Gaza Humanitarian Foundation Initiative 'Outrageous': UN Probe Chief

The use of the US and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation to distribute food in the Palestinian territory is "outrageous", the head of a UN inquiry said Wednesday.
Navi Pillay, who chairs the UN's Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Israel and the Palestinian territories, joined a growing chorus of criticism of the GHF's operations, and cited its US links.
"In every war, the siege and starvation surely leads to death," the former UN rights chief told journalists.
"But this initiative of what's called a foundation, a private foundation, to supply food, is what I see as outrageous, because it involves the United States itself, the government, and it turns out, as we watch daily, that people who go to those centres are being killed as they seek food."
An officially private effort with opaque funding, GHF began operations on May 26 after Israel completely cut off supplies into Gaza for more than two months, sparking warnings of mass famine.
The United Nations and major aid groups have refused to cooperate with the foundation over concerns it was designed to cater to Israeli military objectives.
Dozens of Palestinians have been killed while trying to reach GHF distribution points.
Pillay said the commission would "have to look into... the policy purpose and how it's being effected.
"We have to spell out what is the motive of, right now, the killing of people who are coming for humanitarian aid from this so-called foundation -- and that lives are being lost just in trying to secure food for their children."
Unprecedented in its open-ended scope, the three-person Commission of Inquiry was established by the UN Human Rights Council in May 2021 to investigate alleged violations of international humanitarian and human rights law in Israel and the Palestinian territories.
South African former High Court judge Pillay, 83, served as a judge on the International Criminal Court and presided over the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda.
On Tuesday she presented the commission's latest report to the Human Rights Council.
It said Israel had attacked Gaza's schools, religious and cultural sites as part of a "widespread and systematic" assault on the civilian population, in which Israeli forces have committed "war crimes" and "the crime against humanity of extermination".
Israel does not cooperate with the investigation and has long accused it of "systematic anti-Israel discrimination". Navi Pillay served as a judge on the International Criminal Court AFP Dozens of Palestinians have been killed while trying to reach GHF distribution points AFP

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

DW

44 minutes ago

• DW

Israel says it launched strikes on Iran missile facilities – DW – 06/21/2025

Renewed strikes in Israel and Iran come after Tehran ruled out a return to nuclear talks until Israel halts its strikes, and Israel's army told Israelis to brace for a "prolonged campaign." According to Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar's estimates, Israel's attacks on Iran have slowed down the Islamic Republic's development of a nuclear bomb by several years. "I believe, according to the assessments we hear, we have already delayed their ability to obtain a nuclear bomb by at least two or three years," Saar said in an interview with the German tabloid newspaper. "The fact that we have eliminated those individuals who led and advanced the weaponization of the nuclear program is extremely important in terms of the results," he said. "We have already achieved a lot. But we will do whatever we can. We will not stop until we have done everything possible to eliminate this threat," Saar said. The conflict between Israel and Iran erupted a week ago with Israeli airstrikes targeting nuclear and military sites, top generals and nuclear scientists. The Iranian state news agency Tasnim named the "martyred" scientists as "Abdolhamid Minouchehr, Ahmadreza Zolfaghari, Amirhossein Feqhi, Motalleblizadeh, Mohammad Mehdi Tehranchi and Fereydoun Abbasi." Israel is convinced that Iran is trying to build a nuclear weapon, an accusation that Iranian leadership has repeatedly rejected. Iran has maintained that its nuclear program is meant for civilian rather than military purposes. However, experts and the International Atomic Energy Agency, the UN watchdog which inspects nuclear facilities, have questioned and criticized the Iranian claims. The German air force evacuated 64 citizens from Israel who arrived in Cologne on Friday. The Airbus A400M military aircraft touched down at Cologne/Bonn Airport. This is the first time the German air force has flown German citizens out of Israel since the conflict with Iran escalated about a week ago. The group of German citizens was flown out of Israel as part of a "diplomatic evacuation," the German government said. "The flights were carried out at short notice in close coordination with the Israeli authorities and were primarily intended for families with children and other vulnerable persons." In the past two days, Germany had begun evacuating its citizens on special flights, though not directly from Israel, but rather from Jordan. Around 2:30 a.m. in Israel (2330 GMT on Friday), the Israeli military warned of an incoming missile barrage from Iran, triggering air raid sirens across parts of central Israel, including Tel Aviv, as well as in the Israeli-occupied West Bank. Israel said its defense system intercepted the missiles over Tel Aviv. The Israeli air force also said Saturday it had launched a new wave of airstrikes against missile storage and launch sites in central Iran, on the ninth day of conflict between the two countries. Israel's armed forces chief, Eyal Zamir, warned that his country should be "ready for a prolonged campaign" against Iran, as the war entered its second week. Zamir's statement echoed earlier remarks by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who said the fighting would continue "for as long as it takes." A meeting of the foreign ministers of three European countries with their Iranian counterpart, Abbas Araghchi, came to an end Friday in Geneva, with the ministers from Germany and France voicing hope over future talks. Araghchi, meanwhile, said Iran would not return to talks about its nuclear program until Israeli "aggression ceases and the aggressor is held accountable for its committed crimes." US President Donald Trump said on Friday Iran has a "maximum" of two weeks to avoid possible US military strikes, one day after stating he would decide within a fortnight whether to take action. Welcome to DW's coverage of the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran. The nuclear talks in Geneva ended on Friday with no conclusion. The date for the next round of talks has not been decided. Meanwhile, Iran and Israel have resumed attacks against each other. In addition to the latest news, this blog will bring you photos, videos, analyses and on-the-ground reporting from DW correspondents.

DW

14 hours ago

• DW

Iran: Can war with Israel trigger regime change? – DW

The Islamist regime in Tehran has been using the conflict with Israel to rally support and unify the Iranian people behind them. But can Iran's current system really survive the crisis? "Iran will not surrender and will continue to defend itself," Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader of Iran, told the public in a televised speech this week, following days of Israeli bombing and Iran's retaliatory strikes. His exact location is unclear. Rumors and hints from the US and the Israeli governments indicate that he could be personally targeted at some point by an Israeli air strike. If Khamenei is assassinated, he would share the fate of many high-ranking members of his regime who have been killed in recent days. And this has prompted many to ask — how can a regime that fails to protect its own top officials be trusted to protect Iran's borders? "Despite all claims [by the Iranian government] about missile defense or protecting command centers, the absolute inefficiency of this regime has become apparent to the public," exiled Iran expert and sociologist Majid Golpour told DW. Iran's Khamenei defies Trump's call to surrender To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Could this weakness bring about the collapse of the Islamist regime? According to Golpour, this mostly depends on its political alternative. "Now is the time for the nation's political forces to present a common charter — both against the ruling system and against outside threats. But there are still no concrete plans, functioning coalitions and viable structures inside the opposition," Golpour said. Opposition in Iran battered for decades But finding common ground is easier said than done. Even outside Iran, opponents of the regime are split into rival groups. One faction of the Iranian diaspora regards the eldest son of the ousted Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi as a possible interim ruler — or at least a symbol of national unity. Since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, Prince Reza Pahlavi has mostly been living in the US and has tried to position himself as a political leader and opponent of the Islamic Republic. He has no political organization active on Iranian soil. And that's no surprise — the Islamist regime has been suppressing dissenting voices inside Iran for many decades. Any person posing a possible threat to the regime is discredited, harassed, arrested and often sentenced to long prison terms. Still, political scientist Shukriya Bradost, a non-resident scholar at the Middle East Institute, a US-based think tank, believes there is a chance of a political shift. Iranians protest Israeli strikes To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Bradost believes that a political vacuum could emerge if the regime gets seriously weakened. This would allow opposition groups to organize protests and strikes, and enact wide-reaching change. Will war make Iranians more patriotic? A deciding factor during wartime is the feeling of patriotism linking Iranians to their country. This sense of unity helped the Islamist regime stabilize after the 1979 revolution. When Iraq, under Saddam Hussein, attacked Iran in 1980, people rallied behind the country and persevered through eight years of war that cost the country up to 1 million Iranian lives. The Islamist leaders are once again using nationalist rhetoric to firm up support. "The Islamic Republic has recognized that people no longer identify with the idea of a 'nation of Islam,' but rather see themselves as citizens of Iran. No sensible person can be fooled by this staged nationalism," political scientist and journalist Shahran Tabari told DW. It is however difficult to ascertain what people of Iran feel at this time — except for fear and anger about the escalating conflict happening without their consent. Waiting for Trump's decision Nobel Peace Prize laureate Narges Mohammadi, famous for her fight for women's rights in Iran, recently called on Israel to stop its attacks and urged a truce across the Middle East. "I want to ask President Trump — not only not to join this war, but to stop it," she said in a video message carried by US broadcaster CNN. Meanwhile, the West seems to be divided on Iran and without a clear strategy for a regime change. While some voices in the US, like former National Security Adviser John Bolton, call for a military intervention, US President Donald Trump seem to be hesitant — for now. Iran's exiled prince urges global support for Iranian people To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video This article was originally published in German

DW

14 hours ago

• DW

Why justice is crucial in the US-led DRC-Rwanda peace deal – DW – 06/20/2025

Civic society organizations fear the consequences of an agreement that overlooks justice for crimes committed by armed groups, as the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda prepare to sign a peace agreement on June 27. The Democratic Republic of the Congo government and Rwanda will be the chief signatories of the peace agreement, with little or no involvement from the rebel groups currently occupying the eastern parts of Goma under the Congo River Alliance. Technical teams from Rwanda and Congo initiated a draft on Wednesday in the US-mediated peace process. Analysts, however, say the sticking point could be the implementation. "The reason why we have a challenge with all these peace deals is because, we keep including clauses for amnesty. It means it is justice delayed," said Kambale Musavili from the Center for Research on Congo-Kinshasa. "What it signals to armed groups committing crimes on the ground is that you can pick up guns and blackmail the Congolese government to negotiations. The Americans are making the same posture, unfortunately they are going to reinvigorate the same militia groups," Musavili added. The conflict in eastern Congo has displaced thousands, especially women and children Image: TONY KARUMBA/AFP Concerns have also been raised about the details of the deal, which are yet to be made public to the Congolese. "What we are experiencing here is not really new. But now, what are the operational commitments that will be put in place?," said Professor Philippe-Doudou Kaganda, Scientific Director of the Center for Research and Study on Conflict and Peace in the Great Lakes Region. "It is precisely here that there is a risk that we will not have a realistic agreement on certain aspects and that could possibly lead the belligerents to strengthen their demands and continue to wage war." Cautious optimism The Congolese civil society is optimistic but cautions thathistory may repeat itself if the deal is not carefully handled. "Certainly, this is an agreement that we are longing for," Hyprocat Marume, President of the South Kivu civil society, said. "But it should have been signed since the capture of Bunagana, instead of letting our people die first and leaving us in a crisis situation." Marume stressed that the Congolese government must help its citizens to live in peace and tranquillity. "Taking up arms to demand positions, we must ensure that this experience never happens again." Previous ceasefires between Kinshasa and Kigali have often failed, but Washington hopes this one will stick and bring economic opportunities. The draft peace deal aims to end fighting in eastern Congo, where Rwandan-backed M23 rebels made significant advances at the beginning of the year, capturing the strategic city of Goma and the town of Bukavu. "The agreement includes provisions on respect for territorial integrity and a prohibition of hostilities, disengagement, disarmament, and conditional integration of non-state armed groups," said a statement posted to the US State Department's website. The deal also includes provisions for facilitating the return ofrefugees and internally displaced persons, as well as ensuring humanitarian access and establishing a regional economic integration framework. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio (C) has been leading the peace agreement between Rwanda and Congo Image: AP Will Trump's gamble pay off in the DRC? US Secretary of State Marco Rubio will witness the official signing ceremony next week. The agreement announced on Wednesday builds on a declaration of principles signed between the two countries in April. It will signal a breakthrough for President Donald Trump's administration's push to halt the conflict in eastern Congo and attract billions of dollars in Western investment to the mineral-rich region. However, it is unclear whether the Congo River Alliance — a coalition of rebel groups that includes the M23 — will adhere to it. The Democratic Republic of Congo is hoping to secure peace and security backed by the Americans. In return, the US will benefit from a minerals exchange deal estimated to be worth around $2 trillion (€1.7 trillion), which will be made available to US companies for extraction. In Congo, coveted cobalt mined by child laborers To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Rwanda and Congo twice reached agreements last year under Angola's mediation on troop withdrawal and joint operations against the FDLR rebel group, which Rwanda accuses of perpetrating the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi. However, ministers from both countries failed to endorse the deals. Angola stepped down as a mediator in March after several failed attempts to resolve the escalating Rwanda-backed rebel offensive in eastern Congo. Fighting intensified this year as Rwanda-backed M23 rebels advanced to seize the region's two largest cities, displacing thousands of people. Congo accuses Rwanda of supporting M23 with troops and arms, while Rwanda denies helping the group and says its forces are acting in self-defense. Edited by: Chrispin Mwakideu