming around again next year, and it being an even larger success.'
Colorado's search and rescue teams are all staffed by volunteers, and CPW's Backcountry SAR program helps funnel funds from sales of the Keep Colorado Wild Pass, as well as hunting and fishing licenses, to search and rescue teams around the state. The pass costs $29 for Colorado residents and can be added to your vehicle registration.
CPW says clean boats make for happy lakes
CPW noted that modern drones have high-tech cameras and sensors that can provide inaccessible views for ground crews. The agency also uses drones for wildlife and land management.
'This conference allowed us to get everyone in a room, make contacts and share best practices. I particularly enjoyed the question and answer sessions after each presentation, where critical discussions and learning were exchanged peer-to-peer,' said Dave Miska, president of Douglas County SAR, in CPW's release.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Insider

an hour ago

• Business Insider

I tried barbecue burgers from 3 fast-food chains and ranked them from worst to best

I tried barbecue burgers from Burger King, Shake Shack, and Smashburger. Burger King had the most classic barbecue burger with lettuce, tomato, and bacon. But I liked Shake Shack's burger topped with fried onions the most. Tart, crunchy pickles, fried onions, and a hearty slathering of tangy, smoky barbecue sauce: that's what the best barbecue burgers are made of. For many people, barbecue sauce is a summer staple. The flavor profile is everywhere, from cookouts to the drive-thru line. But when it comes to which fast-food chain delivers the best bang for your buck with its barbecue burger, that's a little more up in the air. I tried barbecue burgers from Burger King, Shake Shack, and Smashburger to determine which chain offered the best taste and value. Here's how three fast-food barbecue burgers ranked, from worst to best. My least favorite of the three burgers I tried came from Smashburger. Smashburger, a Colorado-based chain now found across 34 states, sells a BBQ bacon smash burger for $10.86, excluding tax and fees, at my nearest location in Brooklyn, New York. It was the cheapest of the three burgers I tried. The burger came topped with pieces of crispy onions. The burger came topped with cheddar cheese, applewood smoked bacon, crispy fried onions, and barbecue sauce. Beneath a pile of crispy onion bits, I could clearly see the barbecue sauce, although overall, the burger looked and felt a little dry when I picked it up. I loved the bacon on this burger, but the burger was let down by an overcooked patty and the onions. The crispy onions seemed to soak up a lot of the moisture from the beef patty and the sauce in my mouth, leaving a dry bite. The burger patty was also dry and well-done. I'm not a fan of any burger cooked past medium, so this well-done patty simply wasn't doing it for me, but how a burger is cooked is a matter of personal preference. The cheese on the burger I tried also wasn't melted enough to provide enough moisture to counteract the dryness of the burger. However, the bacon on this burger blew me away. It was smoky and perfectly cooked. The barbecue burger from Burger King landed squarely in the middle of my ranking. I ordered the BBQ bacon Whopper Jr. and added cheese. It cost $11.09, excluding tax and fees, which I thought was a little pricey for a junior-sized burger. The burger had classic toppings like lettuce, tomato, and onion. The burger was served on a sesame seed bun and topped with barbecue sauce, mayonnaise, pickles, and strips of crispy bacon. The condiments, cheese, and juicy tomato added a lot of moisture to this burger without becoming soggy. I would order this burger again, but it didn't blow me away. The bacon was crispy, though not as flavorful as the bacon from the other two burgers I tried. However, I thought this was a great classic cheeseburger. The onions, lettuce, and tomato were fresh, and the beef was juicy while still retaining a smoky, chargrilled flavor. However, it tasted similarly to a classic Whopper, and I didn't get a strong barbecue flavor from it. It was a classic cheeseburger, but I was looking for more barbecue flavor. My favorite burger came from Shake Shack. Shake Shack, which has US locations in 30 states and Washington, DC, offers two different kinds of barbecue burgers: the Smoky Classic BBQ burger and the Carolina BBQ burger with fried pickles. I ordered the classic version, which is topped with fried onions and bacon. It cost $13.29, excluding tax and fees, making it the most expensive burger of the bunch. The burger came piled high with toppings and a hearty slathering of tangy barbecue sauce. The barbecue sauce evenly coated the soft, fluffy bun and all of the toppings. I was impressed by the size and thickness of the pickle slices, as well as the amount of crispy onions and bacon stacked on top of the burger patty. The cheese was perfectly melted, and the onions were crispy and mouthwatering. The cheese was evenly coated on every inch of the thin, crispy patty, and the bun held everything together while still retaining its softness. This Shake Shack burger blew me away. It tasted restaurant-quality. Though thin and crispy, the burger was still perfectly cooked at a medium temperature, and the onions, though crispy, weren't hard, crunchy, and dry like the onions on the Smashburger cheeseburger I tried. Rather than bits of cut-up onions that didn't have much flavor, these onions were more similar to onion rings, and instantly transported me back to summer carnivals and roadside stands. The pickles added a tart, crunchy flavor, and this was the only burger where I really tasted the barbecue sauce. It was smoky yet light and had a slight vinegar taste that balanced out the richer flavors of the cheese, beef, and bacon. Though it was the most expensive burger, I thought it was well worth the slightly higher price.

Yahoo

18 hours ago

• Yahoo

You've Heard Of Red Flags, But Here Are 10 'Pink Flags' To Pay Attention To In Relationships

People often talk about 'red flags' in the world of dating and relationships. These are signs that you and your partner are not compatible, or toxic behaviors and personality traits that you want to avoid. But there's also such a thing as 'pink flags.' 'Pink flags are those things that you notice, that nag at you,' said Tracy Ross, a licensed clinical social worker specializing in couples and family therapy. 'Maybe the first or second time you push them away, but after a few times, you begin to pay attention and ask yourself, 'Is this a flag that could be a deal breaker, or am I imagining it or overreacting, or is this something that can be addressed?'' Pink flags tend to be more subtle and less serious, but they can still pose some risk to a relationship. 'I think it's important to be mindful of pink flags, or points of anxiety in your relationship, but use them as opportunities to grow together and individually,' said Alysha Jeney, a therapist and owner of Modern Love Counseling in Denver. 'Don't ever dismiss your intuition, but also try to sit with it to be sure you aren't making assumptions or projecting onto your partner.' Although pink flags can vary from person to person and relationship to relationship, some occur more frequently than others. Below, Jeney, Ross, and other relationship experts break down 10 examples. 'If you've never argued before or don't argue really ever, this can be a 'pink flag,' because oftentimes it can be an indicator of both parties not being authentic enough in the relationship, and/or willing to be vulnerable enough to truly grow within the relationship,' Jeney said. She emphasized that arguing is not always a bad thing, and that couples need to learn how to deal with conflict effectively in order to have a successful relationship. 'It's a pink flag when difficult or uncomfortable conversations are avoided,' Ross noted. 'At first it seems like you are just having a good time, and then you notice you check yourself before bringing up something that could be tense or create controversy.' Instead of avoiding problems and letting them fester, try addressing them head-on and learning to communicate through difficult situations together. Otherwise, this pink flag may turn into a red flag. 'A potential pink flag might include a difference in how you express affection and want to receive it,' said Rachel Needle, a licensed psychologist and the co-director of Modern Sex Therapy Institutes. 'If you are someone who really enjoys physical touch like holding hands, kissing, and embracing often, and your partner does not, this might be OK for you in the beginning while you have all these other exciting and intense emotions, but not feel as good as time goes on and your needs remain unmet.' It can be helpful to learn and talk about your respective 'love languages' to understand the best ways to show each other affection. This might also be an opportunity to discuss expectations when it comes to communication. Damona Hoffman, an OkCupid dating coach and host of 'The Dates & Mates Podcast,' noted that many people want to communicate with their partner throughout the day. 'One of the most common topics I get questions about on 'Dates & Mates' is texting,' she said. 'For some people, daily texting is an imposition; for others, it's a red flag if they don't hear from their partner every day. That leaves us in pink flag territory where we might read it to be a sign of a relationship roadblock, when our partner simply has a different way of communicating or comfort level with constant connection.' 'Not sharing about what came before you, or who is in their life, might be a pink flag,' Ross said. Sure, it's natural to want to know all about your partner's life and experiences, and learning this takes time. But perhaps you feel like they're intentionally keeping information from you. 'If you sense your partner is hiding something from you, this can be a pink flag that needs some special reflection to help you identify whether or not you are being a bit too cautious from a past experience, or if you have valid reasons to explore further,' Jeney said. 'Your intuition is important, but sometimes it can be misguided if you aren't sure where it is coming from.' She recommended taking a moment to journal and ask yourself if you remember having similar feelings in a past relationship and if you might be projecting that experience onto this one. 'If you aren't sure, then simply talk to your partner about your anxiety without being accusatory,' she advised. 'Maybe it's just that you have a need or boundary that isn't being addressed. Maybe they have a need or boundary that isn't being addressed. Talking to each other can clear all this up, and if it doesn't, this may turn into a full-blown red flag.' 'If you find you are not sexually compatible, that might be a pink flag,' Needle said. 'Not all sex is spectacular at the beginning of a relationship, as it often gets better as we get to know someone and feel more connected and comfortable.' Pay attention to whether the issues are a matter of newness and simply needing to learn each other's turn-ons and desires, or if it's a longer-term concern. 'If after some time it hasn't improved even after communication, or there is sexual incompatibility i.e. your sexual preferences or styles don't align, this could create a much bigger issue moving forward,' Needle said. 'We can consider lack of consistency a pink flag because it could indicate that they are not reliable, possibly cheating and/or not being honest,' Jeney said. 'Most oftentimes, though, it could mean that your partner is human and just trying to do their best in navigating their own life and stressors. Sometimes they aren't able to be consistently open, happy, patient, available. Sometimes they are defensive, withdrawn, inattentive.' Other times, however, a lack of consistency might be a sign that something is off or there's a bigger issue at play. Your partner might be sending you unclear signals, or their ways of expressing affection or connection might be all over the place. 'Maybe they won't touch you in public but are all over you in private, or the opposite,' Ross said. 'Maybe there are boundaries that give you pause or make you uncomfortable, or they're not respecting your boundaries, only their own ― double standards.' Jeney recommended having a conversation with your partner with the intention of 'checking in,' rather than coming at it from a place of suspicion. Ask if they're doing OK, and if they feel comfortable sharing their concerns with you during stressful times. 'These questions are important to answer before jumping to conclusions and making more issues in the relationship than necessary,' she said. 'Another pink flag might have to do with distraction from technology and inability to be present,' Needle said. 'If your partner is constantly distracted with checking their phone, computer, or even watching television, especially during conversation or even sex, this could lead to a bigger issue if not discussed early on.' Be mindful of the different ways you both interact with technology and social media. Perhaps one of you posts photos of the other, or of the two of you as a couple, but the other never does. Consider whether this contrast bothers either of you, or is an indication of bigger issues beneath the surface. 'It can be a pink flag if you are seeing someone for several months with regularity and they won't define the relationship, [or] you find that you are not talking about what you want in a relationship,' Ross said. 'Maybe you are getting signals from the other person that they are just having a good time while you are looking for something more serious.' Perhaps the person you're seeing tries to avoid meeting or spending time with your friends and family. Again, it's important to feel open to communicating about the bigger picture of what your relationship is, and what it means to both of you. This kind of avoidance can be a sign that you're on different pages. 'Feeling emotionally safe in a relationship is essential for the relationship to be healthy, grow, and thrive,' said Sarah Weisberg, a licensed psychologist and founder of Potomac Therapy Group. 'We feel emotionally safe when we are respected, heard, validated, and supported in our relationships. Emotional safety happens when our partner makes an effort to understand and prioritize what matters most to us.' She noted that this should be reciprocal in all relationships, whether between friends, family members, or romantic partners. Anything that reduces a sense of emotional safety can be a pink flag. 'It could be forgetting to ask about your partner's big work presentation, failing to truly consider your partner's point of view on an important topic, not keeping your word, putting your needs ahead of your partner's, snapping, interrupting, leaving your partner hanging, rejecting bids for connection, etc.,' Weisberg said. 'A pink flag becomes problematic when emotional safety is compromised and there is not swift effort to repair the hurt.' You might find yourself in a relationship with a person who has a history of cheating, lying, or betraying. Or perhaps you have had this experience in the past. 'If your partner has been vulnerable enough to disclose to you that they have had a past they aren't proud of, you should appreciate their honesty first and foremost, because obviously we all have pasts and behaviors we have had to learn from,' Jeney said. 'Although your partner is being forthcoming and you feel they have changed, this could be considered a 'pink flag' to just be aware of.' She recommended giving your partner the benefit of the doubt and trusting them as much as you can without judging them for their past behaviors. 'But at the same time, be cautious of any potential patterns that show up in your relationship,' Jeney added. 'Time will naturally reveal if this is their character, or if these past experiences were, in fact, mistakes that you both have to let go of.' You might also want to pay attention if your partner is very close to their ex. Needle noted that this doesn't have to be a negative thing, depending on the nature of the relationship. 'If it is an unhealthy relationship filled with co-dependency and emotional lability on either side, or if there are unresolved feelings, this could create an issue in your relationship,' she explained. 'There need to be boundaries with any relationship, but especially with an ex-lover.' Relationships inevitably evolve over time, but some of these changes can be pink flags in themselves. 'Maybe you've stopped being intentional,' said Liz Higgins, a relational therapist and founder of Millennial Life Counseling. 'You're not putting intent into dating, nurturing your relationship, checking in with each other. Or your physical relationship has changed in [a] noticeable way. This wouldn't necessarily be a negative, but I see [it] as [a] 'pink' flag because it may represent a transition or impasse that is happening that you could benefit from talking about.' Addressing the changes, whether they're temporary or longer-term, can help bring you and your partner closer, and prevent the pink flags from turning pink flags have you noticed in your past relationships? Let us know in the article originally appeared on HuffPost.

CBS News

19 hours ago

• CBS News

Residents in Denver's Sloan's Lake neighborhood hoping for funding for lake cleanup

Residents near Sloan's Lake in Denver are worried about the lake's condition, and they're hoping voters can help. This November, voters will decide whether or not the City of Denver will get access to an $800 million Vibrant Denver Bond, money that would go towards a variety of projects. Officials said the bond would improve the city without raising taxes and would go towards public facilities like parks, rec centers, libraries, roads, bridges, police stations and cultural venues. Right now, there are over 220 projects across the city that want a part of that financing. In Sloan's Lake, a particularly ambitious proposal is already starting to gain traction among its residents. Former mayoral candidate and State Director of GreenLatinos Colorado, Ean Tafoya, used to visit the lake as a child, but the lake he remembers is very different from what it is now. "The lake becomes sick and is dying from the algae blooms and the dead fish," he explained. Just down the lake at the basketball courts another resident, Dominic Cordova, said he would also like to see the lake cleaned up. "People come from all over to see it, tourists and locals alike. It's real important that we keep the integrity of it," he said. He's seen the effects firsthand on the water. "I paddleboard in there as well. So, you can definitely tell. I don't know if there's algae, but there's definitely stuff in there sometimes," Cordova said. The City of Denver said the Parks and Recreation Lake Management Team is monitoring the lake for blue-green algae. According to the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, the organisms can "bloom" into dense concentrations, which produce toxins. The lake receives a large amount of stormwater runoff from across the watershed, said the city. They explained that the lake needs environmental improvements. The extent of this project would include dredging and deepening the lake, cleanup of the pipe infrastructure and pollutant control. Tafoya said the water is a vital resource. "We have to make that investment to protect the water, and it's super important. Coloradans and Denverites, they know how important water is in the west, and so, we have to do what we can to protect it." There are still many hurdles to go before it gets to a point where the various projects can try to secure some of the Vibrant Denver Bond. First and foremost is making sure that the money is even available via a vote this coming year.