Jets at 2025 NHL Draft: Evaluating 12 options for Winnipeg with pick No. 28

Barring trades, the Winnipeg Jets will pick 28th at this year's draft. There's pressure to do well with this one: Winnipeg didn't have a first-round pick last year and 2021 first-rounder Chaz Lucius recently announced his retirement due to Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. The Jets' prospect pool does have exciting players — Elias Salomonsson, Brayden Yager, Brad Lambert and Colby Barlow most of all — but it's thinner than Winnipeg is used to.
Advertisement
So, who is likely to be available when they pick at 28? Who should Winnipeg choose?
Here are 12 options, with analysis from Corey Pronman and Scott Wheeler — plus my view on how each individual player could fit into the Jets' future success.
Please note that this piece borrows heavily from the deep, detailed reports provided by Pronman and Wheeler. Their latest top prospects pieces are linked below; use them for an even deeper look at Winnipeg's potential draft options.
Pronman's report (27): Brzustewicz played a notable role on a strong London team this season, appearing at times on both special teams. He's a tall right-shot who skates well and doesn't shy from using his feet to jump up into the attack … I could see more offence coming from him with more opportunity.
Ates' angle: A big, mobile, right-handed defenceman sounds so much like the ideal Jets draft pick that Pronman chose Brzustewicz for Winnipeg in his most recent mock draft. The connections get closer, still, with Brzustewicz teaming up with Jets 2023 fifth-round pick, Jacob Julien, to win the Memorial Cup. The Knights are a dominant OHL team known for leaning heavily on their stars, sometimes inflating their draft year projections — but Brzustewicz didn't get that treatment. That's why both of our analysts see room for him to grow with a bigger role.
Wheeler's report (31): Nobody works harder. He can play both center and wing … He's competitive and has a good stick on lifts and disruptions. He makes plays quickly. He can be a menace on the forecheck. But he's also got some vision, with an ability to find the secondary wave on the ice and get pucks off the wall and to the interior.
Ates' angle: Again, with Florida's second straight Stanley Cup on everybody's mind, I'm guessing elite forecheckers who play with NHL size and speed and can play all three forward positions will have extra cachet on draft day. Zonnon plays the kind of all-around game with a lot of subtle strengths and relatively few weaknesses that gives him a high floor and a playoff-ready middle-six ceiling. If I'm right about teams' draft day thinking, Zonnon may be off the board before the Jets pick — despite our experts' rankings of 31 and 41.
Advertisement
Pronman's report (42): Skates well, has good puck skills and can make creative plays with the puck. I wouldn't describe him as a top-tier playmaker, but he sees the ice well enough. Moore's compete has come into question at times this season, and he's certainly inconsistent, but he has the ability to be effective down low and can kill penalties.
Ates' angle: It's tough to watch Florida win the Stanley Cup and get fired up about players whose 'compete' gets listed as a weakness. That said, Moore seems capable of getting to the danger areas and improved his play enough down the stretch to feel projectable as an NHL centre. He's a wiry, big-framed player who Wheeler believes will add yet more muscle and power to his game. Even if he tops out as a bottom-six centre, the Jets do need some insulation beyond 30-plus stalwarts such as Mark Scheifele and Adam Lowry. Yager is the only blue-chip centre in the system; I'm still thinking Lambert's best bet is on the wing.
Wheeler's report (40): He finished the year above a point per game as their top scorer and he's a centre who has been counted upon to play an important role on both special teams (he tracks and angles well on the PK, is strong, protects pucks well and took on defensive assignments) and is credited for his well-rounded game on and off the puck.
Ates' angle: The more I look into U.S. NTDP players, the more I prefer McKinney to Moore, although critics of McKinney's game point to a 'vanilla' skill set without a clearly identifiable NHL strength. I tend to like it when the Jets make ambitious swings at the end of the first round (such as Lambert, whose explosive talent and precipitous draft day fall made him feel like a high-risk, high-reward type of pick.) McKinney feels more like a David Gustafsson type of pick — probably 'safer' and probably with a bottom-six NHL ceiling.
Pronman's report (35): Vansaghi played limited minutes on a top NCAA team in Michigan State this season. Despite his role, he still showed a lot of traits that will appeal to NHL teams. He's got a very high skill level, especially for a forward of his size. He beats defenders one-on-one routinely and has a ton of imagination with the puck.
Advertisement
Ates' angle: Wouldn't you know it: Right after I complain about low ceilings, we get to discuss Vansaghi, whose physical tools give him a chance to pop — if he can add a bit of footspeed or if he can learn to make his reads with more of an impact player's pace. I tend to be wary of players with below-average footspeed unless they have high-end hockey sense to make up for it. (For a perhaps unwelcome example: Rutger McGroary gives up footspeed to most NHL players, but his read of the game does imply middle-six possibilities to me.) Thus, I get concerned when I see Pronman rate Vansaghi's hockey sense as 'below average.'
Wheeler's report (44): Wang's an extraordinarily mobile player for his size, with impressive skating technique through his inside and outside edges laterally and flowing mechanics going north or back to pucks. And while his handling still needs a little refinement, he's got some skill, can play with fearless confidence (which I wanted him to show more of and skate more pucks in the OHL instead of deferring), and has the heavy shot you'd expect.
Ates' angle: I'm sorry, but you're telling me that Wang is 6-foot-6, 222 pounds, and is 'extraordinarily mobile' and a 'premium' athlete? That's the kind of long term bet I'm willing to make — despite the questions about Wang's hockey sense. He's still 17 years old and has just played half a season for Oshawa in the OHL — if he's going to become an NHL player, he's going to need many, many more reps against elite players his own age. His size, mobility, backstory and late-blooming status remind me of Johnathan Kovacevic as a Jets comparable — years away from pro impact, but has the tools to be helpful if his college career goes well.
Pronman's report (32): He's huge at 6-foot-6 and quite athletic in how easily he gets around the ice. That athleticism is also why he is being recruited as a D-1 football player. … The speed and skill for his size are very unique. … The team that drafts him will bank on him not being fully developed yet, and ideally, him picking hockey full-time.
Ates' angle: Another 6-foot-6 prospect with great athleticism and good mobility, another player I view as worth investing in — if it's clear that West wants to pursue NHL hockey as opposed to college football. To be clear, he's not a burner — he's mobile for his size more so than a top-end skater — but West has good hockey sense and is seen as a 'true' centre (that is: not someone who will immediately get moved to wing by his NHL team.) It's possible that he picks football or that West's relative lack of offence compared to other players on this list make him a second-round pick as opposed to Winnipeg's choice at No. 28. I wouldn't be put off by a 'draft and follow' if the same scouting staff that picked Kieron Walton in the sixth round last year believed in West this time around.
Wheeler's report (24): They called him 'The Wizard' at Shattuck, and he lives up to it. The lightning-quick, puck-on-a-string hands. The shiftiness. The clairvoyant vision and eyes on the back of his head. The touch and finesse on passes. The feel. The natural release … Not that long ago, he was 5-foot-7, and now he's closer to 6-feet, and he still has room to grow and get stronger. If he can improve his skating, he'll become a top offensive player in college.
Ates' angle: I recently argued for the Jets to choose Lee in our staff mock draft, likening a bet on the silky-mitted Madison product to the play Winnipeg made on Lambert in 2022. (The difference in that year's case was that Winnipeg had two first-round picks and had already made a 'safe' bet on McGroarty at No. 14.) In Lee's case, the appeal is in his elite hands and the idea that he's in the midst of a dramatic growth spurt; Lee is a below average skater but the idea is that his wheels may catch up once he stops growing quite so quickly. If the Jets have any reason to believe his feet will catch up to his hands, I think Lee would be a bet worth making late in the first round.
Advertisement
Pronman's report (28): He's a very skilled big man who can make small-man-type plays in tight areas. He sees the ice at a high level and has a creative offensive mind. Horcoff is also good enough in the hard areas and can play the body when he needs to.
Ates' angle: Horcoff left the U.S. NTDP to join Michigan partway through last season, making a more impressive impact for his college team than he did for the American program. He has good puck skill for his size and plays an athletic, competitive game that makes him hard to play against. His dad, Shawn, was not a burner when he was drafted but went on to win the fastest skater competition at the 2008 NHL All-Star Game — for this potentially irrational reason, I read Horcoff's highly athletic but medium-paced scouting reports without a lot of concern. He strikes me as the kind of player who will be a productive version of a bottom-six centre if he doesn't make it further up the lineup.
Wheeler's report (26): Gastrin's habits and details are there at an early age. He's not a dynamic offensive player, but he handles it well, makes plays around the net and below the goal line, and seems to really understand timing and spacing. He's also got a natural shot and release that I expect him to show more of as he learns to attack for himself more.
Ates' angle: Gastrin is the captain of his age group for Team Sweden and had some spectacular moments at the Ivan Hlinka tournament last summer, including an eight-point game against Team Switzerland. I think he's the kind of big, responsible centre brimming with intangibles that the Jets would love to draft — if he's still available to them at 28. He's one of the hardest-working players in this draft class, shoots well and doesn't have any real holes in his game.
Pronman's report (30): Prokhorov is a huge winger with very good hands. He can make a lot of skilled plays in open ice, at full speed and in traffic. He's a very physical forward who leans into guys with his big body and plays a direct style. Prokhorov isn't blazing fast, but he moves well for his size and can skate at the higher levels.
Ates' angle: There are a ton of big players on this list — I'm sure you've noticed — but it's more about the quality of the prospect than hunting for size with the Jets specifically in mind. Prokhorov may have less appeal than big centres such as Horcoff and West, given the Jets' relative strength on the wing, but he makes great use of his size in the danger areas in front of the net. It's a little odd to think of the Jets picking a winger without high-end skating — their homegrown stars, Kyle Connor, Nikolaj Ehlers are great skaters — but then I think of Vilardi and Perfetti's effectiveness and the idea doesn't seem so absurd.
Wheeler's report (21): He's a worker with legit skill and smarts. That combination of effort, sense and talent really blends well together at the junior level, and though he looks a little lean, it doesn't present itself in his game because of his work rate off the puck. I do find he can slow the play down a little too much at times, but he thinks it at a very high level.
Advertisement
Ates' angle: Kindel is skilled, he's fast, he's lauded for his compete level and he can create offence in a lot of different ways. It's the sort of profile that would dazzle were he not listed at 5-foot-10 and will almost certainly make him a first-round pick regardless of that caveat. Talent plus work ethic is a dangerous combination and I'll admit I'm biased toward any prospect with 'hard to play against' as a realistic descriptor of their play — as long as they score well, which Kindel definitely did: 99 points in 65 WHL games despite being 17 for most of the season.
(Top photo of Henry Brzustewicz: Kevin Sousa / Getty Images)

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Fox News

20 minutes ago

• Fox News

Caitlin Clark has rare shooting woes as Fever fall to Valkyries following fiery Sun matchup

The Indiana Fever did not have to come to Caitlin Clark's defense this time, but the Golden State Valkyries did not make it easy on her on Thursday night. Clark, coming off a game that involved a lot of extracurricular activity after the whistle between herself and the Connecticut Sun, was not her usual sharp-shooting self in the Fever's 88-77 loss to the Valkyries on the road. Clark shot just 3-of-14 from the field, including her seven failed three-point attempts going through the hoop, as the Fever ended up blowing a 13-point lead in this game to fall to 6-6 on the year. Clark tallied 11 points, nine assists and seven rebounds, while turning the ball over six times to Golden State. While Clark struggled from beyond the arc, her teammates did not fare that much better. As a team, the Fever shot just 8-of-29 from three-point land, with Sophie Cunningham, who had been dubbed Clark's "bodyguard" on the court after the previous game against the Sun, being the only one to hit more than one of her attempts. Meanwhile, the Valkyries, led by Kayla Thornton's 16-point night with five three-pointers, now own the same 6-6 record. Golden State also saw major contributions off the bench, with Tiffany Hayes (14 points, five assists, three rebounds), Chloe Bibby (12 points, three rebounds, one assist) and Laeticia Amihere (10 points, three rebounds, three assists) all helping their team overcome a double-digit deficit in the end. For Indiana, Aliyah Boston led the team with 17 points, while Kelsey Mitchell (16 points) and Natasha Howard (13 points) all landed in double digits in that category. However, turnovers played a large factor in the Fever losing their lead, as the Valkyries forced 17 total while committing just seven. This uncharacteristic performance from Clark specifically comes after getting poked in the eye and being shoved to the ground in a very physical WNBA Commissioner's Cup game against the Sun on Tuesday night. Clark was being guarded by Jacy Sheldon when the Sun guard poked her in the eye, and the Fever superstar retaliated by pushing her away. That led to the Sun's Marina Mabrey running over and shoving Clark to the ground while her back was turned. A skirmish broke out, but it would not be the end for both teams. Later in the game, Cunningham wrapped up Sheldon while she was trying to score a basket in the fourth quarter, and it escalated to the point when both players got ejected after their physical altercation underneath the hoop. Indiana ended up winning the game, 88-71, with Clark totaling 20 points and six assists. It was just her second game since returning from injury. However, this certainly is not the way Clark or the Fever wanted to respond after that chippy game against the Sun. Their next opportunity to get back in the win column will be Sunday against the Las Vegas Aces. Follow Fox News Digital's sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

New York Times

33 minutes ago

• New York Times

2025 NBA Draft: Knicks have the 50th pick. Who could they select?

As we await the blue-and-orange smoke to reveal itself above Madison Square Garden, signaling the New York Knicks have hired a new head coach, let's quickly turn our attention to the 2025 NBA Draft. New York has the 50th pick Wednesday, which isn't sexy. But the franchise has come a long way from the days of draft night being the most exciting viewing experience of the season. Nothing wrong with a little give and take. Advertisement Given the Knicks' financial situation, landing a veteran college player who could contribute on the floor immediately with their lone selection would be a home run. It also might behoove New York to get someone it can draft-and-stash for a later date. Both options make sense for this iteration of the Knicks. With less than a week until the annual event, here are five names New York could potentially land at pick No. 50. From January 1 until the end of the regular season, the Knicks ranked 20th in 3-point percentage. You can never have too much shooting. *Enter Brea* The 22-year-old is probably the best 3-point shooter in the draft. Well, not probably. Brea is the best 3-point shooter in the draft. He spent his first four college seasons playing at Dayton, where, as a senior, he knocked down a berserk 49.8 percent of his 3s (on 6.1 attempts per game). In his final college season with Kentucky, Brea made 43.5 percent of his 3s (5.9 attempts per game). Brea has good footwork, which should allow him to be a good movement shooter at the next level. He's got long arms and a quick release. Brea also is a smart player in the half court and can catch you by surprise with some of his passes. The reason Brea will go late in the draft is likely due to his age, lack of athleticism and defensive struggles. However, if the Knicks can get someone who can come in, eat up seven to 10 minutes per game, make open shots and get paid like a second-round pick, that would be very beneficial to their roster construction. "HE HAS BEEN A FLAMETHROWER FOR KENTUCKY!" 🔥 Koby Brea is up to 21 PTS after his third triple 📈#MarchMadness @KentuckyMBB — NCAA March Madness (@MarchMadnessMBB) March 23, 2025 Splitting his time between three different colleges, Peavy showed to be a quick-twitch athlete at the college level who should be physically ready for the NBA on Day 1. He's a big, strong physical wing who makes his presence felt when in transition and going downhill. He's also an active and smart cutter. Defensively, Peavy can guard multiple positions and, while he tends to be aggressive, he does have good timing and instincts. Advertisement As it pertains to Peavy as a shooter, I have good and bad news. The good news is that he improved from 3-point distance every year. Peavy rarely even attempted 3s during his first four collegiate seasons, and he also rarely ever made the ones he did take. In his final season, Peavy knocked down 40 percent of his 4.1 attempts per game. He has shown great growth in that area of his game. The bad news is that he never shot better than 66 percent from the free-throw line in college, leaving some scouts I talked to with questions on if his touch as a shooter will translate to the NBA. Peavy has flaws, which is why he'll likely go somewhere in the range that the Knicks are selecting. However, his physical tools, defensive chops and potential improvements as a shooter are worth looking into. Unlike Brea and Peavy, Pate would be a bit more of a project. He's a big guard who isn't built like most 19-year-old players and already has professional experience. The thing that sticks out most to me when watching Pate is the blend of craftiness and explosion he can put on display when attacking the rim. When he gets a full head of steam, with his size, it's tough for defenders to stay in front of him. On top of that, he can stop on a dime. He can pull off up-and-unders in traffic. There's some good stuff there. Pate's offensive game really pops in transition. He loves to get out and run. He had some fierce finishes at the rim during the G League season. The shooting, though, has a long way to go. Pate's release is a bit funky. His feet aren't ever square to the basket, and it's almost like he's turning his body 90 degrees before releasing the ball. Teams will need to really work with him there. Overall, though, Pate is young, athletic and has some skill to him. He certainly could be worth a flyer for a team that is already filled with veteran pieces. Dink Pate gets the first bucket of the 2025 #NBADraftCombine! @CapitanesCDMX — NBA G League (@nbagleague) May 14, 2025 Watkins, a CAA client, is tough. He likes to defend. He isn't afraid of contact. He likes to get out in transition. Watkins has a 6-foot-11 wingspan and isn't afraid to use it on either side of the floor. I don't think Watkins does anything great, but he does a lot of stuff well. A few scouts I talked to call him a well-rounded second-round prospect who they view as a safe pick around the area New York is selecting. Watkins is a solid rebounder for his size. He's not a bad passer either. He does take tough shots sometimes and averaged way too many 3s last season (5.2) for someone who has been a below-average 3-point shooter throughout college. There's a reason he's slotted to go somewhere between Nos. 40 to 55. Advertisement It wouldn't surprise me if Watkins ended up in a team's rotation as a rookie. Again, he plays tough and has good size. He can make plays with the ball or without it. Watkins just needs to work on his shot selection and work really hard to develop his shooting, both stationary and off the dribble. If Sanders' 3-point shooting popped a bit more, I think he would be going much earlier than where he is projected to get drafted. He's a smooth, big guard who played point guard throughout his college career. Sanders has good footwork, and he's patient and crafty in the pick-and-roll. Sanders reminds me a bit of Kyle Anderson, or a very, very poor man's version of Cade Cunningham. Sanders' offensive game is very deliberate, predicated on footwork, and he uses his big frame. The biggest knock on Sanders, who started his college career at Cal Poly, is his lack of athleticism. He won't blow past anyone off the dribble. He won't win a foot race in transition. He also may have issues staying in front of quicker players at the next level. Yet, all of those things were said about Anderson when he came into the NBA, and 11 years later, he's still going. I'm a fan of Sanders. (Writer's note: I'm a sucker for big, slow guards whose success relies on fundamentals and footwork.) I'm not saying Sanders is for sure going to be an impactful NBA player. I'm just saying I tend to believe in players with a high IQ and good fundamentals figuring out how to stick around more than I do athletic players with a low IQ. Sanders lands in the former group. (Photo of Dink Pate of G League Ignite: Cooper Neill / NBAE via Getty Images)

Yahoo

an hour ago

• Yahoo

Could Connor McDavid Really Join the Flyers? Never Say Never

The Flyers could build an Avengers-like roster around Connor McDavid in short order. (Photo: Perry Nelson, Imagn Images) To this point, the Philadelphia Flyers have shown an odd hesitancy to make any bold moves for NHL roster players during their rebuild. Could it be as simple as holding out for Connor McDavid in 2026? McDavid, 28, has one year remaining on the eight-year, $100 million ($12.5 million AAV) contract he signed with the Edmonton Oilers on July 5, 2017, which means the five-time Art Ross Trophy winner can hit unrestricted free agency in 2026 if he chooses. Advertisement On the other hand, McDavid can extend with the Oilers, losers of two consecutive Stanley Cup Finals at the hands of Sergei Bobrovsky and the Florida Panthers, as early as July 1. In Thursday's end-of-season press conference, McDavid was non-committal on his future in Edmonton, opting for a generic, middle-of-the-road answer rather than something more optimistic or certain. 'This core has been together for a long time and we've been building to this moment," McDavid said. "With that being said, ultimately, I still need to do what's best for me and my family. But of course there's unfinished business here.' Winning appears to be the biggest priority for the NHL's best player, and McDavid won't be giving himself the best chance of doing that by thundering onward with an Oilers team filled out with scraps year after year. Advertisement "If I feel that there's a good window to win here over and over again, then signing is no problem," added McDavid. And "if" is doing a lot of work in that sentence, given how the last two years have played out. By the time 2026 rolls around, and depending on which players the Flyers decide to keep and trade, Philadelphia could have nearly $50 million in cap space to make a pitch to McDavid and, potentially, other NHL stars to join Matvei Michkov and Co. Additionally, the contract of Ryan Ellis could always be placed on long-term injured reserve to create an extra $6.25 million in a pinch during the season. Advertisement The current CBA permits a player to earn a maximum of 20% of the salary cap, so if the NHL salary cap is $104 million for 2026-27, McDavid could sign a deal worth $20.8 million annually. That's no problem for the Flyers, who will still have Michkov, Jett Luchanko, and whoever the No. 6 pick in the 2025 NHL Draft is on rookie contracts at that point. Goaltending, like in Edmonton, would pose a major problem, but it's ultimately up to the Flyers to use draft picks and other assets to solve it. Realistically, the Flyers could boast a center depth of McDavid, Sean Couturier, James Hagens, and Luchanko just two years from now. A lot would have to go right for that to happen, to be clear, but the possibility is there. Advertisement Furthering the appeal of the Flyers is the presence of wingers such as McDavid's Canada teammate, Travis Konecny, Tyson Foerster, Michkov, Owen Tippett, and even Bobby Brink. That's much more appealing than Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, Zach Hyman, and a bunch of dart throws. Defense is less certain on the Flyers' end, but they could still be better than what the Oilers have with a few breaks. The book is not closed on Jamie Drysdale, and who knows what happens with Cam York? A trade for Alex Romanov would give the Flyers some serious depth on the left side, and management are believers in prospects like Helge Grans, Oliver Bonk, and Spencer Gill. Flyers 2026 Stanley Cup Odds: Better Than the Canadiens? Flyers 2026 Stanley Cup Odds: Better Than the Canadiens? The Advertisement Philadelphia Flyers do not have the best early odds of winning the Stanley Cup in 2026, but how their odds rank compared to some other teams around the NHL might come as a shock. Inexperienced, yes, but they may have more to offer at the NHL level at this point than the likes of John Klingberg, Brett Kulak, Troy Stecher, and even Darnell Nurse. Evan Bouchard sways the conversation slightly, but for all his offensive exploits, he's average at best defensively and is set to command a massive new contract. The Panthers have proven that NHL teams don't necessarily need one alpha above the rest to win so long as the group is the right mix of good players. Advertisement Even with an all-out pitch to McDavid, the Flyers are still perfectly capable of finding this harmony. But the big question remains: can the Flyers strike the big trade? And is their big swing ultimately going to be McDavid? Never say never in this league.