Got a tax notice for a sudden income spike? What it means what you must do

If you receive a notice from the Income Tax Department under Section 133(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, don't jump to conclusions. This provision allows tax officers to seek specific financial information or documents from any person, regardless of whether a formal assessment or investigation is ongoing.
According to Kunal Savani, partner at Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, 'Section 133(6) empowers tax authorities to call for information not only during ongoing assessment but even when no proceedings are pending.'
He added that such notices are commonly sent when there are high-value transactions, sudden income spikes, or large deductions that appear inconsistent with the income reported by the taxpayer.
What kind of documents are usually sought?
Ankit Jain, partner at Ved Jain and Associates, says that the notice may ask for documents such as:
Bank statements
Purchase or sale agreements
GST returns
Invoices
Loan documents
Agreements with customers or vendors
He explained that even third parties, like banks or vendors, can receive such notices if they are linked to a taxpayer under scrutiny.
Steps to follow after receiving the notice
According to Jain, the taxpayer should follow a structured response:
Verify the notice: Ensure it has been issued by a valid income tax officer and carries a DIN (Document Identification Number).
Compile documents: Gather all relevant data and check it for accuracy.
Submit the response: The information should ideally be furnished via the Income Tax e-filing portal, Jain said. 'For hard copy submissions, get an acknowledged copy,' he added.
Seek more time if needed: If documents can't be provided within the deadline, Jain advised sending a formal request for extension.
Is it a sign of trouble?
Both experts clarified that a notice under this section does not imply wrongdoing. 'It's a routine tool for verification. No proceedings can be initiated solely on the basis of this notice,' said Jain.
How to avoid receiving one in the first place
To steer clear of such notices, Naveen Wadhwa, Vice President at Taxmann, recommended maintaining financial transparency. He advised avoiding large cash transactions, especially for property or jewellery, and ensuring accurate income reporting throughout the year.
'These notices are often triggered by mismatches or anomalies. If your disclosures are consistent with your financial activities, there's little reason to worry,' Wadhwa said

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Time of India

4 hours ago

• Time of India

Cheated investor of 3.66 cr, scamster's Dubai run ends in extradition

Surat: A Surat-based property broker, Upvan Jain alias Bunty Jain, who fled to Dubai after allegedly cheating a 62-year-old private sector employee of Rs 3.66 crore in a property scam, was deported by the United Arab Emirates (UAE) authorities following an extradition request by the Indian govt. Jain was taken into custody by the Surat Police Economic Offences Cell at Ahmedabad airport on Saturday and was produced in court the following day. He was remanded to three days of police custody. The case against Jain and his eight accomplices was registered at Adajan police station and later transferred to the Economic Offences (Eco) Cell for further investigation. According to the police, Jain operated as a broker in Surat and allegedly duped Gyanchand Jain between 2019 and 2020 by promising high returns on real estate investments. He sold him four properties — an office in VIP Plaza and flats in River Palace, The Legend and Castle Brown residential complexes — and collected Rs 3.66 crore in the process. Investigations revealed that Jain and his associates created forged sale deeds, used stolen govt stamp papers and opened fake bank accounts to receive and divert the funds. These accounts were registered with Sutex Co-operative Bank, IndusInd Bank and Surat People's Co-operative Bank. The money was subsequently routed through multiple accounts to avoid detection. On learning about the fraud, Gyanchand filed a police complaint against nine people: Upvan Jain, Ashwin Langadiya, Arif Pathan, Naresh Vadhel, Rasik Ambaliya, Bansi Kalsariya, Sangita Kalsariya, Chetan Magroliya, and Vijay Langadiya. While the Eco Cell has already arrested the other eight accused, Jain had fled India. After the complaint was lodged, Upvan initially took shelter in his hometown Udaipur, Rajasthan, before flying to Dubai. A Lookout Circular (LOC) was issued against him, but with no return in sight, the Indian govt pursued extradition under its bilateral treaty with the UAE. Based on India's formal request, Interpol detained Jain in Dubai. He was deported to India after the legal process was completed and handed over to Surat police at Ahmedabad airport.

India.com

8 hours ago

• India.com

Will Tax Refunds Come Earlier This Time? Here's What FM Sitharaman Said

New Delhi: As the ITR filing season picks up pace, salaried individuals are actively submitting their Income Tax Returns and many have already applied for refunds. To ensure quicker processing, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has directed senior CBIC officials to speed up ITR-related scrutiny. She also stressed the need to simplify the GST registration process for better taxpayer convenience. Finance Minister Reviews GST and Customs Department's Work Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman recently reviewed the functioning of the Central GST and Customs Department. During the meeting, she directed officials to resolve business-related complaints quickly and also focus on curbing tax evasion and wrong tax credit claims. She urged senior CBIC officials, including Chief Commissioners and Directors General to improve their efficiency and fill vacant positions without delay. Rs 2.23 Lakh Crore in GST Evasion Detected Officials informed the Finance Minister that by the financial year 2024–25, GST evasion worth Rs 2.23 lakh crore had been detected. Out of this, Rs 28,909 crore has been voluntarily paid by taxpayers. The Finance Minister was in discussion with senior officials of the government's indirect tax administration. The goal of the meeting was to ensure that principles like ease of doing business and ease of tax compliance remain central to the tax system. At the same time ensuring strict compliance with tax laws was also emphasised. For the central government, reforms, reducing paperwork, and deregulation remain top priorities. The government aims to unlock the country's full economic potential. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman's Budget speech on February 1 had also focused on key reforms needed across various sectors.

Business Standard

8 hours ago

• Business Standard

Bengal may lose ₹25 cr GST as SBI shifts key unit from Kolkata to Mumbai

Kolkata faces a potential state GST loss of nearly Rs 25 crore this fiscal year as the State Bank of India (SBI) moves to relocate its Global Market Unit (GMU) from Kolkata to Mumbai, a civil society organisation has claimed. This proposed shift has drawn protests from civil society groups like Bank Bachao Desh Bachao Manch (Save Bank, Save Nation Platform), describing SBI's decision as "arbitrary and opaque". "The GMU and associated units contribute significantly to state revenues via GST, nearly Rs 25 crore this fiscal year. Additionally, over 70 contractual staff stand to lose their jobs," Bank Bachao Desh Bachao Manch joint convenors Biswaranjan Ray and Soumya Datta said in a complaint. The State Bank of India recently stated that decisions regarding the opening, shifting, or rationalisation of branches and offices are part of an ongoing business process based on evolving operational and administrative needs. This explanation was provided by the Deputy General Manager (Operations), SBI Corporate Centre, in a letter dated June 11, 2025, which responded to a previous complaint from Bank Bachao Desh Bachao Manch to the President of India in March. The Manch found SBI's reply to be "generic and bureaucratic", and "devoid of substance or justification". The group also noted that it neither addressed the core issues raised nor provided a rationale for the displacement of strategic banking operations. The Manch then complained to the Centralized Public Grievance Redress and Monitoring System (CPGRAMS) under the Department of Administrative Reforms and Public Grievances. Protestors have highlighted several concerns beyond the potential GST loss, including the disregard of historical and legal commitments, specifically a 2008 agreement between the bank and its federations to retain the GMU (which evolved from the erstwhile Foreign Department) in Kolkata. The GMU's shifting is part of a "pattern of systemic marginalisation" of Kolkata's and West Bengal's institutional roles within India's banking landscape, the forum claimed. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)