Ram darbar consecration at Ayodhya: What this means, which is the ‘only temple' where Ram is worshipped as king
The Ram temple in Ayodhya witnessed another pran pratistha (idol consecration) earlier this month, when the idol of Lord Ram the king was consecrated.
The pran prathistha in Ayodhya last January was a grand affair, attended by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and scores of other VIPs. The ceremony this time was simpler.
While the consecration last year was for the idol of Ramlala, or Ram the child, this pran pratistha was of the Ram Darbar, or Ram as the king, surrounded by wife Sita, brother Lakshmana, and devoted ally Hanuman.
While the Ram Darbar can be found in many Indian homes, there is only one temple in India where Ram is worshipped as the king. Which temple is that? In which other forms in Ram worshipped? We explain.
Why the second pran pratishtha
Consecration is the formal process that transforms an idol into a deity, which can be worshipped and grant boons. You can read in detail about the process and significance of pran pratishtha here.
Since Ayodhya is both the birthplace and the kingdom of Ram — the seventh avatar of Vishnu — the temple honours him in both forms. Ramlala, or Balak Ram, or Ram the child, is worshipped as a symbol of purity and innocence, in the vatsalya (tenderness) form of bhakti (devotion).
Ram the king is worshipped as a symbol of justice and peace. Ramrajya (the reign of Ram) in the Hindu tradition is symbolic of an ideal state, a land where people live in harmony under a fair and efficient rule.
However, interestingly, the one temple in India dedicated to Ram as king does not worship him as the king of Ayodhya alone.
The Ramraja temple is located in Orchha, Madhya Pradesh. Acharya Jai Prakash Tripathi from Kashi, the priest who led the recent consecration ceremony in Ayodhya, told The Indian Express, 'The consecration in Ayodhya was of the Ram Darbar, or the court of Ram, where He is featured along with Mata Sita, Lakshmana, and Hanuman. The Ram Darbar symbolises Ram as both king and head of family, who inspires love and devotion and dispenses justice. The only temple which worships Ram as the king is located in Orchha, where he is worshipped as the king of Orchha.'
The Orchha temple was built during the reign of Madhukar Shah (1554–1592) of the Bundela dynasty. Legend goes that while Madhukar Shah was a devotee of Lord Krishna, his wife, Queen Ganesh Kunwari, was a devotee of Lord Ram. Once, the king wanted to visit Braj-Mathura with the queen. Ganesh Kunwari, however, had had a dream where Lord Ram directed her to build a temple for Him. She, thus, wanted to go to Ayodhya.
Incensed, Madhukar Shah said she could go to Ayodhya, but should come back only if she brought Ram with her.
The queen then went to Ayodhya and prayed for months. When Lord Ram did not appear, the dejected Ganesh Kunwari threw herself into the Sarayu river. Here, an idol of Ram appeared in her arms. The Lord, however, put several conditions before going to Orchha.
First was that he would be worshipped as the king of Orchha, second was he would travel only in the Pushya nakshatra (a certain alignment of stars and planets), and the third was that wherever the idol was first put down would be his home.
The queen accepted. When the king heard the news, he was overjoyed and ordered the construction of the Chaturbhuj temple to receive the idol.
Once back, Ganesh Kunwari put the idol in her chambers at night, intending to move it to the temple the next day. However, the idol refused to budge. Thus, it is the queen's palace which is the Ramraja temple today. The Chaturbhuj temple stands next to it, dedicated to Vishnu.
The Ramraja temple does not have the shikhara, or the spire above the sanctum sanctorum that is a standard feature of temples, pointing to its origin as a palace. It has arched entrances and domed chhatris, more in keeping with a palace.
'Because the deity here is a king, it gets a guard of honour. Even today, four policemen from the Madhya Pradesh police are assigned to the temple. The aarti here has a martial note to it, and is accompanied by a gun salute. Also, distinguished guests are offered a beera (betel nut) and ittar (perfume), as they would at a king's palace, as opposed to prasad (an offering of sweets) in temples,' Avinash Pathak, the District Informatics Officer of Tikamgarh, where Orchha is located, told The Indian Express.
In what other forms is Ram worshipped?
Shiv Prasad Pandey, Sanskrit teacher at DAV Post Graduate College in Varanasi, told The Indian Express that apart from Ramlala and Raja Ram, the other form is Kodanddhari Ram, or Ram the warrior carrying his bow and arrow. 'This form is quite popular in south India,' Pandey said.
Yashee is an Assistant Editor with the indianexpress.com, where she is a member of the Explained team. She is a journalist with over 10 years of experience, starting her career with the Mumbai edition of Hindustan Times. She has also worked with India Today, where she wrote opinion and analysis pieces for DailyO. Her articles break down complex issues for readers with context and insight.
Yashee has a Bachelor's Degree in English Literature from Presidency College, Kolkata, and a postgraduate diploma in journalism from Asian College of Journalism, Chennai, one of the premier media institutes in the countr
... Read More
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
41 minutes ago
- India Today
Trinamool Congress's Alifa Ahmed wins Kailganj bypoll, defeats BJP's Ashish Ghosh
Trinamool Congress (TMC) candidate Alifa Ahmed has won the Kaliganj Assembly bypoll in West Bengal's Nadia district by a massive margin of 50,049 votes, defeating her nearest BJP rival, Ashish Ghosh. The by-election was held following the death of her father and former MLA Nasiruddin Ahmed in February this to the Election Commission of India (ECI), Alifa secured 1,02,759 votes, while BJP's Ashish Ghosh received 52,710 votes. The Congress-Left-supported candidate, Kabil Uddin Shaikh, came third with 28,348 Alifa received around 9,000 votes less than her father's 1,11,696 votes in 2021, her winning margin increased. Nasiruddin had won by 46,987 votes in the last election, whereas Alifa surpassed that, seemingly due to a split in votes between BJP and Congress-Left candidates. Outside the counting centre, Alifa thanked voters for their support. She said, "This victory is because of people's love and faith in Mamata Banerjee's development politics."Responding to BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari's claim that Hindus didn't vote for TMC, Alifa said, 'I do not agree. We received significant leads from some Hindu-majority areas.'She added, 'We did not target votes from any particular community. We approached all voters. The results show people don't support communal division in Bengal.'advertisementWith PTI inputs.
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
Pakistan will go to war if India denies water under IWT, says Bilawal Bhutto
Pakistan's former foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari on Monday said his country will go to war if India denies Islamabad its fair share of water under the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT). India put in abeyance the 1960 agreement soon after the April 22 Pahalgam terrorist attack that killed 26 people. Home Minister Amit Shah last week announced to never restore the historic accord. Bilawal's comments came two days after Pakistan's Foreign Ministry criticised Shah's "brazen disregard" for international agreements. Bilawal, in a speech in parliament, rejected the Indian decision to suspend the agreement and threatened to get Pakistan's share of water. "India has two options: share water fairly, or we will deliver water to us from all six rivers," he said referring to the six rivers of the Indus basin. Live Events He said that the IWT was still in vogue as the agreement cannot be held in abeyance. "The attack on Sindhu (Indus River) and India's claim that the IWT has ended and it's in abeyance. Firstly, this is illegal, as the IWT is not in abeyance, it is binding on Pakistan and India, but the threat itself of stopping water is illegal according to the UN charter," he said. Bilawal, who is head of the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), also threatened that if India decides to follow through on the threat, "we will have to wage war again". The former foreign minister also highlighted the importance of talks and cooperation, especially in counterterrorism efforts. "If India and Pakistan refuse to talk, and if there is no coordination on terrorism, then violence will only intensify in both countries," he said. Bilawal also accused India of "weaponising terrorism for political purposes". He claimed that during his diplomatic visits to the UK and European nations as foreign minister, it was evident that India had lobbied hard to reverse Pakistan's progress on the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) front. "At a time when Pakistan had successfully moved from the FATF grey list to the white list, India made every effort to drag us back to the grey list using false narratives and diplomatic pressure," he claimed. Bilawal also said that Pakistan succeeded in raising the issue of Kashmir on the world stage and President Donald Trump had spoken in favour of mediation on Kashmir. Apart from immediate steps such as putting the IWT in abeyance and stopping all trade with Pakistan, India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, targeting terrorist infrastructure in territories controlled by Pakistan in response to the Pahalgam terror attack. The strikes triggered four days of intense clashes that ended with an understanding on stopping the military actions on May 10.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Remembering Emergency: When India banned Coke and brewed nationalism in a bottle called Double Seven
HighlightsIn 1977, following the end of the Emergency and the fall of nearly three decades of Congress rule, the newly elected Janata Party government launched Double Seven, India's first government-backed cola, as a symbol of economic self-reliance and political change. The introduction of Double Seven was spearheaded by George Fernandes, the then Industry Minister, who expelled Coca-Cola from India due to its refusal to comply with local equity regulations, leading to the development of the indigenous beverage by Modern Food Industries. Despite a grand launch and the tagline 'The Taste that Tingles', Double Seven failed to capture the public's interest, facing stiff competition from established brands, and ultimately faded from the market after Indira Gandhi returned to power in 1980. In the summer of 1977, just after the 21-month Emergency ended and India turned the page on nearly three decades of uninterrupted Congress rule, a new political force was not the only thing bubbling to the surface. The newly elected Janata Party government had shown the door to Coca-Cola and unveiled its own fizzy response -- Double Seven. The country's first "sarkari cola" was launched as a symbol of economic self-reliance and political change. Named after the landmark year that brought the Morarji Desai-led Janata coalition to power, Double Seven was more than a beverage; it was a political statement in a bottle. The indigenous cola had an elaborate launch at the annual trade fair at Pragati Maidan. The Double Seven cola , popularly known as "Satattar" (77 in Hindi) was manufactured and marketed by the makers of Modern breads - Modern Food Industries - a government-owned company. Interestingly, then MP H V Kamath was also awarded a cash prize for coming up with the name "77". Although "77" was not ready for sale until 1978, the name was chosen because 1977 was the year of big changes in India -- such as the end of the Indira Gandhi government and Coca-Cola. At the helm of affairs in the cola episode was then Industry Minister George Fernandes, who decided to throw Coke as well as IBM out of India over their refusal to follow the provisions of what was then the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act. Rahul Ramagundam wrote in Fernandes' biography "Life and Times of George Fernandes" that the provision stipulated that foreign companies should dilute their equity stake in their Indian associates to 60 per cent. Fernandes wanted Coca-Cola Company to not just transfer 60 per cent of the shares of its Indian firm but also the formula for its concentrate to Indian shareholders. The company said it was agreeable to transferring a majority of the shares but not the formula, which it contended was a trade secret. The company exited the Indian market as the government denied a licence to import the Coke concentrate. Fernandes then introduced the indigenous drink "77". The government asked the Central Food Technological Research Institute (CFTRI) in Mysuru to develop the formula. Sold with the tagline "The Taste that Tingles", the cola did not strike the same chord with the public as Coca-Cola, amid tough competition from brands like Campa Cola, Thums Up, and Duke. "I remember the launch of Double Seven at the annual trade fair at Pragati Maidan, a proud gift from the Janata Party, an indigenous drink supposedly superior than Coca-Cola and a stark reminder of Indira Gandhi's humiliating defeat in the recent general elections," author Sunil Lala says in his book "American Khichdi", published in 2009. Tata McGraw Hill's book "Advertising Management: Concepts and Cases" also mentions Double Seven as an example of government branding and "swadeshi" marketing gone awry. Hill cited the launch of Double Seven as a business school case study in government-backed branding, highlighting the campaign's missteps and beverage-market context of the late 1970s. The end of Double Seven, not so surprisingly, coincided with Indira Gandhi reclaiming power in 1980. Coca-Cola made a comeback in October 1993, post-liberalisation of the Indian market by the P V Narasimha Rao government and has maintained a strong presence ever since. Congress leader Shashi Tharoor has also referred to the episode in his book "India: From Midnight to the Millennium and Beyond". "Heedless to the signal these exits sent to the world - whose brief hopes that a change of government might have led to a more welcoming investment climate were poured down the same drain as the Coke - the Janata ministers chose to celebrate the departures of these multinationals as a further triumph for socialism and anti-imperialistic self-reliance," Tharoor wrote in the book. The Emergency was imposed 50 years ago on June 25, 1975, by the then prime minister Indira Gandhi. Triggered by political unrest and a court verdict invalidating Gandhi's election, the Emergency suspended civil liberties, censored the press and saw mass arrests of opposition leaders.
