New Zealand's Ability To Monitor Geohazards Weakened By Science Job Cuts
Press Release – PSA
The National GeoHazard Monitoring Centre, operated by GNS Science, provides round the clock monitoring of potential tsunamis, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and landslides, and was set up after the Kaikoura Earthquake in 2016.
The centre providing 24/7 monitoring of geohazards will have to close at times as Government cuts force the centre workforce to be cut to the bone.
The National GeoHazard Monitoring Centre, operated by GNS Science, provides round the clock monitoring of potential tsunamis, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and landslides, and was set up after the Kaikoura Earthquake in 2016.
Last year GNS Science announced plans to cut a quarter of the 20 strong team of Geohazard Analysts by attrition following funding cuts. Yesterday, with 18 of the team left, it called for voluntary redundancies and indicated that forced redundancies could follow if sufficient voluntary redundancies are not agreed.
'Cutting the team to the bone means there is a high chance the centre will close at times when a team member falls sick or is unavailable for whatever reason – how is this keeping New Zealanders safe?' said Fleur Fitzsimons, National Secretary for the Public Service Association for Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi.
Analysts work in teams of four, that is falling to three, but there must be at least two on each monitoring shift raising the risk of the centre closing due to staff absences.
'The Government needs to explain to New Zealanders why it views that this service is not as important as it was two years ago, before its funding cuts.
'Geohazard Analysts play a critical role in reviewing earthquake measurements to determine things like the magnitude and location of earthquakes and provide science advice to our emergency management services.
'The Government's decisions mean that this critical information may not be available to emergency management in times of need when lives are at risk. This is reckless for a country so vulnerable to geohazard risks like earthquakes and eruptions.
'This government does not value the role of science as we have seen with more than 400 jobs cuts throughout the sector, and a restructure announced this year with no new funding.
'The undermining of the National GeoHazard Monitoring Centre is yet another sad example of the Government's short-sighted cuts that we have seen across the public sector with little regard to the impacts on New Zealanders.'
Background
In September last year GNS Science announced plans to axe 59 roles, 10% of its workforce following Government funding cuts. The cuts shocked the international science community – 85 scientists from seven countries wrote an open letter to the Government stating that the cuts risk 'compromising essential geoscientific expertise and partnerships needed to address geohazards risks, which is critical for a country whose economy and community safety is so vulnerable to earthquakes, volcanoes, and climate change'.
The Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi is Aotearoa New Zealand's largest trade union, representing and supporting more than 95,000 workers across central government, state-owned enterprises, local councils, health boards and community groups.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
2 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Accident numbers putting pressure on ACC
Nearly half the population of Otago had active Accident Compensation Corporation injury claims last year, prompting the government agency to raise concerns about the financial pressure it was putting on the sustainability of the scheme. In 2024, there were 100,336 new injury claims and 124,269 active injury claims made to ACC from people in the Otago region, costing the taxpayer more than $312 million to help them recover. Otago's total population in 2024 was 251,300. ACC injury prevention leader James Whitaker said the number of injury claims and associated costs were the highest in the Otago region for the past five years, and the numbers reflected a nationwide trend. "In 2020, ACC accepted 90,375 injury claims from the Otago region at a cost of $189m. "To put it simply, more people are getting injured, and it is taking longer and costing more for them to recover." He said the data had showed ACC needed to look more seriously at raising collective awareness of the need to prevent injuries. In 2024, ACC accepted two million injury claims from 1.6 million New Zealanders, and it cost nearly $7b to help people recover from these injuries and to maintain some form of income (weekly compensation). A total of $4.4b of these costs went towards rehabilitation expenses. He said over the past 20 years, the costs of supporting New Zealanders with injuries had climbed from just under $1b in 2004, to nearly $4.4b in 2024. Mr Whitaker said the high number of injury claims and costs was putting pressure on the sustainability of the ACC scheme. "We want all New Zealanders to get the help and support they need when they're injured now and for many generations to come. "What we all need to do is be more mindful and present when there is injury risk present. If I get hurt, what is the impact on those people who I care about?" The most common injuries occurred at home or in the community (61,920 costing $167m); sport/recreation (26,660 costing $58m); and work (10,346 costing $66m). ACC Minister Scott Simpson said a report titled "Injuries in New Zealand" would be released annually to help raise the collective awareness and promote injury prevention. "ACC is a unique and world-leading scheme and one that we cannot afford to take for granted. "Injuries cause harm to the person injured, but they also put pressure on business productivity and on the financial position of the ACC scheme. "We need to safeguard ACC, so it is there to help and support our future generations. "One of the key areas [in which] we need to improve is reducing injuries." Whether it was at home and in our communities, at work, in sport and recreation or on our roads, the number of people getting injured was too high — especially considering most injuries were preventable, he said. Mr Whitaker said independent research indicated more New Zealanders were now taking actions to prevent injuries to themselves and other people. "By being present in the moments when there is injury risk, we can get the job done and continue to do the things we love. "This is far better than experiencing pain, creating flow-on effects for friends and family, and facing a long rehabilitation."
Otago Daily Times
9 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Diagnosis is that team work is needed
Gil Barbezat asks what is needed for vital healthcare reform. For many years, New Zealanders have enjoyed state-provided medical services. An ageing and growing population, technological development and practice refinements mean our medical workforce and infrastructure no longer meet evolving needs. Daily media critiques of shortcomings in our healthcare expose serious problems. Decline in access and equity of services Healthcare problems have increased steadily since the 1990s introduction of neoliberal health policies. Recent surveys of OECD countries suggested New Zealand generally provided good care, but problems were identified relating to access and equity. Differences between patients of high- and low-income, urban or rural residence and ethnic and gender issues feature prominently among our troublesome statistics. Politicians of various persuasions have failed to maintain their obligations towards modern patient-based services. Neglecting maintenance of hospital buildings and development for decades is now predictably taking its toll. What is required? • Staffing needs Medical professional education at our two existing medical schools needs greater support. Access to foreign graduates becomes difficult in a competitive healthcare labour market. Patient-related clinical experience in public (not private) hospitals is essential for professional training. Clinic- and hospital-based specialist services should be staffed and equipped to modern standards. Hard decisions are required to determine where these services are made available. Some (e.g., organ transplantation) will remain in major centres. • Working environment Collaborative teamwork at all levels is required for successful staff recruitment and retention. Existing staff are frustrated by insufficient operating and procedure time allocation to meet patient demand. Morbidity and mortality increase, particularly for cancer and heart conditions. Negotiating salary scales with staff who are overworked and have insufficient support while struggling in crumbling facilities is unnecessarily antagonistic. Outsourcing patients to private facilities relies predominantly on the same staff, merely shifting the venue and diluting public hospital staff at increased cost. GPs provide the backbone of our system; more are urgently needed, especially in rural areas. Services should be integrated collaboratively with accessible specialist services (investigations and treatments). The current situation where GP practices become a cul de sac for patients normally requiring specialist care elsewhere is frustrating, dangerous and costs lives. • Operational management Medical professionals provide medical advice at the interface between clinical demands and the community. In the current environment, that treatment or advice is too often futile as it has become unavailable. Crucial decisions are determined by budgets allocated by politicians and implemented by appointed managers, neither of whom have direct contact with patients. Clinicians exceeding budgets are regarded as inefficient. More clinical input is essential in determining budgets. Administrators and politicians laud evidence-based management outputs, but resist attempts to measure the gap between patient demand and service delivery. They evade accountability for service deficiencies by actively avoiding the collection of data on that topic. Budget adjustments — who pays? State-run public healthcare systems are most economical. Private practice remains a choice. Two-tiered healthcare, where timely diagnosis and treatment are available only to those who can afford to pay, is unacceptable. Some claim they would give anything to regain their health and be happy to pay for it. But what happens to those who cannot afford anything beyond their daily living costs? Early care saves future expense. Dollars spent on healthcare return a handsome dividend. Preventive medicine is cost-effective, but requires time and appropriate investment in staff and infrastructure. ACC delivering prompt access to fully funded treatment has improved outcomes. Despite its expense, care is more accessible and equitable compared to that for other medical conditions. Some similar funding stream could be found for other services. Any public-private partnership (PPP) includes investors' profit. PPPs provided rapid improvement to an ailing United Kingdom National Health Service system in the 1990s, only to lead to eventual added expense when inevitable interest payments became increasingly burdensome. Procedures are more expensive in the private sector. Just as wine is far more expensive in a restaurant, healthcare is far more expensive in the private sector. Public service costs could be regarded as wholesale rates, avoiding the markup inevitable in profit-driven systems. Profiteering is not confined to supermarkets. Despite the highest per capita spending on health, the United States has the worst health statistics among most OECD countries. Meeting the health requirements of New Zealanders requires further investment of government funds, but money is not of sole importance. Happy and productive staff deliver the best collaborative and economical care. Better staffed public hospitals serve more contented communities. Our government recently found a large financial cache to increase military spending. Is universal healthcare less important? Revenue generation through some form of equitable, innovative taxation must provide much needed additional funding. Urgent collaborative action required Collaboration beyond party politics is required for equitable access to good clinical care for all Kiwis. Health outcome measurements can monitor the success or failure of their actions. • Gil Barbezat is an emeritus professor of medicine.
Scoop
14 hours ago
- Scoop
Don't Steal The Super South's Last Govt Head Office
Press Release – Dr Colin Meurk ONZM Unless the South Island leaders stand up to be heard on this issue now, the govt will get away with further undermining balanced and shared regional development that is resilient and supports meaningful, respectful nationhood, says Dr Colin Meurk … 'Time is running out.' That from one of Aotearoa's leading ecologists and environmental academics, Dr Colin Meurk ONZM. Dr Meurk has written to MPs, iwi contacts, academics, and local Councillors, highlighting dire consequences of losing the last Government head offices to the North Island. 'In mid-March, Government announced that the Crown Research Institutes (CRIs) will be amalgamated into three new Public Research Organisations (PROs) by early October. It's clear that there's lobbying to get the head offices located in the 'golden triangle' (Auckland, Tauranga, Hamilton). This seems to be confirmed by an evasive answer to a recent question at Parliament during Scrutiny Week, related to where the headquarters will be,' he says. The amalgamation of Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research, Plant & Food, Scion and AgResearch into the so-called Bioeconomy PRO, officially commences on July 1st. Currently, the head offices of Manaaki Whenua and AgResearch are located in Lincoln near Christchurch, but the CEOs of those organisations and other Government science advisors all reside in the North Island. 'Removing our last head offices is just not on and would be a symbolic kick in the guts for the South Island,' says Dr Meurk. 'Te Waipounamu is thriving and a key part of the national representation of bioscience and agriculture. Not having a head office here in the South will negatively affect our status, voice, career pathways, and importance as well as the strength and resilience of the overall sector, nationally, not to mention the administrative funding into the local economy which will be shredded from local offices of the new PRO.' Dr Meurk says that it's misguided for a Minister of Science and Innovation, Dr Shane Reti, to state that the amalgamation is designed to 'maximise the value of Government funding and drive economic growth'. Business as usual is almost certainly unfit for looming crises that will demand critical, multi-lensed, outside-the-square science and innovation. 'I see this as continued hollowing out of the South Island,' he says. 'The south is experiencing unprecedented growth and popularity, yet government is failing to grasp the opportunities in our unique public research sector and leadership that is already well-established at Lincoln and the wider region. Climate and geo-tectonic risk, especially up north, demands government infrastructure be regionally spread; we must not put all our governance eggs in one basket.' 'Our Prime Minister is in China right now promoting Aotearoa as a place for students including agricultural students, to study. It seems totally counter-intuitive that the last head office here should be disconnected from the centre of New Zealand's agricultural and tourism enterprise, and our affordable living,' says Meurk. 'I'm somewhat surprised that South Island leaders have not voiced more concern. Unless they stand up to be heard on this issue now, the government will get away with further undermining balanced and shared regional development that is resilient and supports meaningful, respectful nationhood,' he says. Dr Meurk ONZM is standing in the 2025 local body elections for Environment Canterbury in Ōpuna – Christchurch West Additional Over the past 33 years, the South Island had at least two central Government Head Offices (HO) – for Crop & Food and Landcare Research CRIs. A decade or so ago, Crop & Food was amalgamated with Hort Research to form Plant & Food, and their head office was moved to Hamilton/Auckland. Meanwhile, AgResearch's head office was moved to Lincoln. In mid-March the Government announced that the Crown Research Institutes (CRIs) will amalgamate four Crown Research Institutes (CRIs) to form three new and more focused Public Research Organisations (PROs) in early October. Legislation to formally establish the PROs will follow in 2026. There are plans underway to locate the head office to Hamilton, likely supported by Plant & Food, the CEO of Landcare Research, the interim chief of the PRO, and Sir Peter Gluckman (key Science advisor to Government) who are all based in the North Island. 'The cards are stacked to further hollow out the South unless concerted joint pressure is exerted by Councils and Iwi of the South.' Colin Meurk Lincoln University This unique University has experienced significant growth in student numbers over the past few years. In 2025, Lincoln is ranked within the top 25% of universities globally in the QS World University Rankings. Specific numbers for qualifications conferred show a 22% increase in 2025, with 1,613 qualifications conferred compared to 1,320 in 2024. In 2024, numbers exceeded 5,000 students for the first time. This was a 21% increase in student headcount in 2024 compared to 2023. The university's strong performance is attributed to a robust portfolio of relevant research. Research Income: External research income has increased, rising by 8% to $35 million. Factors Contributing to Growth: Lincoln University's growth is linked to its focus on land-based and environmental subjects, strong industry connections, and high graduate employment rates, which are currently at 84%, according to The Press. Vice-Chancellor Professor Grant Edwards has said that the strong growth signals Lincoln University's increasing influence in shaping the future of the land-based sectors in Aotearoa and globally. Canterbury University In the top 1% of world universities. Student numbers approaching 25 000 and upsurge in overseas students.
