Want to Invest in the S&P 500? This ETF Is a Smart Choice With Uncertainty Surrounding the Stock Market and Economy.

The S&P 500, which tracks the 500 largest U.S. companies on the market, is the stock market's most important index. It's become the benchmark for measuring stock and exchange-traded fund (ETF) performance locally and abroad.
Unfortunately, even the S&P 500 isn't immune to high volatility, as we've seen in the days following President Donald Trump's new tariff plan. The plan has sparked concerns about higher costs, reduced consumer spending, and increased recession chances.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue »
Despite the uncertainty in the stock market, the S&P 500 is one of the best investments anyone can make. However, given the current environment, investors could take a different approach to investing in the S&P 500 by buying shares of the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (NYSEMKT: RSP).
The S&P 500 is market cap-weighted, so larger companies account for more of the index than smaller companies. This has always been the case, but the problem is that megacap stocks (especially in the tech sector) have shot up in valuation over the past few years, and now the S&P 500 is a little too top-heavy.
Below is how much the S&P 500's top 10 holdings are represented in both the standard S&P 500 and the equal-weight ETF:
Company
Percentage of S&P 500
Percentage of Equal-Weight ETF
Apple
7.24%
0.19%
Nvidia
6.07%
0.20%
Microsoft
5.85%
0.21%
Amazon
3.93%
0.19%
Meta Platforms
2.88%
0.18%
Alphabet (Class A)
1.97%
0.11%
Berkshire Hathaway
1.87%
0.22%
Broadcom
1.84%
0.20%
Alphabet (Class C)
1.62%
0.09%
Tesla
1.62%
0.21%
Data source: Vanguard and Invesco. S&P 500 percentages as of Feb. 28. Equal-weight percentages as of April 11.
There's a stark difference between 10 companies making up 34% of an index and those same companies comprising 1.8%. When it's going well, it can go very well. When it's going badly, it can go very badly. Other than Berkshire Hathaway, every stock in the S&P 500's top 10 holdings is down year to date through April 14 and has weighed on the index.
The equal-weight ETF helps hedge against concentration risks, especially with the "Magnificent Seven" stocks and the tech sector. Every sector will likely face challenges with the Trump administration's new tariff plan, but the tech sector could be more vulnerable because of how many top companies rely on imports from countries like China and Taiwan.
I don't see the tech sector stalling or losing long-term growth potential, but investors could lean more toward dividend and value stocks until some of the tariff-related uncertainty works itself out. With the equal-weight ETF, your exposure is more evenly spread between sectors:
Sector
Equal-Weight S&P 500 ETF
Standard S&P 500
Industrials
15.79%
8.3%
Financials
14.69%
14.5%
Information technology
13.31%
30.7%
Health care
11.82%
10.8%
Consumer discretionary
10.02%
10.5%
Consumer staples
8.02%
5.9%
Utilities
6.52%
2.4%
Real estate
6.09%
2.2%
Materials
5.10%
2%
Energy
4.31%
3.3%
Communication services
4.03%
9.4%
Data source: Invesco and Vanguard. Equal-weight percentages as of April 11. S&P 500 percentages as of Feb. 28
The S&P 500 is meant to give a snapshot of the U.S. economy. The equal-weight ETF ensures a more balanced representation instead of one skewed by a handful of megacap tech companies.
Going for the equal-weight ETF doesn't mean giving up your chance for high growth. In fact, since it hit the market in April 2003, the equal-weight ETF has outperformed the S&P 500.
I still believe the standard S&P 500 should be the foundation of most investors' portfolios, but the equal-weight ETF can be a great complement to the top-heavy nature of the S&P 500.
Before you buy stock in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $518,599!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $640,429!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 794% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 153% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join .
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of April 14, 2025
John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Stefon Walters has positions in Apple and Microsoft. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Berkshire Hathaway, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Want to Invest in the S&P 500? This ETF Is a Smart Choice With Uncertainty Surrounding the Stock Market and Economy. was originally published by The Motley Fool

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

CNBC

17 minutes ago

• CNBC

Asia-Pacific markets set to open lower as U.S. bombing of Iran escalates Middle East crisis

Peter Adams | Stone | Getty Images Asia-Pacific markets are set to plunge Monday, after the United States' attack on three nuclear sites in Iran raised oil prices and investors' fears of an escalation in the Middle East conflict. Oil prices have spiked in recent weeks following the increased tensions in the Middle East. Brent Crude was trading at $78.88 per barrel after surging 2.48%, as of 7.30 a.m. Singapore time, while the West Texas Intermediate crude added 2.48% to $75.65. Japan's benchmark Nikkei 225 was set to open lower, with the futures contract in Chicago at 38,310, while its counterpart in Osaka last traded at 38,370, against the index's Friday close of 39,403.23. Futures for Hong Kong's Hang Seng index stood at 23,396, pointing to a weaker open compared to the HSI's last close of 23,530.48. Australia's S&P/ASX 200 is also slated to open lower, with futures tied to the benchmark at 8,469, compared to its last close of 8,505.50. U.S. equity futures fell in early Asia hours following the U.S. strikes in Iran. Futures tied to the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell by 109 points, or 0.3%. S&P 500 futures shed 0.3% and Nasdaq 100 futures lost 0.4%. Two of the three key benchmarks on Wall Street fell last Friday as investors kept watch on the Middle East conflict while contemplating the Federal Reserve's plans for interest rate cuts. The S&P 500 declined 0.22% to end at 5,967.84, making it the broad-based index's third consecutive losing session. The Nasdaq Composite dropped 0.51% and settled at 19,447.41, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average ticked up 35.16 points, or 0.08%, closing at 42,206.82. — CNBC's Lisa Kailan Han, Sean Conlon, Brian Evans contributed to this report.

San Francisco Chronicle​

38 minutes ago

• San Francisco Chronicle​

Oil rises and US stock futures slide as markets react to US strike on Iran nuclear sites

NEW YORK (AP) — The price of oil rose and U.S. stock futures fell as global markets react to the U.S. strike against nuclear targets in Iran. The price of Brent crude oil, the international standard, rose 3.3% to $79.60 a barrel. U.S. crude rose 3.1% to $76.16 a barrel. On Saturday, U.S. forces attacked three Iranian nuclear and military sites, further increasing the stakes in the war between Israel and Iran. Futures for the S&P 500 fell 0.5%, while futures for the Dow Jones Industrial Average slipped 0.4%. Treasury yields fell slightly. The modest moves indicate markets are taking the latest development in stride. The conflict, which began with an Israeli attack against Iran on June 13, has sent oil prices yo-yoing, which has in turn caused see-saw moves for the U.S. stock market, because of rising and ebbing fears that the war could disrupt the global flow of crude. Iran is a major producer of oil and also sits on the narrow Strait of Hormuz, through which much of the world's crude passes. An Iran retaliation that included closing off the waterway would be technically difficult to pull off but traders are afraid Iran could severely disrupt transit through it, sending insurance rates spiking and making shippers nervous to move without U.S. Navy escorts Some analysts think Iran is unlikely to close down the waterway because the country uses it to transport its own crude, mostly to China, and oil is a major source of revenue for the regime. 'It's a scorched earth possibility, a Sherman-burning-Atlanta move,' said Tom Kloza, chief market analyst at Turner Mason & Co. "It's not probable.' Kloza thinks oil futures will ease back down after initial fears blow over. Ed Yardeni, a long-time analyst, agreed, writing in a report that Tehran leaders would likely hold back. 'They aren't crazy,' he wrote in a note to investors Sunday. 'The price of oil should fall and stock markets around the world should climb higher.' Other experts aren't so sure. Andy Lipow, a Houston analyst covering oil markets for 45 years, said countries are not always rational actors and that he wouldn't be surprised if Tehran lashed out for political or emotional reasons. 'If the Strait of Hormuz was completely shut down, oil prices would rise to $120 to $130 a barrel,' said Lipow, predicting that that would translate to about $4.50 a gallon at the pump and hurt consumers in other ways. 'It would mean higher prices for all those goods transported by truck, and it would be more difficult for the Fed to lower interest rates.'

Yahoo

an hour ago

• Yahoo

If You Had Invested in Trump's 1980s Companies, Here's How Much You'd Have Today

President Donald Trump wasn't always the commander-in-chief; prior to having engaged in a political career which has seen him become the 45th and 47th president of the United States in serving non-consecutive terms, Trump was known as a businessman — and later, media personality — who partook in a variety of different entrepreneurial ventures. Trump's Economy: Read Next: If you'd backed those publicly traded ventures in the 1980s, how would your investments be faring today? Launched to much fanfare in 1995, Trump took Trump Hotels and Casino Resorts public, attracting $140 million in stock purchases from investors betting big on the well-known real estate tycoon. However, with Trump at the helm, holdings went from a single Atlantic City Casino to quickly snatching up debt-burdened Taj Mahal and a third Atlantic City casino, both previously owned by the now-president himself. A number of personal loans borrowed from the company followed suit, according to a Forbes report, and eventually, the company lost $647 million from 1995 through 2004, when it declared bankruptcy. Learn More: Following the initial 2004 bankruptcy, Trump Hotels and Casino Resorts was renamed as Trump Entertainment Resorts. And while Trump was paid $2 million per year despite stepping down as CEO (after receiving an approximately $50 million for services and rents rendered during his tenure as chief over Trump Hotels and Casino Resorts), that company lost $189 million in 2007 and a further $232 million in 2008. On Feb. 13, 2009, Trump as well as his daughter, Ivanka Trump — installed on the board in 2007 — resigned their posts. On Feb. 17, Trump Entertainment Resorts declared bankruptcy. Today, Trump Entertainment Resorts exists as a fractional penny stock with negligible value, meaning that investors who did not sell their shares earlier would be essentially left with no value. Trump Media & Technology Group remains in play, however, with majority ownership resting in the hands of the president. The company is most notably involved with Trump's Truth Social social media platform, although in recent days it has been dedicated to building a substantial Bitcoin treasury reserve. According to Benzinga, the SEC recently gave the nod of approval for Trump Media to expand upon these plans with a slated $2.3 billion capital investment, coming from more than 50 institutional investors. Following an initial blockbuster public opening on March 26, 2024 — the first time in nearly 30 years where a portion of the president's business empire went public, per CNN — where shares reached ~$78 before falling to rest at around $70, Trump Media's stock price has tumbled precipitously. As of close of trading on June 20, share prices were at $17.83. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates How Far $750K Plus Social Security Goes in Retirement in Every US Region This article originally appeared on If You Had Invested in Trump's 1980s Companies, Here's How Much You'd Have Today