Welsh Labour falls to third in poll as voters say 'they haven't got a clue'
Welsh Labour falls to third in poll as voters say 'they haven't got a clue'
A new major poll suggests that Labour is heading towards its poorest performance in the history of devolution, potentially dropping to third place behind Plaid Cymru and Reform UK in the next Welsh Parliament elections. Wales Online readers have been debating the issue in our comments section.
Released on the eve of the Senedd election anniversary, which will occur on 7 May 2026, the Barn Cymru poll by YouGov for ITV Cymru Wales and Cardiff University indicates a grim forecast for Labour, with their predicted share at just 18%, trailing behind Plaid Cymru's 30% and Reform UK's 25%.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
Should these figures translate into actual votes, Plaid Cymru would emerge as the largest party with an estimated 35 seats, while Reform UK could secure around 30 seats. Labour would be left with 19 seats, and the Conservatives, who are currently the second-largest party, would fall to fourth place with nine seats. The Lib Dems are expected to gain three seats.
READ MORE: New toilet-free trains described as 'absolute madness' are set to appear in Wales
READ MORE: £205m investment for Cardiff Airport slammed by Bristol but 'brilliant news for Wales'
The data reflects a shift in support away from Labour towards Reform UK and other left-wing parties, highlighting a general dissatisfaction with both the UK and Welsh governments. It also reveals that traditional Labour voters may opt for Plaid Cymru during Senedd elections.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
Reacting to the poll results, First Minister Eluned Morgan described them as a "serious wake up call" for her party. She emphasised the gravity of the situation, saying, "That is a wake up call if ever we've seen one. It is a serious challenge for us. It's a serious challenge for UK Labour and I think it means that we all need to think very seriously about delivery on the things that matter to the people of Wales."
Dr Larner of Cardiff University's Welsh Governance Centre described recent polling as a "substantial shift" from what has been seen previously. He noted that while polls are only snapshots, they do indicate a trend across the UK.
Commenter Felix core says: 'We do not need an English nationalist party, Reform, in charge of the WELSH Senedd.'
Busa1 thinks: 'The Welsh Labour Party has virtually destroyed Wales during the years since being put in power, all they seem to care about is getting rid of all industry, planting trees and wasting our money on the huge white elephant of Cardiff airport.'
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
Dm68 agrees: 'Labour 'have to deliver on the things that matter to the people of Wales'. Trouble is, it is blindingly obvious to everyone that they haven't got a clue what the people of Wales want!'
EUandMe thinks: 'I'll vote for any party that allows me to choose a candidate rather than a party. And if the party also promises to abolish the extra waste in the Senedd then that would be a bonus.'
Deankb states: 'I fully expect Labour to have a terrible election in Wales. For far too long, they've taken the electorate for granted. Their decision to cease all road building comes from a party that obviously doesn't commute to work very often. Having said that, I would never, ever vote for Farage. Brexit has been a disaster for the UK, despite Nige telling us we'll be free of the EU & will be drowning in all the extra cash coming our way. He has no plan for the NHS, or education, or anything.'
Dm68 pleads: 'For goodness sake don't vote for Plaid. They are Labour in disguise and have shored them up on numerous occasions including the disastrous 20mph.'
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
Jeff2509 replies: '20mph is working to save lives and money. How is that disastrous?'
Alex Peters asks: 'If Labour cared about saving lives, why did they take the Winter Fuel Allowance off pensioners?'
Gar880 retorts: 'They made it means tested rather than universal. Is there a conversation to be had about the threshold to qualify? I believe so. Also that wasn't Welsh Labour that brought in that specific policy. You don't even know what you're raging against.'
1anj thinks: 'Change is great news. Just what the country needs.'
Ironside states: 'I'll be staying home come the next WAE. None of them are worth voting for. None of them will do anything to improve Wales. They will all say they'll do this and that just to get your vote but will never deliver. I've been around long enough to realise what they say and what they are two different things.'
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
Ethel the Frog writes: 'We need a serious look at independence.'
PJ372 disagrees: 'Independence would absolutely ruin us, we have no currency of our own, no industry, no army or defence, the list goes on.'
Diane1711 points out: 'Don't forget, we had over a decade of Tory ruling and all the money has gone to those who didn't need any more in the first place! They made a mess of all of it, including the NHS and, unfortunately, it's going to take Labour a long time to put things right.'
How do you think Wales will vote at the next elections? What do you see as the future for Wales? Have your say in our comments section.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Nigel Farage backs US strikes on Iran and blasts UK govt
Nigel Farage says he is 'pleased' that US hit Iran with air strikes at the weekend saying he believes UK should provide help if the Americans ask for it. The Reform UK leader also criticises the UK's position saying: 'Does the government have a policy? As I said earlier, they appear to be completely blindsided by what were entirely predictable actions'.
Newsweek
4 hours ago
- Newsweek
Republican Support Flips for US Involvement in Israel-Iran Conflict
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Republicans have shifted their position on the U.S.'s involvement in the Iran-Israel conflict following President Donald Trump's decision to conduct strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities. According to a YouGov poll conducted over the weekend, 68 percent of Republicans approved of the U.S. bombing nuclear sites in Iran, with 13 percent opposed and 18 percent undecided. In a survey days earlier, however, 53 percent said the U.S. should not get involved in the conflict, with 23 percent in support and 24 percent unsure of their position. Why It Matters The U.S.'s dramatic entry into the conflict between Israel and Iran has marked a major shift in Trump's foreign policy. The strikes not only raise the possibility of retaliation by Iran, which has dubbed them an act of "blatant aggression," but have also fueled calls for expanded military action and regime change. However, the strikes and possibility of further American involvement in the conflict have caused a division in Trump's party, with a handful of Republican lawmakers criticizing the president's unilateral action as escalating tensions and laying the groundwork for another protracted military engagement in the Middle East. What To Know According to YouGov's June 13 to 16 survey of 1,512 U.S. adults, 60 percent disapproved of the country's involvement in the conflict, compared to 16 percent who were in favor. In the June 21 to 22 poll of 2,408 U.S. adults about the strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities, 46 percent disapproved while 35 percent approved and 19 percent were unsure. YouGov also found that Republicans' support hinged on their awareness of Trump's decision to strike the three facilities—with 75 percent of those who had heard "a lot" about the bombing supporting it, compared to 57 percent of those who had heard "a little." The later poll also showed that 81 percent of Democrats and 51 percent of Republicans believed the strikes on the nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan were "very" or "somewhat likely" to lead to a wider war with Iran. Republican lawmakers have already voiced concerns about the U.S.'s involvement in the conflict. Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky dubbed the strikes "unconstitutional," while Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia said she disagreed with the Trump administration's decision to get "involved in a hot war that Israel started." On June 18, Representative Tim Burchett of Tennessee told CNN that he hoped for "very little" U.S. involvement in the conflict, which he said could develop into "another endless war in the Middle East." President Donald Trump addressing the nation, following U.S. strikes on nuclear sites in Iran, at the White House in Washington, D.C., on June 21—with Vice President JD Vance (left), Secretary of State Marco Rubio (center)... President Donald Trump addressing the nation, following U.S. strikes on nuclear sites in Iran, at the White House in Washington, D.C., on June 21—with Vice President JD Vance (left), Secretary of State Marco Rubio (center) and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth (right) standing behind him. More Carlos Barria/Pool/Getty Images Other surveys have found similar fears over the implications of Washington's strikes on Iran, but also significant concern about the potential for Tehran to acquire nuclear weapons. A June 18 CNN poll showed that 79 percent of Americans opposed Iran developing a nuclear weapon, including 83 percent of registered Republicans, 79 percent of independents and 79 percent of Democrats. According to a Fox News poll, 69 percent of Democrats and 82 percent Republicans believe Iran poses a real national security threat to the U.S. What People Are Saying President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social on Sunday: "It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!" Republican Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky told CNN: "The notion that this isn't an act of war I find ludicrous. This is a hot war. There are two nations—Israel and Iran—trading volleys of missiles every night, every day. And we're cobelligerent now in this war." He added: "I'm here to represent the base of the MAGA party that got Trump elected. Most of us were tired of the wars in the Middle East and Eastern Europe, and we were promised that we wouldn't be engaging in another one. Yet, here we see this happening." Bruce Jentleson, a professor of public policy and political science at Duke University, told Newsweek there would likely be a short-term "rally round the flag effect," though not to the levels witnessed post-9/11 or immediately following the March 2003 invasion of Iraq. He added: "The Iranian nuclear threat [is] just not seen by many Americans as major and imminent, more potential than definite and at most down the road in the future than in the present. And when the retaliations start, and they will, [it] will be even clearer that this not a one-off and in fact another war, which—even short of large troop commitments like Iraq—will be a war, and one of choice not necessity." What Happens Next Despite Trump's social media comments, administration officials have maintained that the strikes were not intended as a precursor to a regime change. Iranian military leaders have vowed to respond to the American military strikes on its three most critical nuclear facilities.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Britain's Reform party unveils 'Britannia Card' to lure back wealthiest
LONDON (Reuters) -Britain's populist Reform UK party unveiled plans on Monday to offer wealthy, often foreign newcomers a "Britannia Card" to gain exemption from tax on international wealth, income or gains for 10 years for a one-off, 250,000 pound ($336,000) payment. The policy draws a new battle line before the next national election with Britain's governing Labour Party. The government has closed exemptions on so-called "non-doms", or non-domiciled residents, who have long paid little or no UK tax on money earned overseas. Using a press conference to also criticise the opposition Conservative Party for hiking taxes on voters when it held power, Farage said the change would see the 250,000-pound payments distributed among Britain's lowest-earning 10% of full-time workers. "We want, as a party, as many entrepreneurs, as many risk takers, as many job creators, as many people paying lots of tax, as many people investing huge sums of money - we want as many of them as possible to be in our country and that is why today we are coming up with this idea of the Britannia card," said Farage. Last year some 10,800 wealthy people, some non-doms and some British, left the country, he said. "We are also doing something with a very specific aim, aimed at those in work ... So making that gap between being on benefits and going to work bigger, this policy will directly contribute towards that." Reform UK is running ahead of Labour and the Conservatives in the polls before the next election, which must be held by the middle of 2029, buoyed by growing dissatisfaction with mainstream politics and a move towards its brand of populism. Responding to the policy, British finance minister Rachel Reeves told reporters Reform had announced a "tax cut for foreign billionaires". "That would mean either taxes on ordinary working people would have to go up to compensate for those lack of revenues, or ... Reform would have to cut public services," she said. ($1 = 0.7450 pounds) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
